top 100 commentsshow all 129

[–]trident765 18 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

It's like burning a Holocaust museum because it documents hate.

[–][deleted]  (10 children)


    [–][deleted]  (6 children)


      [–]369 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

      That's a big nose you have there.

      [–]Tarrock 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      Why would you have wooden doors on the gas chambers? Wood does not keep gas in. You'd think that'd be important when you put the ovens right outside the chambers, especially seeing as Zyklon-B is explosive when exposed to fire.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)


        [–]Tarrock 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Isn't it weird how the chimney that they love showing off was built by the Soviets in 1947, after the holocaust?

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)


          [–]bjam27 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

          Go AWAY Nazi trash

          [–]wristaction 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Your grandma was never a lampshade.

          [–]wristaction 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

          More like using the 'no-crawl" metatag in your site's header.

          Weird of you to have it that the ADL is "burning the Holocaust Museum" in your metaphor.

          [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          Your version is reasonable and boring. Op's version more exciting, therefore it must be true.

          [–]bobbobbybob[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          OP checked the site's meta directives. Did you?

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          I said I like your version better.

          [–]bobbobbybob[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          I want to be reasonable, boring AND exciting and right

          [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          I checked the source code, and the page doesn't use the robots meta tag. I also can't find a robots.txt file.

          [–]bobbobbybob[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          no crawl? weird that google indexes the site. Oh, that's right, it doesn't have the no-crawl directive.

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)


            [–]bobbobbybob[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

   is still keeping copies.

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

            But you have to load TOR and click through captchas for five minutes to access it.

            [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

            I had trouble accessing until I installed OpenDNS. Haven't had a problem since.

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            I use DNSCrypt.

            [–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)


            Do you remember when that Russian hacker captured it a few years back? I couldn't access it either, or any of the other .xx sites, then the hackers message popped up one day when yet another person posted that link. The hacker chastised the site owner for poor security and said he'd help him out. Was a funny message, but the guy probably had to pay to get it back. Anyway, I ended up going with OpenDNS too.

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            Oh, so it was just a hack causing my problems?

            [–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            OpenDNS cured my inability to access those sites, so I think it's just some funky settings they're using. I don't know much about it other than it works once I switched.

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            I use DNSCrypt, which is a step further than just changing your DNS.

            [–]bobbobbybob[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            i'm using DNS over HTTP, and cloudflare, google, Is it worth adding others?

            [–]bobbobbybob[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            I don't. that's odd. do you? really? can you capture your network activity when you go there?

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            I don't have admin privileges on my network, so I wouldn't be able to check.

            I tried to open it again and it seems to work now. Hopefully it stays this way, because a couple days ago it wasn't accessible.

            [–]bobbobbybob[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            if you 'inspect' in chrome, you can go to the network tab and watch the process

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Oh, that's what you meant. When I hear "network" I always think of my local network.

            [–]cqtz 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

            Usually when it says that a URL is excluded from the Wayback Machine, it means that the site owner wanted to exclude the site or there was a takedown request. I'm not sure what happened for this particular site though.

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            Someone said it had so'm to do with the robots meta tag, but I checked the source code and didn't find one, and neither could I find a robots.txt file. So the only viable, non-conspiratorial answer I can think of is that they issued a take-down.

            [–]bobbobbybob[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            others can issue a takedown. So a site can be taken off due to others not liking it, a bit like reddit downvoting

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Oh, yeah, like they do on YouTube.

            [–]FreedomUltd 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

            Why aren't we getting into distributed internet? We're acting like we don't want to get out from under corporate rule.

            [–]TyranaSoreWristWreck 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

            I'm game if you are. What the hell does that mean?

            [–]Intuit 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            No central servers; content stored on users' machines. Like torrents, but more suited for quick access of pages.

            [–]shakadevirgem 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            Is this the usenet?

            [–]TyranaSoreWristWreck 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            LOL. "The" Usenet. It's just called Usenet. And that's not what he means. Usenet definitely uses servers.

            [–]Intuit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Usenet is pretty centralized these days. But yeah, good example of the tech already existing, even allowing discussions.

