all 4 comments

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lately I find myself closer to anglin's views, bit honestly I think that it's just because he actually came closer to my positions. He's getting old, and started dropping the hardcore schizo stuff

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is another solid article by Anglin. Despite his bad reputation, he actually does have good geopolitical insights. The theme in this article is consistent with what he has written in the past. Anglins diagnosis is that the Globalists have made a number of mistakes that have put them in a losing position vis a vis China and Russia.

 

Frankly, the logical thing would have been to leave Donald Trump in power, skip the coronavirus, keep the economy rolling, keep the military rolling, and figure out a way to undermine China economically and if necessary, militarily. After China is thwarted, Russia falls pretty easy, Iran falls pretty easy, then you’ve got a clear runway for your weirdo Great Reset transhumanist gay pedophile cyborg agenda.

That would have been the smarter choice. America was doing fairly well under Trump. The economy was humming along without supply disruptions, and the U.S. military had not yet been discredited by failure in Afghanistan. But apparently, the Elite cared more about domestic political theater than about global geopolitics. They were so enamored with their own multicultural LGBT crap that they literally couldn't let go of it, even when it was endangering their real long term goals. They used the mass media to run a 24/7 smear campaign against Trump, and they even rigged the 2020 election and gave the Presidency to Biden. That was irrational and emotional. Another mistake was how the Elites refused to decouple the U.S. from China, after it was clear that they had not abandoned nationalism. They could have punished them, but they cared more about cheap goods instead.

Aside from removing Trump from power, which seems like a goal entirely driven by sentimental paranoia, every outcome of the coronavirus agenda has been negative for the Western regime. Yes, it is a longterm goal of the globalist project to collapse the economy, to strip people of their freedoms, but doing those things while China remains so powerful, with its own stable economy and social order, puts the West in a much weaker position.

This forces us to ask the question, what was the ultimate purpose of the pandemic? Was it intended simply to further concentrate wealth into the hands of the Elite? If so, then it achieved that goal at the expense of Americas wealth and stability. It has weakened their position relative to China and Russia. They cannot defeat either country either economically or militarily. In retrospect, it seems that China only went along with the plandemic because they saw the opportunity to enrich themselves at Americas expense. They still aren't onboard with the Globalist agenda.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Anglin has been pushing this 'incompetent jewish elite' theory for awhile. I'm not sure I buy it (I definetly think their middle managers are incompetent though) but he still makes some solid points.

For anyone that use to have a stormer reading habit but lost it because the server went down here's the current normie server

https://stormer-daily.rw/

and here's the always up tor server

http://stormer5v52vjsw66jmds7ndeecudq444woadhzr2plxlaayexnh6eqd.onion/

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anglins theory about the Globalists is that all their great thinkers have died off from old age. Men like David Rockefeller, Samuel Huntington, Zbigniew Brzezinski, George Bush Sr., etc. The remaining Elites are following the strategy laid down by them blindly, without accounting for he changing circumstances (such as Chinas nationalism). He also says that their ranks are too compartmentalised, and that the different groups are not communicating or co-ordinating properly.