Something I've noticed is that many here are willing to cuck out to enemy ideals and barbaric savagery just because "muh moriality doesn't matter!" This is false.

1- Morality is mostly objective

Lefties and the more cucked members of our movement might say such garbage as "Morality is subjective! Different cultures have different standards! Pushing your morality on others is racist and homophobic and anti-semitic, goy!". Yes, some of these statements are factual: Different cultures do indeed have different standards. However just because Hershel and Oogabumbe both like eating children after their pagan religious sacrifices, that does not make this an okay practice. Similarly, just because Sextvs and Marcvs liked to rape greek boys does not make faggotry or pedophilia okay, regardless of their beliefs about how information is passed or other such lame excuses, just as Wiccans justifying their lesbianism with "but it's for my crypto-satanic dyke cult where we play with shiny rocks and sticks" is invalid.

2- Pagans and anti-moralists are no different than Bolsheviks

The Bolsheviks were bad for a myriad reasons. They slaughtered people for being inconveniences or imperfect, they had the idea of "anti-revolutionaries" as an arbitrary label to justify the aforementioned acts, they exploited good stated intentions to rope people into a suicidal death-cult of an idea, and they were mainly controlled and operated by jews. If you analyze these traits, the anti-morality and pagan crowds immediately fall into multiple of these categories. This is no coincidence. Pagans and anti-moralists would have us become "Those commies that have the weird plus signs and the weird government unions" by having us emulate the Bolshevik way of doing things. Killing off political opponents, even ones with no power; Killing anyone deemed inconvenient without even a though of trying to show them the way or reform them; worshipping fictional caricatures of us unironically; riding the wave of more moderate, realistic, or sensible Third Position thought to push their autistic wignat LARPfaggotry; their extreme tendency to hop onto whatever crypto-satanic cult seems cool and absed and edgy at any given time; All of these are negative traits. To go through them one-by-one:

Killing off political opponents only strengthens the resolve against us. Allowing them to exist (although carefully ensuring they have no power or real say in anything) and allowing them to come around to our point of view naturally is in most cases a superior tactic. One must remember, people believe in a politicla position because it benefits them or their people, if another, opposing idea does that better, they will quickly cross the aisle.

Killing those deemed inconvenient is a waste of potential. Think of who those drug addicts, poor people, petty criminals, etc. are at heart: Many are members of our own race led astray and then promptly ensnared by Jew lies and propaganda. Instead of blindly killing them like a retarded Bolshevik, the goal should be to help as many of them as possible to become respectable and good citizens. Solving our low birthrate and dwindling population issues by killing more of our own people for not being perfect in a society and world that purposefully leads them astray is slightly fucking stupid, no?

Many of the wignat pagans you'll meet embrace the wolfenstein and Burgundian bullshit, apparently not realizing these are caricatures invented by our political enemies and normies to depict us as laughably evil and horrible people. That is, they are feeding a fucking psyop against us and acting as if it is an incredibly funny and cool position that will own the libs.

By co-opting reasonable ideas of normal people who aren't megaspergs that idolize fictional caricatures made to demonize us, the latter group actively assists in the Jewish and mainstream destruction of our political ideas and movement.

And finally, I've noticed that many of these people can't stick with anything and regard their religion as a political statement and an excuse for their ideas rather than a real belief. Many I've seen also jump on the most in-vogue sterotypical belief they can find, often not even adhering to it as an actual religion, rather saying they are that thing and using it to make themselves a crude stereotypical excuse for a person.

3- "But you're just a christcuck! You're disrespecting muh traditional religions! Christ was a Jew!"

On the topic of "traditional religions", I must ask: Under which religion did Europe explode into extreme power, wealth, technology, etc.? It was under Christianity that this happened. Why did Europe begin to falter? Well, considering the decline of monarchy and dictatorship coincided with a decline in applied Christianity, the decline of Christianity and rise of cosnumerism and other Jewish pseudo-religious ideas marked this decline. So which had more traditional value: an irrelevant and forgotten belief that barely got its proponents to the Iron Age, or the foundational belief upon which many of the customs, traditions, systems, and ideas that not only the West but anywhere we have visited and imparted our knowledge upon are built?

