all 41 comments

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Update 1:

3. 2022-05-03, United States Courthouse, 350 West 1st Street, Los Angeles, California

YouTube: https://youtu.be/HOwT6-Y3yLA

Here we see another abortionist march. I'll be mostly focusing on the many signs that haven't yet been examined.

A Soyviet Soycialist flag at the very start.

A sign reads: Abortion Rights are Trans Rights are Gay Rights are Human Rights:

Again, we see the intersectional, slippery slope worldview considered earlier. The 'rights' of deviant groups are attached to the concept of human rights more generally, as if to say that the such 'rights' are a prerequisite to the full realization of human rights, and thus that human rights will remain a work in progress until manhole drillers and all other deviants have attained the elusive 'true equality'.

In this video we can also see quite plainly the symptoms of LA's White minoritization in language. At 0:15 almost every 'RiseUp4AbortionRights' sign displays a Spanish language translation of their English language counterpart: 'Abortion on Demand & Without Apology'. We can see a clear effort to extend their cause across racial lines, such that singular movements do not need to be created for each race.

0:30. We are introduced to Alex Mohajer, who according to his organization's website, in 2021 'became the first millennial and first Iranian American elected President of the Stonewall Democratic Club, the nation's oldest LGBTQ+ feminist political advocacy organization'. Unlike the anti-Democrat rhetoric in the PSL-dominated speech, and as a Democrat, Mohajer clearly the protesters to 'do everything in our power to make Republicans pay'. 'We cannot allow the Republican Party to control even a faction of the Federal government'.

4. 2022-05-06, Supreme Court, Washington D.C.

We have several videos from outside of the Supreme Court.

https://youtu.be/BePijz7NYHw

Reminiscent of the Portland Federal Courthouse in 2020, similar barricades have been put up around the Supreme Court.

https://youtu.be/_QLFWmbow2I

This is the 'ReproRightsRally'. I just had to share this one for the 'Jews for Abortion Justice' sign. There is also a visible sign for another organization, NARAL, founded in 1969, that reads: "Reproductive Freedom for All", which purports to have 2.5 million members (https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/about/).

https://youtu.be/Y4sxhpltloc

This girl is plain and simply an absolute lolcow.

It pains me every single fucking day that a gun has more rights than I do.

This one had me burst out laughing. Have you ever seen women being crushed by steamrollers in the way I've seen confiscated guns, motorbikes and cars? Indeed, is a woman ever 'confiscated' by the state for anything other than, say, being arrested for a crime?

Abortion is not just for women, it is for [...] non-binary people, trans people, everyone who can fucking have a child.

Bahaha... that's gobbledygook for non-confused women and confused women.

0:50: Muh Handmaid's Tale

Overturning Roe v. Wade is more about just forcing people to give birth. It's about controlling people, keeping people in a system that keeps them down and continues to let poor people be stuck in cycles of poverty.

1:50: Again, the laughable intersectional slippery slope. Notice that when one claims, for example, that fag marriage is a stepping stone towards pedophilia, this is a 'logical fallacy'... only for them to then promptly turn around and claim that making abortion a state issue is a stepping stone towards banning 'gay rights', 'gay marriage' and 'interracial couples'!?

2:07: 'We're here, we're a fucking gorgeous generation. I mean, look at us, we're hot as fuck.'

Bahahaha... I couldn't make this shit up.

This video then ends with a comical chant: 'This [us protesters] is what democracy looks like; that [the Supreme Court] is what hypocrisy looks like.'

Many more videos have been uploaded to that channel over the past 24 hours for anyone who is interested in further viewing.

5. 2022-05-03, Foley Square, New York City

Twitter: https://twitter.com/i/status/1521620802151477248

This is a clownish nine seconds of members of the Abortion Access Front (AAF) wailing like banshees at their appropriately named 'Primal Scream Station'. They're also bizarrely holding cutouts of the heads of the six Republican justices (including Chief Justice Roberts, who isn't opposed to RvW) mounted atop poles. The idea was that participants could indirectly take out their anger on the six justices by screaming at the cutouts. 'Left Voice'—a Trotskyite 'revolutionary socialist news site and magazine' according to its website—flags and signs were also present.

