Thanks for indulging my curiosity.

I curious why you use the term "patriarchy". I prefer other terms like corporatocracy, technocracy, kakistocracy, pedophocracy, etc. Sex and race aren't the problem so far as I'm concerned and they're only used to divide us into tribalist factions when IMO the largest root problem is the class war between the corporatocracy and the rest of humanity, as all other divisions are part of that greater effort to break us all down. Obviously using "patriarchy" distinguishes which "side" you're on, but does it also empower you or something along those lines, or is it a trigger word, or perhaps it's just a generic word that is easy, understood, convenient? I ask partly because there are most certainly abominable political women who are just as bad if not occasionally demonstrably worse than men who are active agents of the "patriarchy". I could list a bunch but then I'd feel compelled to also list a bunch of terrific women who are being sidelined from political power due to the abundant corruption of the rigged systems.

1) I'm in alignment with you. Abuse is not good from anyone regardless of label. I'm a little confused by the last sentence.

I should also clarify by expanding on my statement about "destroying the family unit". They've been deconstructing our power via social engineering us all in more ways than just the sex issue. There were once strong ethnic neighbourhoods - Polish, Irish, Greek, Catholic, etc etc etc (all with their pros and cons and historical baggage) but they engineered the destruction of those communities by intentionally moving in "undesireables" (whatever that may mean to those communities and individuals) while offering incentives to move out and melt into the generic "white" suburban nightmare where communities were weaker, mixing up all ethnicities, religions, etc. Now with these carrot (low mortgages) and stick (crime) incentives they're pushing people back into the cities more than ever to leave all the natural resources of the land to the powers that be while also caging us in their Agenda 21 plans for "sustainability" for a fictional carbon scare scam. Further, socialism and unions have been utterly demonized as billionaires pay millionaires to tell the middle class that the poor are the problem, never ever focusing on the billionaire Zionist globalist engineers. Add feminism waves, the extremist trans agenda (that most of them don't even want), bizarro incels, SJW political correctness to absurdist extremes, manufactured racism, and whatever other distractions, divisions, and political theater you can imagine - and you've deconstructed ethnicities, communities, unions, families and are left with weak individuals vs the mighty corporatocracy. Also to be clear, I know that not everyone in those tribes I just mentioned are extremists or "bizarro" - but they capitalize on the sensational ones in order to demonize and divide.

2) I'm not deep into Men's Rights at all, however I have yet to ever see anything remotely resembling what you stated about taking away female rights. Maybe I haven't looked deeply enough or have subconsciously ignored the sensational buffoons (just as likely as many idiots as CIA assets) or something but I here are a couple examples off the top of my head that may change your mind: The Red Pill documentary by Cassie Jaye and Feminism - Fiamengo Files with Janice Fiamengo who IMO is a little harsher than she could be on feminists on occasion yet gets to the point and is brief with excellent clarity. There's also the Honey Badgers that I'd heard of years ago. They stand out in my memory because they provided a lot of content clearly and evenly without getting extreme - plus they are ALL females for men's rights, as well as women's and children's rights. I don't need men to tell me how great men are, just like I don't need Ayn Rand to sell me on how greed is good (a Gore Vidal misquote). Above all, they make clear sense to me and realize we need to all have rights, including children's rights and we need to unify, strengthen, and resist the exploitation, division, and oppression of our overlords. In my limited experience, it seems to me most men's rights folks believe that everyone, men, women, and children have legit specific concerns, but MUCH more in common against the corporatocracy and we'd do better uniting and supporting each other.

3) I don't really know what you mean. If you mean go away, then ya, I agree for the most part about the noisy ones. From what I understand, the majority are silent and actually just going their own way defining their own lives and don't need the MGTOW label. I for one might fall into that later category but wouldn't ever call myself that. Especially since I hope my relationship days are not yet over, and when I have had girlfriends it was always that we were going our own way in our own style (ie. Burning Man, alternatives, sustainability, self reliant, indie filmmaker, etc etc etc).

3b) Do you recognize there's a difference between Men's Rights and MGTOW? Many of the former don't like the latter for their antics. I don't know much about whatever antics they mean, as honestly they've bored me so I don't even look when it come up anymore - like country music or car commercials - just not interested.

4) I don't see how. I know I sound like a broken record, but the social engineering of the corporatocracy is pushing the distraction and division with equality like it's attainable when it seems obvious to me the authentic solution is fairness. Formerly men should not be competing in women's sports and should not pretend they have periods or babies. Sure those are extremist and obvious, but this social engineering tapers off to the long tail of micro this and micro that nitpicky stuff - meanwhile we're never questioning the powers that be and their matrix of rigged systems, monopolies, monopoly on violence, bankster scams, and full spectrum dominance.

5) I'm guessing/hoping WGTOW isn't as silly as MGTOW can get. Feel free to skip or expand as you like.

6) What does Pink Pill mean/stand for?

I'm happy to hear you still have hope. I do too. I think it's important. The sidebox reads "there is nothing we can do about it" but I don't buy that. Maybe we're all doomed, but we can go out in style with grace and compassion, support each other, and resist as long and as hard and as much as possible.

Thanks again for your response. Don't feel like you need to indulge all of my verbose nonsense, but I'll thank you in advance for whatever you might like to riff on.