all 24 comments

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Takes anti-psychotics once

lmao, nice post though. Good to see character development😎👍

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

In my mind it can be both. You can have an inner core with plans they attempt to send out. However, their incompetent liberal and lower level Jewish operatives just don't always pull it off. The combined effect of weakening white culture and killing/maiming whites occurs both ways. Sometimes fast, sometimes slow.

The 'cabal' is most likely competing with other power players in elite circles. I.e. I think we have some white hats among the black ones. And let's be honest. Their methods of control: influence, blackmail, psychology, pay offs, etc. These aren't perfect. They control VERY high up powerful people but they can't own everyone. They even make mistakes. They made a HUGE mistake (as mentioned by Soros in an expensive full page New York Times Ad) with the invention of the internet. Information flows way too freely online and too many people are seeing through their psyops and false flags. They are becoming less effective. Until they totally lock down the internet they might have to slow down their plans. Slowing down plans doesn't mean stopping though. Unfortunately for us they learn from their failures and try again. If you look at the current situation the western world is in (the brink of chaos, bankruptcy, and extreme civil unrest) they have achieved their past goals.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The 'cabal'? This really does just sound like Q anon, no matter how much you guys claim it doesnt.

How does one gain entry into "the cabal"? What ensures generational loyalty to this cabal, and ensures nobody spills the beans?

Jews have a centuries long culture, genetic ties, and a self worshipping religion that ensures loyalty, but you think they are being out-jewed by a group of rando rich people with no real ties or ethnic loyalty but who managed to recruit in secret and maintain absolute loyalty under their noses, carrying out plots that would probably result in them going to prison for life if not executed because....why exactly? They are already rich. They dont need to do this. Their kids will already inherit their riches, so what is the motivation exactly? For Jews the motivation is ethnic loyalty, desire for revenge, religion, and intense indoctrination into a victimhood cult. But this shadow elite just seem like cartoon dr evils.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The motivation for the gentiles is to emulate their Jewish overlords, gain their favor, and thusly keep their place in the decadent elite. The degenerate elite like being able to rape, murder, extort, etc. without consequence and the protection of the kike buddies is the only thing keeping that around.

Not to mention that the vast majority are sociopaths or sadists or some other form of antisocial cunt who gets off on the pain and suffering of those they perceive as being under their control and lesser.

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Glad to see you here. Most of times, what's going on is not really related to some obscure conspiracy, but the very evident and clearly spoken desire of more money and power. Mass immigration is mostly about pumping GDP and providing cheap labour, war in Ukraine was a way to establish once again the rule of the American corporations (which failed). The LGBTQ+diversity thing was mostly about cranking up the anticapitalist movement while throwing a bone to the leftish masses. That's why our race - every race actually - and our nations - and really every nation - can only thrive with some kind of socialist economy. There are people who honestly hates the white race, but for the elites it doesn't really matter which race they rule upon. Capitalism is very effective if you aim to material wealth, and that's proved by all the western world, which is indeed extremely rich. It's bad for basically everything else.

Edit: I would also point out that you can't be a socialist while not being racialist and nationalist. Those who are not, are in bad faith or really ignorant of the history and the basics of how humans behave.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't believe that the motivation for all of this isn't anti white. It certainly is, expressively so.
If it was about the economy, every nation would try to get Germanics to their nations and not ruin their own economies by importing low IQ eaters.

Capitalists who care about profits would want to increase the number of best workers; germanics.

But they do not care about that and we all know why.

[–]NeoRail 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You misunderstand the nature of the modern economy. What drives economic growth today is increased consumption, not increased production. The problem of production was in many ways solved perhaps more than a century ago. The issue is that there is not enough consumption in order to make the GDP line go up (infinitely). The most economically valuable citizen today is the one who is easily susceptible to advertising, has low impulse control, is wasteful, always spends and never saves money, is a conspicuous consumer, etc.

