all 127 comments

[–]magnora7[S] 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

I hate the NPC meme because it's dehumanizing language...

but I also have this feeling like I have had in dreams... like why do I think so differently from everyone around me? It's just weird and borderline unnerving at this point. But that's the point of the MKULTRA-style Project Mockingbird propaganda, is to induce this feeling, right?

I'm just very confused about a lot of what is happening, as I imagine everyone else is. So we all have that in common, at least. I think inducing feelings of confusion is also part of the propaganda though, as it disables people. Confused people won't unify to solve real problems.

I just have this feeling like I've been running a marathon to find the truth for decades now and I look behind me and it turns out everyone I thought I was running with me stopped running a long time ago and I never realized how far back everyone was until now.

They say hard times makes for strong men, and strong men create good times, and good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. It's a cycle that never ends. I think we are in the "hard times" part, and the weak people are being forced to become strong through hardship, and boy is it not fun at all.

I don't know what to do other than sit back and wait, and just try to occupy my time with things that bring me joy instead of hitting my head against a wall over and over trying to talk to people who don't want to listen. But if everyone with uncomfortable truths did that, then there'd be no way for culture and community to move forward... so there has to be a balance. But lately I am out of energy to try and spread the truth because the absolute force of manufactured culture right now just makes it seem like an impossible task. It wouldn't work if people were more critically-minded, but most are too tired and too time-poor and and too emotional to really think about things clearly. Especially when the chips are down and they're scared, then they revert to old ways of behaving apparently, trusting the media they know is lying to them, and trusting the pharma companies they know are corrupt, just because they're so desperate for a solution to exist. A sense of desperation that was created by the media blowing covid way out of proportion. Problem -> reaction -> solution.

I don't get how people don't see this. Can you imagine a world where 90% of people know the above, and it's seen as common sense? Maybe someday. I have a dream.

[–]send_nasty_stuff 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's a cycle that never ends. I think we are in the "hard times" part, and the weak people are being forced to become strong through hardship, and boy is it not fun at all.

Just because it's not 'fun' doesn't mean it can't be enlightening. Embrace the pain and suffering. Embrace the transformation.

I just have this feeling like I've been running a marathon to find the truth for decades now and I look behind me and it turns out everyone I thought I was running with me stopped running a long time ago and I never realized how far back everyone was until now.

The search for truth is not a carnival cruise line full of swinging singles.

Problem -> reaction -> solution.

Easy to observe for those with eyes to see.

[–]ISaidWhatISaid 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are training a whole generation to mistake their capitulation to targeted manipulation for badges of excellence. Your first priority should be yourself and your own health, mental and physical, and that of your family and closest friends. Stop wasting your energy on others. Stop expecting others to stand up, expecting others speak up, wondering why everyone else got left behind, etc. You can wait til you are blue in the face for others to stand up and speak, only for them to say the wrong things. You should focus on positive things and things you can actually change. Let everyone else do their own thing, their behaviour will catch up with them eventually. Prioritize yourself and don't allow the mistakes of others to waste your time.

[–][deleted]  (12 children)


    [–]send_nasty_stuff 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Lol. I'm amazed the mods of this sub let you keep this comment up. If you were posting on DAR this comment would have been deleted in minutes. Stop larping that you are going to 'take down' 10k people. You're full of shit and probably a shill designed to make dissidents look violent, which we aren't. It's also hilarious that you would imply it's some type of 'catholic' NWO order controlling things. Wow. Can you get any more obvious Mr. Shekelstein?

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I would have nuked it, but he replied to m7, m7 needs to see it for sure

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    Heck, even if everything fails, and I guarantee that I can eventually setup the raid on the CIA and FSB, I'll setup a solo run myself and I guarantee I'll take down 10,000 + of this Catholic MoFos before going down myself.

    This is low pyramid and the kind of shit that can ruin saidit.

    [–]HibikiBlackThe Easter Bunny 🐰 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    I'm sorry I admitted it was kind of controversial myself but I honestly don't know in what other way we can seriously oppose the government.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    There are ways to hint at that shit without spelling it out. I don't think the idea will accomplish meaningful and sustainable change though. and murder is fucked up*

    [–]HibikiBlackThe Easter Bunny 🐰 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    I wish things weren't so split as they are now but we are in a "It's them or us" scenario. They are literally committing mass murder as part of their agenda. Either way, I've been wanting to have a long chat with you guys about the controversy behind my sub.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    If you'd like to hear from someone who disagrees with these points, with those at the sub, and a "Nationalist Revolution" and thinks there are much more immediate and effective solutions to national problems without having to use questionable rumors, do let me know.

    For starters, let's think of Schopenhauer's 3 evils: paranoia, pessimism and suspicion

    Those will not be helpful in a revolution for the 99%

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Neither is shilling for pedophiles, but you don't seem to grasp this.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Awesome. Thanks for letting me know.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    You don't give a shit. But u/Magnora7 shouldn't be played by shills, but it seems to be his weakness.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    removed for advocating violence

    [–]StillLessons 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    I see precisely what you see. Well said.

    Communication on the internet is a huge part of the problem. Human communication is a very poorly understood phenomenon, but I theorize that humans evolved to communicate face to face. We need the body language and auditory voice cues that real-life conversation provides to gain context. This business of "communicating" via keyboard (as I am doing right now in response to you doing the same) has eliminated a lot of the context we need to understand each other fully. This allows for de-humanization en masse.

    Having said that, ours is certainly not the first generation to face a moral panic. I am quite sure the people in the witch era in the 1600s felt an equal terror as an equal wave of irrationality and hatred washed over the "out" group of the time. So maybe the internet is just the current expression of the same age-old insanity we have been subject to since the beginning of humanity.

