all 2 comments

[–]Ethnosomniator 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

There's more depth to this than it seems. Political decisions, even simple ones like "gtfo, please!" often carry significance because of the sheer complexity of modern states. Invader Migrants are still very badly kept track of. They come, go, register under new names, find a nice shelter with good gibs, are told to work a bit (not really, it's mostly educational stuff they sometimes must suffer through and most can't be bothered) so they leave again etc

So that means that a pay-so-you-don't-stay campaign would be both successful and popular. Because the rapefugees don't care about anything but money and leisure. However, it also means they simply galavant a few miles to Sweden or Germany or France. Which those states definitely don't want. But some politicians will see the value in this and try to make it into a EU wide operation. It also gets more complicated because gradually, all states want good biometrics even for their citizenry. In which case a new database would easily identify even the best actors who at the moment just comfortably hang around Europe with a couple of variations of 'Mohamed'.

To our enemies, the thought of seriously keeping close track of our replacers and coordinating a strategy which would benefit "the right" is very scary.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It should be an EU policy. Nation-states can't solve this alone.