all 13 comments

[–]NeoRail 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I am not sure why you keep posting threads like this. What is there to respond to here? Presumably, in the ideal world of that poster only four people will exist - the strongest, the smartest, the prettiest and the richest (lol?). Apparently, in his view, all other people serve no purpose, are unnecessary, and - perhaps, depending on how closely he follows this perspective - are even undesirable. When it comes to this type of rationale, the only sensible thing to do is to explain its obvious implications and wish the man a good life. Unless he is one of those four best people on the planet, he will probably need the well wishes in order to deal with his extremely nihilistic outlook, all politics aside.

[–]Nasser[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What sickens me the most is that there are Whites stranded and in poverty in Africa while we're stuck with parasites like this, it aggravates me a ton.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People that say things like this are virtue signaling, trolling, or both. It's hip super cool nowadays to hate on white people. It's also cool to start arguments about race, so you can hate on whitey even more. I'm not convinced engaging with people like this is helpful. It's often bait.

In the unlikely scenario where they might be sincere, it is usually best not to argue, because their mind wont be changed by argument. Only personal experience will cure them. When Shaniqua gets promoted instead of them, thats when the neurons start firing.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We just need people to be talking about it, because discussion is the first step that the problem is being acknowledged to even begin with. Just how can a problem even begin to be solved if it is constantly subject to what is known as 'non-decision making'? Prevented from even becoming acknowledged as an issue by those who hold power. Hidden, downplayed, made taboo. Acknowledgement is the first step towards resolution.

This is the main reason I felt that Zemmour was more good than harmful. He simply got people talking about mass immigration to begin with.

And what does this talking do? It forces people to take sides. It forces Whites to be pro- or anti, and makes worthless fucktards like whoever the OP quoted show their true colours. It encourages nonwhites who have antagonistic views to become more vocal and paranoid. There doesn't seem to be any downside whatsoever to the acknowledgement and discussion of the issue.

Let it become a wedge issue in the same way as Roe v. Wade. The more such issues appear the more divided publics become. And there is no such thing as 'too divided' in the current year.

Finally, you can't rebuild the asabiyyah, thumos, etc. of individuals. Nobody seriously argues that allowing endangered species to go extinct is fine even if the members of those species are not the best at any particular thing.

If this asshole needs some kind of proof that there is an instrumental value in keeping any particular group alive, then he is anti-survival for everyone. 'We're not best at this, we're not best at that, we're not best at the other'. Yeah? Well who is? I could just as easily say that groids don't need to be preserved as a race because they sure as hell aren't the smartest or richest, and win fuck all in the way of medals in the Olympics despite being what that guy has in mind when he writes 'best athletes'.

Using his reasoning, why should I give a shit if they go extinct? I also can't think of one single positive thing that Latinos or MENAs are supposed to be the best at, so I guess they should all be wiped out as well. He, of course, won't extend this reasoning that far, because he'd be a racist/Nazi, etc.

How does he even rationalize his own existence? I doubt that he and his family have achieved anything of note, so why would it matter to me if they were all gunned down in the next mass shooting? Apparently people need to be 'superior' to be worth saving, and 'superior' is a club that this fucktard and his family ain't in.

[–]DisastrousDepth14Race comes first 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Like Putin once said, "We don't need traitors in Russia", our attitude must be the same. Race alone isn't enough. Loyalty is another quality we must look for. When the time comes, these traitors must be kicked out with the invaders. I believe we'll be fine in the long run. Do not waste your time arguing with them. They have openly admitted what we kept telling people all these years. All that matters is how history remembers them. Our descendents will see them as traitors. The leaders of the future will hate them for what they tried to do to their homelands and their people. This "replacement theory" is mainstream now and good percentage of our people know that it is happening. The traitors cannot make us stop talking about it. It is only going to get more popular and eventually we'll have our homelands back. These people will remember who the traitors were in the multicultural era. So let these traitors have a good time today. I assure you, they will be hated tomorrow.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank them for going mask off. This is the best response.

They know that they fucked up once you say it and the audience knows it too.

Also never appeal to them with things like "imagine if we said the same thing about blacks". Because it takes the perspective that even when Whites are facing extinct we need the legitimacy of black suffering to bring attention to our oppression. Simply stating our suffering is enough and then pointing out that they do not have the interest of Whites in their mind nor the well being nor any empathy towards Whites.
Show the audience that these people are morally evil and that they hate white people.

Always argue from the position of "Its okay to be White" and that "The extinction of White people is not a good thing". Frame it like this and they have no choice but to take either a neutral or opposing stance (both are horrible optics).
Don't argue why it is not a good thing that Whites go extinct. Don't play games with them. Just tell them that this is your morals and that you are happy that they are being honest with you about the extinction of White people.

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So, only people who are "the best athletes, smartest, and wealthiest" deserve to exist? And WE'RE the supremacists? No, no, no. These people are so evil and disingenuous. They're past the point of denying the replacement, now we just deserve it, or it shouldn't be stopped, or whatever rationale they've moved onto now.

[–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

When it comes to white replacement it's not so much that whites are dying off as much as others are growing faster, but urbanization has collapsed the fertility rate of most non-white countries now and I believe the famines and wars of the coming century will be a massive population grinder for them. There's a pretty good chance whites will be globally dominant again 300 years from now imo.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes here's some data from a Ynglish friend of mine (do follow if you have twitter).

    https://twitter.com/RT_Barentsburg/status/1527327777950552065

    https://twitter.com/RT_Barentsburg/status/1527328036731092994

    https://twitter.com/RT_Barentsburg/status/1527328391531094024

    I have a theory that it's not just feminism/capitalism/famine driving this but also the trend towards private schooling in the third world. In my grandparents generation all the kids had free schooling so people had 5-6 kids. Now each kid is another monthly payment. Makes it harder to justify

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    There is no reason to respond to them at all. The people that ask you to justify the existence of your race are generally nihilistic individuals or your enemies. You should debate people that can be reached or in front of a audience that can be convinced. Your enemies should only be removed, marginalized or destroyed. When you throw pearls to a swine you are wasting time while the demographic clock is ticking. We need to be building up our influence to the point we can actually steer the national conversation toward our interests instead of caring about a lone wolf shooter, abortion, etc.

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Just ask them which non-white country they want to move to.

    [–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    This is also a good one

    [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    What are the best arguments against them?

    Should salamanders commit genosuicide?