all 58 comments

[–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

The corporate form is just a tool to shield an individual from the liability incurred by the business. It's what makes complex economic activity possible. You dont want to lose your house just because your business incurs liability by opening itself to the public.

Your concern is not with corporations. Your concern is with the consolidation of power in a small cadre of elites. William Domhoff referred to this cadre as the Power Elite.

We're all "shareholders". Where do you think your pension, 401k, etc is located?

[–]Jesus 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No, the US government -- UNTIED STATES AND CONGRESS are incorporated. The US is legally a federal quasi public-prviate corporation. Read Chisolm vs. Georgia 1793.

THE CONCERN IS WITH CORPORATIONS.

Did you not know that chain corporations were banned across the U.S. & Britain for centuries until only the last century & half? It was to stop EXACTLY what occurred with corporations that collapse you into food bank status & Slappy Mac's.

They've already done the world-building (ala Pufendorf) into crude national corporation status...it's been 70 years...they are actually slightly ahead of schedule for socially engineering the population for the shift over.

Read: "Flight of the Bumblebees", Bernard Mandeville, 1714 on "top-down private corporation interdependence upon population via enforced unity of social engineering" as well as Malthus, "Progress of Rents" (I think it was). Everyone said NO, but they did it anyway. Here you are now."

https://twitter.com/MyCaptainSlappy/status/1211431267238989826?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVN8mSRUQAAmfKF?format=jpg&name=small

Mandeville, Malthus, Freneau, Hobbes, Phillip Freneau, Gerard Malynes (1622) or Baron Pufendorf (1730), maybe Ayliffe (1734). Mandeville is good too! De Sade, B. F. Skinner & Sun Tzu, Hobbes, Malynes, Pufendorf, Coke, Blackstone, Washington, Franklin,Godolphin on Admiralty

We do know that "constitutional republic" (as neither America Inc. nor U.S. Corp. are "democracies") literally means in latin... "Charter Corporations" (res publicae, i.e., "The People", e.g., fictional "persons" i.e., Thomas Hobbes "Leviathan").

It took decades for China to open up her markets to the west and vice versa because they did not recognise the wests LEGAL PERSON fiction.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DiDYwuCU0AAI1ZA?format=jpg&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DiDYViSUEAAizqf?format=jpg&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DiDYY9uUcAAS5OD?format=jpg&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DiDYcX_VMAAeJO2?format=jpg&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DWW-s3fU0AEqSJQ?format=jpg&name=900x900

Leviathan by Hobbes (easier to read than Malynes...more of a "How to Make a Mega-Corp" book. His work was the newer version of Malynes (updated).

And finally...if you REALLY want to get your mind messed up...the one, the only...BARON PUFENDORF! He is the basis for Washington, Franklin, Jefferson and a host more. He talks company time-travel with imaginary persons, etc.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DX1D6n9VoAU7JyO?format=jpg&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DX1EG_GVAAEz7ff?format=jpg&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DX1EuE3UMAAlhzM?format=jpg&name=small

Think of these fictions as conceptual fictions in the sphere of consciousness or rather the psychosphere. They exist through word cuckery, tacit agreement and faith.

"the Eye" represents (over the Pyramid), or in at least one interpretation, "Reason" (RA) being the penultimate of the entire idea. Knowledge, wisdom, blah blah blah. You get the point. Each mind is a brick which makes up the stronger overall engineering design. THE MOAR U KNOW!

You and I are at the bottom; they game creators are at the top. It is their reason, their idea that created this monolithic corporation.

And for hilarity of Israel incorporated:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dicbz9hVAAARzwZ?format=jpg&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dicbz9YVsAAXQYa?format=jpg&name=small

[–]astronautrob 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Damn bro that's a fucking knowledge drop right there. Well done sir.

[–]Jesus 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank CaptainSlappy on Twitter. He does all the reading, I'm only starting to read what he recommends.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's one reason why I think libertardaians are libertatdians.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Few people would challenge you on this, but I wish they would, just so I could get some more walls of texts. Very good, thank you.

[–]PresentableSonInLaw 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, centralization of power is the enemy of individual freedom.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Learn who your enemies are. It's not your batshit crazy democrat neighbor or aunt. It's not your (African, Chinese, White, Gay, Conservative, Liberal) neighbor.

Bad neighbors is what forces people to create a state.

[–]Druullus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

What about academics/ideologues/politicians/activists/bureaucrats etc, are they just puppets of the evil corporation?

Who owns the corporations, is it only the billionaires?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

OK - but don't add academics. Authoritarians use revolutions to go after the academics, who are not part of the other catagories you mention.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Authoritarians go after some academics. Even Pol Pot had his selected favorites.

[–]Druullus 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Many of the non-STEM academics come up with many of the ideas implemented by the authoritarians.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No, they don't. Why would you believe such nonsense?

[–]Druullus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Of course they do!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why?

[–]Druullus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why faculty etc through their teaching/writing/activism etc and their students influence public policy?

[–]mongre[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Shareholders own corporations. Boards run them. Corporations donate to or own academics, creating bias.

[–]Druullus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No academics are independent of corporations?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Every American has the legal right to start their own business and take advantage of tax breaks that they don't know exist. The first year I started my business, I put a business card on the post office cork board to establish a presence, we got back $1300 dollars. If you just pay in, you're playing the elites' game. Help yourself instead. SCOTUS ruled that a small business only has to try to make a profit. It is not required, in spite of most people thinking that it is.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Used to be you'd only get three years or so of failing to profit. I used to fly to tax seminars in the old days. Great fun.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's good for everyone that that made-up IRS guideline was overruled.

