all 25 comments

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Even god hates capitalism😎👍

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Based Zeus.

[–]hennaojichan 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Poetic justice

[–]Touchngo 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

And just the face too, for the most part. Good aim!

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Zeus or Thor. Based haplogroup I

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Brewdabier 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The gods know best.

[–]Fiyanggu 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The Gods have Spoken

[–]Lothar_vonRichthofen 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I do except to see several pearl clutchy 'heathenists' daying how this act of lightning does not reperesent them

[–]Robin 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Do you know why lightning never strikes twice in the same place?

Because that place isn't there anymore.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Oh come on, as if women would object to having sex with and bearing the child of a God.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

    If only the people who write this stuff were as advanced as the technology they use.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

    Troll detected.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

    Try not to be so fragile, especially if you agree with Guillaume Faye

    [–]ChairmanLmaoSupreme Dear Leader Chairman Lmao Zedong 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    "Muh White people bad"

    Says the moron on the internet, using a phone, tablet, or computer, in the English language.

    What's hilarious is how little self-awareness those who harbour anti-white animus (e.g. your flagrant opposition to White identity) really are. Sometimes I wish that White people never dragged this moronic species into modernity, just so that people like you would have none of the perks of living in the present time, absolutely none of which you even remotely deserve.

    That being said, if your putrid, self-destructive kind win out in the end, and you've bred (unlikely!), your descendants will not have any of these perks, and knowing that is always pleasing.

    It is also an obvious farce that a Reddidiot of 14 years or so, and a Democrat supporter, has the cheek to tag themselves a 'normal person'. Your kind wouldn't be considered remotely normal in any other time. We rightly locked up people who believed in sex changes for children and that 'pride' parades should be in children's cartoons. That such gross abnormality has been normalized, and that opposition to it has been declared abnormal, does not make you a 'normal person' in any objective sense of the term.

    Indeed, you're on the side of the political spectrum more likely to positively correlate with mental illness, feelings of malicious envy towards higher status people, self-centeredness/lack of compassion and physical ugliness. Who knows what science will dig up next—but have fun being reminded of your obvious inferiority to the people you criticize.

    Your sheer victimhood complex is also hilarious. Imagine going as far as to write a massive post crying out that you were given a temporary ban of less than one day, as you have done. Lmao! So childish! Imagine having the gall of believing that we should give you any space when we're deplatformed by the likes of you practically everywhere?

    Indeed, your victimhood complex is so extreme that you aren't even satisfied with your ilk dominating Reddit. Nope! You've got to come to the sites that lack an extreme-Left bias to spew your unintelligent drivel simply because you believe that every last part of the internet must be subordinate to your extremist ideology. Isn't that just so sad and pathetic?

    I joined Saidit months ago in order to learn about right-wing and alt right points of view, to read the stuff you read, to learn about the commonly used websites here

    And... that's some Antifa-level of stupidity right there. 'Anti-fascist researcher' or 'anti-racist researcher' level of stupid. Let me guess, Trump is a Nazi, the Republicans are far-Right, and America constantly teeters on the edge of becoming a Fourth Reich, which is basically what all of you moronic, unthinking lemmings actually believe, and are desperate to prevent. That you believe that everything is 'Far-Right' says nothing about the wider world, and everything about you; namely, that you're Far-Left. You're here precisely because you think you're doing your part to prevent that from happening. So predictable!

    Most farcical of all is your absurd claim to be a historian, by which you mean a pseudo-intellectual interested in misappropriating history to serve radical agendas. Let me guess... the mass expulsions of Jews throughout human history are somehow the fault of everyone else, and that multiracialism somehow 'works' despite all evidence to the contrary? Your understanding of history is around about a 'Rome collapsed bcoz dey raciss!' level?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    I see that this was posted by a coward who has kept this alt account for 9 months in order to post something cowardly.