As for the asinine argument that "Jesus was a Jew!" and that "Christians are cucks! Judeo-Christian n sheeeeit!", I point you to multiple exhibits which will hopefully reflect upon you how stupid such statements are. Firstly, I sugegst watching this video for an in-depth explanation of the Jews and Biblical terminology that has been muddled by jew lies and subversion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHnaBBbgMPY&feature=youtu.be . Next, For all yoru Burgundian LARPers, here is a quote from yoru godlen boy Himmler explaining his shocking sentiments about Chrstianity and the "Christcucks" with which you show such ire: "I forbid every attack on Christ, since such attacks or insults that 'Christ was a Jew' are unworthy of us and certainly historically not true. I have not tolerated an atheist in the ranks of the SS. Every member has a deep faith in God." If you still latch onto the pagan Reich idea, perhaps Goebbels may peruade you, as was his profession: "Christ is the genius of love. As such, Christianity is the most diametrical opposite of Judaism, which is the incarnation of hate. Christ is teh first great enemy of the Jews; that is why judaism had to get rid of him. The jew is the lie personified. When the jew crucified Christ, he crucified ever-lasting truth for the first time in history. The struggle we are now waging is a struggle between Christ and Marx." However, for those of you who STILL disregard these statements, perhaps Hitler himself may shed some light on the matter, surely HE will support your paganism, right? Let's see: "We tolerate nobody in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity. Our movement is Christian." Huh, well then, would you look at that?

On the topc of "Jesus was a Jew", I direct you to the video which I shared in the above paragraph; If you watched it, then one of the main takeaways should be that modern "Jews" are both not the ones depicted and described in the Bible, and also not the same as the Semites, Israelites, etc. In fact, the Jews of today are probably heavily tied to such people as the Canaanites and Pharisees. So to call Jesus a Jew in the modern sense of the word Jew could nto be farther from the truth. In fatc, to apply any genetics to an incarnation of God Himself is a fruitless endeavor. God almsot certainly does not have genetic information as we know it by our mortal sciences, so to say that Jesus is definitively any race or ethnicity is an exercise in futility.

4- "But you hate the Jews! Aren't you being a hypocrite?"

Where exactly in the Bible does it say that we should tolerate Satanic Jews who subvert us? In fact, it says the opposite: Synagogue of Satan, and the like. Some may say and have pointed out that that term onyl applies to thsoe that pretend to be Jews to push a Satanic initiative. However, what they apparently don't realize, is that the modern jew fits that description perfectly. We've already established that what we today refer to as "Jews" are not in any way related to the people whom were called Jews in the Bible. It is also incredibly difficult to differentiate Satanism and Judaism: Both advocate for extreme egoism and the idea that "if you're helping yourself out, who cares about others?", the only difference between the two is that Jews have more traditions and are more collectivist in their approach to worshipping Satan. So indeed, the Jews referred to in the passages referencing th "Synagogue of Satan" are in fact the Jews of today.

It should also be mentioned that I, and I suspect many others, do not hate every single Jew on a personal level; Rather, I hate their "religion" and their ideology and their group identity. All Jews are complicit, however many don't know any better or what they are doing. If Judaism as a belief system and religion collapsed overnight, and eevry single Jew renounced it fully, I would respect the Jews for finally realizing their disgustign actions. I wouldn't trust them still, however I cannot say I feel hatred for every single Jew. Disgust, repulsion, and hatred towards their religion, culture, and ideas, however? Yes.

5- "But the Bible supports degeneracy and multiculturalism!"

Many point to such out-of-context and misrespresented paraphrasings as "turn the other cheek" and "treat others as your family" to imply Christianity is for arce mixing and multiculturalism and such. This is fallacious and incredibly stupid. Many of these childish "gotcha!" statements are completely invalidated when context is brought into the equation, and when any amount of critical thinking is applied. Many other, more developed ideas do indeed come from the Bible, but none of them at all invalidate the Third Position or alt-right in its reasonable form.

To treat someone as your brother deos not mean you must let him come and wreck yoru home, it simply means you offer him help and support. Therefore, treating other countries or races or other groups as humans is all that is required, which is a very low and easily achievable bar, but one that is constantly used by subversives as proof Christians are "cucks" and "race mixers" and the like. One can both separate himself from other races, and still recognize their humanity and worth thereby at the same time. In fact, helping Africans, Asians, Hispanics, etc. by giving them an ethnostate (or multiple) would help us out by pacifying opposition, and removing the need for them to come here seeking a better life, when a better life already exists at home.

What are your guys' thoughts on these ideas?