all 31 comments

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Now you tell me. If you'd told me before I posted I could have actually made it funny and maybe even meme-like.

    [–]zyxzevn 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    The message that you are writing here is not so clear and maybe too long?

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 7 fun2 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes. And not funny. I'd like to say I was drunk meme-ing but I wasn't, though I was/am tired today.

    I might fire my staff of writers. Don't tell them yet.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Even if someone who is not a Zionist wins the election, wouldn't they have to become into a Zionist when they are president?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I think so, yes. You're a zionist - OR ELSE.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I'm not expecting any protest-vote to actually win, but maybe after several elections if enough people protest-vote - maybe something will change - if nothing else, the general consciousness.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes, that is what I've been encouraging those around me to do as well. No hope of winning, and the drones drone on: But we're diluting the vote! What if the greater evil wins? I'd rather vote for the lesser evil than risk the greater evil winning because I voted in a way that couldn't win. When enough people are ready to vote for a candidate that is truly promising, I'll make the switch, I promise.

    This has been ongoing for DECADES. At least here in Canuckistan.

    It boils down to: It's gotta start somewhere. The earlier the better.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    It all boils down to individuality: people don't have enough. They are too primitively tribal. That's right. They IDENTIFY as either Republican or Democrat, and this US vs THEM mentality is at the core of their being. Moreover, US citizens even DEFINE being a US citizen as being EITHER Democrat or Republican. Not all of them, but certainly enough of them.

    Then you have the ego's psychology, which has a stake in being RIGHT, and in being part of the group that is right. Proving yourself right serves no actual purpose: it simply negates the objectiveness of actual reality, in favor of a subjective impression and feeling of power, of being 'right' even if the consequences of this being 'right' and the processes leading up to that and which follow that are all destructive.

    In other words, the primitive, tribal part of the ego's psychology puts more value into being 'right' through voting for 'their' party and also WINNING than in the actual state of the nation or 'doing good'. Until that part is expunged and destroyed, this will keep happening. And TPTSNB know this full well, so they do their utmost to brainwash the masses into being tribal, primitive and self-righteous.

    Eventually, they'll learn. Maybe only after the Earth is an actual wasteland, who knows.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Insightful and sadly true.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Careful, or you will start having to consider that psience might be something to look into. ;-)

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Maybe. I could say all that without psience. (Still exceptionally awful branding.)

    I'm up to 320+ messages backlogged now. I should respond to them instead of making memes and posting current events. I know you wrote some long ones there. I don't mean to ignore them, but I start at the recent ones and try to get through them, but every day adds one or few.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Oh yeah, this is not even scratching the surface. Psience allows one to actually, permanently and verifiably remove conditioning, and it's the only thing that can do that. Moreover, all its results are fully reproductible, which is a crucial characteristic, if not the only one, of true science. Removing conditioning means being able to destroy the unwanted instinctual leftovers from primitive, animal proto-humans that really have no place in modern life. And that's just scratching the surface.

    [–]galaxybrain 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    You vote for someone other than Trump, Biden wins. It doesn't matter whether Trump is the best person for the job, the important thing is to realise that you're playing a game according to rules you can't control. Fighting it doesn't result in winning.

    This post is almost psy-ops level trash in itself.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    How's your Lock Step Lockdown going for you? Still got a job? Still got a food supply? Got bailed out because you're rich? Safe from riots behind your gates? Good for you!

    Trump's "leadership" has failed on almost every level. Biden will be no different.

    More of the same is coming, but worse, regardless.

    [–]Uncle-Ruckus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    From the look of it, it appears this whole ‘meme’ is just an attempt at a clever disguise in order to get people to not vote Trump. From the stupid Trump face in the picture to you rattling on about Trumps failures above, and your overly long text in your shit tier meme that is purely to push a political agenda. We can wait til 2024 to try and change the system, it is not going to happen this election. Wait til there is two new candidates who need picked by the Dems/Repubs.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    From the look of it you completely misunderstand.