            [–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)


            [–]FreedomUltd 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            I think ZeroNet is a good example. Currently impossible to shut down a site on ZeroNet I believe. Google it, very interesting I think.

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

            Because people don't want to download entire websites just to use them, because it can be quite dangerous with viruses and porn. I used to use ZeroNet, but stopped once I found out that just about every site had a crypto miner.

            [–]FreedomUltd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

            So what's better? Trying to get the corporations to respect our rights?

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

            I prefer the federated model over the distributed and centralized models.

            [–]bobbobbybob[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            maybe because zeronet is really badly designed and puts people off?

            [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            The tech is getting there, but it's not quite there yet

            [–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            They have had a removal process for years and try to respect DMCA or something? It's not a safe site and it probably never has been.

            [–][deleted]  (29 children)


              [–]bobbobbybob[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

              We have wandered into semantics now.

              what does the word 'fascist' mean to you?

              [–][deleted]  (15 children)


                [–]bobbobbybob[S] 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

                don't be a dick.

                I'm trying to establish common ground. That's why I'm asking you what your definition is. To tell me that "i have no idea" what you think it is is redundant. Good debating establishes terms used. Bad faith / leftist debating deliberately refuses to define terms to increase conflict.

                [–][deleted]  (13 children)


                  [–]slushpilot 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                  In addition to what u/bobbobbybob said, it's also said to be about strong labour coordination between corporations and the state... That's why the fascist logo is a bundle of arrows, sometimes a bundle of sticks, because a syndicate is made stronger than its individual parts.

                  Here we are in 2021, with powerful corporations deciding what opinions are allowed, effectively enforcing discretionary rules that the state itself cannot... in the name of political favour. "But it's a private company!" Sure, history doesn't repeat. But it certainly does rhyme, doesn't it.

                  Please, u/789, what is your picture of fascism—because I think we all say we oppose it, so why are you disagreeing?

                  [–]PeddaKondappa 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  The terms "corporation" and "corporatism", as used by fascists, have absolutely nothing to do with the modern capitalist usage. Fascism has its roots in early 20th century national syndicalism, inspired by people like Georges Sorel and Charles Maurras. When fascist writers talk about "corporations" they are talking about labor organizations similar to syndicates or trade unions and not big businesses like those on Wall Street. Fascism is explicitly anti-capitalist as well as anti-communist.

                  The people who are restricting speech in the modern West are not "fascists." They are all liberals who probably believe the same things that you do (but I don't), like gender equality and LGBT rights.

                  [–]bobbobbybob[S] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

                  can you please define terms

                  this website has rules, you know. A pyramid of debate. I'm trying to debate with you, but you seem dead set on just attacking me.

                  Dictionary definition:

                  Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

                  in this case, the ultranationalism has transformed into ultraglobalism. 'far right' has transformed into 'far left', although that was always debatable, the NS party being National Socialist, after all.

                  SO, going by that definition, what I said was fine. Dictatorial power, suppression of opposition, regimented society (under new woke oppression metrics). economy 'reset' to meet new ideals.

                  Which is why I asked you what your view of 'fascism' was. There are many.

                  [–]wristaction 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

                  So, in your worldview, the left doesn't exist; there is only "fascism". For instance, the DMV is "fascism" because it's a government agency and your dad is "fascism" because he wields authority over you and the mechanics at Jiffy Lube are "fascists" because they wear uniforms and serve a corporation.

                  This is the level of Qtardism one might've expected in a thread which confuses FPM's use of the "nocrawl" meta tag for censorship at Wayback.

                  789 gave you a solid counterfactual which addresses your malapropism of "fascist" to fascism's actual existence as a real thing in history and you just kind of ignored it. There is actual fascist theory, actual fascist texts. Why are these banned in this allegedly fascist-run society? You don't need to answer it. It was rhetorical.

                  Do you believe that the left will spare you as a fellow "antifascist" because you spent all this time avoiding correctly identifying them and reifying all of your critiques of abusive power to the term "fascism"?

                  [–]bobbobbybob[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                  So, in your worldview, the left doesn't exist;

                  No. I never said that. Not sure why you've decided to open with a straw man, other than you are a leftist.

                  the DMV is "fascism" because it's a government agency

                  Really? your logic took you there? That's just nonsense. You are literally just spouting unfounded shit and pretending that I said any of it in the first place

                  confuses FPM's use of the "nocrawl" meta tag for censorship at Wayback.

