top 100 commentsshow all 148

[–]zyxzevn🐈‍⬛ 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (44 children)

You are a Trojan Horse.
You can easily move to voat and actually have fans.
(note: there are just a few 100 people in the US wanting to promote this stuff)
So you are probably here to stop this website.

The ideology is forbidden in a major part of the world. It will cause black-listing of this site. And it will have consequences on hosting and such. And many legal consequences.

I don't think it is an ideology either, just like Antifa is not an ideology (nor is it anti-fascism). You can discuss some of your ideas on /s/debatealtright I think.

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

You can easily move to voat and actually have fans.

I don't want fans. Also, the NationalSocialism sub on voat is very inactive.

(note: there are just a few 100 people in the US wanting to promote this stuff)

Search up the American Nazi Party, American Freedom Party, National Vanguard, National Alliance, Traditionalist Workers Party, recently founded American Justice Party(not the leftist one), National Renaissance Party, Atomwaffen, NSLF, American Front, Vanguard America, Patriot Front, White Aryan Resistance, WUFENS(WUNS).

I mainly use anonymous imageboards for communication with people who share my ideology, and there are many of them(people). Many = Atleast half a million just from the US. In my part time I work in an organization that recruits members into [redacted], which is a classical National Socialist/Hitlerist party. I have also converted many antifa fags into ardent National Socialists. The party currently has 85000 members in 9 states and 20 cities

I don't think it is an ideology either, just like Antifa is not an ideology (nor is it anti-fascism). You can discuss some of your ideas on /s/debatealtright I think.
I don't think its an ideology either

W T F

[–]suckitreddit 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Okay, not taking any sides here, but you have to know that Saidit.net is using an SJW company to run the website. Saidit had to keep moving from company to company, and they censor content here. I mean, what the fuck? Fuck them. I'll never use them, but that's what it is.

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This sounds like it was written by ADL or similar organization.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah of course, of course I'm an ADL agent here to kill saidit

*rubs hands together*
*haha goyim you'll never know*

[–]IRONICALLY_A_NAZI 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

You are beyond wrong.

Right wing nationalism, with traditional social policies, and strong social programs (National Socialism) is an extremely popular ideology, people just don't know that that is the name for what they believe.

saidit is a joke, if there's no free speech what is the point?

Voat and Pol are full of glowing faggots.

[–]horatioherbert 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

If it's not an ideology what is it?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's obviously an evil satanic cult, never mind that its members denounce evil satanic degeneracy.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You can discuss some of your ideas on /s/debatealtright I think.

For now at least... until they decide our speech is violence too.

[–]IRONICALLY_A_NAZI 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Truth is violence to these scumfucks.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hey now, I'm every bit as much a National Socialist, YES A NAZI as he is. This is utterly unjustified, and it's putting saidit on my "highly suspicious" list.

Free speech? Ha!

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (26 children)

How can you be sure he's a trojan horse? I mean, if he is, then banning him is fine because his goal is subversion rather than discussion.

But I would suggest you tread carefully, lest paranoia gets the better of the admins and everybody not following ever-narrowing definition of "anti extreme" ideology will be labeled a trojan horse, nazi, commie, or whatever.

I'm a nazi. Nazis are not evil, they are GOOD. Jesus would be a nazi if he were alive. Talking about that, where's u/Jesus ? Hm... Did he leave because he saw where things are headed?

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

No, Jesus was of no ism. Jesus helped all races and peoples and was a globalist. That is, God does not care about borders for all his people are brothers in Christ. Hitler was a positive Christian with Pagan beliefs. Nazisim is akin to the ideology of revisionist Zionism but both are diametrically opposed. There were, nevertheless, some amazing policies enacted by the Nazis that curtailed international finance.

[–]asterias 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That is, God does not care about borders

I don't think God asks you to abolish your borders though.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He doesn't. And that is where worldly globalism comes into play. The globalists and corporate internationalists, for the most part, are not of God, or they believe, at least some, that ridding of borders will bring about some utopian society of order and peace. This is the futurist thinking. Again, nations are not pro-God either.

God has a plan. Like all empires, the US will fall.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

If nations weren't important, God wouldn't have created them.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

LOL

God is another myth.

The ruling class created nations and borders.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

God is spirit. God is something we can not comprehend. Big bang theory, something out of nothing, and poof!!

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I don't know what you're trying to say. F God and F the Big Bang.

