Beginning to believe these anti-racist movements have made people more racist than ever. Normal people in my area have had enough.

submitted by PencilPusher55 from self.whatever

It's so interesting to see kind and passive people in my area become clearly VERY emotional when speaking of race and "diversity".

My small town had some type of event to honor those who died in the WTC. Guess what? BLM lined up on the same street holding signs. "BLACK LIVES MATTER TO ME!". To say it made my stomach turn would be an understatement.

For just ONE DAY you couldn't give it a rest? Maybe a time to honor people that were mercilessly killed, others that had to jump to their deaths out of a skyscraper. People who lost parents, children, siblings, aunts, uncles? You had to make it about BLM?

The best part too is that when it has been brought up in casual conversation - no one holds back anymore. Voting for Trump or supporting him in these previous years used to be something you sort of kept quiet. I asked a guy about the protest tonight in a very neutral way and he said "Yeah, and we're all sick of it. These fucking losers out here".

I mean even on Youtube videos that feature "diversity", they all have thumbs down.

Yes, this could be the elites pushing us against each other but I think there is more to it. The people I know who feel this way do not see someone walking down the street (Who happens to not be white) and feel rage and hatred. It's not that primal type of mind. They hate the behavior. They detest the influx of residents in our area that litter and leave shit all over our beautiful town. They DETEST these protesters who stand out here every week.

It's behavior. Any everyone is sick of it.

To say this is a subtle observation is laughable. Even the normies have had enough.

top 100 commentsshow all 131
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]screwballeclipsed 23 insightful - 12 fun23 insightful - 11 fun24 insightful - 12 fun -  (101 children)

What's wrong with being racist?

[–]PencilPusher55[S] 15 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 4 fun -  (14 children)

Because you lose credibility. Hating a kind person off of their skin is fucked up. To me the skin is a side effect of the atrocious behavior.

[–]screwballeclipsed 24 insightful - 7 fun24 insightful - 6 fun25 insightful - 7 fun -  (11 children)

Preferring someone of my own race is not a bad thing. I don't hate someone for their skin color. I sometimes hate people because the way they are acting. So what if I hate them. It's my business and my problem. Racist is just word to change the focus to the accusing person instead of focusing on the real issue.

Used to live in a neighborhood where blacks and mexicans were moving in. I moved out because I was getting something stolen every other week. In a hood with a race similar to mine, I have less blacks and my black neighbor takes care of his property better than I do mine.

All races act like niggers. I have seen Whites, mostly blacks and sometimes mexicans act like niggers all the time. Tell me you don't hate that person who walks on the side walk and suddenly punches another person for no apparent reason. If you don't hate it, then you condone it? You think it's ok to go into a store and start tearing it up cuz some 2 time felon methhead died with 2 types of fentanyl in his body at the time of a traffic stop because he couldn't follow commands from police. Being a nigger is more of a lifestyle.

[–]RedditExPat69 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (10 children)

Preferring someone of my own race is not a bad thing.

I definitely prefer my own race re:dating. Is this considered racist?

[–]screwballeclipsed 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

i think the mainstream media and many of the marxist newspapers in the united states would call that racist. a quick search would confirm it. just look who controls all the media. who wants to make someone feel bad.

[–]RedditExPat69 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

I certainly don't feel bad as I swipe left on black women.

[–]denverkris 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

Lesbians are being called bigots or "genital fetishists" for not wanting to date "women" with a penis, so I'm going to have to say the answer is probably yes.

[–]screwballeclipsed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

that is just a tactic to divide the common people. if people are divided, they can't get together against the common issue in the united states that is destroying our way of life.

[–]denverkris 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Not sure what the "common issue" is but I don't think it matters, statement is valid anyway.

[–]screwballeclipsed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the overthrow of the united states of america. create division, mayhem, sow the seeds of govt distrust and ability. control of information/disinformation. infiltrate and corrupt.

[–]SaidOverRed 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Only if you are white and going against the genocide narrative.

