all 9 comments

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

These are not new arguments, they've been rebutted in that thread and elsewhere. Weavils knows that the Holocaust claims are ridiculous. That's not the point. From MK:

The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.

[–]Nasser[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Were are they refuted? In both threads, he has the final word with no rebuttal from the other users.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The burden of proof lies in the person(s) asserting an event happened. Holocaustians fail miserably at that. The revisionists only need to prove falsification is occurring and the entire holocaust narrative comes unraveled. David Irving famously pointed out that there's really only like 11 holocaust historians and they quote circle themselves and they have infinite support by corporate, government and legal teams with endless money when they are questioned.

The root of the holohoax argument is this: Hitler put Jews in black box political camps that nobody knew what was going on in and since he's such a bad person and since our totally honest Jewish people say he tortured and gassed them relentlessly then everyone needs to accept that's what happened. If you demand evidence you hate Jews and need to be harassed until you change your mind or have your life destroyed. Don't see the problem here? If you're wavering on the holocaust being a hoax just sit with some of Eric Hunt's documentaries that walk you through the mountains of bullshit.

If you think about it the entire holocaust event is like a rape hoax case. Just believe the women; she obviously has no incentive to lie! There's a reason that anglo society held courts and hard evidence up so high. They were trying to prevent all of these historical grievance tricks.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Belief in the Holocaust is not based on scientific fact; arguing with weavils proves pointless because his views are unfalsifiable.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is your counters or rebuttals to them?

My only rebuttal is why does The Holocaust get so much attention?

Removing Hitler didn't magically stop all the other homicides that took place after 1945. In fact, we still live in a very violent world, with the threat of nuclear weapons bringing about more destruction than anything Hitler could have ever dreamed of.

It's such a non-issue today if someone denies it. Anyone possibly involved is already dead or withering away in a Nursing Home.

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Nasser....tell us what YOU think actually happened regarding the Holocaust.

[–]Nasser[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think the Holocaust happened, however I don't believe in it's usage as a weapon to demonize White advocacy nor do I care if it's a justification for anti White actions Jews are massively involved in.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There is a tape of Himmler discussing the holocaust (Posen speech). Deniers have to either falsify the translation to claim he is not talking about killing them or say it is fake which contradicts one of their other arguments that it didn't happen because there are no documents. If they would fake a video recording why would they not do something even more simple like fake holocaust documents?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)