Government then and now

submitted by [deleted] from i.imgur.com

all 30 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like the meme. And it makes a valid point.

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please don't take my previous comment as me not liking it, I fucking LOVE it.

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Why are you mixing fantasy characters with the news though.

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Musky 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    Another Socks alt.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    Who’s socks? Man socks is tweaking.

    [–]Musky 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    u/twignberries is the latest one I see. Think he's running at least 3 now.

    [–][deleted]  (6 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

      I noticed it as soon as you started posting on it. I only out you when I feel it becomes relevant.

      [–][deleted]  (4 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Musky 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        So what does it matter when I point out new accounts of yours?

        why u so mad bro?

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        This is so funny.

        But it’s almost like everyone is socks.

        Like sock is in the wind.

        I enjoy how mean and agressive he is. It’s like in a comical way. It’s like, a bit of Reddit made it here.

        [–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

        Antivaxers in 2021: it's a eugenics operation to give you a third cyber DNA helix which resonates with 5G to kill the free thinkers

        Antivaxers in 2023: actually our only problem with the vaccine was the requirements for healthcare workers

        [–]Musky 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

        the requirements for healthcare workers

        Are you claiming it was just healthcare workers?

        [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

        Depends on state.

        Doesn't matter though, because the antivaxer concerns were about the cyber helix, nanobots and 5G. Antivaxers were absolutely not saying 'okay sure it's net-harmless and effective but I don't like how in some states the mandates will go beyond healthcare workers, so ill refuse to take it out of solidarity with my nurse friends'

        [–]Musky 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

        That's disingenuous to lump people who were rightly concerned with the covid shot with fringe elements in order to discredit them. Right up there with demonizing ivermectin as horse dewormer.

        I don't like how in some states the mandates will go beyond healthcare workers, so ill refuse to take it out of solidarity with my nurse friends'

        Funny that, when half of the medical professionals didn't want something, you think the appropriate solution was to force their hands.

        Since the covid vaccine does not stop the spread there was no benefit to forcing healthcare workers to get the covid shot in the first place. It doesn't improve recovery times, so there's no argument to be made for keeping the medical industry healthy and able to serve. And hospitalizations were less than 1% so there's no argument there either.

        Past time to admit this was a boondoggle, so we don't repeat the pandemic mistakes.

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        Exactly. You nail this point.

        The vaccine has kill or maimed thousand of people. And COVID was not as harmful as as the said.

        [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        Wow so you think covid killed less than a thousand people? That's what you're saying here. Is that what you believe?

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        It’s like you are a parody account.

        [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Didn't you just say exactly that tho?

        The vaccine has kill or maimed thousand of people. And COVID was not as harmful as as the said.

        Ergo covid killed less than "thousand of people".

        Isn't that exactly what you said?

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        😔

        Ur such a such a disappointment.

        [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Well said. Clearly the pharma companies got a hold of government and media, and used these untested experimental shots as a source of profit, bolstered by the fear from covid. And now some percentage of people are damaged long-term from the shots.

        The gaslighting around this issue is unreal (and probably paid for by pharma to occur in the media, including internet comments). But we saw what happened. We remember.

        And like you said, humanity as a whole just made a huge mistake and we must learn from our mistakes so we don't repeat them.

        [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Well, hold on, because arent you doing some gaslighting of your own here.

        Let's try and lay out what you allege here

        1. The pharma companies needed a source of profit

        2. So they had untested shots

        3. And they used government and media to help create a revenue stream.

        That's the extent of the alleged conspiracy.

        What's not in this list? Anything blaringly obvious in its absence?

        • the extent of the conspiracy was us pharma companies selling untested vaccines

        • the conspiracy wasn't about a great reset

        • the conspiracy wasn't about eugenics

        • the conspiracy wasn't about a manufactured virus

        • it wasn't about an indefinite lockdown to imprison Americans in a new jade helm or whatever

        • there isn't a vaccine app on your phone that you have to show anywhere in 2023

        So let's be very clear: If anyone thought that any of these things were true, then they were misled and fooled, because the extent of the conspiracy was a functional but possibly not fully tested vaccine that got America and the world back on track, net-harmlessly.

        So if anyone has comments in their history claiming that anything beyond pharma profit lines were happening - then they need to go and think about why they were so incorrect and misled two years ago.

        Wouldn't want to gaslight anyone, would we

        [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        disingenuous to lump people

        OP allowed himself to conflate two imaginary opinions, so I am allowed to, too.

        when half of the medical professionals didn't want something

        That's a lie

        the appropriate solution

        Is to let Typhoid Mary work in the old peoples' home?

        covid vaccine does not stop the spread

        Another lie

        no benefit to forcing healthcare workers to get the covid shot

        Another lie

        so there's no argument to be made

        Another lie

        And hospitalizations were less than 1% so there's no argument there either.

        Less than one percent of what, dipshit? Of eight billion. All in hospital. During a single epidemic.

        Past time to admit this was a boondoggle, so we don't repeat the pandemic mistakes.

        Huh? Whuh-? Sorry - what? Vaccinating humans against corona viruses was....a boon what? Because....it's a boondoggle because (let's list the things which the OP meme thinks are the problems in 2023)

        1. The "government" mischaracterises what "it" said in 2021

        Just one item on the list, huh. Well what's not on the list? Let's list things which dipshits were wrong about

        1 I didn't get a third DNA strand

        2 it wasn't a eugenics operation

        3 five gee six gee seven

        4 actually it was just a normal scientific above board operation that was carried out pretty well and saidit was wrong to think anything not-above-board was happening

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        People who did not get the vaccine did not say it it gave anyone a third helix. They said it’s gene therapy. It’s untested. Don’t let a bunch of idiots change your dna.

        They said the kitchen sink method worked fine to stop COVID, and it still does.

        They said the government made the virus.

        Etc.

        You are making stuff up.

        [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        First of all, if you want to bet that 0% of self identified antivaxers thought it caused a third DNA helix - then I will confidently take that bet. What's your stake my friend? Let's play for money because I am incredibly confident on this one.

        Other self-id antivaxers absolutely thought it would cause your brainwaves to resonate with 5G and if you want to bet on that one, I am just as confident of winning.

        Still other morons thought equally moron things. And they were all wrong. Actually the only morons who turned out to be correct were the ones who thought that it was a pretty decent, above board, rationally sound, miracle of bio engineering.

        Everyone who thought it wasn't the above board pretty decent job was wrong and op's meme proves it. Because the #1 problem that OP has, is that he things the "government" mischaracterises what "it" said during the pandemic. Not carbon nanobots

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        I don’t know how you do this. But it’s amazing. I applaud you.

        [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Isn't this the parody statement?

        People who did not get the vaccine did not say it it gave anyone a third helix.

        So are you willing to bet on it, or are you going to walk this back?

        You admit this is fake right? Or shall we call it fifty bucks?

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        CNN said it.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [removed]

          [–]Megatron95 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          Fuck off!!!

          [–]LordoftheFlies 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Look Pajeet, if we were interested in throwing our money at a worthless Internet lie, we'd sign up for some e-slut's OF page and at least get some bobs and vagene to enjoy for our trouble. So unless your credit score scam can offer that, fuck off.