The Albert Pike letter

submitted by magnora7 from self.corruption

Albert Pike, Creator of the KKK and 33rd degree Freemason wrote the following letter in 1871:

"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.

The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.

Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion... We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.

Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.

This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

all 40 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

'Emotionally, physically, mentally tired’: Nurses say morale has hit a pandemic low

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/10/15/nurses-covid-morale/

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

"Lucifer" literally means "The bringer of Light" allegorically the ruler of multiple solar systems around and including ours, and hierarchically above Satan, who was God's chosen ruler for this world.

As far as I understand it, the Luciferan revolution was a good and necessary thing for the evolution of the human mind, and not actually evil. It is Satan's horrors that one should fear, and not Lucifer, who wished only to gift us with higher reasoning and mental capabilities.

Satan is truly evil, but not Lucifer. Now, people often use these two figures interchangeably and this is a very misguided mistake. They are as different as anything ever was.

In more detail as they make themselves known again to me, Lucifer's plan was to distance somewhat Man from the Light of the divine, in order for Man to develop his own capacity for Intelligence, something he could never achieve if the Light of "God" is constantly guiding him. This guidance is called "upward evolution" through the hierarchies of the cosmic orders of intelligences. He wished to gift us with "downward evolution" which could replace millions of years of upward evolution with a few decades of downward evolution.

It was risky but there is so much to be gained!

Satan, seeing that the plan was to take some distance from the light, sought to bring about absolute darkness in the minds of men and in general on the Earth. Enslaving Man, reducing his life to an experience of torture, suffering, heartbreak and pain was his plan. Why? Because the energies that are within us are actually very pure, so BLEEDING us from it and feeding off it is very delicious for his order of (lower) entities.

So the difference is absolute. Does this guy mean actual Lucifer? Or does he mean Satan and uses Lucifer interchangeably? Of course he would know the difference, but would he write the plain truth down, or would he not disinform the letter at least to some degree? Yeah probably the latter and he used "Lucifer" for meaning "Satan". Maybe.

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I mean, I see your point I guess, but this guy is also the head of the KKK as well as one of the top Freemasonry guys. Both those organizations were/are not doing good things, imo. Judge the tree by the fruit it bears, you know?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, they may have, in their own twisted ways, goals that aim to be good, and the mistakes are being committed in the methods being used.

For example, let's say they have some objective that they hold as the supreme good for mankind. Then they might say, well any means to get there are OK since they lead to goodness. They would be misguided in that "evil" would be guiding their minds to begin with and thus, make them believe that only methods they can imagine lead to said "good" goal.

They would be wrong of course because Reality does not depend on human mind in order to exist or function. As such, intellect, even the most massively overpowered such as the one I was endowed with at birth - it's destroyed by mercury poisoning now, moreso every day that goes by - can only make a puny and hugely insufficient effort at understanding Reality itself, and even moreso at guiding events toward a "supremely good" goal which one entrusts said wildly insufficient intellect at divining.

I for one, hold that humans cannot know "good" and "evil". The closest approximations one might make are, as my friend Earendil said, "life affirming" and "life negating".

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Everyone sees themselves as the good guy in their own story. That doesn't mean objectively terrible things don't exist. The road to hell is paved with good intentions after all.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed!

[–]raven9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

LoL Satan is nothing more than a Christian psyop. The old ten day pagan agricultral celebration of the Winter Solstice was called Saturnalia because it was marked by the position of Saturn in the sky. The Christians annexed that pagan celebration by imposing Christmas over the same dates. They said that celebrating Saturn was evil and that is how the story of Satan was born.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL that's his greatest trick. LOL. Fall for it all you want. Sigh. IT DOES NOT MATTER ONE SINGLE BIT whether Satan is real or not. Some people believe he is, and they commit the most heinous acts on behalf of this belief.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What a silly, simplistic take. There's a lot more than that. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1-U5WSy2Gs

Fascinating stuff. But you'd never know with that surface-level analysis.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Fascism? Fascism didn't exist until the socialist Benito Mussolini invented it in 1919. Nazism also didn't have a name then. How'd this guy correctly name these two ideologies fifty years in advance?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I've been looking into this myself. Maybe they did exist as philosophies or simple ideas by previous thinkers?