(Sigh. OP is right. Okay, fine, time to start getting based)

[–]jet199Instigatrix 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Not at the moment. Everything sexual is protected from wokescolds by the mass of perverts within the movement.

[–]Notapickme 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I don't blame you with dating. I'm half Hispanic, half white. I'm naturally attracted to Hispanic men but they are definitely alot more misogynist than white men.

[–]Leo_Littlebook 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Motte and bailey. The whole world is ethnocentric. When whites try ethnocentrism, it's called racism. And then racism is equated with hate.

Clearly the real hatred is against badwhites for the crime of being able to topple governments with their rifles.

[–]Intuit 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Racists don't hate people because of their skin, but because of their behavior and values which predispose them to violence against one's own people.

[–]DoubleReverse 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (56 children)

What's wrong with ostracizing you for being racist?

[–]screwballeclipsed 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (49 children)

Why should one be ostracized for preferring ones own race?

[–]DoubleReverse 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (42 children)

You can prefer whoever you want, but if you don't respect other people's rights that's an issue

[–][deleted] 16 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 5 fun -  (24 children)

Access to white people is not a right.

[–]DoubleReverse 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (23 children)

Access to your own land and community is a right.

[–][deleted] 18 insightful - 5 fun18 insightful - 4 fun19 insightful - 5 fun -  (22 children)

Indeed. Europe for Europeans.

[–]DoubleReverse 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

That's exactly right. Europe for Europeans, regardless of their skin color.

[–]asterias 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Europeans do have a skin colour and it's white. There are no "african europeans" or "brown europeans".

[–]DoubleReverse 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Semantics

[–]Maryam 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

No one wants to enter Europe to access the white folk.

And land belongs to no one.

[–]screwballeclipsed 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

yew forget of all the africans that flooded europe for the free gibs after khaddaffi was killed.

And land belongs to no one

incorrect. land does belong to the people. the people live there. the people maintain the land. the people defend the land.

land belonging to no one is a marxist socialism idea.

[–]Conductive-rabbi 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

Cope

[–]screwballeclipsed 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

i wouldn't think that the riots are a right. i don't feel i have the right to burn anything that is someone else's property.

not sure which rights we're speaking of.

[–]DoubleReverse 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

The same rights that white people have

[–]screwballeclipsed 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

not sure what rights you speak of.

maybe it's the right to have an organization that 'prefers' or helps a certain race get ahead like the naacp. that would be racist. or maybe laws that require a business to have a certain amount of individuals employed from a certain race like affirmative action. but that would be racist. whites don't have those rights.

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

The ones in the Constitution

[–]screwballeclipsed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

the united states constitution is a document of the supreme laws in the united states. maybe you're speaking of the bill of rights, the amendments to the constitution?

maybe you can enlighten me as to which rights people other than Whites, do not have?

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

the united states constitution is a document of the supreme laws in the united states.

Looks like you're ready for 4th grade

maybe you're speaking of the bill of rights, the amendments to the constitution?

All of the parts of the constitution

maybe you can enlighten me as to which rights people other than Whites, do not have?

None, because the alt right isn't in power anymore.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]screwballeclipsed 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    (((critical race theory comes from marxism))) and sounds like a bunch of shit to make the truth convoluted. maybe i just don't know enough about it, but i'm not going to take a course about it. it's up there with (((gender studies)))

    [–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    I know nothing about it but I hate it

    Alt right in a nutshell

    [–]screwballeclipsed 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    I know nothing about it but I hate it

    the left: twisting words to fit their narrative

    [–]DoubleReverse 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    Liberalism is all about equality of opportunity and the rejection of racial determinism. If you think liberalism actually has a problem with white people as a group, you're falling for an alt right strawman.

    [–][deleted] 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    What's wrong with ostacizing you for being a leftist faggot?

    [–]DoubleReverse 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Be my guest lol

    [–]antireddit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    If an individual chooses to thats fine. When an ethnocentric tribe use their money and power to promote racism against whites and ostracize whites that push back and display the same ethnocentrism they do, thats a problem, and thats what we have now.