    But I have noticed that people I talk to IRL (which I do as much as I can, even with random passers-by) are not nearly as insane as what we are seeing on all these "boards". People express stupidity in these "keyboard exchanges" that they simply don't say face-to-face. The effect of insulation from the social pushback is real. I am also quite confident that people are confusing what we hear through media (of all kinds, social and traditional) with reality in a way that is flat-out wrong.

    We talk about this so much on this site. Having these sociopaths sitting in the middle, able to "adjust" the stories we are trying to send one another across "their" media, is a terrible model.

    As much as possible, get off these screens and talk to people. Maintain our calm, but don't stop talking. Even when it's uncomfortable, keep talking. I saw a piece by a guy recently who was unexpectedly optimistic, saying that he thinks we're coming out of the darkness with this insanity rather than entering it. If he's right, I would expect people to realize over the next several years that all this time we are spending on these keyboards - here I am as I write this - is a dead end. We have gone into a blind alley, and it's time for us to put these machines down and get back to a direct experience of the world around us rather than a mediated one.

    The times in this moment are very dark, without a doubt. In dark times or light, however, the best any of us can do is to model the light. Your posts do that. I deeply appreciate your perspective and the forum you have maintained here (even with all the flaws any such forum will have) for discussions such as this.


    [–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Thank you. I agree with everything you say. But it's very hard to meet people with the internet being corrupted, and all IRL places of meeting being shut down or having weird rules that result in uncomfortable conversations if I am to speak honestly. I am having a hard time "going along to get along" as most people seem to doing very hard right now. Maybe all this will fade away in a few years and it'll just be a bad memory. I am just shocked, honestly. And I shouldn't be, but I am. There's just so much absolute bullshit happening right now that it's system overload for my brain, and I'm not sure that the solution is to go pet a kitten and play video games all day, you know what I mean?

    There's a lot of uncomfortable emotional labor that needs doing in the public square right now, and it seems very few want to do any heavy lifting.

    [–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    That's a great observation. Online chatter can take the human element out of conversation and can bring out the worst in some since there is no ongoing feedback.

    [–]Rah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Witch hunting at the time was the attempt at rationalizing, not the opposite.

    [–]jet199Instigatrix 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    People are stupid.

    But people are group animals who are meant to work together not come up with the solutions all on their own.

    One of the worst things in hindsight was letting lockdowns, masks, vaccines, etc become a left vs right issue. There are both left and right wing arguments against these things and we need to employ both.

    One of the best things anti covid measures people in the US can do right now is to reach out to those groups like BLM and form a single issue alliance with people they would otherwise fight. This strategy has been very successful for feminists in the UK over the trans issue.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Like Zionists?

    [–]raven9 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    You are not alone. There are millions of us. The effort to force these poisonous fake vaccines on us are crimes against humanity and even though that is being fully exposed by doctors, scientists and independant journalists all over the world the evil tyrants are doubling down on it.

    We must all now all work together and co-ordinate to fight them.This is a war. Our weapon is the truth and our ammunition is the testimony of all the scientists and doctors that have produced the videos to put that truth out there. Share those videos with everyone you know.

    [–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Of course I support the vaccines as the most promising means to quickly wipe out the morons.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    You and your Jewish over-lords of course love the murdering of millions.

    [–]Ludditebardd 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I do not participate online as much as I once did, but I felt I should say a bit here. I agree with you on many levels, and respect what you have said. The country seems to have lost its mind, and the world is not any better. Especially the English speaking world that it is easy for us to get our news from. I often wonder if 5 eyes isn't creating an intentional narrative of the world view that we have. Is it all a distraction from the collapse of the US dollar?

    I am not sure what's going on, but I am sure that lines are being drawn. The way that people talk is so entrenched, so black and white, so us verses them; its the talk of people who are not willing to compromise. Its the talk that leads to civil war. I often think that agencies are trying to steer the narrative to eventually benefit their cause. But I think this time they are loosing control.

    I wish I didn't live so close to Seattle. I wish I owned property with land. I wish my extended and immediate family agreed with me, even a little bit. I wish this wasn't happening.

    But I am glad for places online like this. For people who have sanity and decency like you. We are not all shills and bots. We are not all crazy, or extreme. Thanks to everyone with a sense of humanity and decency left in them, thanks for being out there.

    [–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Thank you as well, comments like yours is how we build a community. You have said a lot of important things to consider here.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (23 children)

    Thanks for this.

    Here's the rub: whereas we should challenge Big Corp and money in politics, the anti-vax movement will continue to divide people. Big Corp and the .01% are manipulating the anti-vaxxers so that they'll argue over facts and science, whilst the .01% fleece the 99% for everything. It should be obvious. We saw 4 years of this under the Trump Admin, with politicians handing themselves tax breaks while putting the US $27 trillion in debt. Now that there is an opportunity to invest in the 99% (the jobs bill; and the defeated voters' rights bill), rather than give more money to the 1%, there is absolute resistence from the GOP and 2 traitor Senators. The solution to this insanity is obvious: vote greedy politicians out of office next year, and help elect an electable person who represents you. Reasonable solutions can only occur at that level. Regarding anti-vax campaigns: who does it benefit to make people mistrust a vaccine that's been administered 6.6 billion times without incident (with the exception of 2 dozen blood clots)? This campaign benefits the .01%, because they want COVID19 to spread, as this makes them rich, and harms everyone else. I normally don't want to influence anyone on Saidit, and I am under no illusion that I will convince an anti-vaxxer, but if I were to genuinely want Saiditors to know something, it's what I've written here. The anti-vax propaganda is a psyop, an information war meant to get votes for the GOP. Check the facts and science of their claims. Think of who pays millions for their propaganda. Moreover, the temporary profits of 2 or 3 Big Pharma companies are nothing compared with the long term benefits of the GOP control of politics, where they deregulate corporate oversight (as they've done in the past) and they borrow from China to give themselves tax breaks, leaving you with the bill. THAT's the problem, not a vaccine. Of course Big Pharma cannot be fully trusted. But who will regulate them? The GOP? Hell no. Vote the bastards out of office. Are vaccines dangerous? No. Does an increase in the percentage of vaccinated adults help open small businesses and end lockdowns? Yes. That should be a priority.

