all 16 comments

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

How are economists only just learning this? Are they fucking thick? Jews intentionally moved the west away from production and into only speculation so that if a revolution did happen again we wouldn't be able to create an independent, autarchic Europe a la the plan of the fascists. I thought everyone knew speculation/FIRE economies are paper tigers and completely fake.

I expect less than nothing from academics and they impress me with their new heights of stupidity consistently.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How are economists only just learning this

Are they fucking thick?

Yeah. Economists are basically worthless. I'm qualified enough to say so

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Economics is the dismal science.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Calling it a science is an insult to science. Chemistry is a science. Physics is a science. Economics is more like sociology or phrenology.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't really understand why this is the case, it is very math-heavy after all.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Econometrics is math heavy. There are useful elements within the study of econometrics and managerial microeconomics, such as demand forecasting, but a lot of economics in general involves human behavior, preferences, utility, and rationality.

Example, in microeconomics workers get paid their MPL, marginal product of labor. That works on paper and probably in reality at some point in time, but in the current year, half the workforce is made up of fake jobs and diversity hires that get paid to be racial tokens. Economic models aren't based around real world economies where coercion and corruption are just as powerful as the invisible hand.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ever heard of physics envy?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dumb quackademics are finally catching up to MarkimusMeridius/DisidentHR 2019 talking points.

[–]shilldetector 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Jewish power knows full well how big Russia's economy is, which is why they’ve risked WW3 attempting regime change there.

The fact they decided to do this instead of simply waiting for Putin to die means they probably know the US is close to collapse. They want Russia under their control when the US implodes, and ironically might have sped up the US collapse to make ut happen.

[–]NeoRail 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Assuming that all of this is correct, this is very interesting. It is good to know that productive industry is receiving recognition again. The really lamentable part in all this is that we have already been through incredible deindustrialisation. Even Russia lost an enormous amount of industry in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

I'm no economist so help me understand. Lets say you have 2 national economies that produce only 3 goods. For country A, instagram posts, rap music, and onlyfans porn subscriptions hypothetically generate $1 trillion in revenue and country B, fertilizer, timber, and machinery generate hypothetically the same $1 trillion in revenue, how do we compare the value of these 2 economies. Are they equal?

[–]NeoRail 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to mainstream economic thinking, they would be equal, yes. Even in terms of actual purchasing power they would be equal - hence why the farce economies of Western countries today still permit Western governments to have massive militaries and exercise a lot of soft power. The problem is that economies using the model of country A would be completely helpless and rapidly collapse without free trade - since they produce no useful goods, they need to purchase all of these from the outside, so trade barriers would be crippling. This partly explains why Western sanctions on Russia have largely failed and have even acted to the detriment of the West - Russian imports simply play too crucial a role in economic life, and are hard to replace. A shortage of instagram posts is easily survivable, but a shortage of food and oil isn't.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

For country A, instagram posts, rap music, and onlyfans porn subscriptions hypothetically generate $1 trillion in revenue

What's funny is that in clown world these things are real revenue generators. People do go work hard at the piggly wigly and then go home and spend half their paycheck on apple music, only fans and Instagram simping. Obviously though clown world only exists in peace time. Nobody gives a shit about sending women $4.99 for a wink when there are roving gangs of nigger cannibals outside.

I think the silver lining here is obvious. That last act on earth most liberals will perform is feeding their pet black people. This time though instead of 'likes' or 'government handouts' it will be with their lives as blacks literally eat them.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

nigger cannibals

I've heard this is a thing in liberia

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For country A, instagram posts, rap music, and onlyfans porn subscriptions hypothetically generate $1 trillion in revenue and country B, fertilizer, timber, and machinery generate hypothetically the same $1 trillion in revenue, how do we compare these the value of these 2 economies. Are they equal?

Consider the costs, efforts, and reach of each product.

For example, the instagram and onlyfans require internet, which uses electricity, but it can be accessed anywhere a PC or phone exists on Earth (so theoretically, billions of customers).

Fertilizer and timber are natural products but you have to pay money to actually move them across borders and then store them in appropriate facilities.

So both have their pros and cons. In a high tech world, internet services are much more profitable. But in a post-apocalyptic one, then we'll obviously need stuff that can't be powered by electricity.

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

PPP is useful for internal spending, i.e. private buying food car and house. When you buy from outside it's the GDP that matters. You won't buy steel at a discounted price just because a packet of sobranie costs 1€ while marlboro is 5,50€. I think the real point here is the industry/commodity vs service thing.