Opinion: Nazi-supporters are anti-white

submitted by marc_gee from self.debatealtright

Nazis were anti-white since they fomented massive wars against whites in order to gain back "stolen land." Therefore supporting nazis is anti-white.

Hitler could have used patience and long-term diplomacy instead, but was too stupid.

Nazi-supporters usually have German blood and are merely German "supremacists" pining for a German ethnostate.

all 74 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (52 children)

Yeah you would have done much better in the same situation. You would have skillfully defeated the combined forces of literally the entire world through your big brain diplomacy. You would have taken the jews' power from them without a war because you're just so smart, they'd have had no choice but to give up their empires in France, Britain, America and Russia instead of just destroying you and killing 10s of millions of Europeans in the process.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

This is my favourite thing in the world big brain geniuses sitting in their study 70 years after the fact and laughing about how 'fucking stupid' people were who were dealing with impossibly complex situations and near unlimited numbers of variables in real time with the benefit of hindsight. It's amazing to watch.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Even with the benefit of hindsight what Hitler achieved was unimaginable. I doubt anyone even with perfect knowledge of the history could have replaced him and done more than he did, his brilliance was matched by a handful of people throughout history and you could realistically argue he's above all of them just due to his starting point and path to power and then how stacked the deck was against Germany when he got into power.

Which great man throughout history came from an equal or worse personal position than him? Which great man transformed their state equally as he did in the same period of time? Which great man had to deal with the same ridiculous conditions against him and still persevered (sanctions, debts, 4 world empires ready to crush you etc) to become as powerful as the reich was? If you take the whole context of Hitler and compare him to the greatest men of history it's honestly hard to argue that any of them were even his equal let alone his superior. Imagine if Hitler was able to be the son of a king and tutored by Aristotle. Swap Hitler with any great man of history, which of them outperforms him?

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    This is only the first element. Hitler built the NSDAP with zero elite and financial support, Stalin took a position in the Bolsheviks that was funded and organised by jewry. Idk about Genghis' situation but I doubt his situation was comparable to Germany's surrounding by the 4 strongest states in the world that all wanted to destroy his country before he even got into power.

    It's the whole collection of circumstances that makes Hitler's accomplishments standout. Rags to riches, built a ground up revolution from mass popularity rather than military, fixed a whole country that was in massive poverty, all whilst 4 empires that controlled the entire planet wanted every German dead and were pretty open about it with sanctions, pacts that made within Europe and whatnot.

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Swap Hitler with any great man of history, which of them outperforms him?

    Clearly he was an intelligent man, but the circumstances were very good for him. Germany was ready for a leader and the people were motivated and desperate. The Germanic people are just of higher stock, making good advisors and soldiers.

    Napoleon might have done just as good or perhaps better if instead of France he had a united Germany, rather than fighting the Germanics (Prussia and Britain) on his way to Russia, which they both lost in. Hitler made very bad military mistakes towards the end of the war. Rating their skill as a military commander, Napoleon was better IMO.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Take the whole context not just one part.

    • Homelessness

    • Getting into power through a grassroots populist revolution with ZERO elite support

    • fixing the country's poverty and making it the world's envy within a few years whilst being sanctioned by world finance

    • coming close to defeating 4 world empires that controlled almost the entire planet

    I'm not saying no one could outperform him at some specific point in his life when he's already accomplished insurmountable tasks. I'm saying no one could outperform him if they had to go from the beginning of his struggle. Swap Napoleon and Hitler from birth and see what's up. Hitler managed to accomplish everything with zero mentorship and favourable conditions, Napoleon was already nobility.

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Swap Napoleon and Hitler from birth and see what's up.

    Hitler was probably better overall, since I don't know very much about Napoleon's diplomatic and administrative skill, only that he would have been a more impressive military commander.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Napoleon could of had usury and debt with peace or war.

    [–]marc_gee[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    dealing with impossibly complex situations and near unlimited numbers of variables

    You are right that I have a simplistic view of world war 2, but do you think a truly pro-white government would have waged world war against millions of whites?

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Yes. If 20 million Europeans need to die in another war for us to liberate Europe from jewry then of course. The alternative is our continued slavery, spiritual destitution and eventual genocide.

    We are slaves that want our liberation. In order to get our liberation the slave master needs to be unseated from power, of course he will protect his power with his slave army. So you propose we just allow our slave master to continue ruling over us because some fellow slaves must die for the rest of the slaves to gain their freedom?

