all 98 comments

[–]cisheteroscum 22 insightful - 6 fun22 insightful - 5 fun23 insightful - 6 fun -  (28 children)

They fired their CEO for not being pro-gay in like 2014. Where have you been?

[–]FediNetizen 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

Actually it was because he donated to some Prop 8 organizations as I recall. I still think it was a bad reason to let him go, but there is a difference between "not being pro-gay", and actively supporting a movement to deny gay people in California the ability to get married.

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (22 children)

Fine - but it's hardly a significant difference. People forget how hard and fast the left tried to normalize gay marriage. By contrast, terrorist BLM has received billions of dollars from private corporations and nothing will happen to these companies

[–]FediNetizen 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

People forget how hard and fast the left tried to normalize gay marriage.

the left

hard and fast

The first Pride march was organized in 1970. At that time even gay relations were generally criminal, let alone gay marriage. "The left" didn't push gay marriage "hard and fast"; support for gay rights was a minority issue even among the left at that time. Gay rights activists fought for those rights over the course of nearly 50 years. If you were surprised by how "fast" it happened, then you probably just weren't paying attention.

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

The first Pride march was organized in 1970

I like your intentional conflation of "gay marriage" and "gay activism". The stonewall event had nothing to do with "gay marriage" but was a response to police raids that ended up having ripple effects across the West for homosexuals in the 1970s. The "Defense of Marriage" Act was signed by democrat Bill Clinton in 1996, 26 years later than stonewall and only in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015 was it determined by the Supreme Court that denial of same-sex marriage by the states was illegal. That was five years ago - and one year after this CEO made his contribution

If you were surprised by how "fast" it happened

It did. Objectively. The American public did not support same-sex marriage as recently as 2004. Anecdotally, I remember the only exposure in the MSM for gays was a show "Queer Eye for the Striaght Guy", a pun I didn't understand until years later. The promotion of gays and homosexuality in the MSM has accelerated exponentially in the last 15 years compared to before. Maybe you were the one not paying attention

Even if we pretend all that isn't true, and Americans and US Courts weren't incredibly morally corrupted in a few short years, and "gay marriage" was all the result of some "gradual, progressive change" over the years - "Gay marriage" is still a joke and paraody on actual marriage. By and large, gays are not remotely monogamous - they have way more partners and diseases than straight people or wedded heterosexual couples. Gays also cannot reproduce, and they have no benefit to the future of state - which is the only reason benefits for marriage should exist. And if that isn't true, then marriage is just a religious institution that shouldn't be corrupted by the state.

Regardless of all of that, the firefox CEO was completely in his rights to donate against the cause of "gay marriage" at the time, and evem today. He was effectively denied his right to free speech when he was fired and lost his source of income - just because he opposed the fake "rights" of homosexuals to marry. Which was a prescient, ongoing issue at the time.

I also like your non-response to this:

By contrast, terrorist BLM has received billions of dollars from private corporations and nothing will happen to these companies

[–]Etsestases 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

gays are not remotely monogamous - they have way more partners and diseases than straight people or wedded heterosexual couples.

And straight men are rapists who can't even make women orgasm 35% of the time, compared to lesbians who don't orgasm just 14% of the time, all they care about is their own pleasure and getting off. Selfish bastards.

I feel bad for women who marry men. Gay men are less violent, less rapey, abuse their partners way less often and actually care about their partner's pleasure.

[–]NatSoc_Fren 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

less violent

less rapey

1

• Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.

• Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).

• The 10 percent fallacy: Studies indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population.

• Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.

• Some homosexual activists defend the historic connection between homosexuality and pedophilia: Such activists consider the defense of “boy-lovers” to be a legitimate gay rights issue.

• Pedophile themes abound in homosexual literary culture: Gay fiction as well as serious academic treatises promote “intergenerational intimacy.”

2

• Bisexual women had significantly higher lifetime prevalence of rape and sexual violence other than rape by any perpetrator when compared to heterosexual women.

• Lesbian women and gay men reported levels of intimate partner violence and sexual violence equal to or higher than those of heterosexuals.

[–]Etsestases 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't know why you bring the topic of pedophilia, but okay then:

Pedophiles are people attracted to children, it has nothing to do with homosexuality, even if the kid is male. Most of the offenders who rape boys, are simultaneously attracted to women. In virtually all cases when a pedophile who rapes a boy is married, he's married to a woman.