    [–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    whereas we should challenge Big Corp and money in politics, the anti-vax movement will continue to divide people. Big Corp and the .01% are manipulating the anti-vaxxers so that they'll argue over facts and science, whilst the .01% fleece the 99% for everything.

    Yes, this bears repeating. This is clearly what is happening, at this point it couldn't be more obvious. Yet so many don't see it.

    The solution to this insanity is obvious: vote greedy politicians out of office next year, and help elect an electable person who represents you.

    Yeah, if only we had a legitimate voting system instead of a rigged electronic-only one run by one company that's never audited, and mathematically guaranteed to be dominated by two parties by design. Voting local is good though. But people who seek power are usually the ones that shouldn't have it.

    The idea government represents the people is just a fiction perpetuated to keep those in power, in power. The "social contract" is just the minimum amount of stuff they have to do to trick the public in to supporting their positions of power. Now that we're in a crisis situation, we see the social contract go right out the window, because now people are kept in check by fear, rather than by acceptance of the social contract.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    (Sorry - one more point) Yes, there are problems with elections, which is why twice the required number of people need to be engaged in them. And yes, politics attracts greedy jerks. But the people who wrote a bill to improve the election process were stopped in their tracks by the GOP and 1 or 2 corrupt democrats. This bill could hit the floor again if there were not as many of the GOP. Anyone in office more than 2 terms really should be voted out of office (as these are often the greedy jerks). The prospect of a career as a legislator must end. It's an honor and a public service, and it's good to have actual Eisenhower conservatives in office, if anyone really wants to do that. The current GOP (and many Dems) are not focused on public service. I appreciate that this is rather aspirational, but I do think we should focus on this process in the next year, even those of us who want the GOP to win. Get the old folks out, I say. On the issue of electoral and corporate legislation, only the Dems are pulling their weight in this category, but there are hopefully "conservatives" who may eventually agree with them. Years ago there were many deals agross the aisle. McConnell and other crooks need to go, if there is going to be any actual legislation in D.C. Currently everything is a standstill. And Biden and the Dems should be much bolder than they have been. They appear weak.

    [–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Voting participation doesn't matter one iota if the voting system itself is rigged. It matters not who votes, but who counts the votes. Especially in a system like ours that has zero transparency or paper trail.

    Thinking about things in terms of Dems and Reps is like watching Professional Wrestling and believing the Kayfabe is completely real. It's Kabuki Theater at this point. Like this comic:

    Neither side is standing up for Americans in any way, shape, or form, for over 40 years now.

    Vote all you want, but there are bigger things to focus on. One solitary piece of input to the political system every 2 years isn't going to solve our problems any more than it already has.

    Time to focus on the thing that controls them both. It's more powerful than either of them.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    OK - then - this is why I have been at Saidit: I'll look forward to reading about the proposed alternate solutions. (I regularly ask for examples, especially at debatealtright, but I've not seen any effective examples. I've noted what I think will work. Thanks for setting up the discussion, another reason I visit Saidit.)

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    You are transparent!

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    H. G. Wells would be impressed.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Shit joke.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)



    Elections are rigged or unrigged from the very beginning, depending on the way you look at it.

    Dirty degenerate, Alan Dershowitz, who wants to mandate vaccines, sees a lesson for Americans [meaning non-Jews] when he pompously critiqued Thomas Jefferson;

    “Citing a tale from the Talmud in which the rabbis tell God, ‘You gave us a document to interpret, and a methodology for interpreting it. Now leave us to do our job, …”’ "It is now our responsibility [meaning Dershowitz’s Judaic tribe] to build on your legacy," he tells Jefferson, and we must decide the matter anew for ourselves, recognizing that "freedom comes with a price, sometimes even a heavy price."

    This frightening insight into the lawyer/rabbinic traditional mentality on Biblical and civil law of which Thomas Jefferson unsurprisingly regarded as a system of wretched depravity, is placed on a pedestal by the likes of Dershowitz and others of his tribe, who see a post-9/11 aristocratic ruling class of Pharisees dictating the laws of the land as a preemptive blessing.

    Evidently, the red ‘democracy’ Dershowitz desires – excluding the fact that the US was never a democracy but a limited liability republic (i.e., a charter corporation situated in the District of Columbia incorporated as US Inc., which was charted by Association Inc. in the 18th century) – is one by mob rule, even if the model given to the mob by modern academia, television, print, private company statue laws, degenerates like Dershowitz, etc., regurgitated by the mob, might be perceptibly deceitful, false and/or immoral.1 What Dershowitz is advocating for is very much corporate communism – not the lowly power of worker’s communism – under the authoritarian rule of a majority consensus that his half-wits can control, so he hopes, through propaganda.