My impression is that the Los Angeles riots are more Far-Left radical than abortionist, whereas NY and Washington D.C. have more comical (for now, and speaking comparatively) 'peaceful protests' which are dominated by abortionist groups.

Lastly, in partial response to some comments here, the Supreme Court has had nine justices since 1869. While a Congressional majority + Presidential approval wouldn't be difficult to attain in order to raise the number of justices in order to make Alito, Thomas, ACB, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh a minority, that would perhaps be the most extreme and transparent power grab in American history. 'We Democrats don't like the current Supreme Court, so we're simply going to change it in a way that favours us' is incredibly blatant interference by the first and second branches of government in the third, and is clearly going to polarize the public even more. Personally, I don't think that will happen. The only way the riots will stop is simply if one of five justices caves in, not through adding two (or more) Democrat justices and thus reducing the 5-4 majority to the needed 5-6 minority. We'll see if any judge switches sides or if Biden and the Democrat-majority Congress begin making the necessary moves to effectively seize the Supreme Court, but I'm hoping that this will go the way of the Yellow Vests: that even after Macron backed down on the fuel tax hike which sparked them in the first place, the protests had already developed a momentum of their own. The Supreme Court doesn't need to succeed, it only needs to hold on for long enough to trigger enough Leftists to keep the momentum going independently of what the government does.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Update 2:

6. 2022-05-03, The State Hotel, 1501 2nd Ave, Seattle, WA

YouTube: https://youtu.be/M1fsI8DDcEw

Hilarity ensues when two losers make a failed attempt to take a pro-life sign.

1:20: One loser then takes another sign and hits a pro-life woman with it. The first loser then picks up the sign and breaks it at 1:36. One woman appears to either want to get back at that loser or take the sign back, only for both losers to push her over.

7. 2022-05-05, Austin, TX

YouTube: https://youtu.be/bsyZV2D2_jE

A woman who tries to interfere with the arrest of another woman appears to have been pushed down by a police officer. The woman recording gets into his face and insists that him shoving 'a woman to the ground' where she 'smacked her head' is outrageous, and that she will 'get his badge'.

Eventually he replies: 'She was on top of an officer, I didn't know she was a woman. I didn't know what she was doing'.

To which the woketard responds: 'And so if she was a man you'd also throw him to the ground?'

'I pulled her off the officer, you're correct.'

'No, you do not have it on video and I will have your badge.'

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Update 3:

8. 2022-05-07, Basilica of Old St. Patrick, New York

YouTube: https://youtu.be/pYxblNdcXc0

The first part of this is the most comical video to come out of this yet. Black woman causing a total scene. Begins destroying White baby dolls, which quite likely is symbolic. The religious folks' response is barely any less comical, resorting to praying in a line blocking the entrance. Quite emblematic of why the American pseudo-Right always lose and America spirals further and further Left: the enemy riots while a whole chunk of them... well... they pray.

2:49: 'America: Where Guns Have More Rights Than I Do'

3:11: 'Protect Abortion Patients & Providers'

4:43: Another chant which seems to be a variation on one I've heard earlier: 'Fuck the Church and legislators; we are not your incubators'.

4:48: Another chant: 'This Church harasses patients'. This can be viewed through the lens of medicalization, where numerous social problems such as abortion and the opioid epidemic are reframed as medical ones. Abortion is thus a mere medical procedure in the same vein as getting a root canal, exactly as in the Reddit comment that someone else posted on this thread. The subsequent chant: 'Abortion is healthcare; healthcare is a right' also fits right in here.

5:37: The sign 'Antis Fuck Off! (And Cops)' comes clearly into view. I imagine that 'antis' denote anti-abortionists.

9. 2022-05-07, Chevy Chase, Maryland

Some assorted rabble are now protesting outside the homes of both Supreme Court Justice Roberts (who doesn't even support overturning RvW) and Justice Kavanaugh.

0:31: The 'Abortion Is Healthcare Healthcare Is A Right' slogan appears in the exact same form as it did it the previous NY video. They aren't even creative enough to switch their slogans up a bit.

3:29: Sign: 'Bodily Autonomy Is A Human Right'

Well, except when it comes down to vaccines.

