Why kike puppets deny Human CO2 involvement in rising temperatures

submitted by AntiSemit from self.environment

It's because they want cheap stuff and to be able to consume stuff for free. Kike puppets don't give two fucks if the world burns, it's "just the third world" anyway. The ancestors of kike puppets have trashed their homeland and fled to the US because they were being too much of a kike puppet. Hence they don't give a shit if global temperatures increases to the point of making the planet uninhabitable.

Global Warming Deniers are like Liberals: they deny Human Involvement in Global Warming because of some "natural causes" also playing a part, much like the Liberal denies Kike involvement in fucking up the economy because "bourgeoisie also play a part". Also like liberals, they don't care about the outcome because they believe they are going to some sky-kike heaven, to hell with everything else.

"f(x, y) = 10x + y let's ignore 'y' even though we can't control 'x'. Also I'm going to heaven anyway, fuck this shit" - every kike puppet ever

all 4 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Bridgeheadprod 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It’s because climate change is natural, co2 is natural, and extra co2 means extra green trees. Also, taxing the element that we are made of is not going to change the natural environment. Also, you sound like a moron.

[–]portace 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Extra CO2 doesn't necessarily mean extra trees. Especially where a lot of land is desert, tundra, rocky mountains, etc. You need both water and soil. Then you have humans already occupying a lot of land and farms where plant growth is controlled.

There's a lot of conflicting info with climate change, but it does seem like the media/oligarchs are purposely trying to get the population to panic about it. But that doesn't necessarily mean that an accelerated increase in CO2 may not have some damaging effects.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because the scientific case for human caused climate change is so strong instead of interpreting data we have to trust the scientists and if we disagree we are Jewish big oil shills or Russians.

[–]SeethingPeasant 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The climate hoax is just that, a hoax. The whole model is built around the idea of climate change. The idea is "we have a solution we want to force on everyone, we just need a problem." Or the Chem trails are working. Chem trails are designed for 2 goals, 1. Recreate cloud cover from volcanos to reflect sunlight and cool the planet, 2. Depopulation. So you have to chose, either climate change is a myth or chemtrails are real. There is a lot of science that prove chemtrails are real, and even more science proving climate change is a myth, which means that chemtrails are really for depopulation.