    As a leech pay-to-play pedophile attorney working for the BAR corporation and Mossad, Dershowitz is no different than the politicians spouting buffoonery while taking kickbacks from private multi-national corporations. Hence, the case for democracy but particularly freedom of speech in a republic, which Dershowitz and his comrades want destroyed – if not a pay-to-play private company operation – acts as you would expect it to act: when the people get tired of you, you’re guilty with penalty of post. “We’ll find yer soul when we hit the bone.”

    Therefore, while the republic is for the company courts, none of these public officials represent you as human beings and all of these structures in the political and modern legal sphere exist as fictional corporations, which were never erected – not in 2001, not in 1964, not in 1920, not in 1864, not in 1776 – to serve you but to castrate you, if you so choose to contract. Ultimately, it has never been anything other than an economic “how much can I get out of you” model. In the old days, the bourgeois would rather have you work as slaves or indentured servants without pay, which ended in the 1900’s.

    Has the mob forgotten the old timers? Refusing to work for US Inc., or subsidiary state corporations, they built their cabins by hand and with help from other autonomous men growing their own food and sustaining their own families. Leave these politicians to bicker among themselves and see what gets done without the lowly worker. It would not take long for the house of cards to come crashing down. Oftentimes, when this occurs, the first class to be marginalized, subjugated and frequently eliminated are the lowly workers – the poor and disenfranchised as well as those who work for their money, comprising the large majority of the ever-decreasing middle class, as opposed to those whose money works for them in interest and dividends. No amount of military force, judicial decrees, or corporations will ever equal the power of "screw you, I quit,” especially if done in mass. Is not citizenship a worthless piece of paper that incorporates human beings in a limited agency capacity under US jurisdiction? Indeed, citizens of the US, after all, were considered by the controllers of US inc., from the period forward of its incorporation, “to be […] Actors on a most conspicuous theater […] I now bid adieu to your excellency as the chief magistrate of your state [Maine]...” – George Washington, June 8th 1783; Circular Address to the States.

    “As a result of establishing Banks of Issue and the gold basis swindle in the United States, the interest and dividends upon manufactured debts is absorbing the net proceeds of labor and thus prevents the people from ever ridding themselves of the bondage of debts. A money system which caused the rich to grow richer and the poor to grow poorer can be advocated only by an enemy of the human family.”

    “The effect of the present dishonest and fraudulent money system is to impoverish and destroy that great and honest middle class of moderate means that stand between those in want and revolution. To make the rich richer and the poor poorer is the greatest crime that can be perpetrated against a people ; it not only takes from the poor the dire necessities of their lives, but destroys their moral well being and brings about a degradation that drives from their souls the image of their Creator. I ask the people of the United States how much longer will they allow themselves to be fooled and impoverished by this money power making them believe that dollars are debts, redeemable and convertible into each other.”2


    “When the money power is herein spoken of, it means the European monied interests as led by the Bank of England, the Rothschilds and their American agents, August Belmont & Co., J. P. Morgan & Co., et al., and their Hebrew [Jewish] Associates in the United States, the Clearing House Association of New York, established in 1853, and the American Bankers' Association, an organization of practically every bank of any size in the United States.”3

    Phillip Freneau, author of ‘Rules of Changing a Republic into a Democracy, then into a Monarch,’ sourced American Museum, July 1792, ‘Rules for Changing a Limited Government into an Unlimited Hereditary…,’ forewarned the transitional methods to will a monarchy in the ruins of a limited government.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)



    To accomplish such a task, agents of this plan would have to “get rid of the constitutional shackles,” to prepare the vulgar mind for aristocratical ranks and titles. Should republican aversion prevent such a transition towards such rule, agents are not to “abandon the enterprise but lay up proposition in record, and in the legislature, drawing up bills, resolutions and reports,” and to keep in view that the limitations in the constitution are to be explained away. “Phrases and precedents may then be shuffled in and out,” to be adverted by candid or weak people and to allow the press during this period to propagate the doctrines of aristocracy and monarchy. “For this purpose,” according to the rules for changing a limited government into an unlimited hereditary one, “it will be particular useful to confound a mobish democracy with a representative republic.” In this period of transition, the agents of such a plan must “make known all the divisions, infighting, squabbles of past until the people tremble at their own shadows and convince them that a king [executive officer], who is always the enemy of the people, and a nobility, perhaps still more so, will take better care of the people than the people will take care of themselves.” That the grand nostrum will be public debt, indefinitely, and ever increasing, to “stretch it and swell it the utmost the items will bear” […] “…to make as perpetual as possible and to modify, complicate, divide, subdivide, subtract, postpone, etc., and it must never be forgotten that the members of the legislative body are to have deep stakes in the game. Properly composed, due members thereof can legislate and speculate, and speculate and legislate, and buy and sell, and sell and buy” until the property falls into their hands. “The favorite few” […] “...their money will give them consequence and influence,” […] “…they will be the readiest materials for hereditary aristocratic order” and through them control will be maintained. The agents of this transformation will impose a “heavy taxes” which “will produce discontents,” so a “standing army will be created in proportion of this dissatisfaction.” Malcontents and dissidents against these agents of change must be suppressed and/or imprisoned.