    [–]DoubleReverse 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    That still wouldn't entitle you to persecute other people

    [–]antireddit 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    No it doesnt, and I never said it does. Persecution is when those in power use it to attack those without power. So who is persecuting who?

    [–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Ideally nobody. Definitely not you, as long as the rest of us have a say in the matter.

    [–]bjam27 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    This is where I'm at.

    If I choose the wrong pancake syrup then the left says I'm a racist. Meanwhile they're pushing for legit segregation.

    Big fucking whoop, guess I'm a racist, who gives a shit anymore.

    [–]screwballeclipsed 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    all of this -ism -phobic and -ist talk is just a tactic to divide people against a common enemy.

    edit: when one wears out, (((they'll))) move to another divide tactic and the circle keeps going.

    [–]suckitreddit 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    What's wrong with being racist?

    Well, let's put aside the hyperbole, and lies. The fact is most people are decent people. Hating a whole group because a relatively small percent is detrimental to yourself, and society. Does that mean you should always lower your guard, and trust everyone? Of course not. Humans are humans, and humans can hurt other humans. But to think that one or a few represent everyone else is unscientific.

    [–]screwballeclipsed 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    yeah, most people are decent people. the fact is 13% of a certain group (as per the fbi website) comprises the population of the united states, yet that same group commits 50% of the violent crime in the united states. so i don't think it's one or a few.

    also, as per fbi website( and one can easily check the fbi website themselves) that the police in the united states shoot more unarmed white men in the united states than unarmed black men. but there's a group that is brainwashed by the media that think they're 'oppressed.' so that 'oppressed' group who is mostly, pushed by the same group that controls the media, riots and burns cities for a greater agenda.

    [–]Intuit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    It's actually 100% of that group that comprises 13% of the population and is represented in over 50% of the crime.

    [–]screwballeclipsed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    i forgot the exact numbers but 9% (black males under 25) are most of that group that causes all that diversity

    [–]Maryam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    50% of the population represents 90% of crime in the entire globe.

    Feminism is the logical conclusion.

    [–]screwballeclipsed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    feminism is just one of the results of the logical conclusion. dig a little deeper. (((who))) started feminism or promotes it the most?

    [–]NutsToReddit 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    It is antithetical to individualism and meritocracy. It means you judge a person not by his or her own actions or merits but by an intrinsic trait they have no control over.

    [–]screwballeclipsed 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    so i am racist against hispanics cuz i see them sweat and work hard to get ahead. i am likely to hire one. so not all of them have that work ethic, but i'm racist because of that.

    it's easy to judge by the group, yes, especially when a certain group is seen to be the race mostly committing crimes and attacking people. or how about a group that controls media to subvert a country or people, psychologically and control the currency to subvert a country/people economically. writing this, i can see why many think races other than white cannot be racist. but they still are.

    i can see your argument, but being called a racist is nothing to me other than a word to make someone feel like they did something wrong because the accuser doesn't agree with something.

    [–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

    Racism privileges mouthbreathers that happen to belong to the majority race, over more competent people that don't. I've met plenty of highly intelligent black people, and also plenty of white dipshits. Even if racial differences do exist, there are plenty of smart people in all racial groups, and those people in non-white groups would be prevented from holding important positions that they would be well-suited for, if the white mouthbreathers get their way. And society would be worse for it.

    I don't want mouthbreathers like you, that have trouble seeing past skin color, to have political power.

    [–]polync 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    In short: "racism is bad because only dumb people are racist; I don't want to be dumb like you, racist". Excellent argument, FediNetizen!

    [–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Indeed. Meritocracy is preferable to ethnocracy. Those that think otherwise are just simpletons that should not be leading anything.

    [–]polync 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Isn't there a circular reasoning fallacy in your words? Like you're not answering the original question "what's wrong with being racist". You just put tags (dumb person, simpleton, mouthbreather) upon racist people and assert they should be restricted from doing something (leading anything) for no reason provided. That tells something about you, and not about the racist people.