5:18: Chant: 'The Whole World Is Watching'

So what? America has one of the most liberal abortion laws in the world. Just because you think that abortion is normal doesn't mean that 'the whole world' thinks it is.

7:10: Chant: 'Codify Roe'

7:53: Chant: 'Abortion Rights Are Human Rights'

8:35: Chant: 'Pro-Life Is A Lie, You Don't Care If People Die'

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

I imagine that these protests will be far more damaging and entertaining than 2020 BLM, since a far larger portion of the population feels attacked; that is, feminists of all stripes, rather than a mere ethnic minority and their sympathizers.

You obviously have little understanding of the current political situation if you can think something so completely wrong.

[–]shilldetector 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Exactly. BLM was secretly hated by most white people. This ruling would have the exact opposite effect, completely alienating whites who would otherwise be sympathetic. It would make the GOP completely radioactive to women and would probably finish off the GOP as a viable party long term, but not because the GOP wouldnt stick up for whites and sane Americans, but because it will be seen as a party of religious extremists, and this will translate to any right wing populist movement.

The fact alt righters think this is great illustrates the problem with a movement that almost exclusively consists of males, a high percentage of whom are probably incels. I hate to be an asshole, but thats just the reality of it.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My main point is that anti racism and black victimology is the #1 issue for progressive activists and it is the ideology the ruling class pushes the hardest. A feminist issue isn't going to cause the nation to spiral into mass riots and destruction like BLM riots of 2020.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree, a bunch of pink haired feminists protesting isnt going to result in mass riots. Sure Antifa may do their normal rioting in their normal strongholds and use this ruling as an excuse, but theyd do that regardless of this ruling.

What this ruling will do is blunt GOP gains because of Dem incomptence and hostility towards whites. It takes the attention of Democrat malevolence in shit like this dystopian council on disinformation and whites who were getting sick of the Dems will continue to support them because they think the GOP is run by religious extremists.

It'll also give the dems the excuse they want to increase the size of the supreme court to roll back conservative gains on the court.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The fact alt righters think this is great illustrates the problem with a movement that almost exclusively consists of males, a high percentage of whom are probably incels. I hate to be an asshole, but thats just the reality of it.

Any dissident worth his salt would support the destabilization of the system. If the left goes apeshit and starts a bigger ruckus than the summer of Floyd, it will further drive the US into a tailspin, especially considering that its in the grip of an inflationary spiral.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Any dissident worth his salt would support the destabilization of the system.

This wont destabilize the system, it will strengthen the system because people who increasingly hate the system will be convinced that the alternative is even worse, they'll think well fuck, if the Republicans are a bunch of religious extremists, than what the hell are these crazies to the right of them. It'll help keep people on the shitlib plantation. The system is going to collapse regardless, but the question is what comes after, and if people think dissidents are the American taliban they will be less likely to support them. We win by being viewed as less batshit crazy and extremist than the left wing extremists burning down American cities and pulling people out of cars and beating them half to death on the street because they dont publicly cry for every black thug that gets killed while doing something thuggish. We win by being the voice of reason and the ones people trust to save western civilization from anarcho tyranny and left wing authoritarianism.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

and would probably finish off the GOP as a viable party long term,

How is that a bad thing? The GOP is a blocker party for alt right ideas. That's it's only purpose. The GOP is just as bad for white people as the demoncrats.

but because it will be seen as a party of religious extremists

It's already seen that way. Your comments are weird. You seem to be implying that the only reason the GOP is losing is because of bad decisions and bad optics towards women. Dude the GOP loses because it's set up as controlled opposition to democrats. It's there to make democratic ideas seem reasonable. The GOP is never going to listen to our ideas if they win. Whenever they get in power they ignore dissident ideas and push uni party central banking ideas. The last thing we want is the GOP continuing to exist as a real political entity in the eyes of normies. It needs to fail. Stop thinking that elections, 'constitutionalism', or politicians are going to save us. That's your first problem right there.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's there to make democratic ideas seem reasonable

The role of the GOP is to concede power slowly. They take radical policies from democrats and slowly normalize them over 10-15 years for the opposing masses. Whites are stuck on the republican plantation.