Ethnic resentment does play a role in politics today - it is very hard to deny that. Just look at the behaviour of mainstream American politicians. The economic issue is more complicated than you make it out to be, though.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is anti-white sentiment, but I don't think it's a driving force by his own. It's a by-product of the cultural milieu. It's important, we must point to it because it's very vocal and pointing to it it's beneficial to out cause, but it's not the core of question. Culturally speaking, the core of the question is the liberalism itself, which promotes that kind of by-products.

Besides that, it's hard to attract German people outside of their country because they enjoy high living standards, but it's not like no one is trying to do so. for a European is extremely easy to obtain a green card or even American citizenship. And on the other hand, for Americans is easy to settle down in Europe. I know that my country grant citizenship to everyone is able to prove that they have Italian ancestry, which is not particularly uncommon in North America and between white amlats. But you are not going to get huge amount of immigrants from developed countries. Even Italy had a peak of 1.000.000 emigrants/year toward America at a given point in the late 1800s, but later catched up with industrialization and that stream stopped.

On the other hand Germany got a huge amount of immigrants specifically to fight low birth rates, expecially Turkish immigrants (that was before Syria). In a capitalist environment you either delocalize or allow people in. Usually both of them happen. That's a basic need of the State to keep stable or grow the fiscal base, while also industry needs to get the best deal with workers.

That's actually nothing new. I think it was Cato who was blaming the senate for allowing huge amounts of slaves to work on Italian lands, claiming that that lands was intended to be worked by indigenous people. The senate basically to him to fuck off, because slaves were cheaper.

I'm not saying that only economy is important. I'm saying that you would be able to better understand the world using the lenses of power and economy. That's because such material objective are very clear and mostly universal. The other driving forces are more elusive, expecially on the global stage, due to cultural differences. They can influence some people, but not all people.

Lastly, the cultural forces within the liberal sphere, the West we could say, are self evident and are indeed clearly connected to economical goals. Liberalism was thought as a way to allow self-accomplishment in the fittest area. The liberal philosopher thought that, given the opportunity, every men would have choose the way that fitted best for him, stating his own goals. They severely understimated the social inertia. Only a fraction of the people actually pursue individual goals; most stick with what's the trend, which is, material wealth. Material wealth is the only universal "good" for our societies. That's why, when you look at cultural phenomenon, you can explain most of them throug the lenses of who's able to profit from them. In the past there were other values one could pursue: honor, virtue and so on. It wasn't uncommon for a man to pursue such values instead of material wealth, because they were universal enough - which mean, universal in the limited context they lived in - to be able to fulfill their ambitions.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good comment. Totally agree.

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The LGBTQ+diversity thing was mostly about cranking up the anticapitalist movement while throwing a bone to the leftish masses.

Your right on the money with that. Notice the timing of when the LGBT crap came out. It started back in 2012, right when Occupy Wall Street was still happening. The alphabet people and their apologists did a wonderful job of fracturing the anticapitalist movement into a mass of opposing camps. The LGBT crap basically eviscerated the left in one fell swoop.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It started back in 2012, right when Occupy Wall Street was still happening.

I think Keith Woods debunked this

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Do you recall exactly what he said?

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He said things to the effect that social media allowed marginalized freaks of society like ugly spinsters, fags, trannies, and other degenerates to organize and push aggressively for minority issues. Social media allowed for self-reinforcing echo chambers and leftist censorship from big tech prevented any moderation. It created a fanatical zeal that spiraled out of control and as social media merged with real life, it spilled into real life.

I personally would add that the mass inclusion of women (particularly spinsters and lesbians) in media and academia contributed greatly to the spread of this plague.

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I would say that societys have always been plauged by degenerates. However, Western society began relaxing their guard against the LGBT weirdos from the 90s onward. The rise of social media accelerated this trend, as it enabled the freaks to find each other and create their own groups. However, I am still absolutely convinced that the LGBTWTF movement is largely artificial. It got a massive boost around 2012. I was a young man when I watched that happen, I remember it very clearly.