I don't know what kind of world you live in. Statistics are iffy and they throw different percentages in this regard, but you're giving the lowest estimates of them all when you say 1-3. I can also point to other studies or surveys where it's way higher.

Heterosexual males have legalized child marriage in plenty of countries, and still practice it in huge numbers. Even in some western countries, there are states where straight men can marry children or teens. That's sick.

About 1.8 billion people, most of them heterosexual, follow a religion in which their prophet married a 6 year old girl, and had sex with her when she was 9. These people defend this pedophile with violence and death when you criticize him. Talk about heterosexuals glorifying pedophilia and having it as part of their culture. Disgusting. And there are some pedophiliac aspects to Christianity as well, religion followed by over 2.3 billion people. That's a whooping 4.1 billion people, mostly heterosexual, who glorify pedophilia and made it part of their culture. Homosexuals are irreligious in way higher proportions than heterosexuals.

Straight men mutilate the genitals of young girls in many countries so they can't feel sexual pleasure for the rest of their lives. Sick perverts.

Lesbian women and gay men reported levels of intimate partner violence and sexual violence equal to or higher than those of heterosexuals.

That's not true for gay men. I didn't speak about homosexual women.

[–]NatSoc_Fren 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Pedophiles are people attracted to children, it has nothing to do with homosexuality, even if the kid is male. Most of the offenders who rape boys, are simultaneously attracted to women. In virtually all cases when a pedophile who rapes a boy is married, he's married to a woman.

You don't even know what "straight" means do ya?

I don't know what kind of world you live in. Statistics are iffy and they throw different percentages in this regard, but you're giving the lowest estimates of them all when you say 1-3. I can also point to other studies or surveys where it's way higher.

Cope moar, statistics don't lie.

Heterosexual males have legalized child marriage in plenty of countries, and still practice it in huge numbers. Even in some western countries, there are states where straight men can marry children or teens. That's sick.

Where faggot?

About 1.8 billion people, most of them heterosexual, follow a religion in which their prophet married a 6 year old girl, and had sex with her when she was 9. These people defend this pedophile with violence and death when you criticize him. Talk about heterosexuals glorifying pedophilia and having it as part of their culture. Disgusting. And there are some pedophiliac aspects to Christianity as well, religion followed by over 2.3 billion people. That's a whooping 4.1 billion people, mostly heterosexual, who glorify pedophilia and made it part of their culture. Homosexuals are irreligious in way higher proportions than heterosexuals.

Christianity has no "pedophiliac aspects" to it. And don't ever group in Muslims with Christians, because Muslims are fucked on another level. I'm not responsible for some sandnigger raping a goat or fucking a child. That's none of my business. I gave you links between modern day pedophilia in America(because I'm not from some sandnigger country) and homosexuality. You have yet to disprove it.

Straight men mutilate the genitals of young girls in many countries so they can't feel sexual pleasure for the rest of their lives. Sick perverts.

As I said, sandniggers are not Christians.

That's not true for gay men.

Prove it faggot

[–]Etsestases 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Bwahaha so you basically just resorted to throw slurs around (with terrible punctuation) and say heterosexual pedophilia doesn't count because these straight men are from countries other than yours. Pathetic defense.

You and your fellow straight male brethren are rotten. I wonder how many underage girls were married to an adult man today alone worldwide. Sick perverts.

Maybe you're still upset for the banning of the straight male subreddit r/jailbait in 2011? Are you a r/jailbait refugee?

r/jailbait, which featured provocative shots of underage teenagers, being chosen "subreddit of the year" in the "Best of reddit" user poll in 2008 and at one point making "jailbait" the second most common search term for the site

Soon after the closure of r/jailbait, the similar subreddits r/teen_girls, r/niggerjailbait and r/picsofdeadjailbait were closed.

Disgusting.

I know you are upset, but please, don't go on a rape spree or behead spree like you were commenting. Try to ignore these heterosexual instincts, they're harmful for civilization. Kkthx

[–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ghey propaganda

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

LOL wow I never could've anticipated such a retarded and ineffectual response. Here I was expecting something to the tune of "but firefox is private companiee!!" but no - you instead equate the institution of marriage and reproduction with orgasms, and make the ridiculous assertion that all straight men are "rapists", without even acknowledging any of the main points. I can't even tell if you're a troll or not. All of your statements on gay men are also unsubstantiated and and almost definitely wrong, there's a lot of predators in the gay community (and a lot of drugs, disease, and pedophilia). You don't have to respond, don't bother

[–]Etsestases 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No need to get emotional. Come back when you can debunk anything I said. I also never said "all straight men" (yawn) at any point, I said "straight men" just like you said "gay men". Now go marry a female child or a teen like the straight males who institutionalized it in many countries do. (And even in some states of your own country, if you're american)

[–]NatSoc_Fren 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Bro, you're the one getting emotional. But don't worry, we'll find the cure, soon

[–]Etsestases 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You won't find anything. You sound useless. If anything, say "they".