We exist, at this brief moment, on this small planet, at this size, small enough to be humble, big enough to be complex - and our consciousness (spirit?) is both too limited to know and understand everything much less what we can even perceive - including our own over-complex consciousnesses and their interactions. I can live with not knowing. Many people cannot. And many people make up and pass down stories to cover that up and provide comfort as well as weaponize it for social discipline-stability and/or power and control.

My mind is eternally trapped within my body paradoxically. I don't need a soul or spirit to bridge between them. The two are real and more than enough to manage without complicating it with extra shit when we also have the diverse external world and all of its internal motivations to deal with.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

We exist, at this brief moment, on this small planet, at this size, small enough to be humble, big enough to be complex - and our consciousness (spirit?)

Literally what Yeshua preached.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If nothing else, Yeshua's words are the truth and no other religion has spoken them in full.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I wouldn't go so far as to even say it's in full, otherwise there'd be no confusion. Both Jesus and Buddha, among others, taught great things - and people haven't learned not to corrupt them.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

God didn't. This world is controlled by Satan. He is the prince of this world, that is why Yeshua refused Satan's temptation. Nations exist due to various factors but God is a globalist in that he cares about all of his brothers in all nations. I would help people of any race or color and preach the word of God to all peoples. That does not mean God is against nations or for them. Just that the worldly beliefs of people who say that God condones a nations actions or its people or bestows some sort of rights to this piece of land or that socialism is anti-Christ (it's not) or that capitalism is pro-Christ (it's not), is, in my opinion unscriptural. God and Yeshua are not of an ism.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Pagan beliefs

Some prominent officers had Pagan beliefs, Hitler called them all "silly" in Zweites Buch. Hitler himself didn't hold any Pagan beliefs.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hitler was born a Catholic, and he died a Positive Christianity type of protestant. He didn't publicly express faith because he wanted the Reich to be secular, and for a state to be secular, the leader of state need not publicly promote any religion. Besides, he even declared that the party believed in some of the principles of Positive Christianity.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[Citations needed for provided source]

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Here are the documents: https://lawcollections.library.cornell.edu/nuremberg/catalog/nur:00773

This R & A report provides its own description on its title page: "This study describes, with illustrative factual evidence, Nazi purposes, policies and methods of persecuting the Christian Churches in Germany and occupied Europe." The report characterizes the National Socialist ideology of aggressive warfare as inherently inimical to Christianity and the Christian Churches, and names specific actions the Nazis took to suppress, terrorize, intimidate, and otherwise persecute Christian clergy and churches within Germany and in the conquered territories annexed to the Reich. For each case, the report suggests a means of solving "The Problem of Proof." This document is a typewritten mimeograph copy of excellent quality on sturdy, slightly browning paper.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

nuremburg

You know that the trials were absolute bogus, don't you?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Norman Finklestein has some good research on this. Norman Finklestein, who is a Jew. Even Jewish scholars admit it was bogus

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–]asterias 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

National Socialism is not the same as Hitlerism and is not a strictly German ideology. For example, the Romanian Iron Guard had a completely different attitude towards religion.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    ^

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    The ideology is forbidden in a major part of the world. It will cause black-listing of this site. And it will have consequences on hosting and such. And many legal consequences.

    Tfw your historical narratives are so self-evidently correct that you have to make questioning them illegal

    [–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    (note: there are just a few 100 people in the US wanting to promote this stuff)

    I would bet money the real number is at least in the thousands, with tens of thousands more that are at least sympathetic to the idea of a white ethnostate. The USA has 330 million people, even only 1 in 100,000 being a nazi supporter gives you over 3k supporters, and that would still be an extremely fringe ideology.

    [–]PrisonMike 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    If it was my platform, I’d want all views to have equality of opportunity to be heard. However, if this causes issues with service providers, I’m not sure what other options aside from banning exist.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    magnora7 should switch servers.

    http://zensurfrei.com/
    https://iweb.com/hosting-provider
    http://versaweb.com/
    Dreamhost is also an option, but sometimes, it tends to kill processes/scripts consuming too many resources

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Wow, a solution that supports natural rights... wow, and some said it couldn't be done.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    /u/d3rr and/or /u/go1dfish, regardless of the topic of this post, I'm curious to know what you think about these alternatives. Also, I'm curious to know if it might be worth one day creating mirror federated sites of/with SaidIt on alternatives like these, and/or perhaps even home servers, and/or perhaps somehow implementing torrenting and/or IPFS to help keep them synced/updated/backedup?

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    there's a hosting company out there for everyone, the free internet is still alive and well.

