Almost All Scientific Fraud In Psychology Backs Up Leftist Dogmas - Ed Dutton

submitted by cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist from self.debatealtright

Link. Skip to 5:00 to get past intro/ads

Studies that support theories concerning Steroetype Threat, the efficacy of bias training, that tribal allgiances can be made over trivial things, "multiple intelligences", and general pro-environmentarian anti-hereditarian dogmas etc are all fraught with fraud and bias, and/or do not replicate

Reasons why leftist academics lie to support these things are probably explained by aspects of liberal personality - notably high nueroticism, narcissism, and lower self-esteem, as well as the different moral foundations they hold compared to conservatives

all 4 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I saw that one, but didn't think much of it. Basically, certain academics are willing to write convincing but false studies in order to promote their worldview. For example, Stephen Breuning claimed that IQ could be raised by dozens of points by changing one's environment—naturally something Left-liberals wish was true—but practically all of the data he provided as evidence was fabricated. He got away with this from around 1978 to 1983. In 1983 he was found out, and yet strangely his 'work' is still being cited today.

More importantly than this video, Keith Woods' latest video on the harmful effects of 'diversity' was the most productive one I've seen recently, mostly because it brings to attention several academic papers that were heretofore largely unknown to us. He clearly did his research.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't believe in that chart. Liberals care about fairness? Not a chance. If they did, the number one conservative meme wouldn't be to display hypocrisy.

Conservatives care about fairness, liberals don't. I'd say the chart is supposed to be the exact opposite.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think "fairness" in that study is more meant as "equality." Like "social outcomes must be fair (equal)" though I'm not sure

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes but they do not want equality, as in equity.

Ask them if they want equity in any place where whites or men are disadvantaged, and they'll laugh at you for even asking such a stupid question.

Whites pay the vast majority of taxes yet get disproportionately fewer benefits from the state. Is this equity? No. Will they make race based taxes in favor of whites? No.

Because they do not care at all about equality or even equity. What they care about is hurting white people.