This scotus leak wreaks of astroturfing. Never heard of a scotus leak before and overturning RvW came out of nowhere. Christcucks have been bitching about it for decades. Everyone should knows it's not gonna stick. Democrats and feminazis will just legally maneuver around scotus. This whole thing wreaks of jew shenanigans.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This whole thing wreaks of jew shenanigans.

Wouldn't even be surprised if the Jew Breyer or the Jew Kagan leaked it themselves. There were even websites set up in advanced (no doubt by jews) to oppose the ruling.

https://dailystormer.cn/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/1651630549305.png

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I dont care about saving the GOP, I want it to go away. The problem is that if the GOP is successfully labled as religious extremists, a lot of normies will think that whatever is to the right of the GOP must be a hundred times worse, some American version of isis, and the Jewish media will do everything they can to reinforce that notion.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Let's look at the figures I provided.

Blacks = officially 13.4%;

Women [irrespective of race] = officially 50.8%;

The latter is almost quadruple the size of the former.

In order for your reasoning to be correct, that a perceived attack on all blacks is more of an affront than a perceived attack on all women, each woman would effectively have to possess around four times less victimhood than the average black. At that point, the outrage would only be equivalent to 2020 BLM.

You know that that's wrong: even if the average black person, male or female, is assigned a greater victimhood value than the average woman, it is nowhere near four times higher.

The fact of the matter is remarkably simple: even if blacks possess more per capita victimhood than women in general, there is no way in hell that that would compensate for the sheer difference in total numbers.

Floyd's death was perceived as an attack on 13.4% of Americans.

The SCOTUS decision was perceived as an attack on 50.8% of Americans.

The higher level of victimhood assigned to blacks, while narrowing the difference somewhat, doesn't narrow anywhere near all of it, such that these riots will be only equivalent to, or lesser than, 2020 BLM.

From the average American's perspective, the SCOTUS just declared war on a majority of Americans.

[–]NeoRail 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

White Americans are also approximately 50% of the population. How does your analysis account for that?

Mathematics is not a useful tool for answering this type of question.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Even if we reframe the above to be perceived attacks on:

Blacks + non-black sympathizers with the 'oppose anti-black racism' cause = (Those who view themselves as under attack plus those who feel they need to defend those who believe they are under attack now constitute something greater than 13.4%)

Women + non-women sympathizers with the 'oppose anti-woman sexism' cause = (Same as above, but now constituting something greater than 50.8%)

The latter still surely constitute a far greater portion of the population even if it isn't strictly the 'almost quadruple' you replied to. There's simply a whole lot more potential rioters this time around, and we can already see that there is a pretty heavy male presence in some of these videos reinforcing that targeted demographic.

I also have no idea why people are bothering to make these kinds of comments. Does it look like I made this post to argue with various people whose views are warped by their animus towards blacks greatly exceeding their love of Whites, such that they are willing to harm the latter in order to also harm the former? Or with people who are conflicted between their social progressive viewpoints and their White ethnonationalism and thus experience cognitive dissonance when their interests clash, i.e. on the matter of White abortion, which is practically what Ethnocrat has done since he moved from the more general pro-abortion stance of libtard trash like Spencer to the 'What race is it?' stance much more congruent with the standard DR stance on the matter?

Now, I don't know what your view is, other than that you have felt unsympathetic enough to have taken a stab at my argument that 2022 is going to be much more riotous than 2020. But I think it's clear that I don't want an information/updates thread to be full of counter-signalling from people like Ethnocrat (who I presume read absolutely nothing of my post, and reflexively commented because this event creates cognitive dissonance in anyone who is 'Far-Right' and yet liberal on abortion ('the abortionists are right to protest... but they're also progressive nutcases who I oppose on practically everything else, I feel uneasy considering this topic and don't want to be reminded about it!') and JuliusCaesar225 (who I presume only read two sentences before immediately nitpicking at one of them). Low-effort comments on an 'effortpost'? That's not my kind of thing.

[–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a debate forum, not social media - there is nothing to "counter-signal" here, there are only different views. I agree that some of the comments in this thread are low effort, but that does not necessarily mean that they are wrong. At any rate, if you are presenting updates on the development of events here, there will be nothing for people to disagree with or complain about. Your analysis, however - which, in some respects, as I suggested earlier, is in my opinion incorrect - is not immune to criticism.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not sure why you think these percentages have any relevance to what you are claiming. America is over 60% white, therefore the discrimination and attacks on whites should be causing mass outrage and riots but it doesn't work that way.

