all 13 comments

[–]Jiminy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"It'd be worse without clownflare"

Sure

[–]LarrySwinger2 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, unfortunately. Good alternatives:

[–]GraviAss We Can 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

If some mods right now would ask for automoderator config, I'd give em, the thing does a great job against spammers.

Other than that, mag ain't doin much, I could understand but I don't.

[–]Mcheetah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep.

[–]neolib 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/s/all at this moment: https://i.ibb.co/qkZCZh2/s1.png (and two more spam posts are at the top since I took screenshot)

[–]Edmond_Dantes 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

http://LeverMind.net is coming soon, brought to you by silenced /u/JasonCarswell and team, who have http://Projex.Wiki going.

For more developing information, see how it's being organized and prepared for a soft launch soon: https://Projex.Wiki/wiki/LeverMind/Organization

Also, fuck magnora7, for stealing my subs because I wouldn't bow down to his stupid arbitrary limit of 40 after I created some of the best subs and didn't ever abuse or use the mod power other than to deal with obvious spam - ironically the very problem that now plagues SaidIt.

magnora7 is guilty of being a dick.
I'm only guilty of imaginary pre-crime.

[–]Mcheerios 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sowwy :(

[–]SneakyBishop 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Agreed. Last week I thought there was some experiments going on where there was no spam at all. Did that code not work?

Still don't see a downside to banning any account that creates a single spam post. Often these accounts are used multiple times if left active. By banning any account that spams it would force all spam accounts to be new and more easily banned.

[–]NutterButterFlutter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The code has been working, the spammers have just moved to other subs. So admins need to put the same code in place on those subs now too.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why would they only do it for some subs (cuz there are no admins and this is fake news)

[–]NutterButterFlutter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There's no need to do it for all subs, just the ones that are being spammed and/or mods aren't active.

So they probably started with the worst subs, and now that those are cleared, they'll be able to see the other ones that are picking up the spam and can do the same.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why not do it for all subs (cuz whatever you're talking about doesn't exist)

There are no admins, just mods that delete spam from their subs sometimes.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've been removing spam like crazy on the few subs I mod along with several others.

I can't ban accounts in some of the subs, but if I can I don't like doing it because then they just move to a sub I can't do anything about.