                  You do know that the internet archive will still archive a site with 'nocrawl" if you ask it to? That aside, FPM does not have the nocrawl meta. YOu are literally just talking out of your arse. Why the fuck do leftists think that continually bad faith debating is going to further their cause? it just cements HATRED in the rest of us. When the time comes, and it is coming, there will be no mercy left.

                  789 gave you a solid counterfactual

                  No, they didn't. You are now adding 'gaslighting' to the mix

                  It was rhetorical.

                  It deserves an answer, though. "NAZIS" are held up as an evil bogeyman, painted with atrocity propaganda, in order to destroy any chance of the positive aspects of national socialism being taken on board, especially the ones around financial independence. The bad parts - the overt authoritarianism, social control and nationalism are constantly used as weapons to attack a sensible opposition to the global fascist state. Always blame your enemy for your sins.

                  Do you believe that the left will spare you as a fellow "antifascist"

                  More straw man. But thank you for exposing the heart of the leftist hatred for everyone else. We've been waking up to it, and conversations like this cement the knowledge that you wish to kill us all. Eliminate our voices, never find mutual understanding. I need no one to 'spare' me. Because if you come for me, you will die.

                  That's Trump's legacy. He woke us all up to how much people like you hate us. So the western civilizational methods of communication, conflict resolution, adaptation and compromise simply will not work, as you are a bunch of slimy, underhand, cheating, dishonest and hateful cunts who want to destroy everything good in this world.

                  [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  You said it Walter. Seems to be a lot of that going around.

                  [–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)


                  What is it?

                  [–]bobbobbybob[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                  That is the question. It seems to mean different things to different people, so we end up arguing over a word, rather than the authoritarian, socially constricting, voice silencing takeover of our world by globalist technocrats.

                  Technocracy doesn't have to be ASCVS (fascist) as well.

                  [–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                  Agreed, I was never all that clear on the specifices, but now people just use it for things they don't like, even when their own behavior reflects the worst definitions of 'fascism'. See: antifa

                  [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  The funniest thing I've seen is when a blog compared Klaus Schwab, Netanyahu and the technocrats to the Reichstag fire and Hitler's alleged master race agenda.

                  I mean, maybe read Feder and look into the economic and social policies of NS. One can take from it without the eugenics.

                  [–]EvilNick 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

                  the nazis were leftists

                  [–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

                  What does repeating this nonsense accomplish for you? It must be something like that you don't like it when libruls call conservatives "nazi" and you think you can just "I know you are but what am I no takebacks" at it.

                  [–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                  It annoys fascist Nazi leftists like you retards so I like doing it

                  [–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                  Well, if you aren't really serious about this stuff, who could possibly care whether you're permitted to say it on social media?

                  [–][deleted]  (1 child)


                    [–]wristaction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                    These "fascist overlords" are closely related to the "old rich white men" who control our economic and foreign policy. IRL, they attend the same shul.

                    [–]bobbobbybob[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                    fellow white men. yep

                    [–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

                    Neo-Bolsheviks (Jews, like IA's Brewster Kahle) =/= "Fascists"

                    Dumbest meme conservatives have about censorship is that censorship makes you a Nazi book-burner. Do you have any idea which books the Nazis burned?

                    [–]Bigs 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (24 children)

                    Could you please explain further, as your link explains jack shit? Thanks :)

                    [–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

                    The Nazis burned books written by Jewish transgender advocates and other degenerates. YW :)

                    [–]Bigs 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)


                    Only those?

                    [–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

                    Seriously? This stuff isn't that hard to find dude

                    Better question: What kind of books do you think Nazis wouldve burnt?

                    [–]Bigs 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

                    I looked, and that's why I didn't bother to continue the conversation.

                    They burned all kinds of stuff, and at this point we can't even be sure what was really burnt or if some things are merely claimed to have been. The initial post about 'do you know what kind of books they burned' sounded interesting and like there was a point to it. But nah.

