you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your words:

I don't support any conquerors,our people won North America,Australia and New Zealand by right of conquest,the Bantus won Southern Africa by right of conquest.

You just said, 'it's bantu land now' and 'whites should leave'. That's at least tacit support of bantu conquors over south african boer natives who have lived on the land for 400 years. If that's your position state it clearly so people can debate with you and hold you accountable for your position.

Which one is it? Your position is constantly changing. The only consistent position you hold is that white people need to retreat and that whites can never be natives. This is the exact same position a critical theorist that goes around academia warping the historical record to make whites the eternal aggressors.

[–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think the situation in Southern Africa is unwinnable and it is best to get our people back home to Europe before mass bloodshed ensues, that's my position.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And if the boer disagree with you? What is your position then? Should american and european whites stand by while bantu slaughter boer farmers that refuse to leave?

[–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In an ideal Nationalist West, they would have free access and naturalization aswell as some agreement with the governments of Namibia,South Africa and Zimbabwe to repatriate Whites in exchange for wealth. If the boers refuse to leave, that is on them not us.