all 16 comments

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Meanwhile this study shows damaged semen quality:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/andr.13209

It tries to say that its only temporary but go to the supplementary table 2 to see the results/data for yourself. n is small and it is a biased sample (likely ppl with already good quality semen) so it is not certain that it replicates to the general population. Worrying though regardless.

I don't get why people here bash on the vaccine skepticism. Everything about the vaccine is jewish.

[–]shilldetector 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Everything about the vaccine is jewish.

Including the fact that nobody is more vaccinated and boostered than Jews themselves, thereby disproving that it's part of some conspiracy to harm and sterilize people.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The jews are killing themselves off intentionally as a fake holocaust to increase their power bro

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No it doesn't disprove anything

[–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bit of an unqualified assumption that the lots or manufacturing is all the same for all locales.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I don't get why people here bash on the vaccine skepticism. Everything about the vaccine is jewish.

Because it's a dumb distraction that has nothing to do with race.

[–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Three military doctors have presented queried data to Ohio attorney Thomas Renz that shows a "shocking and sudden spike in nearly every ICD code for common vaccine injuries in 2021."

Myocardial infarction –269% increase

Bell’s palsy – 291% increase

Congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase

Female infertility – 471% increase

Pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I had my suspicions about mercury and shit in vaccines but hadn't really done much of a research dive before covid. Pre covid I wouldn't have labeled myself 'anti vax'.

The scientists that did this study should expand the sample size and tested all 33 lots distributed to the American populace. Even then animal studies are only a first step towards safety. All vaccines with mass distribution should have years of human trials; fuck 'emergency' authorization protocols. .001 percent death is not an 'emergency' either.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The feminization of society is evident when our reaction to a short-term, relatively mild virus that we have the means to treat rather easily is so extreme. For hundreds of years an illness with a near-100% mortality rate ravaged Europe and caused untold damage to the planet and our ancestors, who had practically no recourse against it, and yet they carried on with politics, wars, and stunning feats of engineering we admire still to this day.

[–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890623821000800

Take note that the lead author of this study, Christopher J. Bowman, is a research fellow at Pfizer. So are several of the other authors of this study (Sarah N. Campion, Gregg D. Cappon, Natasha R. Catlin, etc). There is reason to believe that they may not be reporting objectively on the safety of the Pfizer vaccines.

Also note that Pfizers own animal tests (which they tried to conceal from the public) demonstrated that the lipid nanoparticles do not stay in the injection site, but instead travel all throughout the body.

It's over vax bros like me, SNS, Nombre, and JamesRocket. Our cope dies here.

...WTF?

O_o

[–]Nombre27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know this is an animal study right? Only looked at female rats, not males.

Variable Control (saline) BNT162b2 CRL-Lyon HC Mean (min–max)a
Pre-implantation loss (%) 4.09 ± 6.56 9.77 ± 8.09* 8.4 (1.4–16.2)

The injected group had greater pre-implantation loss, image of source.

Based on this, pre-implantation loss is the difference between the number of released oocytes and the number of conceptuses reaching the state of implantations

Authors explanation:

Although the mean percentage pre-implantation loss (difference between number of corpora lutea [CL] and implantation sites divided by CL) was statistically (p < 0.05) higher in the BNT162b2 group (9.77 % compared with 4.09 % in the control group), the value was within the historical control data range (1.4–16.2 %) and likely due to the numerically higher number of CL in the BNT162b2 group (14.7 and 15.5 CL in the control and BNT162b2 groups, respectively).

So the difference of 0.8 corpora lutea resulted in twice as much failed conceptions. Lol, sure scientist.

I'm not sure how this is a valid conclusion to come to from an animal experiment:

Together with the safety profile in nonpregnant people, this ICH-compliant nonclinical safety data supports study of BNT162b2 in women of childbearing potential and pregnant and lactating women.

Previous data showed a high percentage of miscarriage, although the authors follow-up response says it was typical for the general population but there's questions that need answering regarding the pattern and disparity between the initial group data was collected from and the follow-up group:

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2113516

They reported that among 827 participants with a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in spontaneous abortion by week 20 in 104 (12.6%), and the authors indicated that this proportion was similar to that in the general population. This calculated metric is misleading and does not reflect the real risk of spontaneous abortion.

As stated in the article, among the 827 participants with a completed pregnancy, 700 received their first eligible vaccine dose in the third trimester. These participants should be excluded from the calculation because they had already passed week 20 when they received the vaccination. The risk of spontaneous abortion should be determined on the basis of the group of participants who received the vaccination before week 20 and were followed through week 20 or had an earlier pregnancy loss.

There's questions to be asked from this, e.g. same lots? dose? administrator of injection? Seems odd that such a relatively high percentage of the initial group that they had data for had as many miscarriages as they did within the data collection period for that group and then that trend disappeared from the subsequent group that they followed up on to collect data from. How does the miscarriage rate go from over 80% for one period of data collection to ~14% for the follow-up? That seems like a significant outlier worth investigating.

I think it stands to reason that the data initially collected and analyzed was for women that were injected within a closer time frame of one another and that the follow-up data would have been for women injected later, otherwise the data should have been available within the same timeframe. It wouldn't make sense to not have data for women that were injected around the same time. So why the disparity in miscarriage percentage?

[–]sylla94 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i don't take cuz needle hurty

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

However, I'm still not going to take the vax

Not as if it matters. I was pro-vax during the delta variant when the vaccine still helped mitigate bad scenarios, now like whatever, it won't even protect you that much (only for two-three weeks after the effects kick in, which is a week or two), it's a vaccine for radically different virus, and they're not updating it.

If you want to avoid covid, N99s are a way to go.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There is even evidence to suggest that the early effectiveness of the vaccines is due to a data manipulation trick whereby they push vaccinated cases forward 1-2 weeks while updating vaccinated populations in real time. During a surge, this creates a smaller top of the fraction and a bigger bottom of the fraction (cases divided by population).
I have evidence for this in danish data that I have gone over myself and that I can confirm with 100% absolute certainty (although I do not know if this was done intentionally or if they're just following a standard procedure that everyone uses that creates this effect in the data).

Just to show how stupid this is; for the past 3 months, 100% of the cases have been vaccinated people, some weeks more than 100% ! Yes, you know things are funky when the numbers reach more than 100%, but the funkiness is merely a result of the data manipulation. And obviously the officials or media are not showing vaccinated / unvaccinated numbers now, like they do during the surges.

[–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I recall a good article showing just that, I'll link it if I can find it. They basically made the 2 week cut-off and defined that as still being "unvaccinated" so that they could conflate data from groups that they shouldn't have, i.e. injected but within 2 weeks and completely uninjected. There's literally no reason to do that, especially considering the acute immune response of vaccination.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No adverse effects of BNT162b2 on female rat fertility or reproduction.

Um