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I like your intentional conflation of "gay marriage" and "gay activism".

You should spend more time reading before responding. It's not conflation, as the two concepts are intertwined. Legal gay marriage was the ultimate achievement of the gay rights movement. I mean, jesus dude if you seriously don't understand how gay activism and gay marriage are related, then I have some questions about the bus you rode to school, particularly about its length.

You should spend more time reading before responding. Your "history" sucks and is full of holes. Gay acceptance was a very gradual process. It started first with getting gay relations decriminalized and just not being hated for being gay.

It did. Objectively. The American public did not support same-sex marriage as recently as 2004.

You should spend more time reading before responding. I've already linked historical polls on gay acceptance, but if you missed them the first time, here they are again. It was indeed a gradual process, it was just once supporters of gay marriage became a majority that things started happening in the political sphere.

Even if we pretend all that isn't true, and Americans and US Courts weren't incredibly morally corrupted in a few short years, and "gay marriage" was all the result of some "gradual, progressive change" over the years

Well, you may think it's pretending, but that's just because you are poorly informed.

I also like your non-response to this

Because the types of people that call BLM "terrorists" are just retards living in their own little world and I try not to engage too much because the conversation always spirals. I can only imagine how long your rant would have been if I had responded to two points instead of just one.

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You should spend more time reading

I read everything you posted, and none of it matters. You posted a poll that agreed with mine, there's nothing to see. You may recollect or characterize homosexual acceptance differently, but that's subjective. FWIW, I don't give too many fucks about "gay marriage" beyond pointing out its a mockery of real marriage and has no practical purpose. The CEO was entirely within his rights and reason to oppose this movement at the time, its appalling he was fired

the types of people that call BLM "terrorists" are just retards

So looting, rioting, and attacking random people is called what? "Activism?"

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gays were free to live as they wished, "getting married" was an effort to pretend that anal sex can result in children. There were many politicians who were known to be gay and lived with their gay lover, even in the 1930s, and no one charged them for that (at least in some european countries).

[–]Klondike 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

How is denying someone's rights not a significant difference?

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Gay marriage" is not a right. At least, the rogue supreme court didn't say it was until 2015. It's been dishing out fake ""rights"" for awhile now

Say nothing of the fact that this CEO's right to free speech was effectively denied by his employer, who terminated his employment and thus source of income over issues that were prescient at the time.

https://saidit.net/s/whatever/comments/6915/firefox_just_died_for_me_today_after_i_found_out/oa5h

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[removed]

    [–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Oh right - we all want to live in a country where the right to free speech only applies to "the government" and is effectively useless because private companies can and will fire you, doxx you, and censor you for your private views or actions. That's why we're all here on saidit

    [–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It's wild how much time this guy has devoted to thinking about what married gay men do in their bedroom.

    [–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Huh people being able to have their own beliefs.... Crazy ass shit!

    [–]suckitreddit[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Welp, it's true, I don't pay attention to all the news. There's a ton of information out there. But I was on Chrome for a while, and then I got onto Firefox, thinking they would be better. And now I'm on Brave. It's a really good browser. They have a lot of features not available on either Chrome, or Firefox.

    [–]0rco 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Features such as? One big thing I use frequently on Firefox is the containers extension or plug in but I'll be moving over to brave soon

    [–]EngieBengie 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Based CEO

    [–]soundsalad 6 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 7 fun -  (2 children)

    So, Firefox can fuck off. I'm not supporting terrorism in any way, shape, or form.

    Do you support the US government?

    [–]bald-janitor 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    No

    [–]Arundel 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    This jumped out at me too. It would be very difficult, perhaps impossible, to not support terrorism in any way, shape, or form.

    [–]x0x7 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The downside for me, why I don't want to use brave is that by using a chrome based browser you are allowing google to set web standards.

    [–]HiddenFox 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Been with brave for well over 9 months and have had no issues.

    It's not perfect when it comes to privacy but it's one of the best.

