all 9 comments

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Crying out in pain as he strikes you.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

[–]NeoRail 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are not really trying to justify anything, it is just a cynical tactic.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're mental children. What did you expect?

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Leftists, especially liberal/anarchist types, have a very strong in-group bias. They promote nebulous values like "free speech" and whatever particulars their specific offshoot of the ideology espouses, but common amongst them is that they conveniently fail to mention that such values and doctrines are only ever applied selectively. For example, the "free speech" and "respect" that liberals kvetch about constantly are specifically never afforded to those who disagree with them (even including liberals who fail to toe the ever-moving line), or in the case of commies, how their hatred of the rich and plans to murder landowners and the like never apply to them in their multi-million dollar mansions.

Of course, they have nonsensical justifications for this behavior, such as in the former case, pundits and politicians claiming that because ideas that oppose theirs are an "issue of human rights" or that their opponents "pose a threat to democracy as a whole", they are free to silence, imprison, or eventually eradicate their opponents, and in the latter case, subhuman bottom-feeders like Vaush and Hasan Piker justify their degenerate and ill-obtained affluence with empty copium like "no ethical consumption under capitalism", implying that because capitalism is bad, they can do all the exploiting, wealth hoarding, and other actions they insist should be punished by death without consequence.

TL;DR: It's all copium and circlejerking, and they do it solely to convince normies to give them money and support.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

a very strong in-group bias.

Indeed. But since the way they define the in-group involves nothing obviously ascriptive and immutable—in the way that our in-group is far more clearly defined; after all, a high level of European ancestry is a purely ascriptive characteristic, though there are also partly ideational components such as being of non-degenerate character—and is largely about the set of beliefs to which one subscribes, it is hard to see how they go about exercising in-group preference in practice. After all, no one has a sign on his head saying: 'I'm a Leftist; ergo, I'm on your side.' It is hard to tell whether what seems like Left-wing in-group preference is actually genuine or simply the result of many individuals understanding that they need to work together to achieve individual, rather than group, ends. In the latter scenario, they will of course cease having such an in-group preference in the event that it benefits their individual self-interest to do so.

And this leads to my second point: indeed, much of what Leftists stand for seem suspiciously like rationalizations for their flagrant and ever-growing degeneracy and parasitism. For example, 'tolerance' only ever means, in practice, tolerance of degeneracy: tolerance of fags, trannies, trans kids, &c. For I have never seen these people call for tolerance of something that was not considered, quite rightly, by the overwhelming majority of our ancestors as absolutely evil and stark raving mad. Indeed, many of them would have seen today's idiots as under something akin to demonic possession, and thus worthy only of eradication.

This is one reason for which I have always been wary of self-proclaimed socialists: the overwhelming majority of them subscribe to this ideology only because they have some kind of degenerate motivation for doing so, in particular, a destructive ressentiment, an urge to tear down everyone and everything that reminds one of one's own inferiority. And so no form of socialism that motivates its followers through appeals to such things as the fulfillment of the self-interests that a counter-productive bottom-feeder might derive from a radical implementation of equality, or the psychological comfort that one might derive from seeing those who remind him of his own inferiority destroyed, should ever be taken seriously, let alone as something even remotely capable of improving the state of the race or of Man more generally.

That is, of course, the type of socialist that permeates the comment sections of Vaush: those useless eaters who often confess to being 'neurodivergent', 'trans', 'furries' and so forth. Their brand of socialism would improve nothing: it is merely motivated by such things as the perpetual fear that the host will one day seek to expel the parasite from within himself. In this event, the Vaushists would simply die off, and even they are not stupid enough so as not to know that deep inside. They are, in that regard, smarter than their host.

Destiny, Vaush and Hasan Piker are the first three of these useless eaters that come to mind. All three combine numerous forms of degeneracy, and consequent of it, they attract others of their kind, all of whom are so twisted and far gone so as to see degeneracy as virtuous and the degenerate as brave and courageous.

As an aside, I remember you claiming that you felt worse after taking those vaccines, and not having forgotten this, I should add that I sincerely hope that you are remaining in good health.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All very well put. Leftists and their ilk promote policies mostly to maintain and expand their access to degeneracy to consoom. Much of the leftist dogma is built on doublethink and copium. "Rules for thee but nor for me" could describe half or more of leftist positions and "unachievable pie in the sky" could handily describe the remainder, the latter being the carrot that draws the lazy and degenerate to keep pushing the former.

Unfortunately, Degeneracy seems to be an entropic societal force; Degeneracy seeps into the cracks, gets the ball rolling on the downfall of the society, and unless immediate action is taken, the exponential decline is ridden by these parasites and allows them to expand their influence.

As an aside, I remember you claiming that you felt worse after taking those vaccines, and not having forgotten this, I should add that I sincerely hope that you are remaining in good health.

Thank you for your concern, I think I overreacted a bit at first, while I do still hold that I think the vaccines had an adverse effect, I don't think (as far as I can tell so far, anyway) there has been any long-term damage and many of the issues I was having I have now found are either possibly tied to other factors or were not as bad as I first assumed.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My opinion? Sensationalism sells. Especially with events that have taken place the past decade like Covid or the Jan 6th riot.

It all comes down to wanting to feel validated and strong arming the media to support their causes.

So they look at a story of say "12 White guys walk into a grocery with guns" and use that as proof as "See? We're not doing enough to stop White Supremacy. Now give us more money to handle it".

If it weren't for social media, these people would have returned to their basements, since no one would listen to them or give them a platform.

[–]Nasser 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/y9yg9y/canada_bans_new_handgun_sales_in_latest_gun/it8obdz/

Another thing these worthless,ignorant, pieces of shit do - Asserting ignorant, anti White, bullshit talking points into any subject.