[–]NeoRail 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would suggest that you do your updates in a comment chain since that's easier on the eyes than one huge block of text.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Lol. Imagine if the libs start riots and burn down their own cities in the midst of an inflationary crisis over this fake and gay story. Would be the ideal comedy.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

fake and gay story

This. It's my prediction that

A. This is fake news and RvW stays intact

B. It's real news and RvW stays intact by way of general shenanigans

[–]shilldetector 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm amazed that you guys dont understand what a massive strategic blunder this is, one that the GOP has repeatedly made. This is so advantageous to Democrats that they almost certainly leaked this draft in order to reap the benefits.

I'm not even for abortion in cases where there is no medical issue, but the reality is that the vast majority of women want to reserve the "right", nevermind in situations where the health of the mother is at stake, or cases of rape, or severe deformities or problems with the fetus, so you are unnecessarily alienating half of the electorate aside from a few boomer evangelical women, because we all know this potential ruling would simply be overturned eventually. You are basically saying that the moment a woman conceives her body is now property of the state, good luck selling that.

[–]MythOfPrivilege 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is purely a 10th Amendment issue. Nowhere in the Constitution will you find the the word "abortion." The 10th Amendment clearly states than anything not spelled out by the Constitution falls to the individual States to decide for themselves.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Democrats may get cake and ice cream here. Abortions rights will stay intact or be quickly reinstated through legal maneauvering, while republicans make themselves look like jackasses.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's exactly what will happen, and it is probably by design. These anti abortion catholic justices were all appointed by dimwitted Jew controlled presidents, Bush and Trump. They will fuck whites on everything that matters and will give them this phoney "win" on abortion that actually winds up kneecapping the populist right, and the wealthy (((donors))) that vetted these justices knew this.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yah it's a stroke of genius by the elites. Get whitey fighting over a settled issue while they do whatever it is they have planned next.

[–]MythOfPrivilege 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I mean really, how much damage can a bunch of white lefties actually do? Unlike back in 2020, their muscle (i.e. blacks) will be sitting this one out. They won't have the stomach for the kind of carnage and wholesale destruction that blacks do. At most they'll break a few windows. They won't be torching whole neighborhoods or shooting people.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you know where was BLM most active?

Portland: 77.38% White, 5.80% black;

The area around the Federal Courthouse, in particular, was a constant battleground for months on end, in a city with very few blacks. In July 2020, these events happened in Portland:

https://youtu.be/BZalYHsO9C8 (filmed/uploaded: 2020-07-05)

Six months later, Portland was still like this:

https://youtu.be/DSYofqUlVe8 (filmed: 2021-01-21, uploaded next day)

Seattle: 63.7% White; 7.33% black.

In July 2020, rioting in Seattle was already well underway:

https://youtu.be/L6hkViblrJQ (filmed/uploaded: 2020-07-19)

Three months later, Seattle was still like this:

https://youtu.be/sLGMEXebIhk (filmed/uploaded: 2020-10-18)

Please explain the events in Portland and Seattle over these lengthy durations given that blacks are a vast minority in those cities, and are clearly a minority even within rioters as these videos demonstrate?

My answer is remarkably simple. The quasi-Marxist BLM cause was effectively hijacked in these cities by more radical Antifa and Far-Left organizations, many if not most of whom are indeed 'White lefties'. The relative absence of radical Leftist groups in more black areas meant that BLM was more 'genuine' rather than becoming co-opted by more ideological, radical groups, and so BLM fizzled out because it was a more spontaneous, anger-fueled reaction rather than something organized. Most of these 'ACAB', 'F12' and 'FTP' tags, which are emblematic of Far-Left extremist presences, are being sprayed by non-blacks (and indeed many Whites) in those cities.

We should also keep in mind that BLM continued operating well into the Biden Administration, and did not conveniently disappear as those who allege that Antifa-BLM are effectively Democrat Party fronts believed.