    Everyone shouldbe giving it a try.

    [–]Extract 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    I'm still on FF, but will one day soon switch to waterfox for personal use.

    [–]adultmanhwa 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    try librewolf

    [–]Zapped 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I think Waterfox recently sold out to a marketing agency. I may have misunderstood what they do, though, but they the kid who developed Waterfox did just revently sell it to an established company.

    [–]FediNetizen 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Dropping a browser for supporting politics you don't agree with is retarded. You should be choosing your browser based on its technical merits.

    [–]flugegeheimen 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    It's not as clear cut with Firefox.

    1. It's harder to separate politics and technical merits when browser abuses notifications to send you political propaganda.

    2. The less people use Firefox the faster Mozilla dies. This may be more important for someone than technical differences between browsers. After all some people migrate between browsers all the time, it's not like Firefox is fundamentally more valuable than any other browser.

    [–]HowLongCanTheUsernam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    You are saying that right until there is no other option, and the browser controlls your moves on the internet.

    I don't want my only two options to be a left-radical Chrome and left-radical Firefox.

    And then one day all web sites with "problematic" opinions are on the browsers' blacklistssorry, denylists. Doubleplusgood!

    [–][deleted]  (19 children)

    [removed]

      [–]No_ 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

      Us gays have nothing to do with the pedos trying To perform conversion therapy on kids. We have nothing to do with the buttons treating kids as guineapigs for some weird genderspecial ceremonies. We just want to fuck in peace, but if that means that someone will tell lil Tommy who likes pink that he needs to become a woman, I’ll happily never fuck anyone I love again. Gays Just want to marry, leave us alone. Queers are the freaks that promote Pedophilia and like pumping confused kids full of hormones.

      [–]NatSoc_Fren 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

      After we behead all trannies, we will be able to sort out the fag problem too, don't worry, the cure to homosexuality will be found out.

      [–]Etsestases 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

      But we'll never find the cure for straight male violence. You're rotten. Go start another world war, straightie?

      [–]NatSoc_Fren 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

      straightie

      Your intellectual level is so low, you can't even come up with an insult. Faggot.

      [–]Etsestases 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

      I think yours is way lower for thinking I was trying to come up with one. You sound angry and frustrated like all straight men. Don't throw a tantrum yet, sweetcakes!

      [–]NatSoc_Fren 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

      sweetcakes

      Oh god you're retarded, either lurk moar or go back to reddit

      [–]Etsestases 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

      The subreddits I frequented were all banned by your fellow straight males, the only difference is they wear dresses and harrass/want to rape lesbians specifically rather than all women like the other straight males.

      Females can't have any space for themselves because straight males always force themselves into everything. Lesbian dating apps are all full of males. This happens in your country btw. You heteros are disgusting and pathetic worldwide.

      [–]NatSoc_Fren 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

      Dykes? Lol dykes can shoot themselves in their heads and can be raped a million times for all I care.

      Females can't have any space for themselves because straight males always force themselves into everything.

      Quite contrary to that, I saw some females begging men to come back after the MGTOW movement started.

      Lesbian dating apps are all full of males. This happens in your country btw.

      Whoever does that is a king, give him my commends.

      [–]Etsestases 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      Lol, of course you are a rape and violence apologist/sympathizer. You're a straight male after all. You're rotten, there's nothing that can be done to fix you and your brethren.

      [–]No_ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Hun I am gay. Gays aren’t the problem.

      [–]Happy_face_doomer 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Ew gays

      [–]HegeMoney 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      BLM put the fire back in Firefox.

      [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      The only thing I really miss is Tree Style Tabs (the Sidewise is outdated, buggy, but adequate once you learn the hard way about how it crashes enough), the sessions manager, and the tab group manager. Firefox v56 was the best.

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

      I use and need multiple browsers: one for personal use, one for business, one for the stock market, and one for advertising management/analytics. So that's Brave, Firefox, Chromium and Chrome because my website advertisements and analytics are on google anyway.

      I would use only Brave, as it's my fave, but I can't imagine having 4 different Brave windows open and finding my way productively through my webs. Plus, with this setup I can close one, open the other and never fear that I just lost 200 super important tabs... ;-)

      [–]Canbot 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      If you have 200 super important tabs, they aren't that important. It's like having 200 friends. They aren't real friends.

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Yes I was being facetious. But even 20 important tabs is a drag to lose.

