you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

He was practicing his sad face. Yes, the media were in on it and he knew that. Maybe he missed that this was live or whatever, and thought they would cut it later. Through total control of the MSM, the public won't awaken no matter how big the blunders are (cf. WTC-7), so they became sloppy.

[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The media are in on it?... Okay, that's enough for me. Again, I really encourage you to sit down and consider how many people, institutions and bystanders need to be 100% on board, controlled and willing to participate for what you're describing to work. Not a single whistle blower or moral individual coming forward to expose such a huge, multi-group conspiracy. Give it a little try.

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, it's called Operation Mockingbird, look it up. That's been running since the late '40s and only became known through the Church hearings in the '70s. If it's impossible for any large-scale conspiracy to not have whistleblowers, then how do you explain that?

[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's a pretty massive difference between: "The CIA has cultivated relationships with members of the press" in an alleged operation of propaganda and *"We totally controlled all the press, the local hospitals, the local school and installed several members of the local community for years in preparation for a fake school shooting to push an agenda".

You gotta take a break from the internet, my brother.