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Maybe this whole document is a lie?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe whoever rewrote the current version wanted to make it "simpler" for modern, dumbed-down people and used simple terms such as Nazism and Fascism instead of "National Socialism" and "Authoritarianism" for example.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Then it's a forgery. If I altered the Declaration of Independence to "update" the language, that's called forging.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Very likely. But it could be a forgery with the meaning intact.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If it's a forgery, it's a forgery. If they altered one part of it there's no telling what else was altered, or if it was made up from whole cloth (this is the most likely explanation). It's a fake. The evidence is right there in front of your nose.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because they invented them, perhaps?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Wrote the following letter in 1871, yet mentions Nazis as if they existed back then. /u/magnora7 are you okay?

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This is always the main criticism of the letter. It's not impossible they invented the term beforehand, if this plan is indeed real. It could be fake though, I just think it's interesting

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They did, in the early 20th century at the Basel Zionist congresses. It was archived in their transcripts -- the term National Socialism, to be exact. But the term Nazi, which was created by a Zionist Jew journalist as slang against national Socialists, was not.

I believe many people debunked this letter as a forgery. I don't feel like lookign for these debunkings but they are a search away. If it is a forgery, than a good question to ask would be, who forged it and for what purpose?

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If it is a forgery, than a good question to ask would be, who forged it and for what purpose?

Good question. In my mind, there is a 70% chance it is real. But if it is forged, that is a great question.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a forgery though. I've noticed that media corporations are presently reporting it as an authentic letter, which leads me to believe they are pushing the Islamic vs. Jews script to scapegoat another group. They cannot be that stupid to not know it is a fake.

Edith Star Miller's boook, Occult Theocracy, does write that there was alleged to be correspondence letters between Pike and the Freemason and Young society member, Mazzini. Nowhere in her book, however, does she mention anything in the letter about three world wars. If she had, then it may have proved that such a letter existed considering she wrote this book in 1933. At that point in time, WW1 concluded and WW2 was yet to occur. Star, nevertheless, never wrote anything about World War 3 and only alleged that letter might have existed between Pike and Mazzini.

This letter that you posted came from disinformationist William Guy Car's book, Pawns in the Game, which was written in the 1950's. So did this prediction exist before the 1950's, doubtful.

The term Nazis was utilized as a colloquial and deragatory term to describe a backwards farmer or a peasant, describing an awkward and clumsy person of no good morals in the 1920's.

In this sense, nazi was a hypocrism of the German male name Ignatz.

In the 1920's, opponents of the NSDAP seized on this, using the earlier abbreviated term "Sozi" for Sozialist. NSDAP shortened their name to nationalsozialistche.

In order to refer to the National Socialsits i nthe deragatory form of Nazi mentioend above, the first use by national socialsits occured in 1926. Goebbels called Der Nazi-Sozi. In Goebbels pamphlet Nazi is only mentioned a few times with the word Sozi included. Nazism is based on a 1920's timeline onwards, Pike died in 1891, well before the use of this term. FOIA 242 of British archives shows that no such letter exists.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I saw this post on reddit and I couldn't help but think of the last 3 paragraphs of that letter: https://www.reddit.com/r/houston/comments/q9e5az/the_satanic_temple_houstons_3rd_annual/

"look they do good things, and they hate who I hate, so they must be good!" are basically what all the comments say. While promoting literal satanism, as if it's a joke.

Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.

Creeps me the hell out. Cattle gleefully running to the metaphorical slaughter, not realizing what they are entangling themselves with. I expect to see the next decade of normalizing this kind of stuff to the point it becomes a mainstream religion, which will act as a great cover for all those actually doing evil in the name of evil... Catholic church part 2 basically, but worse because there's no pretense of morality in the first place. People are playing with fire by aligning themselves with these organizations and they think it's all jokes and fun and games. "The enemy of my enemy must be my friend!" is terrible reasoning if the enemy owns both sides

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Very interesting letter. Thanks. It was not written before the early 20th century, at best. The original source for it cannot be found and the language does not reflect one's way of writing in Arkansas in 1871. The Butler Center for Arkansas Studies cannot find the letter, and another Pike letter some have claimed to be at the British Library is not there. Concepts of world wars, illuminati, Zionism, Fascism &c were not considered in Arkansas discourses of c. 1870. I would like to know who typed these letters, if they were Pike's. More info:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3480720/Letter-written-Confederate-officer-150-years-ago-predicted-two-World-Wars-said-Islamic-leaders-West-just-hoax.html

2 pages of info here

https://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/findingaidfull/collection/findingaids/id/3172

A freedom of information request, here

https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/darkness-over-all-john-robison-and-the-birth-of-the-illuminati-conspiracy