      [–]Ludditebardd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      I'm also a fan of multiple browsers for different browsing tasks. For example, 2 or so years back when I still used Fedbook, I would browse it on a Chromium browser on my phone, and use a different browser for everything else. It was a small way to try to keep Fedbook tracking to a minimum, but I'm sure they have surpassed that workaround.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Firefox has a Fedbook container against it. I don't know how good it is, but they offer it.

      [–]HowLongCanTheUsernam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Any reason you don't use Vivaldi in your line-up?

      After trying out all the browsers, it seems to be the best option there is currently. But I rarely see people using it for some reason. Am I missing something?

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      No, you're not missing anything. You're right, it's one of the best. I think it's even installed, just my tabs are all open on other browsers. Simple laziness.

      [–]PatDaddysFShack 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      Firefox is a browser beacon for change and human rights. If you want to support the globalists, use that other crap. I'm sticking with my Firefox.

      [–]HowLongCanTheUsernam 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Nope, sorry. Firefox is almost 100% financed by Google (via their search engine agreement). It only exists so that Google can claim that Chrome isn't a monopoly. In the past couple of years, Firefox has become a political organization of far-left activists. Its not about the Browser anymore. Why do you think the Rust devs are working hard to establish their own independent Rust Foundation and get away from Firefox?

      [–]Yousuck 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      You know,big techs are all leftist.You cant be here if you are not using one of them.I recommend that you go offline.

      [–]galaxybrain 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

      Eh, Brave is just another Chrome clone. At least with Firefox you're not supporting the virtual rendering engine monopoly Google has created

      [–]HowLongCanTheUsernam 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Nope, its a Chromium clone. Big diff.

      [–]galaxybrain 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Still the exact same Blink rendering back-end

      [–]HowLongCanTheUsernam 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Yep, but no Goog spyware.

      What's better than Blink + V8?

      [–]bzzrak 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Chromium is opensource so google doesn't make anything off of it afaik.

      [–]ballooon 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      There is also [ungoogled-chromium(https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium). For Android I use Bromite

      [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Ok

      [–]PatDaddysFShack 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      If that's the case then I fully support Firefox and American freedom. Keep supporting the Chinese you fool.

      [–]HowLongCanTheUsernam 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Not just "support BLM". Firefox fired one of their founders, beccause he had a "wrong opinion" ten years ago. Someone had dug up an old Tweet from 10 years before, where he had supported some Californian legislation against "gay marriage" (back then it had support by a majority of people in California).

      Wrong opinion in the past. Fired today. That's the same guy who then started Brave Browser. Firefox has become a political organization of radical left activists, its not a Browser anymore.

      Claiming the switch is "painless" isn't really true though. Brave still has many problems (sync being a major one) and has made some bad moves in the past months. I switched from Brave to Vivaldi for now, until Brave sorts its shit out and stops using questionable ways to earn money.

      [–]sproketboy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I used Brave but they still put ads on YT sometimes which is annoying.

      [–]PATGUI 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      it died for me on mobile because their latest update is an absolute disaster. Using brave now.

      [–]Wahwah 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Yes, you should soft boycott or do anything you can to let the full force of capitalism hit back at those organisations who are supporting this communist terror organisation. They have death wish, let them have it.

      [–]Arundel 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I can understand that many things (e.g. software) are unrelated to culture wars. I can do this because I'm not obsessed with culture wars to the point where I see them in everything.

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      [–]christnmusicreleases 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Dissenter.

      [–]Fetus_inhaler 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      How is brave browser?

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Imagine not supporting BLM in order to accelerate the collapse of the capitalist system. Never going to make it.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      is there a type of laptop you guys recommend?

      [–]adultmanhwa 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      thinkpad, linux friendly

      [–]HowLongCanTheUsernam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Linux friendly, and best keyboard of any laptop.

      [–]adultmanhwa 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      where's the proof?

      [–]igorness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      That's really fucking stupid of you!

      [–]Zednix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Brave is pretty sweet on mobile too, it blocks ads natively.

      [–]ballooon 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      What does this have to do with the actual browser?

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      You can also reimport them easily into Firefox. Like sometimes when i switch versions. You won't believe how fast about 15000 bookmarks are imported and addons and pocket are synchronized again. No: you won't. Just saying...

      I don't give a fat flies shit who they seemingly support. I support firefox as a piece of software .

      [–]CompleteDoubterII 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I would advise against using Brave, for the reasons explained in these two articles.