BTW, about the social media aspect. The degenerates have always favoured Twitter over all other platforms. It is interesting to note that Twitter hit 100 million active users in September 2011. Thats around the time this shit started to reach critical mass.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

E) They wanted to track how ideas spread

Quarentene, limiting peoples social groups to the most crucial people, having people home&online, etc.
This all forms a perfect experiment to track the dessimination of ideas and how certain ideas spread in populations.

You can see a virus just like a meme. It is spread through human contact. You can see vaccination as the prevention of the spread of certain ideas.

The exact same mathematical models that can be applied to tracking virus and network analysis can be used on censorship and propaganda.

F) Testing was a genetics gathering procedure

Also I don't think covid is over.
Also we do not yet know if it causes sterility or not. People talked about it being recessive, so 2 vaccinated having kids would be more likely to be infertile. Etc.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lots of people made a good buck for sure.

Take the EU for example, they bought 1.8B Pfizer vaccines for the price of 15,5€, while Belgium bought them for 12€.

That's 1.800.000.000 * 3,5 = 6.300.000.000€ (six point three billion euros) they stole! All while Ursula von der Leyen was exchanging private messages with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and later deleting them!

This is, as far as I know, the biggest, most egregious and most out-in-open case of corruption in human history, and no one was held responsible for it! And it requires zero conspiratorial thinking, it's a matter of public record, not some speculation!

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I will admit freely, I went full schizo with the vax thing. Thought this was the big move from ZOG and they'd use it to insert genetic modification on us or make us permanently dependent on vaccine shots like insulin is for diabetes.

They did. They used it to sterilise 3 generations, though passing time will account for plausible deniability. I have a post about it. Pfizer and Moderna have undisclosed ingredients, specifically CRISPR CAS9, which is used to slice chromosome 12 and 5, specifically, having impact on fertility.

But now COVID is a thing of the past, the establishment has moved on to the next happening: the Russia-Ukraine war and vaccine passports and lockdowns have gone away.

Lockdowns are still a thing, esepcially in certain European countries. It's just that those who refused the CRISPR injection are not allowed to do certain things, which is a deception in itself.

Billions took the vaccine but tens of millions didn't die or become infertile from the vax.

It was targeted at certain people. Dr. Hill showed that many people recieved controls, others recieved the CRISPR Cas9, while others received kill shots.

I still think it's dangerous and unnecessary but I no longer think that they cause sterility or death on a wide scale.

They cause sterility. Just search my posts or see very_0wn's twitter account which has the information and studies nobody talks about. They do indeed cause sterility upon repeated usage via CRISPR cas9.

A. ZOG medical corporations wanted to make big bucks out of it.

True, they were promised a 'vaccine' CRISPR revolution and got it with the declaration of their Syndemic.

B. ZOG governments wanted to use it to increase surveillance and repression.

True.

C. Some ZOG big boys saw it as an opportunity to push their pet projects like vaccine passports, digital ID, and so on

That was the plan, it's just that they got a lot of pushback.

D. Big finance wanted to use it as an excuse to do QE and offload their liabilities onto the central banks and further fatten their pockets.

Exactly, the entire system was foing to fail, so they imposed lockdowns. See the Repo markets before the pandemic.

However, COVID ultimately fizzled out and became benign as most infectious diseases do with the omicron variant.

Covid was released as a stealth ethno-bioweapon targeting Indo-Europeans via ACE2 receptor which was used as a catalyst for CRISPR mRNA revolution. They didn't need it to be that devastating to get the results they wanted.

The lockdowns also caused the global supply chain to crater and they could simply afford it no longer. The lockdowns and vaccine passports no longer became justifiable and the global capitalist economy was on the verge of collapsing due to the supply chain disruptions.

It's not over yet. If you understand that they plan these events in advamce, you'll notice, like EVENT 201, they underwent pandemic exercises for a deadlier pandemic come 2025. The plutocrats have already said another pandemic (syndemic) is coming.