    Obviously it's not desirable but what else can be done? ZOG is going to use white men as their slave army. We can either fight them or you can advocate their continued rulership over us with some nonsense rationalisation that somehow if a white person dies at the hands of Europe's liberators that delegitimises them and somehow makes Europe's slavemaster the good guy.

    [–]antireddit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    I'm not going to continue arguing about whether or not the Nazis were anyone to emulate or admire. I've already discussed this numerous times. We can agree to disagree.

    What I will argue is this. Every minute you spend defending the Nazis and trying to convince people who've been indoctrinated into seeing them as the ultimate evil, is time you could use illustrating what is happening to us right now, and who is responsible for it. What Jews have done to the countries that fought against the Nazis is possibly the greatest betrayal in human history. You would be much better off pointing out this betrayal. Jews have used the power hitler's failed war gave them to discriminate against and incite hatred of whites in their own countries while flooding their countries with non european immigrants Jews themselves despise, in the countries that fought and died saving them from the Nazis(if the Jews own rhetoric is to be believed).

    Jews have no excuse for this betrayal, and it doesnt take a long history lesson or lengthy discussions for people to be disgusted by it. Most of the men who fought against the Nazis would be classified as Nazis today thanks to Jewish rhetoric about "white supremacy" and nationalism. Trying to redeem the Nazis plays right into Jewish hands, as they can and have used it to cancel anyone who makes this argument. The key to winning is convincing whites that their treatment by Jews is bullshit and they dont have to accept it.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Every comment you make on saidit concern trolling people not to RESPOND to people posting nonsense about NS is time you could have spent doing literally anything else except being a raging homosexual

    [–]antireddit 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    You have a strange definition of trolling, and I'm not just talking to you. In general when you bring up Nazis to anyone who isnt already red pilled, you just dug yourself a hole for no reason. Some of you need to step out of the wignat bubble and face reality. Its not about impressing people in some circle jerk.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    no one does this. this subreddit is filled with people who claim to be nationalists, against jewry, against finance and capitalism. pray tell why the people here SHOULDNT be educated on the one state in history that fought for everything they claim to believe in?

    why shouldn't i correct people making uniformed statements? what ur doing is textbook concern trolling. u pretend that im walking up to people in the streets wearing a stahlhelm doing romans when i simply respond to someone who bring up ns.

    if you unironically believe that discussing past nationalists amongst nationalists is the same as saying dumb shit to normies then you are incredibly stupid. this saidit page IS a 'circlejerk' of nationalists dummy of course we're going to treat it like one

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I think you're thinking about the wrong guy, the one who always comments "Don't discuss Nazis you could get banned" is ShiversRussia2017

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    antireddit always replies to my comments doing it when i respond to someone else who brought them up first

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Just to clarify I wasn't saying you yourself have a simplistic view of WW2 given I don't really know much of what you think I was more commenting on a broader trend of armchair generals and geniuses who know exactly what should have been done.

    As for waging war on 'millions of whites' I never hear this same claim leveled at the allies who declared war on Germany and murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians after WW1 and WW2 -- millions is probably closer to the truth after WW2. Hitler waged war on Poland and the Czechs who were oppressing ethnic Germans and acting unreasonably and the country he mainly waged war on was the Soviet Union which already had killed 10 million or more White Christians owing to their bastard ideology -- well assisted by Jews of course in those killings. Who could argue that it was bad for any person to seek to wage war on the Soviet Union and wicked to ally with them? (Churchill you worthless drunk traitor I'm looking at you.)

    The bottom line is his campaign wasn't for the destruction of Whites it was for the liberation of White people mainly from Jews.

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    All potties did bahd dings; sometimes dey did good dings. Deer was a waw. Instigated by all pwaywers, some more so dan othas.

    It was bad and the common peoples had to deal wit it.

    [–]marc_gee[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (33 children)

    You would have taken the jews' power from them without a war

    Why didn't Hitler have the power to deport jews in Germany without instigating war?

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

    1) they didn't want to be cut off from the German market

    2) they ruled the 4 world empires in France, Britain, Russia and America

    3) no one wanted them

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (27 children)

    Where on earth do you get the idea that Jews controlled the US,France,Britain and the Soviet Union in the 1930s?

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

    Where on earth do you get the idea that they didn't?

