Pedophiles are pretty based

submitted by IMissPorn from self.unpopularopinion

I know a lot of you probably associate pedophiles with elite satanists and crazed trannies, but most of them aren't like that. How many of you have actually spent any time with them and tried to learn what they're really like?

Go see what they think about basically any political issue. Covid, climate change, trannies, you name it. Chances are you'll see a lot you agree with, and even more importantly, lively debate. Pedophiles, for obvious reasons, abhor censorship and groupthink.

I know the whole wanting to fuck kids might be a sticky point for some of you, but A) I think you'll find more pedophiles than you'd expect agree it should remain strictly fantasy, and B) is it really that big a deal compared to the root evil of censorship?

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]SMCAB 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not going to give it much thought.

No matter how "based" a pedo is, I will, with a smile, shove one of my many high powered weapons into its mouth should they come anywhere near my children. Whether I pull the trigger or not will depend on the length said pedo took. Just looking will get the metal in its mouth.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Only people I know who like to talk about and defend pedophiles are pedophiles. It is abhorrent to decent people.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What kind of Pedos are we talking about?

The kind attracted to 16 year olds (most of us if we are being honest) or the kind who wanna fuck pre-pubescent kids (not cool)

I think you'll find more pedophiles than you'd expect agree it should remain strictly fantasy

If they can keep it strictly a fantasy. I don't have a problem with what their fantasies are and what they are attracted to. I already had an account banned for posting an article about a dude who was arrested for having a sex doll that looked underage. I agree this is just censorship, and dont care what the piece of silicon looks like that some dude is fucking. I don't want anyone abusing kids though

[–]IMissPorn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well, the particular pedos I was thinking about when I wrote this are lolicon anime fans. So yes that includes little kids, but at the same time it's a step removed from reality since it's stylized as hell most of the time. But anyway, it's not real, so naturally I think that's nobody's business, same as the doll.

I'm not sure how many of them are attracted to children IRL, probably some are.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm not the thought police, and I don't believe in thought crimes. I know a lot of users here will argue that it is only a matter of time before they abuse a child, but I don't believe in pre-crime either. I am attracted to every other woman I see on the street, but I am not a serial rapist. People don't have a say in what they are attracted to, and as long as someone is not abusing kids, I really don't have an issue with it.

[–]TheMagicFlute 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They, by classic definition, have inclinations inside them which have potential for danger. I don't support that recklessness. Though the sheer umbrella of things people will lump with them, and their approach when they find a real or perceived one, is itself nothing short of barbaric. Peoples' refusal to be critical on the matter leads to collateral damage nobody wants to take credit for.