    [–]Leo_Littlebook 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    Magnora's anti-Nazi policy is nonsense. Saidit obviously does permit the advocacy of "violence", when it's lawful or when it's war. Nor have I seen evidence that the Nazis advocated for the extermination of other races. There is better evidence for Australians, Chinese and Americans doing that, but you don't ban their iconography. The Holocaust is an obvious hoax to anyone who investigates fairmindedly.

    If Magnora want to limit Nazi trolls, he should ban them for rules of debate violations. There are some NatSocs who would follow the rules, and they would improve the site. The majority of the Voat mouthbreathers would get caught by existing rules.

    The reality is Magnora is a bit too scared of Jewish power, and a bit too indoctrinated with Jewish lies, to do that.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    This.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    ^

    [–]FediNetizen 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (68 children)

    Listen magnora7, you, as the administrator of a big internet forum are not supposed to let your personal biases come into play when managing content on your forum.

    It's not a matter of personal bias. You are advocating for an ideology based in violence. If antifa started a sub where they advocated and coordinated violence they would get banned too.

    If you are offended by a banner, you are a big snowflake. Therefore, I conclude this statement by saying that u/magnora7 is gay.

    Really showing everyone what you're bringing to the table here. And the answer is: not much.

    I am leaving the decisions in the hands of saidit users. Should I get banned or should I not get banned?

    First off, your use of future tense just shows how delusional you are. You have already been banned. Additionally, your use of "leaving the decisions in the hands of" makes you sound like one of those sovereign citizens that believes they're only subject to the rules if they personally agree with them.

    Finally, as has already been said, there are websites that accept your ideology (Voat, /pol/, Gab, etc). Presumably the reason you don't want to use them is that you know they're shitholes, but that's generally what happens when a website has no content moderation policy. That's just the reality you have to contend with if you want to advocate for an extremist ideology like Nazism.

    [–]Jesus 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    /u/Horrux /u/magnora7

    Anyone who wants to hear the other side of the debate or an objective take on the NSDAP and their crimes and policies should read and watch:

    "La révolution européenne" (1942) by the French economist Françis Delaisi

    Here is a great photo from the book:

    http://i60.servimg.com/u/f60/09/00/16/97/franci10.jpg

    The great documentary titled Hitler's War - What the Historians neglect to mention

    https://archive.org/serve/HitlersWar-WhatTheHistoriansNeglectToMentiontestVersion/HitlersWar-Draft2.mp4

    ^ ^ ^ Hitler's WarThis is a 96 minute long “Made in Germany” underground documentary film. It’s the first documentary ever to unabashedly explain from the German perspective, how World War II really began, and the many efforts that were made by Hitler to avoid it, and to establish a lasting, viable and mutually acceptable peace, but how he was ultimately left with no choice but to invade Poland. It documents many facts that have been deliberately left out of the “official narrative” as presented by the victorious Allies, which we have all been taught since 1945, and which Germans especially have been constantly reminded of since the war ended; with the blame entirely upon Germany’s shoulders. Many of the claims of the Allies that have been widely accepted as fact are refuted here as patently untrue, distorted, or ignored completely.

    The film is largely based upon a book entitled “Der Krieg der viele Väter hatte” (PDF) (English: The War that had Many Fathers) by German author and historian, Gerd Schulze Rhonhof and “Ein unvermeidlicher Krieg? — Der Weg zum 1. September 1939” (An Unavoidable War – The Path to September 1st, 1939). Rhonhof is a former high-ranking, German military officer (Brigadier General in the Panzer Division) who has done, as any honest historian should, his own deep research in the war archives, and has been assisted many other historians. His website contains all of his documentation. His books and assertions, not surprisingly, have not been so well received by many politicians, academia, the Left, and the mainstream media.

    The making of this film seems to have been prompted primarily by some comments made by Chancellor Angela Merkel, speaking to a live audience and the various Heads of State from many nations, gathered at a ceremony in Danzig in 2009, to remember Hitler’s (allegedly) senseless and unprovoked attack on Poland, paying respects to the Polish victims on behalf of Germany, and as always, expressing gratitude to the Allies, for their sacrifices in the victory over National Socialism. Merkel, like all other German chancellors since the end of World War II, accepted full responsibility and with it, the perpetual guilt for the entire war on behalf of all Germans, and unquestioningly accepted, again: the villain role ascribed to National Socialist Germany by the victors, which many Germans, to this day, deeply resent, yet have silently endured it all of their lives. Merkel’s comments, however, struck a raw nerve for many Germans who know “the rest of the story”.