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

    No evidence at all to support it.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

    Oh yeah you're right dude. All those bankers that the oligarchs of the capitalist empires like the Rothschilds, Schiffs, Warburgs etc that controlled the western states and funded the bolshevik revolution were all gentiles. The 80%+ soviet leadership being jews were all gentiles too. Churchill was definitely not a proto-neocon puppet for finance too, he was just acting entirely on his own accord. America is LOL, let's not even bother talking about how jewed America has always been. France though you might be right, although it's doubtful considering.

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

    Churchill didn't come to power until after WW2 started.

    Stalin purged the Jewish leadership of the Soviet union and it wasn't 80%. The Russian revolution was caused by the agitation of WW1 and consistent frustration with the autocratic tsarist regime.

    If the US was controlled by Jews in the 30s, why did they reject a boat of Jewish refugees coming from Nazi Germany?Why did the KKK an anti semitic organisation have so much power aswell as an Anti semitic preacher?

    If you look at the major banking in the banking in the US in the 1930s, you will see that Jews didn't have much power aswell as that, name one major media company in 1930s US that was Jewish run.

    I'm not simping for Jews, I hate them just as much as you do but that is beyond delusional believing that.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    Churchill didn't come to power until after WW2 started.

    Yes Churchill didn't exist until he became prime minister, he simply spawned out of thin air at that very moment. Let's just ignore that Chamberlain didn't want the war and Churchill is openly credited and celebrated by the libtard establishment for being the one to get us into the war.

    Stalin purged the Jewish leadership of the Soviet union and it wasn't 80%.

    In the 50s, almost a decade after WW2 concluded.

    If the US was controlled by Jews in the 30s, why did they reject a boat of Jewish refugees coming from Nazi Germany?Why did the KKK an anti semitic organisation have so much power aswell as an Anti semitic preacher?

    Because being in power doesn't mean you have absolute power and can do whatever you want. There could have also been tactical reasons IE pushing for war. Also lol @ bringing up the KKK. Their leadership was a psyop from the start, no different to the Know Nothings. These protestant white supremacist organisations that mysteriously make white people hate Catholics and all the rest of it, crazy coincidence!!! The KKK was one of the major agitators against Germany too btw.

    name one major media company in 1930s US that was Jewish run.

    Umm... All of them? Fox: Jewish. MGM: Jewish. Warner Brothers: Jewish. RKO: Jewish. Paramount 2 out of 3 Jewish. The ONE founder of the 5 big media companies who wasn't jewish is called 'the founder of hollywood', so as usual the jews had their designated buttgoy frontman.

    I'm not simping for Jews, I hate them just as much as you do but that is beyond delusional believing that.

    Not really, you just haven't bothered to actually look into the JQ you just choose to hate them on principle.

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Prove these claims, you are making them in face against the current of history. It is up to you to provide sources to all of this.

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Churchill was mainly on the back bench of UK politics in the 30s due to his past disasters in Gallipoli and mismanagement of the UK economy in the 1920s. The UK entered WW2 because of Poland not because of Churchill. If Jews did control the UK in the 1930s, where were all the Jewish Mps or cabinet members?What major British companies or Industries were controlled by Jews?

    Stalin purged the Jewish Bolsheviks in the 1930s with the show trials.

    Correct on the media companies but that hardly means they controlled the entire country. Most American's didn't go to the cinema or had tv's. Germany declared war on the US after Japan bombed Pearl Harbour. The KKK point is ridiculous and you know it.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Churchill didn't come to power until after WW2 started.

    Ever heard of The Focus? Henry Strakosh? The payments Benes was making to Churchill and other British politicians in return for belligerence towards Germany? Bought and paid for fool.

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Never heard of the focus. One Jewish businessman paying some debts for Churchill is not sufficient evidence to prove Jews controlled Britain in the 1930s especially considering all the UK had done to appease Germany.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    There's 'no evidence' that Jews played a massive role in Bolshevism? Come on, dude.

    Admittedly as Stalin started to take a firmer grip of the state their influence waned but it was still there. I've only ever heard liberals and conservatives deny this.

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    They did but Stalin mass purged them with the Show trials to the point where by the 30s I'd say he was the true controller of the country.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    So he 'purged' the million or so Jewish communist partisans that the Germans killed on the Eastern Front? Why were they still fighting then?

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    What are you talking about?

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Hi Sauronlord, just randomly found your thread (I googled 'buttgoy' lol) on reddit trying and failing to get people to defeat me in debate lmao. Should have known better man.

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Haha damn lol good find man.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It's been 6 months, where is my equal?