    What Freneau was able to delay well before 19th century reconstruction for a short time – that of mob democracy and hereditary monarchy, strangely beloved in today’s western world – and not withstanding the fact that Washington’s republic, dually for the courts, was merely another magisterial monstrosity that Samuel Adams ("Founder"), lover of Liberty, thought decent to shove through the "Riot Act,” (yesteryear’s Patriot Act) empowering Sheriff's to kill rioters in groups of 12 or more, proclaiming, that "[i]n monarchy the crime of treason may admit of being pardoned or lightly punished, but the man who dares rebel against the laws of a republic ought to suffer death” ; is the Hegelian divergence of competitive enterprise over the people. While many of the colonists fought in the revolution against the British, seeking sovereignty and allodial title for the decency to be left alone from all intrusions, taxes and foreign encroachments; the revolutionary continentalists, including autocrat George Washington, never had this in mind, exclaiming that “[m]ankind when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government.” – George Washington to Henry lee, Oct 31st 1786. In other words, the autonomous man is unfit to govern himself. And while the republic was incorporated by a body of mostly rich, slave-owning continentalists – neither mechanic or farmer, nor the working common folk had any say – for the property and protection of their assets and the few wealthy and powerful enough – mostly lawyers, land speculators and bankers – to consolidate; Washington appointed an abundance of monarchist sympathizers, like the Hebrew Alexander Hamilton (Levine), who established the executive branch, believing the carrying out of a permanent public debt to be the peoples’ blessing.

    Concerning the transition of a limited government to a monarchist one, Frenaeu, who Washington wanted dead, explains that if the burden of permanent public debt cannot be preserved without uprising, a standing army must be imposed to quell such dissatisfaction. For a ‘better tomorrow’ by force was the diktat. Such a debt would require “the establishment of a great incorporated bank.” “If the constitution […] should not authorize it, [and it does not], “so much the better.” The schemers thus employ deceit to enact, exclaiming “push it through by a forced meaning and you get in the bargain an admirable precedent for future misconstructions.” In so erecting the bank, Frenaeu reminds us that the schemers were to always “remember that it is to be made particularly instrumental in enriching and aggrandizing the elect few...” Furthermore, rule number 10 of this strategy is especially interesting and peculiarly evocative of the left-right political psychodrama which is played out today. “Divide and govern is a maxim consecrated by the experience of ages, and should be familiar of its use by every politician as the knife he carries in his pocket.” When such progress in this transformation is dually made and accomplished, when the public mind is but a emulator of our cloak-and-dagger agenda and “the rules already laid down,” it will be necessary and “proper to venture […] toward a removal of the constitutional landmarks.” […] “It may be called,” observing present day rhetoric, “a power for the common safety or the public good, or, ‘the general welfare.” “It will not be so easily perceived that the premium bestowed may not be equal to the circuitous tax on consumption which pays it.” Rule 12: Proposes that the ‘external danger’ would be a politically expedient scheme to augment the need for a large standing military force. Rule 13: “[This] same prudence will improve the opportunity afforded by an increase of military expenditures for perpetuating the tax required for them.” The schemers confide that if this admitted inconsistency “and establishing of a perpetual tax for a temporary service produce any difficulty in their undertaking, rule 10,” that of divide and conquer, “must be resorted to.” Rule 14: “Throughout this great undertaking it will be wise to have some particular model constantly in view.” As a covert project, the schemers devised methods to stamp down suspicions and alarms, that they knew “were to be expected.” It is vital that “the people […] be kept asleep so as not to discover, or be thrown into artificial divisions so as not to resist, what is silently going forward.” Accordingly, the best general rule is “taking from the example of crying “stop thief.’” The modus operandi is thus this. “To charge every man who whispers, or even thinks that the revolution on foot is mediated,” neither pens nor lungs spared, “with being himself an enemy of the established government, and meaning to overturn it. Let the charge be reiterated and reverberated, until at last such confusion and uncertainty be produced, that the people being not able to find out where the truth lies, withdraw their attention from the contest.” Is it any different today? “Long live the queen,” exclaims Joe Biden. This is what Freneau was to delay but unfortunately the people ignorantly clamored towards the rule of the few.
    The proponents of limited government and a free and autonomous man, though Jefferson spoke only with his lips, Freneau, a French illuminate, was able to inform public perception and postpone what would be enacted 150 years ago with the assassination of Lincoln and the bankers reconstruction policy.

    A group of persons said it owned everything and the mob did what it said, and not the other way around… that led to the industrial revolution and those industrialists who worked the people to the bone for their own private gains. The 4th industrial revolution is now upon us, will you go along with it or turn your back towards it? Because what they have in store for us, if you so chose to play, is human capital of bestial gamification – capital under a new, more Orwellian and intrusive system..

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    And if anyone knows anything of 20th and 21st century 'history' we have a anglo/British/Judaic hereditary aristocracy closely connected through family. It doesn't take much research to figure out most of the presidents of US Inc. are related.

    [–]raven9 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    a vaccine that's been administered 6.6 billion times without incident (with the exception of 2 dozen blood clots)

    When you feel the need to so massively exaggerate the figures in order to support your point you just prove that even you know your point is not based in reality.

    Bottom line, only lies need more lies to support them. The truth stands up by itself and the truth is millions of people are being injured by the vaccines.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Where do you think I got the number? You think I made that up? Before you make a fool of yourself, search for the numbers. Here, I'll help:

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    Of course Big Pharma cannot be fully trusted. But who will regulate them?

    why trust their vaccine then? Why give them immunity for it?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

    It's not just their vaccine, as the resarch for vaccines developed world-wide. Collaboration between virologists and other medical scientists helped develop the vaccines. We can trust that this collaboration, the science behind is, and the relative successes of 6.6 billion doses already administered and previously tested quite thoroughly. My note that Big Pharma cannot be fully trusted refers to other problems with Big Pharma that are unrelated to the vaccine, which is an international project. I did not say that they cannot be trusted on all matters. It would also be really foolish of them to screw up the arrangments for the vaccine.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They are fools, and they've been screwing up since Day One.