    “Hitler’s War” is also a sharp rebuke to well known German “journalist”, author, filmmaker and commentator Guido Knopp (to whom the original film title actually refers), and who many Germans regard as “Uncle Guido” (in the English sense of an “Uncle Tom”), as he has a reputation for being a domestic Propaganda Minister for the World War II Allies, regarding the Third Reich and National Socialism. For he, like Merkel and the others, continues to ignore many facts, and only dutifully reminds Germans of the guilt of their forefathers (and by extension, their own “inherited” guilt), based upon a highly sanitized “official version” of history.

    There are always two sides to every story, and now the Germans are finally telling theirs. This film is a “must see” for anyone with a sense of justice, honour, fairness and dignity, who have respect for ALL of the victims of World War II (not merely the “politically correct” ones) and who are interested in an accurate account of history. Indeed, if we are to learn from history, and not be doomed to repeat it, then we must also have a fair and accurate account from which to draw our conclusions and upon which to make decisions in the present, and for our future.

    This film has broken through the 60+ year old taboos. Truth has breached the barbed-wire fences of “political correctness”, and is making a desperate run for it’s life.

    Translation, narration, sound mixing, over-dubbing of the original soundtrack by Justice4Germans (2011)

    http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/

    Original German version: http://archive.org/details/Hitlers-Krieg-Was-Guido-Knopp-verschweigt

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/hh-vol-6_medium.jpg

    Film:

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/First-Holocaust_1920x1080_compressed.mp4

    https://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/ProbingTheHolocaust-Part1-HB25.mp4

    https://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/ChemistryOfAuschwitz-4th-hb27-est.mp4

    https://archive.org/details/SchultzeRhonhofManyFathersWPermanentSubtitles

    https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1309285737l/711592.jpg

    Gottfried Feder’s 1919 vision of a highly democratic, corporatist National Socialism with a grass-roots electoral system:

    https://i0.wp.com/arplan.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Volksgemeinschaft.jpg?w=387&ssl=1

    https://arplan.org/2019/03/04/national-socialist-democracy-feder/

    The Central Council, according to NS Feder, will thus be composed as follows:

    1.Independent farmers- 3 & 3 farm laborers = 6

    2.Independent foresters- 1 & 1 lumberman and forest worker = 2

    3.Independent gardeners- 1 & 1 undergardener = 2

    4.Owners of mines & foundries- 1 & 1 miner = 2

    5.Quarry owners- 1 & 1 stone worker = 2

    6.Brickyard owners- 1 & 1 bricklayer = 2

    7.Concrete works- 1 & 1 concrete worker = 2

    8-12.Metallurgical industry- 5 & 5 metallurgical workers = 10

    13.Chemical industry- 1 & 1 employee 1 worker = 3

    14-15.Textile industry- 2 & 1 employee2 workers = 5

    16.Paper industry- 1 & 1 employee 1 worker = 3

    17.Leather industry- 1 & 1 employee 1 worker = 3

    18.Wood and insulation- 2 & 2 workers = 4

    19-21.Food production industries- 3 & 3 workers = 6

    22-23.Clothing industries- 2 & 2 employees 2 workers = 6

    24.Laundries- 1 & 1 worker = 2

    25-26.Building industry- 3 & 2 employees 2 workers = 6 [7]

    27.Printing presses- 2 & 1 employee 1 worker = 3 [4]

    28-29. Commercial enterprises- 2 & 2 employees = 4

    30.Innkeepers- 1 & 1 employees = 2

    31.Theaters- 1 & 1 employee = 2

    32.Music, art, writers- 2 = 2

    33.Transportation- 1 & 1 employee = 2

    34-36.Government officials- 2 = 2

    37.Local government officials- 1 = 1

    38.Further groups as expedient = 14

    councillors: 100 [98]


    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/babylon_medium.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/schultzerohnhofwarfathers_medium.jpg

    ^ ^ ^ One of the best books I've ever read on the Father's of WW2.

    https://documents1940.files.wordpress.com/2019/11/germanys-war-john-wear.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/hh-vol32_medium.jpg

    https://images.jumpseller.com/store/patriotic-dissent-books/844987/rthr.jpg?0

    https://archive.org/details/HitlersRevolutionByRichardTedor_383

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/againstbetterjudgement_large.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/stalinswar-pb-400pp_large.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/hh-vol-7-500_large.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/hh-vol-29_large.png

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/1483954072.main_medium.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/who_started_ww2_-_tbg_medium.png