    [–]marc_gee[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    There was the plan to deport them to Madagascar I think. Serious question, why do you think war with whites was required to to corral jews into camps and then deport them? Lots of jews went voluntarily IIRC. Can we really say war was required if it wasn't even attempted without a war?

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Serious question, why do you think war with whites was required to to corral jews into camps and then deport them?

    That's not what happened. Jews were in power in Germany, they lost their power so the rest of international jewry endeavoured to destroy Germany.

    Lots of jews went voluntarily IIRC. Can we really say war was required if it wasn't even attempted without a war?

    The war wasn't about kicking the jews out of Germany from Germany's perspective. They were regaining lost land and wanted to fight bolshevism and take some of Russia's land. If you read NS propaganda from the 20s and 30s they talk about mismanagement in Russia time and time again, they talk about how Russia could have been the granary of Europe. They wanted to fertile farmland to feed their growing population. If you know anything about the Soviet union you will be familiar with the many famines, most notably the Holodomor. The Nazis sought to put the land to proper use I suppose you could say.

    [–]marc_gee[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    They could have had a jew-free Germany without war then and used patience and diplomacy from there to free Europe, like I said. To me this seems like the white positive path instead of the scorched earth path that killed so many.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    How the fuck do you know they 'could have' achieved this hypothetical you've come up with?

    Alright I've come up with my own one: Germans could have just sailed to the moon and fired death rays from their flying saucers on Jews from space. Case closed Nazis failed. Do you realize this sounds a little insane and speculative?

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Hot take.

    There's a big thread a bit down called 'Why The Third Reich Worship' with a lot of discussion about this issue among others if you're interested.

    PS Anglo-Irish person here with no German blood who supports Uncle and the glorious campaign he waged against the forces of evil.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Baste.

    Have a kino Uncle A pic for your troubles fren.

    [–]Minedwe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So many based people in one image.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    thank u for your service

    [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    WWII was prepared years beforehand, I don't understand how people think ZOG activated its forces just right after the invasion of Poland.

    This is like basic knowledge, just see Hitler/Jesse Owens thingy, how did the jewish press portray that event, and what did Owens actually say (or as Wikipedia say, "alleged").

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Oh does Wikipedia call that 'alleged'? Fucking hell. That cracks me up.

    The quote comes from his memoir for pity sake.

    Wikipedia knows better though.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Additionally, an article in The Baltimore Sun in August 1936 reported that Hitler sent Owens a commemorative inscribed cabinet photograph of himself. Later, on October 15, 1936, Owens repeated this allegation when he addressed an audience of African Americans at a Republican rally in Kansas City, remarking: "Hitler didn't snub me—it was our president who snubbed me. The president didn't even send me a telegram."

    Jewish media about Hitler-Owens encounter: absolute fact!

    Owens about Hitler-Owens encounter: allegations, need source, yikes.

    Just ctrl+f Hitler and read bits around it. Really activates my almonds.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

    Agreed. Supporting the cartoonish version of what the liberal world order wants you to believe is a 'Nazi' absolutely is anti white.

    Hitler could have used patience and long-term diplomacy instead,

    You have a very poor understanding of the events leading to WWII.

    https://altrighthistoryoftheus.weebly.com/uploads/3/7/5/1/37514239/published/newspaper-judea.jpg?1486152643

    (Notice the date on that publication)

    [–]marc_gee[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    That is interesting. Do you think peaceful deportation of jews was impossible after that point, 1933? And do you think Germans wanted to wage the war primarily because of jews?

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Do you think peaceful deportation of jews was impossible after that point

    No. Jewry was assisting Hitler in Peaceful deportation. See: Haavara Agreement. When you declare war on someone you obviously want your people out of the war zone. The fight was less about Jews in Germany and more about who was going to control continental Europe and influence world trade/tech/law. Who was going to set the tone for the next 100 years of the industrial and tech revolution. Germany, US, UK and Jewish elites knew that tech advancement was shrinking the world and international trade was a powerful weapon that was quickly becoming a king maker (specializing meant that with the swipe of a pen you could starve an entire nation by cutting it off from world trade). WWII was a Globalist vs Nationalist war and Traditionalism/truth vs Hedonism/liberalism. WWIII is going to be a similar fight.

    And do you think Germans wanted to wage the war primarily because of jews?

    No. Jew hate was actually relatively new in Germany. Germany wasn't attacked because it realized Jews betrayed Germany and openly called them out. It was attacked because it was the only significant sovereign power standing in the way of the central banker take over of the world. Central bankers need mental control over people through total control of narrative and Germany as a bearer of truth, traditionalism, and morality opposed that. Central banking isn't just about Jewish power. It's about a whole host of hedonic people and minions of Jewish ideology. It's about blood lines and european occultism. It's a very old fight.

