You don't have to act like a feral nigger just because you don't agree with what I said.

That's because I've corrected you over and over again. Maybe your skull shouldn't be so thick?

The US military-led many innovations but what is often forgotten is that while the military finances projects, the actual work, and research are generally done by private corporations like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and General Dynamics.

Most of those companies are integrated within the military-industrial complex. They have US government intervention written all over them.

The transistor was created by Bell labs which is now part of AT&T, stealth tech was developed by Lockheed Martin and the guided munitions revolution was led by Raytheon and other private companies.

This is literally a talking point from Alan Greenspan, and what he never mentioned is that they had a government-granted monopoly. So much for competition and the wonders of the free market.

The computer was first made by Allen Turing during ww2, but since then it has been advanced and upgraded by private corporations like Intel, Apple, and AMD.

Most of the technology that makes up computers and smartphones was invented by the US government. The internet is another example.

The microchip revolution has been led by private companies with TSMC taking the lead in shrinking chip size to 5 nm.

The US government played a crucial role as well: https://fedtechmagazine.com/article/2018/09/how-government-helped-spur-microchip-industry

Similarly, there are countless innovations and breakthroughs you and I have never even heard of being made every year by private corporations in fields as varied as Biotechnology to nanomaterials and materials science.

And how many of those companies began with the help of governments?

Universities get most of their research grants from the private sector.

And the private sector gets tons of grants, subsidies, bailouts, and monopolies from the government.

The reason Germany was able to develop such a competent scientific establishment so fast after 1871 was because they were the first to fully integrate the university establishment with the industrial establishment.

Yes, and why did that happen? Because Germany originally had a state-owned financial sector that guided capital towards industrial -- and military -- development and expansion. They invented state capitalism. Thorstein Veblen wrote extensively on that. China uses a very similar model.

You should read less communist propagandists like Noam Chomsky and actually look at the history behind various industrial sectors.

Says the guy who regurgitates Wall Street -- and predominately Jewish -- propaganda. And for what it's worth, I don't get my information on this subject from Noam Chomsky. I get it, partly, from Michael Hudson, who's infinitely more knowledgeable than the neoliberal hacks you rely on.

Adolf Hitler, the man you hold as your idol loved private enterprise and privatized most of Germany's national industries. He correctly saw that private enterprise was the road to innovation and progress.

What you fail to mention is that the so-called "privatization" in Nazi Germany mainly benefited Nazi Party members. Most of the new "private" owners were card-carrying Nazis, and thus part of the state apparatus. Nazi Germany had its own military-industrial complex, so the lines between "private" and "public" were blurry at best. By the way, during the Total War period all major industries were nationalized again. Not that it matters.

The USSR fell behind the US because it never privatized its industries or gave them autonomy.

That's debatable.

Anyway, I'm not a communist. I'm not in favor of an economy that's 100% state-owned. But it's simply a fact that the state has always been the biggest entrepreneur in history. The state often creates new wealth and then the private sector appropriates it, which is the complete opposite of the myth that we're taught from birth. A lot of capitalists aren't wealth creators, they're wealth extractors.