all 9 comments

[–]Nasser 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Their argument I believe to this is that White demographic decline is occurring but that it isn't being done with implicit intent, or they pull the standard the "race doesn't exist" or "What even is White?" counter arguments.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, but that's what makes the whole thing ridiculous.

They'll claim that "race doesn't exist" but then turn around and say "we need more diversity". And how do you get that diversity? By increasing the amount of non-white immigrants of course!

[–]Fonched 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I see the "half-white people are never counted as white" thing most often, but it only really makes a difference if the majority of non-white population growth comes from interracial relations. Or that even if it goes below 50%, white people may still have institutional power or it's still not quite low.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The levels of parody and lack of self awareness in that article is off the charts:

Scholars have attempted to address subfactors and anticipated results of White demographic decline in relevant societies. The term majority minority has been used to designate an area where a decline, of what are nationally defined as Whites, has resulted in a former majority becoming a minority. Examples of this include parts of the United States and Brazil.[8][9] Other notable concepts include demographer Eric Kaufmann's theory of "Whiteshift", which predicts transforming classifications of Whiteness as mixed-race majorities emerge, and social psychologist Jennifer Richeson's research into racial shift conditions, which outline how White people's hostility to other racial groups increases in proportion to their awareness of a drop in White population share.

Experts in extremism and terrorism have shown national demography in relation to white people to be subject to exploitation by both radical and political right-wing groups, including adherence to conspiracy theories.[10][11] This has also manifested as anti-abortion,[12][13] and anti-immigrant sentiment. Academic evidence indicates that immigration significantly contributes to the maintenance of economies, civic institutions, and population levels of places affected by White demographic decline, such as in the Southern United States.[14]

They acknowledge that Brazil is a former White majority country. How did that go for them?

They also acknowledge that White people turn to extremism when their numbers begin to fall.

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Most non left wing ideology or idea political articles on Wikipedia are written by people who disagree with the things they're writing about.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe, but the article goes out of its way to be disingenuous or downplay certain elements. For example, this animated picture:

White Americans of one race (or alone) from 1960 to 2020. Some changes may be due to changing self-identification patterns rather than demographic changes

I doubt millions of New Yorkers, Californians and Texans all just woke up one day and said "You know what? I'm not White anymore."

[–]Fonched 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When I saw California's graph on Twitter, many were pointing out how it failed to show that there were more white people today in absolute numbers, especially nationwide. But the chart still showed white population growth leveling off (going sub-zero in recent years) and the absolute number showing a slight decline. I don't 100% know about this "more white people today" thing, or when the post-1965 reforms would have truly seen growth in non-white populations.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't care if it's "natural" or being pushed by White enemies (it is), I will fight tooth and nail to stop it. Period. To not is suicide or allowing genocide.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wikipedia is completely anti-White.


One of the most basic lies Wikipedia tells is that it has a neutrality policy - in reality, the policy has glaring flaws. It's frequently used to assert liberal left worldviews as fact, as if they were the neutral statements of truth. On issues including (but not limited to) race and crime, drug legalization, and even religion, Wikipedia presents unbalanced and in some cases outright misleading information. The website has gotten to the point that its own co-founder, Larry Sanger, even wrote an article verbally destroying it.