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/clarkblacknazis_medium.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/rudolfhess2_medium.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/finalsolution_medium.png

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/nuremberglastbattle-3d_medium.png

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/37l_medium.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/hh-vol-8_medium.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/hh-vol-1_medium.jpg

    https://shop.codoh.com/media/_versions/book_images/hh-vol-39-700pp_medium.jpg

    And if you want to get a pro-polish, anti-German and critical stance on Zionism, this is a great author on this subject:

    https://www.polishclub.org/author/jan-peczkis/

    [–]IRONICALLY_A_NAZI 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (55 children)

    You lie and argue in bad faith. Fed. National Socialism has no prescriptions for violence. The NSDAP was involved in a World War that was separate from their economic and social political beliefs. (Other than being specifically targeted by outside forces for having the only ideology that threatened the status quo of the Capitalist/Communist false dialectic.)

    No NatSoc in 2020 wants to cargo cult 1930's Germany. We don't live there. And it's not 1930.

    [–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (54 children)

    National Socialism has no prescriptions for violence.

    Just so we're on the same page here, genocide counts as violence, right?

    No NatSoc in 2020 wants to cargo cult 1930's Germany. We don't live there. And it's not 1930.

    He says, in a thread where people are arguing poor Hitler had no choice but to invade Poland, and that the Holocaust was a hoax.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (48 children)

    Poland was actually a false flag, designed to start the war, as it did.

    Time for you to catch up. Watch some of these: /s/TheHolocaust or read this list I haven't finished, Top 14 Counter Points To The Official Holocaust Story

    6 million was a number promoted in the 1800s. Why are those alleged 6 million more special than the 70-85 million who died in WWII? Why are (((they))) "better" victims? How come people don't talk about the vast numbers of Germans (innocent and guilty) who were mass murdered across Europe AFTER WWII?

    Why do they need laws to force people not to be skeptical of the Holocaust narrative? Censorship is usually to suppress the truth, otherwise normal open means of dealing with things can be used (ie. slander laws, etc).

    [–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (47 children)

    No thanks, not interested in holocaust denialism.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (46 children)

    Then remain ignorant.

    "Denialism" is the propaganda slur (((they))) all used for healthy skepticism, just like the pejorative "conspiracy theorist". But you already know that, and that's why you use it.

    [–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (45 children)

    Dude, we know the Nazis were killing Jews (and other "undesirables") because they kept meticulous records of when and how they killed them. The numbers tattooed onto the arms of Auschwitz survivor corresponds to their records which were stored on a punchcard system that used machines that IBM sold to the Nazis. All of this is well-documented in "IBM and the Holocaust".

    When the Nazis' own records document their killings, claiming that it didn't happen is about on the same level as those southerners claiming the civil war wasn't about slavery, despite the seceding states stating in their proclamation that they were seceding because of slavery.

    [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

    You really should look into Norman Finklestein, who's father was in Aushwitz. He says the numbers are inflated, as well as a great many other things. He doesn't cover all the bases, but he at least proves that what you are saying isn't totally accurate.

    [–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

    You can argue about the exact number killed, but all that means is it could be closer to 5 million than 6 million. Another "gotcha" I see all the time is people pointing out that since a lot of concentration camp prisoners died of sickness or malnourishment they shouldn't be counted since they weren't explicitly executed. I think that argument is dumb.

    [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

    It's not even that close, have you even looked into it at all? Once again, I have german gypsy blood in me. I should hate nazis, but I don't because I'm a mature person.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Clearly you know little but think you know much, because you may have seen much propaganda misinformation.

    The number of people who died (were NOT killed) was about 200,000. Not just Jews. That's still a fuck tonne, admittedly, as you see in the propaganda photos and movies taken by what became famous Hollywood directors. They died from typhus and starvation, as did Germans, because their supply lines were cut off, they had no fucking fuel to transport food much less burn 6m bodies nor properly defend themselves in the war. Those were SLAVE camps, not death camps. The US was worse with their prisoners (if they bothered to let them live) and their concentration camps.

    [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Say with me: holohoax

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (31 children)

    They kept records of prisoners' identities. They shaved prisoners' heads. They issued prisoners new clothes. They cremated the corpses of prisoners that died of infectious diseases... and none of that points toward any sort of systematic killings. There's not a single authentic document mentioning any sort of extermination program, and if you claim otherwise, you're a liar and you know it.

    [–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (30 children)

    here's not a single authentic document mentioning any sort of extermination program, and if you claim otherwise, you're a liar and you know it.