    [–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Lol, it is thoroughly unsurprising that as a racism advocate you operate at a level where you think circular reasoning is some exotic concept that needs to be explained. Thanks for proving my point though.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So, if Jewish Zionists push meritocracy, then this could lead to Jewish control? Or if white supremacists do the same, then white nationalists taking over?

    [–]screwballeclipsed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    you seem genuine about your feelings, so i will respond.

    Racism privileges mouthbreathers that happen to belong to the majority race

    the majority race on the planet are blacks if you haven't noticed.

    over more competent people that don't.

    how does one being racist make them incompetent?

    I've met plenty of highly intelligent black people

    i have yet to meet any highly intelligent black people. i have a neighbor and some inlaws that are smart enough to stay out of this whole BurnLootMurder sham. i doubt you have met any 'highly intelligent blacks,' not because they don't exist, but look at society. the world in general. do you see any black societies thriving(besides wakanada?) look at africa. the most fertile land on the planet, maybe even the most beautiful. rich with soil and minerals. do you see a pattern? where are those highly intelligent blacks?

    plenty of white dipshits

    yes, there are plenty of those. no disagreement there, but you seem to think this is a black and white thing, why?

    Even if racial differences do exist, there are plenty of smart people in all racial groups

    there are (not plenty) of smart people in all groups, just like there are "dipshits' in all groups. but look at the world, do you see any race leading the world? which race has led the world? give me 5 things invented by the race that has led the world in terms of anything, economics, agriculture, whatever...while you're doing that, look at the races who are not leading. are they destroying?

    if the white mouthbreathers get their way. And society would be worse for it.

    i disagree. look at white societies in the past. say, 1950's america. 1930's germany or europe. those times were vibrant, peaceful. the pictures i see from then show a happy people. no riots from a 2 time felon methhead that was on 2 types of fentanyl, so drugged up he couldn't take orders from police.

    i think i can agree with you that the world isn't perfect. it never will be. whites have been doing pretty good, with many mistakes, but i think if you were to research most of those mistakes, there was a dirty hand behind the curtain that is exposing themselves more and more as of late. just remember, google is not your friend.

    [–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    So you don't like racism, but think it's a good idea to incite anger in those groups through insults? In particular calling out the "white mouthbreathers that get in the way". You're not doing a very good job of promoting your ideology are you? Seems more likely that you are here for the endorphin rush.

    [–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    You can open up any American History textbook and find out what happens when your nation is built on institutional racism. Slavery was justified because of the supposed inferiority of black people. Same with Jim Crow laws, and the racism that pervaded the south until recent history. Emmett Till was 14 when he was kidnapped, tortured, shot in the head, and had his body dumped in a river, all for making some kind of inappropriate comment to a white lady. When on trial after being caught, the defense team made direct appeals to race when they asked the jury to acquit. "Every last Anglo-Saxon one of you men in this jury has the courage to set these men free." is one of the most famous lines by the defense.

    White supremacists, racists, or anyone that consciously chooses to view other people as sub-human because of group membership factors outside of their control, do not deserve respect. I wasn't even trying to upset anyone, just being honest about my feelings of contempt. But you want me to play nice with racists, and act like it's a simple difference of opinion between two reasonable people? Go fuck yourself.

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Don't forget Jewish supremacism; such as Rabbi Kooks followers. Empires trying to be empires will always fall.

    [–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    №thing you just said relates to my comments in any way. And again you end it raging in anger.

    "But you want me to play nice with racists,"

    Yes, I actually do. If you can't even bring yourself to articulate your ideologies in response to the simplest of questions such as the ones in this thread "What's wrong with being racist?", then № one will listen to you. You are only inciting anger in others.

    №w if you open up a history book. You may end up experiencing a small panic attack.

