all 37 comments

[–]SoylentCapitalist 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (25 children)

On average US citizens aren't unhappy enough to care since material needs are met and pharmaceutical technology is effective at dealing with mental illness. Based on current trends, blacks may simply be absorbed by the white population or at the very least become whiter than the current 25% on average which would improve stability as the population becomes more homogenous.

[–]Girondin 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Pharmaceutical technology is effective at dealing with mental illness

Then why is the suicide rate increasing? There are many reasons to be skeptical of the efficacy of anti-depressants.

How would race-mixing improve stability? In bi-racial and tri-racial countries, racial stratification and racial hierarchies (Haiti, Brazil) are still a source of problems.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Then why is the suicide rate increasing? There are many reasons to be skeptical of the efficacy of anti-depressants.

It's not just anti-depressants. Doctors prescribe benzodiazepines to patients like candy.

How would race-mixing improve stability?

Homogeneous societies are typically more stable than multicultural ones.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

Ah... Brazil. Here we come

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

I don't think it would be as bad as Brazil for numerous factors.

1) Northwest European genes are superior to Iberian ones.

2) East Asian immigration.

3) Only 13% of the US population is black and they're already 25% white on average. (Brazil has 19.6% mean African DNA):

To reduce the potential of bias from studies with different sampling methods, we calculated the mean genetic ancestry weighted by the number of individuals. The weighted mean proportions of European, African, and Native American ancestries were 68.1%, 19.6%, and 11.6%, respectively.

https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000400495

Let's say immigration gets as bad as California's demographics nationally which has only 36% whites, California still has an average IQ of 95.5. If the population became homogenous it would still have an IQ of 95 because mixed individuals have an IQ the mean between both races (Example being African-Americans have 85 average IQ and 20-25% white DNA).

Despite that 95 IQ California has a GDP higher than the UK and only 40 million compared to their 60 million population as I've stated in the past. California does have less blacks than the national average but there are also more whites outside of California. I personally don't see why the elites would want to destroy their superpower, so I think the national white mean DNA would remain higher than California's because a 95 IQ superpower could not last long technologically.

[–]Girondin 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

if " Northwest European genes are superior to Iberian ones." (what a blanket statement) tell me how "East asians genes and Ashkenazim genes are superior to Northwest European genes" (is superior genes is judge based solely on average IQ they are). You can say that some groups have advantages in certain traits but to say that their "genes are superior" is ridiculous, whites aren't superior to blacks, Indians aren't superior to Arabs they are different.

California is a massive economic hub, home to silicon valley and almost all of the entertainment industry of course it would be richer than the UK.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

"East asians genes and Ashkenazim genes are superior to Northwest European genes" (is superior genes is judge based solely on average IQ they are).

Average IQ, conscientiousness and feats. A study showed Europeans have more conscientiousness than East Asians.

Counter to past studies, the two groups were not significantly different on Agreeableness, and European Americans scored higher on Conscientiousness. The finding that European Americans score higher on Extraversion than people of Asian descent is consistent with past studies (Mastor et al., 2000; McCrae et al., 1998)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2630227/

Conscientiousness also correlates highly with success. Anglos built the largest empire on earth, the strongest superpower, and Jews subverted it.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Anglos built the largest empire on earth

Spain had the first global empire in history.

[–]oneinchterror 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And that's an incredible feat which ought to be commended, but it still paled in comparison to the British Empire.

[–]Girondin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Personality tests have way more flaws then you think, the psychologist Joe Heinrich in "the weirdest people in the world" lays out compellingly why they should be distrusted, I am not to go as far as him in my distrust of personality, but there are lazy, and dumb Nordics just as like there are with Meds, or Indians or Arabs or Jews or any ethny. "Northwestern genes are not superior to Iberian genes" is retarded. If EVERY single northwestern european had traits vastly superior to Iberians, like humans with worms then maybe you can claim superiority, even then it is a value judgement, no gene is biologically superior, other than ones that spread and replicate.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Personality tests have way more flaws then you think

Conscientiousness is a pretty reliable metric. It correlates higher with success than IQ.

Conscientiousness is the best predictor for long-term success.

but there are lazy, and dumb Nordics just as like there are with Meds, or Indians or Arabs or Jews or any ethny.

That's why we're dealing with averages of course.

