all 27 comments

[–]Vulptex 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

I don't get it

[–]Musky 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The idea is that the woman is slutting around and making herself undesirable to her future husband.

Imo you really don't want to be someone's first and only, they always wonder what it will be like with someone else. Although I also understand not wanting the town bicycle.

[–]ihaveyourdress 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As opposed to the very real memories and pair bonding she will have from being with other men?

[–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Believe me, I understand the pain of having to share someone you love, particularly when the other guys were kind of pieces of shit, and even after they're long gone the memories will be there forever. It's not a great feeling.

But I've seen the other side of it, show me a woman who has only ever had one partner and I'll show you a woman who thinks about what it would be like with other men. At least in the first case, the woman picked you and not those other guys. They're real and have faults and their thing already didn't work out. She knows what else is out there already, doesn't need to wonder. But a fantasy of other men, you can't compete with that. And unrequited desires have a way of growing.

I think the lesser of two evils is to accept the woman has a past rather than to know she's going to always wonder what it could have been like with another man. Wonder if it could be better. That sort of thing can leave a woman vulnerable to temptation.

Men can sow their wild oats too, same thing happens when you've only ever been with one woman.

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Women practicing hedonism by racking up a high body count are ruining their chances of finding a husband.

[–]J_Hard_R_Tolkien 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Burning out their oxytocin receptors riding the cock carousel so they can't bond with their husband and children.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Really? I don't think it matters to most men now that we know how to make sure the babies will be his. Which is a dumb concern, but it is what it is.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

DNA tests to establish paternity are illegal in many jurisdictions.

I'm guessing you didn't know that until I just told you?

Moreover women with a high body count are going to have big problems with pair bonding with a man. It's a series of brain chemical reactions which are just not going to happen.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not how the woman in the comic felt about it. If you're right then the comic is wrong.

[–]Bonn1770 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

So many newfags here.

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Interestingly lesbians and bi women screw around far more than straight women. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/oct/24/3

This is because really most straight women know full well a high body count will work against them and so act accordingly.

Most of those nice middle class pro-sex feminists have very boring sex lives themselves. The trouble is they convinced poor, less smart women to live the lifestyle they don't have the guts to live.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was the plan all along. Let them be the sluts while they reinforce the patriarchy.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Why does she worry about a lost marriage, but not him?

Do only women get married these days? In which case shouldn't it be another woman she missed out on?

This comic makes no sense.

[–]LordoftheFlies 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The comic's rationale is founded on elements of Red Pill thinking, the gist of which is that today's party girl with her choice of temporary bedwarmers is tomorrow's lonely, wine-swilling catmom, while today's friendzone sucker is tomorrow's good man with his choice of permanent partners.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

A lot of men WILL NOT touch a woman who isn't a pure virgin. In contrast a lot of women are turned off by a man who hasn't had sexual success in the past.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Proof?

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I don't know, maybe how every single culture in history was extremely prudish about female sex and banned polyandry, but polygyny was perfectly acceptable? How society used to put such a high value on female virginity? Men have always refused to fuck women who've fucked other men before. So much that ancient societies devised rituals to make a woman prove her virginity to a man before he would marry her. The reason is they wanted to keep track of bloodlines. A woman can always be sure that her child is hers, but before DNA tests a man could not. I can't fathom why that's such a big deal but it is.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I don't know,

I don't know either, but it sounds like bullshit to me.

how every single culture in history was extremely prudish about female sex and banned polyandry

It's more common. But it's not every single culture. Tibetan culture, for instance was ploygymous and polyandrous.

Men have always refused to fuck women who've fucked other men before.

I don't recall ever doing that. Or even thinking to ask.

So much that ancient societies devised rituals to make a woman prove her virginity to a man before he would marry her.

Makes some sense in ancient societies when you didn't have birth control or antibiotics. Of course their "proof" was based on the untrue claim that all women bleed on their first time because the hymen is torn. But the cartoon above is set in the modern world. I don't believe any of this proof is required now.

The reason is they wanted to keep track of bloodlines.

Probably not. The reason is they didn't want to die of syphilis. If the problem was bloodlines it would matter not at all what she did before marriage, and only what she did after.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

In the modern world our instincts are still millenia behind. A man doesn't always know why a woman being a virgin is so important to him, he just has the very strong feeling that he should be the only man who's ever touched her. It's just a part of their sexuality.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Nah, I've never thought that.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not every man does, but a lot do.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I doubt it.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Just look on this site if you don't believe me. And literally all of history.

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Reddit soydrones love to bitch about this one.

It is interesting to look at the philosophical roots of the idea that consent is all-encompassing. They seldom get questioned, or even mentioned.

[–]LordoftheFlies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reddit soydrones love to bitch about this one.

Oh, they'll go after anything from Stonetoss, it's not just this one.

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The man who would've married you if you went such a whore.