Is /u/Digifutura a Spammer?

submitted by VantaFount from self.saiditCleanup

What's your opinion?

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

Yes. 3 months ago I would have said no. There's blatant spam being posted now.

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Agreed, it used to be nice, now it's pretty spammy

[–]VantaFount[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

But not regular spam. It's sort of like teriyaki spam. Slightly more palatable, but you still don't want it.
https://www.spam.com/images/9/b/f/9bfcfe5d441ec50e5c5425f679d7115711a7458f/spam-teriyaki-455.png

[–]VantaFount[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

We have an /s/Ads sub.
/u/Tiwaking suggests Digifutura have a sub of their own. I'm leaning in favor of that idea. But I don't know how much of a strain it puts on the servers to have individual subsaidits for accounts that are posting content that nobody wants.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

it's no strain at all to have more subs. i dont know how a bot can be talked into using a different sub though.

[–]VantaFount[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

/u/digifutura has actually commented twice before. It doesn't look like a true bot account. More like an employee posting. If that's the case, we can possibly reason with them.

[–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Putting them in Ads or their own sub seems to be a good idea.

I like the idea of putting them on their own sub as they are tech related.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah agree

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Digifutura have a sub of their own. I'm leaning in favor of that idea.

There's no way to enforce this other than threatening a ban if they don't, and I think they're a bot anyway so they probably won't listen at all

[–]Tiwaking 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I assumed it is a bot. It really deserves its own subsaidit

[–]VantaFount[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

That's a fair compromise.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