"Northwestern genes are not superior to Iberian genes" is retarded. If EVERY single northwestern european had traits vastly superior to Iberians, like humans with worms then maybe you can claim superiority

If Britain conquered peoples in Africa and India many times larger than their own population, innovates better than these populations, and builds better societies than these populations, we can reasonably say Brits are superior to those people on average. Be it specific metrics in IQ, or conscientiousness, they have an overall superiority. Those metrics just help us quantify this superiority and we can apply it to Anglo-Iberian discrepancies.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Northwest European genes are superior to Iberian ones.

Source?

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Portugal has an average IQ of 95, less than California which is only 36% non-hispanic white. Spain does better at 97 average IQ but still inferior to the 100-102 Northwest Europeans have.

https://www.worlddata.info/iq-by-country.php

[–]oneinchterror 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

If push came to shove I'd probably agree with you that Northwest Euros are superior, because they're my people, but I think it's more subjective than you seem to insist. If you want to claim that NW Euros are superior to Iberians because of higher IQ alone, in order to be consistent you'd have to concede that East Asians are superior to NW Euros, and we both know that isn't true in the slightest.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Let's say immigration gets as bad as California's demographics nationally which has only 36% whites

False, 36% refers only to non-Hispanic whites. With Hispanic whites included, California is 60% white.

[–]oneinchterror 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"White" by United States census standards is not the same as the alt-right's conception of "White". California is most certainly not 60% White anymore lol, unfortunately.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, we all know the US census categorization is retarded.

But you're probably right California isn't 60% white, since the US census determines who's white and who isn't purely based on self-identification, and lot of self-identified "white" Hispanics are actually literally mestizos (in some cases with actual white ancestry as low as 60% or even less).

The US census bureau should just abolish the Hispanic category and instead categorize white Hispanics (NOT self-identified "white" Hispanics but Hispanics who are actually genetically mostly or fully white) as white and non-white Hispanics as mestizo or simply non-white Hispanic.

[–]TheJamesRocket 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Based on current trends, blacks may simply be absorbed by the white population or at the very least become whiter than the current 25% on average

Why the fuck would that happen? Are you suggesting that the level of miscegenation in the U.S. is enough to cause a substantial change in racial admixture? If thats what you are claiming, then show evidence.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Are you suggesting that the level of miscegenation in the U.S. is enough to cause a substantial change in racial admixture?

It already happened. How do you think African-Americans are 25% white on average:

The average African-American genome, for example, is 73.2% African, 24% European, and 0.8% Native American

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/12/genetic-study-reveals-surprising-ancestry-many-americans

[–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Because back when slavery was still legal, rich slave owners fucked their female slaves and fathered mulatto children. As a famous example, Thomas Jefferson had four kids with his black slave.

There is still some detestable amount of miscegenation going on today, obviously. But nothing that would support your claims.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

As a famous example, Thomas Jefferson had four kids with his black slave.

We don't actually know this.

[–]oneinchterror 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

We don't?

[–]aukofthecovenantWhite man with eyes 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There's some suspicion that the man involved was Thomas's brother Randolph.

[–]Richard_Parker 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Zoom, zoom, zoom...

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I thought they were supposed to be Generation Zyklon?

[–]oneinchterror 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What I've heard is that zoomers are very extreme in their beliefs. So while not many of them are right wing, the ones that are are extremely right wing.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well for what its worth, what matters is fanaticism, not numbers. Its better to have 10% of the population on your side, them being totally devoted to the cause than having 50% of the population on your side, them being casual normies.

Fanaticism always wins in the long run. Moderates have never changed anything, they merely adapt to the change enacted by fanatics. See French revolution, Bolshevik revolution and Nazi revolution for reference

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Zoomers are a big mix. Theres plenty of Zoomerwaffen types but almost equally as many "nonbinary pansexuals xe/xem" types too. Of course Boomers and millenials did a really great job of making Zoomers the least White generation yet and bombarding us with porn, affirmative action, and brain drain bullshit to try and get 50 IQ sub-saharan monkeys to understand calculus, not to mention pumping us full of Jew-made drugs that worsen and create mental illnesses.