    [–]marc_gee[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Thanks for the lesson. Do you think it would have been better for Germany to peacefully deport all jews and not have any wars? Germany could have avoided wars, I think we can agree.

    Did Germany really have white people's best interests at heart by fighting the war, or only German interests? Was it better for Germany to kill millions of whites to try to free Europe from jewish power and consolidate central banking power? Couldn't this be considered anti-white? Did conquering Russia, France, and Poland show value towards the non-German whites who had to suffer and die? The value that alt-rightism tries to have for our people.

    Imagine how much a jew-free Germany without wars could have done in the long run to peacefully relocate jews living all over Europe. If you believe a conspiracy that jews would have bankrupt Germany if they didn't wage the war, can you prove it?

    These are just questions to consider, you don't have to answer them all.

    [–]IRONICALLY_A_NAZI 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    If the whites are going against their own interest, it's not anti-white to kill the enemy against your providence.

    Wars amongst europeans is completely natural, it just so happens in this case the Allies were on the wrong side of the war and Germany had to show tough love to attempt to save Europe.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    No. Jewry was assisting Hitler in Peaceful deportation. See: Haavara Agreement. When you declare war on someone you obviously want your people out of the war zone. The fight was less about Jews in Germany and more about who was going to control continental Europe and influence world trade/tech/law. Who was going to set the tone for the next 100 years of the industrial and tech revolution. Germany, US, UK and Jewish elites knew that tech advancement was shrinking the world and international trade was a powerful weapon that was quickly becoming a king maker (specializing meant that with the swipe of a pen you could starve an entire nation by cutting it off from world trade). WWII was a Globalist vs Nationalist war and Traditionalism/truth vs Hedonism/liberalism. WWIII is going to be a similar fight.

    You forgot one thing. The world empires were run by International Finance, Germany and Italy weren't a part of International Finance. The bankers don't ultimately care who is in power when the choice is Britain, France, Russia, America because they have control over the economy of all of them. The bankers had no say in Germany and Italy which was the real issue. /u/marc_gee

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Schacht was definitely an International banker and a self-admitted freemason. Hitler booted him in the late 1930's.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes Schacht had basically no autonomy though, he did what Hitler told him and he constantly bitched and moaned about it lol.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    JEWRY

    No, Zionist Jewry and Shabbos Goy Zionism was assisting Hitler. Diaspora Jews had no intention of leaving for Israel.

    125,000 Jews fought for the Reich.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The fight was less about Jews in Germany and more about who was going to control continental Europe and influence world trade/tech/law. Who was going to set the tone for the next 100 years of the industrial and tech revolution.

    Agreed!

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Apparently, neo-liberals want you to believe Mike Enoch and Milo are members of the National Socialist German Worker's Party.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Hitler proposed 26 peace agreements all denied.

      [–]Minedwe 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I defenitely have ideological differences and disagreements with nazis (including Hitler) and some of the nazi LARPers that exist and pollute our movement today but I have only one thing to say to this post:

      FUCK OFF WITH THIS SHIT.

      The unfortunate truth for some dipshits here that constantly whine about "muh nazis bad! Stain on our ideas! Ruined Germany!" is that even if you don't like Hitler, he contributed so much, directly and indirectly, to our movement and he did so much even for the modern, shitty world that he cannot be ignored. And if you pick past Jewish and establishment lies about him and his movement, many of the main issues people even within our movement have with him have.

      The biggest thing we should think about Hitler is, we should learn from his successes and failures and use his ideas where applicable to make sure that when we rise a second time, we won't have to rise a third.

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      In 'Red Symphony' Hitler states that he would have never of had attacked the USSR if he had known the amount of men and offensive ready capabilities they had. He regreted this, even though he openly advocated for such an offensive move to happen in Mein Kampf.

      'Red Symphony' goes on to detail Hitler's under-men and army leaders, many of whom, disregarded Hitler's orders.

      Hitler had plenty of support from Zionists and industrialists. After thr British agent freemason Schacht was booted, the allies planned a full-frontal assault.

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      OPINION: Dugin supporters are knowingly or unknowingly supporting National Bolshevism.

      [–]Courbeaux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Dugin is based. The problem is the AmNats.

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Dugin is an occultist Bolshevik.