all 7 comments

[–]passionflounder 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

W.H.O. is moving to social engineering which means that there's no longer any global health issues to tackle and they're no longer necessary. Dissolve them.

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In acid.

[–]passionflounder 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like the way you think.

[–]Dregan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Groomers

[–]scornedandsedated 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The endgame is to fuck kids. It is always about fucking kids.

[–]HiddenFox 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Spokeswoman Tanya Carter said: 'An urgent inquiry is needed into how this ideology… has come to influence so much public thinking.'

This is my thinking. The people who came up with this need to be fired. With the reason why they are fired easily searchable for their next potential employer.

A spokesperson for the organisation (WHO) said: 'Our guidelines reflect established psychological facts about children's understanding of their bodies and psychosocial development based on decades of research.'

This is bullshit. Complete bullshit. You may find a handful of psychologies that will go along with this but our natural instincts tell us this is wrong. A four year old does think about this stuff. A four year old does not need to think about this either! Fucking disgusting.

[–]SaiditNotReddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

we can trust them with our health...why can't we trust them with the sexual health of our toddlers?? /s

sick fcuking world we live in. kids younger than 4 don't even have the vocabulary to understand... so i guess they will have to 'show them'