    Once you are done ponder that, you may have further questions to ask, such as, why aren't there as many black ancestors in Europe in spite of more slaves being shipped there? Hint it involves sterilizations and cullings. Or, what was the origin of the word slave? Or, what ethnic group owned the most slaves in America? Or even more importantly, which groups of people were selling the slaves out of Africa?

    Or more importantly than even those questions, are the questions ȯ̵̹̝̕f our modern life, since we don't live in the past. Which group of people currently perform the majority ȯ̵̹̝̕f manual labor in America today, providing services in a debt based society, constituting modern slavery? Hint, it's №t based on their skin color, but on the abuse ȯ̵̹̝̕f their work ethics.

    Good luck w͚ͮi̮̲t͐͊̚ḧ̯̻̖͐͆ t̷̋h̸̙͍̒̕a̵̛͉̘̰͝ṫ̸̡̕.̷̱̬̀̀

    Ĥ̅͛ǝ̮̺͕̲̰llo ʍoɹlp' I,m Qnǝsʇᴉouɐqlǝ.̬̘̟ͅ

    [–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    "Oh my god, black people owned slaves too."

    It's annoying when self-absorbed mouthbreathers throw out trivial facts like they're supposed to be bombshells. Slavery isn't an American invention, but the institution of slavery in America was rooted in racism, as were the Jim Crow laws that followed. It was only through the civil rights movement, which was an explicit rejection of racism, that minorities in America were finally given the civil rights to which they should have always been entitled.

    If you think this inane shit is supposed to rock my world, I suggest you extricate your head from your asshole.

    [–]Zahn 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    How do you manage to talk so much and still not say anything important at all?

    but the institution of slavery in America was rooted in racism

    So do tell, in what culture that practised slavery was it believed that the slaves were not thought to be ethnically or racially inferior? How is the U.S. different in this regards?

    load more comments (2 replies)

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]screwballeclipsed 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        i don't see how it can be 'funnier.' i don't know what tgw is.

        it's a terrible idea to divide people and racist is just another word to do so. a certain group of people use those -ist, -ism words to create outrage because it sells so well. good news doesn't sell much.

        [–]passionflounderPaper tiger 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Frankly I believe the intent is to divide us in part by fanning flames of racism. So much media and political poison has damaged our minds to the point where any political or social cause discussion between differing viewpoints is all but impossible.

        It is most likely by design. Instigating chaos and create a crisis for which there is a ready remedy.

        [–]blah-blah-blah-blah 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        Several years ago looking for conservative-ish content on youtube (back when such things were still allowed) I stumbled across lots of clips of people like Stephan Molyneux, Ben Shapiro, Jared Taylor at American Renaissance, Jordan Peterson, and the great Victor Davis Hanson.

        Molyneux and Peterson were the ones who woke me up to information about intelligence, personality, psychology, behavior and genetics. It really explained everything about why blacks are so unsuccessful in this technological society, and that by not addressing the truth, we are sentencing ourselves to a perpetual spiral of hate and recrimination coming from blacks that has nothing to do with us, and everything to do with their own biology.

        Jared Taylor, and later Colin Flaherty made me aware of the true dimension of black criminality that I wasn't paying attention to before. It still amazes me how much blacks are getting away with inflicting so much savage harm on everyone else, and still being treated as victims and martyrs. It's mind boggling.

        If you are of a mind to, check out Stephan Molyneux's podcasts on www.freedomain.com with Charles Murray or Linda Gottfredson. Intelligence and it's genetic heritability are extremely important to what is going on right now.

        Also, check out American Renaissance presentation 'the color of crime'. It's a big wake-up to anyone who thinks that white people are essentially the same as blacks when it comes to criminal behavior. It's not even close.

        Colin Flaherty is a bit more rough around the edges in his presentation of black criminality, but he's a national treasure, and a bottomless trove of information on that subject. He wrote two books on the subject: 'Don't Make the Black Kids Angry', and 'White Girl Bleed a Lot'. He also does podcasts and videos, and has a channel on Bitchute called 'Undeniable Truth'.

