all 4 comments

[–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I agree. Men who are too lazy to look abroad shouldn't reproduce their lazy genes.

[–]ForbiddenKnowledge[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What do you mean? Not being interesting in exotic women isn't a bad thing.

[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exotic? If you are stuck in a sewer with rats, climb out.

[–]Mcheetah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you talking about incels under six feet, or people with like, actual diseases, like sickle cell? Eh. Either way, I kinda agree. Modern women's shallowness and narcissism is kind of nature's Darwinism. The issue is, the tallest, most attractive men (Chads) also tend to be the dumbest men as well, and the most shallow women are also the stupidest women in the world (usually Liberals and feminists.) So it's still not exactly Survival of the Fittest, even if they're physically superior.