    There will be a subtle comeuppance, when their plans come to fruition only for their successes to be used as fodder against them. I don't trust Big Pharma to wipe its own ass, let alone work on some international project that is supposed to be democratic!

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    do you think it would be ok to take away their immunity, since the vaccine is so safe?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Immunity from prosecution is not the main problem. It was merely to allow for a quick turn-around of the vaccines and tests, without the worry of litigation, particularly in the US, where anyone could have challeged the process, shutting it down, only for political reasons. Oxford U. did not have to worry about this. Big Pharma is however not immune from serious challenges, if especially there are any serious side effects. For example, Oxford's AstraZenica was pulled form some of the markets. Propaganda websites focus on this immunity issue, but it's not what anyone worries about in the present case. If there are serious side effects, the value of the research, development and manufacturing investments will drop exponentially. But that's not happened in the US. There is a much bigger legal explanation about the importance of the initial immunity from prosecution clause, but it would take too long to write here. It's essentially a nothing burger. There are controls in place - in the market - to stop a vaccine distribution if there are serious side effects.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    is that a no

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    it's a no, until next year or the year after, while research is in process.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    maybe people should wait till then to get the vaccine

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I explained that the market keeps Big Pharma's vaccines in check. If there are problems, the vaccine is pulled, as has happend in some countries for AstraZeneca. The immunity clause merely helps them avoid frivolous lawsuits.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Question.... do you have stock in these vax companies? I notice that a lot of degenerates promotign these vaccines always are shareholders.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    You mean a bunch of Zionist Jews created these vaccines for a promised vaccine revolution for a corona virus pandemic they drilled for 6 months before?

    [–]humancorpse 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    A big part of the problem is the anonymous nature of the internet, which means that our enemies can sit in on our conversations while pretending to be our friends.

    If a social media portal were to require full registration of it's users, this bullshit would stop in two seconds.

    of course this also means that we would also need to know who the operators of these forums really are.

    [–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Yeah it's a sort of paradox of internet forum anonymity.

    More anonymous conversations bring about more truth because people don't hold back, but it also allows for bad actors. But having complete identification removes bad actors but also removes the anonymous cover that allows them to speak freely.

    [–]humancorpse 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    bad actors need anonymity. good actors like anonymity only because they are duped into being afraid by the bad actors.

    it is my opinion that if a social media portal were established that required members to fully identify themselves, pehaps going as far as having a whatsapp video call with them would squash all of the bullshit.

    never show fear to your enemies.

    the current social media model only serves to turn communications into a clusterfuck for the good actors.

    [–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    good actors like anonymity only because they are duped into being afraid by the bad actors.

    Well, people do lose the careers over relatively benign statements on a regular basis. It's not an empty fear. There's good reasons good people would want to avoid reprisal for saying the truth

    [–]humancorpse 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    people would want to avoid reprisal for saying the truth

    welcome to nazi germany.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    and USA during mcarthyism

    [–]swordofdamocles42 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    I feel that the problem is the Internet.

    i've gone offline a lot more recently, and IRL things are just not so bad at all. AGITPROP is a real thing and its very bad for you. I used to feel just like you do but now i just worry about me and the rest of the world can look out for itself.

    I cringe thinking about some of the shit I used to believe.... yes bad things are happening, but not in your backyard. the net just magnifies the worlds problems and dumps them in our lap. IRL its crickets...

    you are welcome. you are now free to do whatever you like. enjoy your playthrough. :D

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    What crazy things did you believe?

    [–]swordofdamocles42 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Too many to mention really, i think the most dangerous one, was thinking the enemy were people like us... its more like world controllers in brave new world. IMO.

    oh i fell for veganism for nearly 7 years... that one wrecked me quite badly.

    I know your stuck on the jew level, i fell for that 1 for a year or 2 as well.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Certainly not Jew, but Jews play a big role because they reject Christ and due to their nepotism and wralth. It's corporations and billionaires more than anything else.

    [–]swordofdamocles42 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    if Christ was real.... if you think about it there's no real proof. religion was the OG psy-op. it has every one of the hallmarks.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    He was real, as real as the rabbis saying he is rotting in feces. So, devine and worth living for.

    [–]swordofdamocles42 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    oh aye....

    [–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I agree, the internet is really blowing some things waaaay out of proportion and it's distorting people's view of reality.

    [–]swordofdamocles42 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The net is their invention and its how they are going to borg us. the sooner we get off the better. but its toooo hard for most, maybe even me...

    [–]Zapped 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Every man is an island. We each live in our own world. The best we can do is to take care of ourselves and our families. Keep the faith, but don't let the noise of the world outside your head drown out who you are. I am not a religious person, but I think the first verse of Niebuhr's Serenity prayer fits the philosophical struggle you're going through. It can be frustrating when others don't see what we do, even if we feel we are clear in expressing our views and the facts. We also don't always see from other's perspectives, shaped by their own experiences and knowledge. Sometimes the best you can do is express yourself and move on. Being part of a movement is great, but without doing our part to be the best we can, that movement doesn't happen. You posted content and information online. You helped make Saidit happen so others have a more open exchange of ideas. You took time away when you needed to take care of things. The only constant in this world is change, and it is up to each of us to work with that change to come out better on the other side. Be satisfied with yourself. Don't sweat the rest.

    [–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Thanks. I believe we have to come together to form some sort of community or consensus to really have any forward progress in on a broad scale. Being alone all the time isn't good, so being an island isn't great. Having a family isn't being an island, that's a community too. Everyone should do what they can to build something bigger and better than the system that's currently decaying right now. Thanks for your kind words.