        [–]Tarrock 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

        The founding fathers only wanted "White, land-owning men in good standing" voting for a reason. 3 of those 4 are have been destroyed, while candidates like Bernie Sanders have attempted to destroy the last one (remember when he said the Boston Bomber should vote?).

        -This was founded to be a white country. 90% of Americans during WW2 said they'd rather lose to Hitler than give the negro civil rights. Shame society has been crumbling since then.

        -The founding fathers believed that only land-owning men should be voting as if you had enough wealth to own land, then that meant that you were well enough to have time to get educated on the political process and understand the issues. You can go over to Reddit and see how misinformed the people straight out of high school are.

        -Men think with facts, while women think with emotion. The Romans had a theatrical play they used to do 2000 years where all the men stepped down and put the women in charge. The first thing they do is basically enact communism and sexual liberation. It's common fact that women will trade anything for security, it's in their nature. You can go on twitter and see how much of a problem women in, this is who's leading cancel culture. When all the real problems are gone, women start going after mean-words and will happily destroy their constitutional rights just to think they won and get a tiny sliver of security from being called bad words.

        The problem is the fact that most people are indeed NPCs and will be follow what their overlords tell them. Good for those normies for waking up, but the current mess we're in is because of normies. The MSM is too powerful and the media wing is basically unchecked in the constitution. If people started going after the MSM's advertisers and pushed back when they advocated for the destruction from free speech by advocating against freedom of the press, shit would quickly start to change.

        But the right is too lazy to actually do that. Besides that, I think the only way this ends at this point is conflict where the left ends up ground under the heel of the right, destroying HUNDREDS of years of the shit they've been pushed forever.

        [–]yishengqingwa666 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

        "Men think with facts, while women think with emotion."

        LOL, male MRA "logic", folks. Big thinkins, mm hmm.

        https://trustyourperceptions.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/dudesaredoomed1/

        https://icemountainfire.wordpress.com/2014/11/17/men-are-not-broken/

        [–]asterias 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        The Romans had a theatrical play they used to do 2000 years where all the men stepped down and put the women in charge.

        Not the Romans but the Greeks

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata

        [–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        remember when he said the Boston Bomber should vote?

        You mean the fake bombing PsyOp? With another stupid PsyOp narrative built in?

        Search plasmaburns on bitchute watch his videos. The bombings were hyperactive drills.

        [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        hyperactive drills.

        Hadn't heard that great term before.

        Yes. The Boston bombing was easily verifiably as phony as a 13 dollar bill.

        [–]Intuit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        And for people who say that this denied women the vote, that's not the case. Land-owning men being able to vote meant that families voted - all the concerns of the people in that family went into the vote made.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]Intuit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Whites are the only people who actually want to accommodate other cultures. Which is why whites are preyed upon by foreigners.

          [–]slushpilot 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

          I think you're right. Maybe anti-racism hasn't made people more racist, but certainly more distrustful of each other.

          If I have to worry that someone is going to report me for a "microaggression" or have me fired because of something I "liked" online, then I'm going to try and stay away from people who might do that (regardless of their race) and keep my mouth shut about my true feelings.

          [–]SaidOverRed 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

          OP is definitely right. The left thinks they are going whip the normies into good little NPCs or get more fascists because they make for good strawmen to go burn at the stake. But they are mostly wrong. Yes, some do succumb to TDS, but what really happens is that the moderates wake up and move to the right. Those already on the right don't move to fascism (although we are becoming more hard-assed than before) because all their stupidity just shows that we were correct all along.

          In 1990 being called anti-black was like being called a witch in the Salem trials. Being called anti-black in 2020 is like being called a witch when the last Harry Potter book came out. It just doesn't have the same punch. No one cares if you actually are pro-this or anti-whatever. Be a good person & citizen otherwise and it's as ignorable as the fact that you may or may not like Yemenese people. Either way doesn't matter.