In addition, the syndemic was acaryluzt to implement the UN's SDG AGENDA 2030 goals.

Most big ZOG events are driven by media and social media hysterics and the Russian invasion of Ukraine diverted attention away from the COVID. The blue checkmark class had something else to squawk about. Ultimately, this crisis in conjunction with the Biden administration's actions so far has also caused me to re-evaluate my previous way of looking at things. I've abandoned deep conspiracy theory thinking in the vein of Thuletide, Apollonian Germ with their UN depopulation, Agenda 2030, and Freemasons-Illuminate nonsense.

Why? They are not finished yet. Wait until 2025.

I've come around to a more grounded form of thinking where the current world order is the product of Jewish nepotism and a general cultural milleu of libtardism that has been crafted over the last 80 years due to Jewish control of American academia, media, and entertainment.

True.

I no longer think of the structure as some pyramid where Rothschild and other Jewish bankers are sitting at the top crafting grand narratives and giving direct orders to all the regime apparatus as a whole.

It works more as a culture of Jewish revolutionary spirit and cultural vandalism.

tl;dr, the elites aren't supervillians planning for world domination. Libtardism and anglo-Jewish materialistic end of history thinking is all they know and they know of no other way to operate. They also go along with it because it greatly benefits them. The Jews are obviously driven by what's good for the Jews and what's bad for the goys.

I can agree with the last part of the analysis.

[–]Ehhhhhh 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Covid isn't a thing of the past. Some people died or were injured quickly. With others, it will take time. Cancers are increasing. Immune disorders will start developing in others and already are, supposedly.

They are starting to push other stories to cover up or explain the side effects of the jab, such as the bs story of climate change causing heart attacks. Also, with this changing dna, this can affect offspring.

It didn't merely "fizzle out" either. This is planned. More people will still die or be affected from the jabs that they already took. More should be demonstrating how ineffective the shots were at helping and how dangerous they were, and have the WHO and CDC overhauled, but they won't because all is controlled. This set the stage for their next planned pandemic.

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If you had asked me 1 year ago what the purpose of mass vaccinations were, I would have given you two reasons:

1) To sicken the population, to sterilise them, and to kill some of them.

2) To implement a digital vaccine passport that would restrict the peoples freedoms.

 

At this point in time, 1) has arguably been achieved but 2) has been abandoned.

As recently as January, my fear was that the Elites were going to go all in with the vaccines and the passports, and to keep pushing until they had gotten everyone jabbed. I was afraid that they would tighten the vice on the unvaccinated and make it impossible to do anything in public without a vaccine passport.

I must admit that when they announced they would be removing the passports, I was flabbergasted. That made no sense to me whatsoever. Why would they push so hard for so long, to burn through so much social capital, only to cave in at the last moment, when they were almost near the finish line? It was a huge surprise for me, but also a relief.

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But with all that said, it bears keeping in mind. The vaccination campaign was merely one aspect of the plandemic, and it may not even have been the most important aspect. The Elites have achieved many of their goals during the last 2 year. The lockdowns stopped the economy from overheating as a result of the Federal Reserves quantitative easing (I.E., printing trillions of dollars into existence). The lockdowns also wiped out many small businesses and made people more dependent on megacorporations, while also putting millions of people into debt and poverty. It also gave the Elites a pre-text to create a central bank digital currency, that they will be rolling out soon.

The great reset is not over yet, and there will be more manufactured crisis' on the horizon as they seek to reshape the world.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ironically, I used to be skeptical of the anti-vax shit, and now I believe something was up with the vax and I severely regret getting any of the shots, much less 3 (I had little choice in the matter and was already becoming hesitant by the third). I'm still alive though, so all those "vaxxies will be dead in [TWO WEEKS]" posts everywhere were just as wrong as the "All the unvaxxed will literally get turbo AIDS and die in [TWO WEEKS]" ones it seems, but I do undeniably feel worse on average than before.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

fyi tagging more than 3 accounts means they don't get the notification