    [–]Zapped 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I was using the "every man is an island" metaphor to say that each of us is an individual and has the responsibility to take care of our self so we can be a part of something bigger. I did not mean to infer isolation is the way, although some of us are just built that way, and that's ok, too. I see you being of great influence, even if you don't feel like you are doing enough at times. There's the different perspective I was talking about.

    [–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Is anyone trying to do this besides me? I organized weekly online Old Testament readings for a small online religious community. I traveled around until I found a good place for a physical community which I hope to move to eventually. And for the longer term, I hope to organize an intentional ethnicity. Is anyone else doing any kind of community building?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    You are nutters.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    The world is entering an era where there are no collective solutions. So long as the individual's mind is collective, that is, fundamentally involved in a more or less symbiotic relationship with the collective, there will be less and less solutions. Only the full individuation of mind and consciousness can provide a degree of peaceful enjoyment of life to the person.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)


      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      You don't understand the individualism of the mind. People's minds are collective. That's why everybody's buying the same shite. That popular crap. The iPhone, the Nike, the Tesla, and so on.

      What you call "individualism" is simply them being self-centered and egoistical. Riots at Walmart on Black Friday? That's not individualized mind, it's collective mindlessness.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      "temporary pleasures"

      You remind me of one of those religious preachers who are so Heavenly minded, they believe that everything created by man or outside of the context of their book canon is inherently corrupted, sinful, wicked, etc.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      That's not true individualism, that's egoism you are harping about.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I'm starting to come to this conclusion myself, although my personality is definitely opposed to the reality at hand.

      I was raised to think about the collective first, the individual last.

      [–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      Humanity has become too stupid and depraved to function. Until a few billion morons die, nothing will improve.

      [–]magnora7[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

      Overpopulation is not the problem, stupidity is, as you mentioned. A lot of people dying doesn't fix that. Truth and awareness in a culture does. So if we want to combat it, we have to spread truth to anyone who will listen.

      [–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      If you tried to spread truth to chimpanzees, this wouldn't make them particularly successful because they are just too stupid to benefit. The West has been decaying genetically for about 200 years, and I think it has reached the point that culture alone cannot fix it.

      It is worth understanding how the current West rose in the first place. It was harsh Darwinian selection combined with religiously enforced monogamy to prevent negative fisherian selection during the medieval period that increased genetic quality to the level that the West could succeed. In particular the Black Death killed 30 to 60 percent of the population and greatly increased genetic quality. Much of this is covered in the book A Farewell to Alms. We need similar genetic improvements again before we can hope to recover culturally.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      I do agree with your thought process, but then you get on the bandwagon of the Jewish over-lords and support their scheme.

      It's one thing to hope for something good to come out this (the betterment of our evolution) another thing to support the actual crimes which might (might) produce the results you want.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      I think he's saying we could have a black death that would kill off the weak, that's kind of what covid does but it's not really that threatening, won't kill 30 to 60 percent of the population anyway. I don't see how he is supporting jewish overlords or whatever.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      He also thinks the vaccines killing all morons is a good plan, so, wisen up, why don't ya

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      that makes sense i guess but at least right now the vaccine ain't killing 30-60%, maybe it will catch up to them later?

      [–]goobandit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      So if we want to combat it, we have to spread truth to anyone who will listen.

      I’m around a ton of wokefolx and no matter how much kool aid they’ve chugged, they have no words when I’ve said “Do you believe [they] would ever tell us the truth? Haha no way.” It’s a neutral statement, it’s us versus the problem. They know. We all know. It feels good to raise people’s awareness, leave them better than you found them.

      [–]Cass 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      I've been working in call centers and speaking to all kinds of people. Most are stupid and they get angry if you try to tell them the truth about what's going on.

      I recently read an article about the Great Reset that scared me so much it kept me up at night

      I feel powerless.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      The goal IS to make you FEEL powerless, because you literally have all the power.

      [–]Cass 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      I started a new job last week and after doing some research I found out I'm literally working for the Rothschilds and Blackrock. It sucks balls and I want to quit already, but I have to stick with it at least 3 months because of the contract I signed.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Learn your lesson. Never sign a contract.

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)


      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Should I get angry back at them if they get angry at me for telling the truth?

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Why not? It's not like we're at a stage where offending people is the worst that can happen.

      [–]Cass 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      No, what's the use? It'd be like that meme about playing chess with a pigeon.

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      I like this:

      " Just keep saying the truth and planting seeds, but take care of your mental health too."

      Key concepts here. I just plant seeds, not more than that.

      [–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Yup, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.

      You can show someone a thought but you can't make them think.

      It's good to just keep planting seeds, and taking care of your mental health so you have a good time on this Earth while planting seeds.

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Plant seeds both ways.

      [–]thefirststone 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

      But Texas just made a law for $10k reward for ratting on people getting abortions. So it's all just kind of a fucking joke at this point. The people are not being represented in any aspect of government or industry.

      The people who kill babies? Good.

      [–]magnora7[S] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Well regardless of how you feel on abortion, paying people to $10k rat out other people for breaking the law is some communist-level nonsense

      [–]thefirststone 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Yeah, I'd rather get away with murder, too.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      yeah I made a different post about that, I think the ratting people out for money part of the law is no good, just make abortion illegal if you want it illegal, I know there is roe v wade, well send it to the supreme court, they got 6 repubs now, they can't reverse roe?

      [–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Yeah it's a mess, it's like they waited for a moment when everyone was distracted by coronavirus to pass a crazy bill that wouldn't have ever passed otherwise. A lot of places seem to be doing that right now...

      [–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

      We're in the end times bro.

      [–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

      I bet it felt that way in 1944 too.