    Oh really? Interesting.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (26 children)

    He's very correct.

    Also the War Of Northern Aggression was not about freeing slaves. That's more bullshit. It was about maintaining central control and full spectrum dominance when the South wanted to break away, as was their right.

    Bring the irrefutable proof to counter it and I'll change my mind.

    We've ALL been brainwashed since we were born with propaganda. Are you strong enough to actually look at counter narratives thoroughly to make up your mind for your self? I never wanted to be remotely associated with Nazi thinking but 5 years ago I actually looked and was profoundly shocked at what I discovered - but the wake up that really fucked with me was discovering the fact that climate change is a giant scam. I still care deeply about the environment, but now there's no doubt that everything the government and MSM push has a deceptive agenda behind it.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Who did?

    [–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    How were you not banned for ban evasion?

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    My second account was, I made a new one. Also who "says, in a thread where people are arguing poor Hitler had no choice but to invade Poland, and that the Holocaust was a hoax"? When did I say that?

    [–]asterias 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Justification of the invasion in Poland is not some kind of National Socialist dogma. Even in Germany of the time, too many disagreed with this.

    As for "holocaust", in countries like USA and Israel the Armenian Genocide isn't recognized as such, and paid journalists and academics are even free to claim it didn't happen. The role of cryptojews ("Young Turks") in the Armenian Genocide isn't even discussed. Yet nobody is considered guilty for this. So what's so special about "holocaust"?

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    ^

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    " Additionally, your use of "leaving the decisions in the hands of" makes you sound like one of those sovereign citizens that believes they're only subject to the rules if they personally agree with them. "

    I've long advocated for a more democratic transparent process of community justice on SaidIt. Something like a dedicated sub to bring conflicts, which of course could invite some mob mentality but that could also be countered by cooler heads and weeding out of the worst. Importantly, this diffuses some of the direct responsibility and blame that is forced upon M7, were he actually to delegate and oversee the process rather than being burdened with the entire ordeal. It seems to me as though M7 must enjoy being the axe man.

    " they're shitholes "

    Freedom of speech is not about speech you agree with. That's easy, bland, and banal. Truth and freedom are not easy.

    [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

    It's not a matter of personal bias. You are advocating for an ideology based in violence. If antifa started a sub where they advocated and coordinated violence they would get banned too.

    Yup, exactly. Nothing more really needs to be said about the matter.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

    If someone started a sub about Mao, then it would go? What about a sub about America, which is a nation founded upon genocide? Answer this fucking question or you are a hypocrite.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Agreed.

    /s/WarWatch exists, though it doesn't advocate violence.

    We need to be able to study everyone, including bad ideologies and bad history.

    Furthermore, there are MANY more NatSoc parties CURRENTLY around the world than just the German Nazis of yore and whatever might pass for it now in America or Europe.

    I can assure you I do not support NatSoc, nor ever will, but I do want to be able to know about them, understand them, and maybe even learn their strengths and weaknesses.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Yeah, I want to understand people, not write them off.

    [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Yeah if someone made a pro-Communist sub featuring pictures of Mao and the PLA army and was actively promoting that, then yeah I'd probably remove that too.

    A sub "about America" is fine, but a sub about promoting the genocide of Native Americans would also be removed.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Once again, genuinely curious, but what would you describe as promoting genocide?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Even in the United States a group that is inherently advocating for subversion of the state is subject to monitoring, especially if their primary avowed method to establish that subversion is through violence instead of persuasion or popular vote. If he thinks he's allowed to express a desire to violently overtake the duly elected representatives of the state as "free speech", and commit to declaring a plan of action to do so, he's going to swiftly find the federal courts don't agree with him on that score.

    It really comes down to a matter of planning. Outlining a plan to force such an overtake is exactly that step too far and runs directly afoul of conspiracy related laws to boot. Hosting such content, with such outlined plans, and with such an inherent manifesto of violence, runs afoul of every nations laws including those of the United States. I would argue so does hosting ANTIFA content as it does the same thing.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It's not a matter of personal bias. You are advocating for an ideology based in violence. If antifa started a sub where they advocated and coordinated violence they would get banned too.

    And that's an association fallacy. Unless I start actually advocating violence on my sub, I have a right to not get banned if this site is meant to be pro free speech.

    First off, your use of future tense just shows how delusional you are. You have already been banned.

    I have not been banned. Or at least in my opinion, I have not been banned. If I was actually "banned", I would accept that I had actually violated site rules and have gotten banned. I had not violated any. The question refers to more "Did I actually commit a policy violation?" than "Should magnora7 ban me?".