    Why have you worked so hard to develop this statement that has nothing but hatred and attacks? Think about that for a minute. Moreover, stating facts about racism is not "anti-white", not in the least. That's one of the most idiotic fallacies here. (And this propaganda term originates from some of the Zionist websites supporting extremist anti-US, anti-99% activities and claiming that "anti-white" comments are also anti-semitic. The obvious manipulation here only works with dumbasses who don't understand the fallacy.) I am also not a victim of anything significant. A number of your claims have nothing to do with me. Think for a moment about the time you spent studying an anonymous Saidit user in order to post all of this hatred and idiocy. You need help.

    Comments like yours also do not follow the basic rules at Saidit, even if there is a lot of have speech here. DAR was long ago removed from r/all by M7 because it crowds the front page with hate speech posts, which goes against Cloudflare's rules for its websites. Now with 6+ hate speech posts for DAR at the top of r/all on a daily basis, Saidit again resembles portions of 8Chan. This is what Cloudflare thought of 8Chan. I think u/d3rr will not agree with me, but I hope he's thinking about it. Anyone who thinks DAR is good for Saidit's r/all, wants to see Saidit filled with hate speech and posts like yours. It's not what I would want with Saidit, but I also appreciate that 99% of Saiditors appear to agree with everything on DAR, and thus it's appropriately in r/all; Saidit is now essentially DAR. In this context, your response to me is not surprising. But you don't have to try so hard to make a point (especially when it's wrong). Grow up; and stop using alt accounts.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    How can I rightfully kick DAR off of /s/all if they follow the rules? It can't technically be 8chan content because saidit is still not allowing violence promotion or personal insults. What's an open debate site to do? How can saidit be between reddit and 8chan/voat/poal if the people's will, DAR, is not allowed to exist?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    I actually agree on these points, though the last comment - relating to the existence of DAR - might be answered by this:

    If DAR is in /r/subscribed, instead of r/all, it arguably retains its userbase, but it's also OK on r/all, depending on what Saidit wants of its site. What is interesting to me is that so many of the DAR posts are often at the top of r/all, which of course is an organic aspect of Saidit's users' interests. Not that this is necessarily a problem for most Saiditors, but if Saidit is to grow its userbase, it is unlikely to keep new users who disagree with DAR. And I appreciate that Saidit might not want users who disagree with DAR. But here's the rub: many users at DAR promote hate speech and extremism. This can work against the causes of DAR, when, for example, ane of the manipulations of Zionist and Russian disinformation propaganda is to identify concerns about racism as anti-white. This is meant to polarize the social media discourse about race, as has been Critical Race Theory, another manufactured non-issue that's meant to piss off people on the right. DAR often blindly promotes this hateful agenda by the trolls of the 1%, who are paid to sow dischord. I think M7 understood this form of extremist self-pawnage, per his discussions on Youtube, for which there is a long history. I think hate speech should be allowed, but not the main identity of Saidit, which seems to have developed on much of the top posts of r/all. It's just something worth considering. I am not recommending that DAR be removed from r/all, but that Saidit and DAR should be a bit more self-critical, and consider global trends in social media, in order to evaluate what is promoted here.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Saidit and DAR should be a bit more self-critical, and consider global trends in social media, in order to evaluate what is promoted here

    Does this mean that saidit should be less edgy and only talk about safe topics? The global trend of social media seems to be circling the drain while TPTB flushes your ass.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Yes - this is a very important concern. I think Saidit should be edgy. My concern is merely with patterns of extremism and hate speech. These patterns can potentially be questioned by mods, such as duplicate posts on the same extremist report, or news.

    (So much on Saidit is against something, or anti- something, rather than for something or promoting a solution to something. Imagine having to live with or near a Saiditor. I wonder, for example, who Saiditors would vote for in the next election. What practical solutions do Saiditors want, I wonder. I've been asked to post this Q at DAR, but I doubt that would be much fun for anyone.)

    [–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Extremism and hate-speech

    You do realize this is exactly what the ADL, JIDF and DHS claim.