For example, BLM was still in the streets in Salem on 2021-03-28:

https://youtu.be/5XUtwuo0KwI

I'm seeing more anger from these people at Biden than I saw from the 2020 rioters at Trump.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Who the fuck cares? This just looks like conservatard outrage porn to be honest.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    This wont result in that. You honestly think Tyrone is going to riot and burn down his neighborhood because pink haired feminists are angry?

    All it does is strengthen Democrats political power and result in more Merrick Garfinkles having absolute power over us

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    You honestly think Tyrone is going to riot and burn down his neighborhood because pink haired feminists are angry?

    No, but shlomo will, and he runs antifa.

    [–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Pretty silly to have your pro-abortionist, 'progressive' views warp the fact that we're seeing something completely at odds with all of American history; namely, a perceived attack on well over a hundred million Americans. Anyone who thinks this is just going to fade away simply has no idea of the hornet's nest that has just been disturbed by the SCOTUS.

    [–]Nasser 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I'd say I'm neutral on the whole abortion debate, I see the pros and cons of both sides for our people. That said, the views of psychotic,deranged parasites like this: https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/uiorxl/im_not_promurdering_babies/i7e54y8/ are the ultimate example of how twisted modern liberalism is and how much it has corrupted society.

    If you're on the pro life side, I'd really suggest you spread this piece of shit's comment all over the internet and on the ground, and any others.

    [–]FriedrichLudwig 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    God the responses. These people are utterly worthless.

    [–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    That is a comment befitting of the times: nihilistic and deeply self-absorbed. Also an extremely false equivalency: no death takes place when one gets a 'root canal or even a tattoo'. The unintended consequences of such an argument are also obvious. You could swap 'abortion' out for 'murder' and still make a case convincing enough for the average Redditard.

    [...] There should be MORE [murders] because [murders] are normal.

    I'm [pro-murder] because a woman doesn't need a reason to [murder].

    I [murdered someone] because I just didn't want [that person alive]. Period. I wasn't raped, I was totally healthy, I had a loving relationship, I had plenty of money. I [murdered someone] because it felt good and I [was feeling blood lust and had an urge to kill].

    I don't need some poetic reason or moral justification to get a root canal or even a tattoo. If I want or need one I'll get one because I have full agency over my body.

    Why the fuck is [murder] any different? This type of bullshit just solidifies that [murders] are bad things, something someone should only do as a last resort, something shameful. It's not, it's just another thing that happens every single day.

    [Murder is] normal.

    Is there anything really disanalogous or logically invalid in my reframing of her 'argument'? Nope. Her appeal isn't to consent or harm or anything where one could argue that my parody argument is a false analogy. Her appeal is to how 'normal' abortion is (and killing is also ubiquitous throughout nature, which also renders it completely 'normal') and to hedonism (if it feels right, it is right, which would also be the rationale for many serial killers). Why couldn't her failure of a mother have these same attitudes towards her, to spare us from reading that filth today?

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I just want to ask them this: "Imagine someone kicks a pregnant woman in the belly and causes a miscarriage. Let's say the mother feels like it was good that she was rid of the child. Should it be considered murder considering that the woman feels like it was good that she lost the baby?"

    [–]Fonched 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    What does everyone think of these arguments against pro-life sentiment? https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/376104801 I haven't seen much rebunking of these yet.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Give me a fucking break. These issues collectively don't account for 2% of abortions.

    The overwhelming majority of abortions are done for economic and career reasons.

    [–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    If you mean the link OP, it is an idiotic copypasta also doing the rounds on Reddit. I can just as easily make up my own 'argument' for the reverse.

    I'm pro-Brittany who [would have realized today, were she not tragically aborted at eight weeks,] that she [would be] financially, emotionally, [and] physically [willing and able] to raise a [large family].

    [insert as many similar statements as needed]

    Life is fucking nuanced, unlike [the views of these] rotten [abortionists].

    Go ahead. Argue back and say that I'm [anti-choice] all you want, but the truth is this.

    I'm [pro-choice].

    Their [choices].

    [The choices that would have been made by those who would be here today if it were not for 1,500,000,000+ abortions].

    [–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    All this salt almost makes me think a million nigger babies is worth it

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The mistake is calling it abortion. It should be called what it is - Women's filicidal privilege.