[–]Girondin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

In the grand context of things of course "Gen Z" (I think we should call them young people) are the most liberal, in 1960 only a handful of low status people were arguing that sodomy laws should be repealed (who would be labeled rightly or wrongly as "pederast"), that was only your grand-parents generation or great grandparent's generation, in some areas this probably held true to the 1980s+. We forget how conservative things were, you can read books from the time that show how rare swearing was in the 1950s, in the autobiography of George Rockwell he heard his first swear word when was like 16.

Here is my breakdown of the video:

He talks about how leftist channels are increasing while right wing channels are supporting BLM. Then he talks about people refusing to believe that the right is becoming unpopular.

Are we suppose to not take into account the massive banning that Youtube has done of James Allsup (600k), Stefan Molyneux (1M), Warski and Fuentes and so many others. Leftist channels like Philosophy Tube and Contrapoints get positive mainstream coverage (interviews in BBC, and many more). Left-wing channels being bigger is based on elite not popular mechanisms, censorship and positive MSM coverage.

The proposed mechanism as to why they would be more conservative is stupid, "youtube". Anti-SJW content on youtube was not watched by a majority of young people, only a minority. During the heyday anti-sjw content I personally knew no one who watched it. I am 99% if we survey most high schools in America we would find most of them or a substantial portion to be libtarded and have more vocal libtarded segments like troons.

I don't find the conclusion to be surprising. If you are a millennial, X or Boomer the cultural landscape was so much different when you formed your political conclusions. For boomers growing up homosex was associated with pederasty, for X growing up troons were associated with trans-vestism. In our cultural landscape being LGBT is celebrated, gay prides marches can be found in nearly every city, when I'm driving I occasionally see "black trans lives matter" flags and car stickers, Zoomers grew up liberal and we are seeing the results.

We should not despair, You can ask any old member of the dissident right (WN, traditional Catholics etc) and they will tell that the portion of young people is substantially increasing, in the 2000s and 1990s the events were mainly attended by old people, fresh faces were rare. Now these groups have a large young people presence, many of them majority young people. Also web traffic to dissident right websites is growing. Radical politics is growing.

[–]TheJamesRocket 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Gen Z is a garbage generation.

Every negative thing that was ever said about the Millenials is doubly true for the Zoomers.

I am convinced that some of them aren't even human. They are zombies, flesh puppets, or humanoid robots.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Pre humanoid goblins is the best description for a lot of them. Effeminate, mentally ill, drugged up on ADHD and depression meds, high on weed and muscles half atrophied due to lack of physical exercise.

[–]TheJamesRocket 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yep. And thats not to mention their insane belief system which is self contradictory.

That gender is a social construct, but men oppress women. That systemic racism is real, but race doesn't exist. That Communism will make them rich. These things are mutually exclusive.

[–]oneinchterror 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Leftists, truly, are not human.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah. They don't truly have beliefs. They are just conditioned by media and ''entertainment'' to have certain political reflexes in response to stimuli. Black criminal? Poverty and systemic racism made him do it. Black rapist? White men rape too! Islamic terrorism? The far right does most of the terrorism, here I read it on Vox who cite the ADL. Trannies committing suicide? That's just due to transphobia!

Its no different than a computer algorithm giving scripted answers to specific questions.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Perhaps its owing to increased consumption of hollywood trash or more Americanized culture in general?

Or how about the fact that the right in the Anglosphere is almost entirely aimed at boomers?

Young women being brain dead as ever though, heavily support the greens, socialists or whatever twitter tells them is trendy.

First of all, a lot of young Polish women also support the nationalist right. Secondly, the ruling PiS party is incredibly retarded on abortion and the environment. Blame them.

Flanders

https://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium/87983/far-right-and-right-wing-parties-set-for-exponential-growth-in-flanders-new-survey-suggests/ 😎

Don't know about Germany or the Scandis though.

It's true in East Germany, but I haven't seen enough data on Scandinavia.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Or how about the fact that the right in the Anglosphere is almost entirely aimed at boomers?

Perhaps. The two party system stiffles the rise of any populist party and funnels the political conversation towards the false dialectic of liberal v conservative. Every election its supposedly an apocalyptic battle of marxism vs fascism. Its not hard to see why many young people might outright check out. But the degeneracy among gen z is impossible to deny as well.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Every election its supposedly an apocalyptic battle of marxism vs fascism.

If only.