    Additionally, your use of "leaving the decisions in the hands of" makes you sound like one of those sovereign citizens that believes they're only subject to the rules if they personally agree with them.

    I did not violate any rule. A server banner with photos of Hitler isn't "promoting violence".

    Finally, as has already been said, there are websites that accept your ideology (Voat, /pol/, Gab, etc). Presumably the reason you don't want to use them is that you know they're shitholes, but that's generally what happens when a website has no content moderation policy. That's just the reality you have to contend with if you want to advocate for an extremist ideology like Nazism.

    I do use many pol boards on many sites, but the thing I like about reddit-like UI is that its highly customizable.

    [–]Questionable 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

    Oh, I am so very concerned. Anyway͚̣̯̖̲͇ͅs...

    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

    First they came for the Nazis...

    [–]FediNetizen 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    And then tens of millions of people didn't die because society decided violent extremism shouldn't be tolerated. You are referencing a poem that laments the tragedy of the Nazis rounding people up one group at a time and taking them away, and successfully doing so because the community wasn't united.

    Here's a motto for you: Fuck nazis, fuck communists, fuck violent anarchists, fuck white supremacists, fuck anyone that advocates for violence, genocide, or discrimination against a group because of factors outside of their control.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    because society decided violent extremism shouldn't be tolerated.

    Because the firebombings of Dresden and Tokyo, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the Rape of Berlin weren't violent extremism... the Western plutocracies partnered with Stalin and they ultimately had to turn Hitler into a comic book villain to justify their own atrocities, but people aren't buying it anymore.

    [–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Because the firebombings of Dresden and Tokyo, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the Rape of Berlin weren't violent extremism

    Correct, it wasn't. That was war, and possibly war crimes, but not what we're talking about here.

    they ultimately had to turn Hitler into a comic book villain to justify their own atrocities, but people aren't buying it anymore

    Sounds to me like you believe you are one of the enlightened few that "knows" the holocaust was a hoax. Explains why you're defending literal nazis I guess.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    War is not an excuse. EVERY war is built on lies and includes innocent victims.

    Sounds to my like you are one of the ignorant masses who buys the "official" narrative propaganda. Explains why you keep your mind closed.

    Also FYI, just because I understand that Hitler, the Nazis, and Germany were the underdog of WWII and are innocent of MANY things (yet very guilty of MANY other things), doesn't mean I support Hitler, the Nazis, Germany, NOR England, Russia, the USA, Canada, Australia, etc.

    FUCK ALL THE GOVERNMENTS from all of history.

    [–]scrubking 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

    You sound like a leftist trying to infiltrate this forum and bring it down.

    [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

    Ding ding ding

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    magnora replying only to three replies and ignoring 53 replies shows just how small minded the ban was.

    [–]Chipit 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

    It's not you, it's the fact that your stuff gets pointed to to try and get this whole site banned.

    In fact, I rather doubt your a natsoc at all. Whining and complaining? That's a leftist tactic. Where's the rage and all caps I associate with the far right? You sure you're not one of those leftists engaging in a parody of what you falsely believe the Right thinks? Because there are more than a few of those on this site.

    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    It's not you, it's the fact that your stuff gets pointed to to try and get this whole site banned.

    That's the main problem I am trying to address. This site can banned if someone outsider finds our content offensive. The server company has an "Acceptable Use Policy" which is basically what snowflakes/outsiders use to ban content on the site if they find it offensive. IP2 got banned due to this. If saidit indeed bans subs without any actual reason except for reddit-like standards, then they should point it out in either the sidebar or on the top of the website in big letters:

    "WE DO NOT ACTUALLY PRACTISE FREE SPEECH. WEBSITE ADMINS CAN, AT ANY TIME LABEL YOUR IDEOLOGY AS VIOLENT AND KILL YOUR SUB AND ACCOUNT. ALSO, SNOWFLAKES CAN SPAM DMCA REQUESTS WHICH CAN LEAD TO A SUB GETTING BANNED BECAUSE OF THE HOST SERVER'S POLITICAL VIEWS. "

    rage and all caps I associate with the far right

    That's your notion of the far right. And no, 4pol is not our representative.

    [–]Chipit 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    You smell like a leftist with a false mustache. You're hitting the wrong notes. This isn't what the far right gets angry about.

    [–]Jesus 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    Chipit, you were the same person who said a nice Iranian user was a shill made to bring down this site, turns out he is a great fellow who posts great material.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    You smell like a leftist with a false mustache. You're hitting the wrong notes. This isn't what the far right gets angry about.