          [–]PencilPusher55[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Yes, exactly. What's sad is that this poor behavior unfortunately reinforces a lot of stereotypes.... mostly racial ones. It's not to say that they do it BECAUSE they are that skin color, but now they're rendered "immune" to criticism because if you dare speak out against it, you're racist.

          When you specifically mention the behavior, normies are much more open to having a conversation and that's when you see what they really think. Trust me, I am infuriated with the leftists in my town. They are all frail white people that can barely hold up the BLM signs.

          My biggest fear is that they open some type of doorway to chaos if they keep having these protests... If they get as big as the ones I see on Youtube and what not. If that were to happen and property were to be damaged, my town would fucking lynch them.

          [–]IridescentAnaconda 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          Consider that the term "anti-racist" might not mean "opposed to racism", but rather "racist in the opposite direction".

          [–]Jesus 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          If Laura Loomer is against BLM AND BLM is anti-Zionist and anti-Israel, then I must question everything.

          [–]Riva 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          https://twitter.com/SVNewsAlerts/status/1304957995793690630

          Normal people have had enough.

          [–]bagano1 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

          It has.

          Also, all you have to do is go to the rich neighborhoods where the "chosen people" live to see who has the biggest Black Lives Matter signs.

          I just don't get what their deal is. They seem to get a kick out of f***ing up society.

          [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          Chaos is a tool. If you have power the masses will look to you to bring a solution to the chaos. If you have the power you get to rewrite the rules (in your favour) to "stop" the chaos. You get more power, more wealth, more control - to "fix" the chaos and thereafter. The ignorant masses are manipulated more, are exploited more, and suffer more.

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          Very much like the plot of V for Vendetta. Create a problem (disease), allow for the ensuing chaos to galvanize people into looking to YOU for help, then release the solution (medicine) and profit.

          [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Indeed!

          [–]Spicylikegumbo 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

          Are you implying white people don't litter or display trash behavior? I don't get what is wrong with protesting. Are they breaking any laws? How is what they are doing stopping you from honoring 9/11 victims? They don't have to honor them, but you are free to do so. They have no obligation to honor deaths of people they did not know. Sure it was a national tragedy, but there were countless tragedies. You don't stop your life because of it.

          [–]PencilPusher55[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

          Well, when my town consisted of... one demographic, the town was immaculate. No crime, and I'm not exaggerating. There was zero crime. It's all over now.

          As for the 9/11 victims. Yes, we get it - You can protest whenever or where ever you want. It's your right. The issue was tact and class.

          I watch these videos of firefighters going in to save people, innocent citizens leaping out of a window covered in smoke only to die in the most horrific way imaginable, people being crushed be debris as the building fell down.

          Maybe just one day make it about someone else and not BLM. But as stated, none of the frail white liberal fucks in my area care about BLM. This is ENTIRELY about having the eyes on them. It's full fledged narcissism. They could not care less about the black people who died from police, let alone black on black crime. LOL. YEAH RIGHT!

          They have no obligation to honor the deaths, fine. But to pick the same night for your gay little protest holding up your shitty cardboard signs with platitudes on them? It's being distasteful.

          [–]Intuit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Yes, it's more general than just race, it's about values. Shared values means that you can treat your fellow man as yourself because he will do the same, and your actions further both of your goals since they are aligned. People of the same race can be corrupted with garbage like Marxism and thus have very different values than yourself.

          load more comments (4 replies)

            [–]DisgustResponse 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            They have no obligation to honor deaths of people they did not know.

            Pathetic.

            [–]Trajan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            The whole identity politics idea is doomed to create racism. We have enough research to show that making race more salient encourages division by race. Threatening the group identity, as in treating white people like they are monsters, causes people to react in defence of their shared identity. Most of this research was performed by researchers who very much did not want this outcome. There’s been a lot of work to try to understand how to make multiculturalism work, and none of it recommends raising minorities above all others. The same effects apply with sex and sexual orientation.

            [–][deleted]  (1 child)

            [removed]

              [–]PencilPusher55[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

              Yes. I am a sensitive snowflake.