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Zionism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

The first freemasonry lodge was built in Arkansas in 1866, so I don't see why such language couldn't be in use by people within that club.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Good to know. I wish I knew more about freemasonry. Not to start a different discussion, but what's studied by historians, historians of science and historians of art normally excludes discussions of freeemasons. Thus I don't know the differences between the freemasons and the 'practical men's' guilds before the early 16th century, or indeed after that, when academies were favored for the intellectual practical men, and in some city-states the guilds were closed between the early 16th and early 17th centuries. Freemasonry appears to develop in the 17th century in England, and in the 18th century in France, for different reasons, though by the 19th century it seems freemasonry had differed significanty from its predessessor organizations, focusing especially on speculative interests, though with some allegiance to Enlightenment science. As for the inclusion of the crusaders in the 18th century, I have no idea what happened there. Anyway - just some general thoughts.

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Yeah I agree with your overall synopsis. Freemasonry is hard to analyze, by design, as it is a secret society and all.

But what's extraordinarily clear to me after studying Freemasonry on and off is that it represents Zionism and the goal is to rebuild the Temple of Solomon. It's clear if you look up the names of all the 33 degrees, about half of them mention this. Retaking Jerusalem to rebuild the Temple of Solomon on Mt. Zion is the goal. Which means to tear down the Dome on the Rock, and to basically retake greater Israel away from Palestine.

And it turns out the people spearheading Zionism in London from the 1860s and on are the Rothschilds, culminating in the Balfour Declaration, which makes it pretty clear who is in charge.

So if we connect the dots, it seems that Freemasonry exists as a way to shoehorn Christians and other gentiles in to supporting geopolitical goals relating to Zionism, which is in turn the key project of the Rothschilds. And the Jesuits are the highly-trained people that work directly under the Rothschilds, who operate the central banks and the Churches, and the Freemasons operate the Police, Judges, Politics, and so on.

That's basically the gist of it, as far as I can tell.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

speaking of rebuilding the temple, I don't know if freemasons are involved in this, probably, but it should be obvious zionists would want to rebuild it, that temple is important in the jewish religion, right now it must feel blasphemous to them that a muslim minaret stands on their most holy site.

So why not do it? They've had control of israel since 1948 at least. Well it is the third most important religious site to muslims. They would be furious, not that they're happy about zioniosts controlling what was once their territory in palestine but if israelis did remove the dome on the rock, muslims would likely fully attack israel and we'd have that third world war. Another reason they might not want to rebuold the temple is that prophets in the hebrew bible said the messiah will come when the temple is rebuilt. In christianity, the body is supposed to be a temple, so there should be no need for a third temple, and yet many evangelical christians believe Jesus will return when the temple is rebuilt. Others believe the anti christ will come and rebuild it.

But in any event, when no messiah, jesus or otherwise, comes when the temple is rebuilt, since religion is fake, it would hurt belief in all 3 abrahamic religions in the world, so therefore israel will never rebuild it.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

They've been working up to it: https://www.palestineportal.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/LossOfLandMapCard.png

It is their singular goal. They will not stop until it occurs.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I know they want all the land but the temple is another story. If that's their singular goal why not do it over 70 something years. It's actually easier to demolish a building and build a new one than to ethnically cleanse millions of people. Based on that pic are you thinking they want it to be entirely white before they rebuild the temple? The problem is not palestineans it is the entire middle east full of muslims.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The Temple is symbolic of the situation of ownership of the holy land, it's not just about the building

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

true which again makes me ask why not do it.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Because they literally can't without causing a huge war that would probably destroy their existing country. They're working up to it

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a forgery. Pike never wrote this.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

FAAKKKKKKKE

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

the letter does seem fake because of using terms that didn't exist yet. I wonder if it's made to seem fake and crazy on purpose so we don't look into other things Pike did write. I feel the taxil hoax was like that. They release something wild and crazy on purpose in order to discredit conspiracy theories based on facts about freemasons.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Could be, but it describes the events so clearly. It reminds me of that book "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" which, even if it is fake, is still hitting the nail right on the head in an oddly perfect way to describe the world today.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

yeah but it's easy to write something years after the world wars and have it describe them clearly

I think protocols of zion are real, reason being that the one who supposedly debunked them was foster dulles. A guy working for rothschilds and who was in on killing JFK.

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah could be. We'll know it's true if that's how WW3 goes, I guess