    There is no good option. Both candidates are evil and corrupt and serve only business interests. NO ONE SERVES THE PEOPLE.

    To be crystal clear - the agenda I'm pushing is to reject the duopoly.

    Fuck the left and fuck the right.

    Go another way.

    [–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    Direct democracy is better.

    [–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Nah. That's just mob rules. My collective is bigger than your collective. We vote to put you in the oven. You go in the oven.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    You have zero idea what direct democracy is, right? You obviously haven't studied the topic AT ALL. Please inform yourself before posting nonsense, it doesn't make you look good.

    Start with just a tiny drop of education for yourself. You can thank me and apologize after.

    https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/5p4t/what_is_direct_democracy_here_is_how_the_swiss_do/

    Unless your argument is that all democracy is "mob rule" and that we should get rid of it because of that. So which is it?

    [–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    How is it "direct" democracy when you have a "representative" parliament? Switzerland has partial direct democracy like in other western countries that have referendums on things. Actual direct democracy in the US would be a disaster which is I guess what you want.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    It's DIRECT because the people can veto any bill and require anything to be legislated for. How do you achieve that in the totalitarian states of america.

    [–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    By helicoptering clowns like you to Cuba so you can make your magic utopia without us.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Illogical leap.

    Direct democracy is better, among many alternative solutions (ie. ranked choice voting). But they won't allow that. "If voting were effective they'd make it illegal." In this case they won't allow voting to become effective and then they don't need to make it illegal. There are already over 40 ways to rig the vote.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Nice article, nice idea, but IMO it's impractical without access to the MSM.

    For years I've been saying a triumvirate would be better forced to reach consensus on issues among the 3, nothing proceeds without consensus. Maybe more, up to 8 would be even better, though slower. Consensus means all agree completely, rather than a majority.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumvirate

    8 was the ideal project team number, according to studies about projects and problem solving - according to a video I saw about solving puzzle rooms. I don't know if it actually would apply to politics, but more than 8 and it gets confusing and/or political and less than 8 is not as many diverse creative minds. Also, in the team of 8 someone would be given the task of managing/wrangling the information - thus leaving 7, an odd number if voting was necessary.

    [–]SmallPP 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Haha

    [–]at_finn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Nah...fuck that shit. Sounds like a good way to allow the marxists to take complete control of this country. I will proudly vote for Trump again.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    You mean commies. If Marxists had their way people would not confuse them for commies.

    Voting for Trump is a vote for Zionists - who also control the commies. You're playing right into the left-right bullshit paradigm.

    [–]suckitreddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Trump did a lot of good things. Was he perfect? No. But nobody is. He certainly did a better job than Barack Obama, and George W. Bush. He didn't start, or continue any wars. He took away unneeded regulations, and also he stimulated the economy. He also increased individual rights, like when he allowed terminally ill patients to try drugs in testing, and I believe he made it legal to use CBD oil.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Name anything Trump did that was good. I can assure you there were nefarious motives.

    Obama was a wolf in sheep's clothing. Trump is a wolf in blowhards' clothing. Bush is an idiot in wolf's clothing. They are all scum.

    "He also increased individual rights."

    Fucking absurd.

    "he allowed terminally ill patients to try drugs in testing"

    It's hardly a right for a small minority of desperate people. Try improving things for the masses and then I'll be impressed.

    "he made it legal to use CBD oil"

    True but hardly a major step in the idiotic and illegitimate drug war. This hardly makes up for complete collapse of America and 10 million people being kicked out August 1st for a crisis they didn't manufacture. While cities burned he did nothing. The guy is a failure of a leader and on every level Machiavellian.

    [–]Uncle-Ruckus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    VA Act, First Step Act, made animal cruelty a federal felony, MS13 crackdown, record low unemployment (before COVID)... There plenty of good, whether he had other motives, he has done. However the media doesnt like to cover that very often. Not that he is a shining example of a president.