      [–]soundsituation 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Have you heard of generational theory? It encompasses a lot more than I'm up for getting into on here but we (taking the liberty of assuming most of us were born roughly between the early 80s and mid 90s) belong to the same generational archetype as the young adults of the WWII cohort. We're both considered Hero generations.

      [–]sproketboy 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      The Fourth Turning is a good book.

      [–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      We didn't have Nukes and CRISPR back then.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      No, but the evil ones were talking about it, planning for it, and rolling out similar things. Sensitives could feel the times that we are living in now, they could feel our tense thoughts.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      The same feeling is occurring today because the Earth-shattering events we are experiencing were being thought up back then.

      The world is ending, and goody-two-shoes like you need to wrap your mind around this, and quit looking for an insane culture to wisen up.

      It's going to crumble.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

      Honestly, that makes it feel even more scary.

      [–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

      Well, at least it answers the Fermi paradox.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      What is that?

      [–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Fermi paradox

      Is search hard?

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      i'd think, even if humans wipe themselves out, there still should be some many trillions of intelligent life forms out in space, that at least a few would end up smart enough not to kill themselves and would want to explore the universe

      [–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      should be some many trillions of intelligent life forms out in space

      Information Theory is a branch of mathematics. Those guys would disagree - their calcs seem to indicate super rarity. There's a fair chance that we're all there is.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      that makes a bit more sense to me, they're saying life is super rare and maybe earth is the only planet in the universe to have it, or it is super rare in the universe where we'd likely never see any life and especially not then intelligent life which must be even more rare. That is different than saying intelligent life is just likely to wipe itself out.

      [–]GraviAss We Can 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      The world, the man is at it's weakest point I believe, information is available at such a scale, it is so easily manipulated at this kind of scale and the amount of populace that is fed this shit is enormous, uncountable and is a powerful tool to behold. This is the time of digital and information - they collide and merge, it's everywhere, everyone is fed the same filtered grain that someone wants everyone to eat, be the one that is not being fed and see the results - Pain, madness, suffering. To be the so called minority of one is almost being insane, but hold strong, for it is strength that makes life easier, no going around. Endure and struggle - Minority of One, One?

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I'm here.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

      What if the world is rigged almost by design? That things are always going to evolve so that the most heinous gets in the highest levels of society. Or it can be that its just "easier" to take the evil road than the good road. Either way, it's still messed up.

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      It all boils down to the origins of thought. Shrinks know that there is ZERO evidence that thought is man's creation. So, if you remade your view of the world based on the idea that thought comes from elsewhere. What would your view of the world be then? What would make sense?

      This is a supremely worthwhile exercise, since it is a very fundamental aspect of life that applies to EVERYBODY. How can we make sense of the world if our idea about what controls the individual is fundamentally wrong? We can't. Do the exercise, you will be amazed at what it reveals.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Test his words, people. They are better than anything else on this thread. Do the exercise.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Thanks. Most won't, and that costs mankind dearly. Especially now that time is short and the pressure is high...

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      No, most won't, and some who will are going to stop exercising their minds after waves of pollution temporarily overcomes them. The lying scum in power are inadvertently adding to this thought-pollution through the controlling of meager personalities.

      Speaking of which, it was a blow when I realized I could no longer enjoy music the same way as before. I've been playing guitar and bass for years, and have more or less put these down due to the involutive effects my upbringing had on making and listening to modern music. I still haven't rectified this issue; obviously, some part of me clings to waste. And the pressure is indeed high...

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Evolution is life-affirming, so the heinousness that you see, this is involution.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I think people want a better kind of evil tyrant in charge, one that doesn't push weak sjw theories, and is all about strength. All thru history people enjoyed following strong men.

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      ahhhhhh, it is. Every country is a corporation.

      [–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Socio-economic hierarchies are a filtering system that filters for sociopaths. So the only solution is to reduce the size of the power structure, but this requires each individual to become more self-reliant and independent, which is not something most people are motivated to do until they realize how broken the power structure is because it destroys their life in some way or another.

      [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      /u/magnora7 The world isn't going insane, it is just that insane people control the corporations and how they run. I went outside and farmed, did not see one insane thing. If you want to know the true naturalist technocratic agenda being slowly implemented, PLEASE READ THESE BLOGS AND TWITTER USERS; (Alice McDowell's Blog) (Alice McDowell's Twitter) (Corey morningstar's Blog) (Corey Morningstar's Blog)

      These two individuals, espeically Alice McDowell, show you EXACTLY what the well placed anti-Christ scumbags, Zionists included, are planning by showing you what they ACTUALLY talk about and write about in their white papers and think tanks.

      The goal is a new technocratic order based on social credit, which will be implemented slowly over a 50 year period using sustainability and covid, among other viruses as the defining motive. It isn't really about sustainability but about the financialisation of nature, the digitization of all aspects of life in a metaverse --Crypto and Blockchain are part of this transformation as well! Considering capitalism was failing due to the unsustainability of a propped up retail economy, a crisis had to occur and a new social contract had to be imposed, so they claim.

      Think human capital markets, data-pharming, impact/value markets based on the WEF's stakeholder model.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Ever wonder about the Mandela effect, and how it targets religion? Did you know scientists say we’re in Orion, or that Mars is smaller than earth? We’re entering the reign of the antichrist IMO, and he’ll point to religion and say we misunderstood it. That’s why Adam’s hand is higher than God’s in the Creation of Adam by Michelangelo. We’re in the great deception and things are going nuts so the antichrist can swoop in and “save” us.

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Dumb. We are all born in sin. The anti-Christ will be a man.