all 7 comments

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

such as the 'it's the ziocon jews' people constantly plaguing the discourse.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Or the "it's the jesuits" people who never listen to contrary evidence...

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

i can tell you are still not reading through s/jesuitsandzionists

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Nice, I welcome all conversation that includes both as being powerful. If we're talking about who is more powerful, but admit both are very powerful, then that's a conversation that can be had.

But when people say "oh the zionists aren't powerful at all, it's only the jesuits" I have questions. Or vice-versa. Both are obviously super-powerful organizations. The only question is the relationship between the two and I will admit it's a bit of an open question, but the evidence to me suggests the zionists are the more powerful ones. But there's definitely a lot of conversation to be had there, no doubt at all.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

zionists are the subset of the jesuits (the superset)

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

right, and I see it the other way around because of the evidence I've seen. It's definitely an interesting topic of research though.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)