[–]killerjavi98 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Corporations are not the top of the food chain their just a tool of these architects of control. It would be like cutting the arm off an octopus. Secret Societies and Elite Bloodlines like Black Nobility who have through centuries taken control over the world's religions, governments, economies, resources, and everything under. They got their arms entrenched into almost every aspect of society for the complete domination and control of the human race under a one world government in a New World Order. This is a war on humanity by a few like minded psychopaths in powerful positions who think their gods on earth and above truth..

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol, disinfo here

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know mongre... I kinda don't mind some corporations. The Toyota and Suzuki corps have always given me good value, and the WestFarmers corp that owns Bunnings hardware chain have great deals, you should see the twinkling solar lights I got for $10 for X-mass! I can't imagine having all the cool stuff I enjoy today if there was just little mom and pop factories making stuff. And i won't even go into my Citizen Eco-drive watch collection, love those watches! I think the trick is just to accept the world as it is and enjoy the cheap prices many corps bring to the market, while avoiding overpriced crap like iPhones and fancy blueTooth headsets, European cars, and all Ikea products.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Eat the rich.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Yeah, like that will keep america fed for like about one hour, then what?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Then, the richest of the poor will become the new rich to be eaten. Repeat, until the genes responsible for the accumulation of private property are eliminated from the gene pool. Then, communism.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

then after communism, socialism

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Huh? Whose property are you redistributing? All the rich are already consumed.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

permanent revolution

there will be corrupt members trying to sell out socialism, they must be constantly guillotined

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Makes sense. Even with no wealth inequality, there would be wrongthinkers to barbecue.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

unironically yes, people that wrongly support the rich need to be taken out, it will be self defense so it's ok

[–]Druullus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't it socialism before communism?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

communism, with 60 of misery for the masses, followed by "western capitalism" which transitioning from communism means the typical oligarchical system of capitalism, which brings more misery to the masses since the wealth is concentrated in only a dozen or so hands.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They want to use eugenics.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

eugenics, and with it the total eradication of what is deemed deplorable. Behind it all though is a knowledge that the planet can only support so many people, and a nation only so many. I wonder how much of Stalin's thinking was on population pressures and resources when he let the masses starve and sent them to gulags?

I knew a russian guy, in his forties, a technician type. He came out here with his wife to start a new life in Oz. I asked him once about the 'system' over there and how it had to better now that it wasn't a total dictatorship. Now he would not even have been born when old stalin died but he got all defense of the dictator? Spoke of him in glowing tones in fact! I put it down to delayed Stockholm Syndrome and never bothered having another conversation with the guy. These broken people from broken countries are welcome if they play by our rules, but I'm not a psychologist, and life is too short to have their shit dribbling into my head all the time.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stalinist terror is what happens when one has to rely on communists to govern a country. Are they all retards? Are they all villains? Poor Joseph just couldn't figure it out.

It isn't widely known, but late Stalin was fighting against his own party to introduce more democracy and capitalism. His reforms reduced the persecution of common people, and he persecuted many of his genocidal party members. It makes sense for common Russian people to appreciate his efforts.

Stalin had failed to kill Khrushchev. He was close, once. Khrushchev was under investigation for the Ukrainian genocide. But he was extremely good at playing a retard, and as a communist leader, Stalin couldn't just execute them all. The few reasonable party members Stalin had managed to find, were disappeared quickly after his death.

Modern communists can't decide what to think about him. While Stalin was one of the most efficient communist leaders, he clearly lacked faith.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Then we revise the constitution to prevent corruption from seeping in to our government.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

A piece of paper can't have such power.

The state only follows the constitution when it fears the people.

When the state thinks the people are toothless, it will ignore their rules.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Correct. And impoverished people dependent on the government for the very food they eat are not to be feared. The old french monarchy made the mistake of not feeding the people. The US government won't make the same mistake. It can cancel all forms of payments but SNAP will be the last.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Indeed.

The elites will take away everything but the necessary minimum.

Then, the climate will change, and there will be no food, and no reserve.

Faced with the unavoidability of death, people will stop fearing it, and will do whatever they want.

History will repeat itself, and yet another eternal empire will fall.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm usually down on the french, they don't have much of a track record for bravery yet they think they are God's gift to the world, just like the Greeks, the Italians, the British, and even the Egyptians that are starving in their squalor. I call it the Past Empire Syndrome Trademark [PEST]. These pests think that because they once [long long ago] ruled large swaths of the planet that they are the chosen elite, just like every church on the planet thinks it has God's ear and every other religion is false, or at the very lest, misguided on the finer points of doctrine.

But all that aside, I think the French peasants of the révolution were probably a more staunch breed than the TV addicted weak muscled breeds that now reside in most western nations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjDtnLrt71Y

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"We"? Who is "We". You and your friends? The constitution was drafted by rich men to protect the rich, and any revision will done by women and men like them or by psychopaths who have risen to power in the vacuum of legitimate government. Any revision would take away what's left of your freedoms. You're empire is at an end, and so is the 400 year old western empire. It's all downhill now for you I am afraid to say.

Here in Australia, well that's another story...

[–]adultmanhwa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

NANI?!?!? What about Chyna Narrative?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Taking the fight to them is like David vs. the entire Goliath lineage. Turning your back on them, that's the juice.

[–]Tarrock 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

s/mediapunchback

Sub to that sub as we'll be going after some of the most powerful corporations in the media starting in January.

[–]CheekyCunt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Corporations are the fronts that real criminals hide behind. The complete subversion of the MSM is a prime example.

[–]ZestyOnSaidit 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's ironic that you say all of this yet choke down on one of their core propaganda fallacies.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which one?

[–]mongre[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which is?