                    [–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

                    that's why I didn't bother to continue the conversation

                    Yet you did anyways

                    like there was a point to it

                    Every time boomercons compare the left's censorship to Nazis they are basically saying "See liberals? We're better liberals than you! Checkmate" ~ t. conservatard

                    It's a completely ineffective tactic and really stupid. The left doesn't care about being hypocritical or abiding by "free speech." The Nazis burnt books promoting the very things conservatives hate - subversive shit like transgenderism, etc. written by mostly Jewish authors. The left (and Jews/Communists) censors things they hate - anything critical of racial egalitarianism, anti-whiteness, degeneracy, or Jews. Theyre not stupid enough to think theyre being "Nazis" and they just laugh when you say dumb shit like that. Stop adopting the left's shitty values and their "anti-nazi" BS. "We're less gnatzeee than you!!" has never worked and never will

                    [–]bobbobbybob[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)


                    The Nazis burnt books about things they hate.

                    Currently, Liberals are banning things they hate

                    The commonality is the control and the hate. What is in and out of hate is fashion, not the underlying ideological disease itself.

                    [–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

                    My point is that likening leftists/Jews to Nazis is an ineffective tactic because it has never worked. Nazis are the opposite of leftists and are what people think of when they see "fascist". It just muddles the actual issue

                    [–]bobbobbybob[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

                    Do you have any idea which books the Nazis burned?

                    Yes, they burnt a whole lot of books on gender, for one thing. What ius your point, other that to throw insults?

                    Fascism is a system. Just because it isn't looking like nazis, doens't mean it isn't fascist. Italy was fascist, too, but with a different flavour. I've already posted a definition and explained why it fits. your simple =/= is just a statement, nothing to back it up. I get that you think it is true, but then you think all sorts of weird shit

                    [–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                    The ADL trying to deplatform Gab is just Jews engaging in censorship to the benefit of Jews and the detriment of whites. You can call that "fascism" if you really want, but its not effective since it's not what 95% of people think of when they hear the word "fascism". Certainly they don't care.

                    I'm saying just name Jews as Jews. This "youre fascister than I am!" has gotten us nowhere.

                    but then you think all sorts of weird shit

                    Like what?

                    Edit: Lol wrong thread my apologies this is about the WaybackMachine - but same logic applies. Guy in charge of IA is Jewish and the ADL is leading the charge to censor the net

                    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)


                    Yes, it's like MeWe. Owned by a Libertarian Jew who bans anyone for calling out Jewish supremacism. But yet he claims MeWe is pro freedom of speech. His also gets interviewed by the BBC now owned by a Jew, and Russian news agencies as well as Amanda Head, and is an admirer of Greenblat.

                    [–][deleted]  (7 children)


                      [–]bobbobbybob[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

                      it is you who have to define. I don't owe you anything.

                      leftist troll detected. You tell me that I don't understand fascism. So I ask you waht you think it is, you refuse. I then define what I think it is, you ignore the definition, and double down.

                      There is plenty of fascist TV. All the TV is pushing the new social order : inclusivity, diversity, representation. All TV pushes the globalist utopia. All tv paints liberals in a good light, silences conservative voices, or makes them evil. All tv supports the technocratic surveillance state.

                      fuck off

                      [–]slushpilot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      Thanks, I see where you're coming from.


                      Yup, I'll buy that for a dollar. It' probably a bit of everything from the past, but never the same way twice. Hence why we now have words like "Trumpism".

                      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      Pinging doesn't work like that. You do u/bobbobbybob and u/slushpilot

                      [–]Bigs 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                      Can someone tell me the difference between that site and

                      Because still has it and I'd like to donate to them, providing they are entirely separate for those cunts that censored?

                      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      I'm not sure what the difference is between all these archive sites either.

                      [–]369 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      They wouldn't need to burn books if their plans were working.
                      Burning books means they're desperate. If they were winning the psychological game, they wouldn't be doing this.

                      [–]dissidentrhetoric 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      The globalists are running scared and this is why they are acting out so boldly against populism.

                      [–][deleted]  (1 child)


                        [–]ReSegreto 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                        Well,we can't archive Vox Populi anymore.

                        [–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                        FrontpageMag is an explicitly neoconservative site. It's the '''edgy''' version of The Bulwark.