    Ok sire, whatever you say

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    These people literally have their minds shut. I don't want a sub to actually promote violence, but I want the majority of views and ideologies to have a platform to speak. At the very least, so people can understand how the modern followers of such views are thinking and viewing the world.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    ^

    [–]md_saidit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Meh. Nazis crying foul don't really concern me.

    [–]NorfolkTerrier 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    "Yeah, I support the Nazi Party. Well no, I don't (openly) support what the Nazis actually did because I'd get banned. But the uniforms were nice, hehe. Wait, I'm still banned? OPPRESSION!"

    Poor you. Being banned by internet moderators is definitely the saddest thing that has ever happened as a result of Nazism.

    Now that that's out of the way, there is an actual issue related to this kind of thing. I'm sure a lot of people came here because of free speech. I created an account here, in part, because of leddit banning things for no reason/stupid reasons. At the same time, if a forum's only/main appeal is absolute free speech, then a problem develops where it becomes only a place for extremist rhetoric, instead of a broad community of all kinds. Because people who are not alt-rightoids, etc. will see no reason not to just go back to Reddit, the community is doomed to fail as being a true public forum.

    With that said, we did see Reddit slide from only banning actually illegal or violent content, to banning people for disagreeing with gender ideology or for supporting the current US President. If there are limits (aside from legal) on what can be posted here, they need to be consistent and established clearly. I think SaidIt should clarify what its overall sitewide rules are. As far as I can tell, all content based moderation is based on a few subjective lines about the "Pyramid of Debate."

    I agree with removing violent posts. It's pretty hard to separate Nazism from violence. On the other hand, is communism banned? Huge death toll and all of its symbols are associated with violent regimes. Is racism banned? Is promoting something that sounds vaguely communist or racist banned? From whose perspective? Etc. I'm not saying there can't be a line, but that line does need to be defined.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I disagree with your opening 2 paragraphs, but I strongly agree with the idea that things can be clarified. I think the PoD is fine, but you are correct in that it is subjective. The "law" is simple, but it needs an abundance of case examples to back it up and clarify.

    It's easy to separate Nazism from violence if you actually understand it. Same with communism - and capitalism, which are verifiably much worse.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Saying "/u/magnora7 is gay" is immature, unproven, and does not help your cause. Pointing out his hypocrisy and/or lack of strong evidence, etc. would have been your better play.

    IMHO, the sub should be allowed, just as SJW and Antifa subs should exist to defend their ideas (except for violence).

    IMHO, people should not be double banned if all they are doing is pleading their case.

    In /s/whatever/comments/6bdf/why_did_both_my_account_and_my_subsaidit_get/, /u/magnora7 states: "a literal nazi, who advocates for the extermination of other races".

    While the mainstream media has no problem lying and promoting this BS I should hope that M7 actually knows better on MANY levels.

    1) The Holocaust is a series of exaggerations and fictional myths, depending what aspects you're referring to. Meanwhile we are not allowed to post in /s/Holocaust (a private sub) or /s/HolocaustSkepticism (a locked sub), neither of which started that way, but only /s/TheHolocaust which was started by someone promoting the MSM narrative.

    2) There is a HUGE difference between trying to export (eradicate) all the Jews from Germany (true), and the "extermination", aka "Jewish Solution" (myth).

    3) Just because you support someone or some idea (ie. Trump, NatSoc, Christianity, America, Green Party, Anarchism, etc.) doesn't mean you buy into EVERYTHING they purportedly or actually represent.

    I could go on but this is already too tedious.

    When M7 is weak, it makes SaidIt weak. I have mixed feelings about M7. I have strong feelings for SaidIt. To support SaidIt I will always support M7 to the best of my ability - but never at the expense of truth-seeking. This Holocaust and Nazi shit seems to be a weakness of M7's and therefore a weakness of SaidIt. I really hope this can be resolved soon and for good, properly, and strongly with clarity and transparency.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 7 fun4 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

      You totally destroyed me.

      You have successfully and totally annihilated my argument.

      You have propitiously and equally refuted my entire argument. My argument vis a vis your argument is very weak, therefore as a figure of speech, you have destroyed it.

      This message is to inform you that the user writing the message has an opinion, that you have unconditionally and uniformly countered his argument. In this argumentation, the argument constituted by you is, vis a vis the user's argument, assailable and therefore as a stylistic device, the user informs you that you have marvelously and exceptionally obliterated his argument.