Hollywood race swaps are really a gingercide

Jesus · 2023-03-17T07:02:38+00:00

Nope. Christianity is doing great in Catholic circles. If you hadn't noticed, Jew, the post-Vatican II Church was an invention of converso Jews, communists, freemasons, homosexuals and Zionists following the orders of Nahum Goldmann's Spirit of Militarism and the "breaking up of all social definition and public polocy ethical barriers."

Christians follow Christ and do his will. Jews hate Christ or do not care for his teachings and live as nihilistic gentiles or their naturalist opposed equivalents — destroyers and not builders.

We built Western Civilization and you are currently destroying it. It doesn't matter in the end because the biosphere is gone by 2026.

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:57:56+00:00

You're a fat Hasbara golem trolling on saidit.

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:56:57+00:00

Ahhh, yes JIDF, reverse psycology. How's the weather in Tel Aviv?

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:56:19+00:00

Jesus was not a Pharisee (modern Judaism) or Talmudic Jew; He damned them… repeatedly! He rejected the racial creed which the Orthodoxy of Judaism, the worst religion ever devised which has no redeeming qualities whatsoever, has taught secular culture Jews through victimhood complexes, the Holocaust industry and Zionism.

Recall especially that today’s “Jews” boast that they follow the Pharisees…

"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.” -- Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474 "Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.” -- Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, The Jewish Publication Society of America (1946) p. xxi "The Talmud is the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the ‘Tradition of the Elders,’ and to which He makes frequent allusions.” --Michael L. Rodkinson, The History of the Talmud: From The Time Of Its Formation About 200 B. C. Up To The Present Time, Kessinger Publishing, LLC (June 8, 2006), ISBN-13: 978-1428631366, p.70

"Allusions”? Yes, Jesus damned those man-made traditions for voiding the commandment of God. Mark 7:8-9

“This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible.” -- Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p.59, 159 …and that Jesus singled out the followers of the Pharisees as twofold children of Hell more than the Pharisees themselves. Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves. Matthew 23:15 The word “Jew” is a modern word with many ambiguous meanings, but neither by race, residence, nor religion was Jesus Christ a “Jew” and He certainly isn’t a bastard of a whore boiling in feces as Jews insist. In his book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed drills that point home most eloquently: What manner of man was this? Another paradox in the story of Zion is that in our generation Christian divines and theologians often insist that “Jesus was a Jew”, whereas the Judaist elders refuse to allow this (those Zionist rabbis who occasionally tell political or “interfaith'” audiences that Jesus was a Jew are not true exceptions to this rule; they would not make the statement among Jews and seek to produce an effect among their non-Jewish listeners, for political reasons). This public assertion, “Jesus was a Jew”, is always used in our century for political purposes. It is often employed to quell objections to the Zionist influence in international politics or to the Zionist invasion of Palestine, the suggestion being that, as Jesus was a Jew, none ought to object to anything purporting to be done in the name of Jews. The irrelevance is obvious, but mobs are moved by such phrases, and the paradoxical result, once again, is that a statement, most offensive to literal Jews, is most frequently made by non-Jewish politicians and ecclesiastics who seek Jewish favour. The English abbreviation, “Jew” is recent and does not correspond to anything denoted by the Aramaic, Greek or Roman terms for “Judahite” or “Judean”, which were in use during the lifetime of Jesus. In fact, the English noun “Jew” cannot be defined (so that dictionaries, which are scrupulously careful about all other words, are reduced to such obvious absurdities as “A person of Hebrew race”); and the Zionist state has no legal definition of the term (which is natural, because the Torah, which is the Law, exacts pure Judahite descent, and a person of this lineage is hardly to be found in the entire world). If the statement, “Jesus was a Jew”, has meaning therefore, it must apply to the conditions prevailing in his time. In that case it would mean one of three things, or all of them: that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah (therefore Judahite); that he was of Judean domicile (and therefore Judean); that he was religiously “a Jew” if any religion denoted by that term existed in his time. Race, residence, religion, then. This book is not the place to argue the question of Jesus's racial descent, and the surprising thing is that Christian divines allow themselves some of the statements which they make. The reader should form his own opinion, if he desires to have one in this question. The genealogy of Mary is not given in the New Testament, but three passages might imply that she was of Davidic descent; St. Matthew and St. Luke trace the descent of Joseph from David and Judah, but Joseph was not the blood father of Jesus. The Judaist authorities discredit all these references to descent, holding that they were inserted to bring the narrative into line with prophecy. As to residence, St. John states that Jesus was born at Bethlehem in Judea through the chance that his mother had to go there from Galilee to register; the Judaist authorities, again, hold that this was inserted to make the account agree with Micah's prophecy that “a ruler” would come out of Bethlehem”. The Jewish Encylopaedia insists that Nazareth as Jesus's native town, and indeed, general agreement exists that he was a Galilean, whatever the chance of his actual birthplace. Galilee, where nearly all his life was spent, was politically entirely separate from Judea, under its own Roman tetrarch, and stood to Judea in the relationship of “a foreign country” (Graetz). Marriage between a Judean and a Galilean was forbidden and even before Jesus’s birth all Judeans living in Galilee had been forced by Simon Tharsi, one of the Maccabean princes, to migrate to Judah. Thus, the Galileans were racially and politically distinct from the Judeans. Was this Galilean, religiously, what might today be called “a Jew”? The Judaist authorities, of course, deny that most strenuously of all; the statement, often heard from the platform and pulpit, might cause a riot in the synagogue. It is difficult to see what responsible public men can mean when they use the phrase. There was in the time of Jesus no “Jewish” (or even Judahite or Judaist or Judean) religion. There was Jehovahism, and there were the various sects, Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes, which disputed violently between themselves and contended, around the temple, for power over the people. They were not only sects, but also political parties, and the most powerful of them were the Pharisees with their “oral traditions” of what God had said to Moses. If today the Zionists are “the Jews” (and this is the claim accepted by all great Western nations), then the party which in Judea in the time of Jesus corresponded to the Zionists was that of the Pharisees. Jesus brought the whole weight of his attack to bear on these Pharisees. He also rebuked the Sadducees and the scribes. but the Gospels show that he held the Pharisees to be the foes of God and man and that he used an especial, scarifying scorn towards them. The things which he singled out for attack, in them and in their creed, are the very things which today's Zionists claim to be the identifying features of Jews, Jewishness and Judaism. Religiously, Jesus seems beyond doubt to have been the opposite and adversary of all that which would make a literal Jew today or would have made a literal Pharisee then. None can say with certainty who or what he was, and these suggestive statements by non-Jewish politicians ring as false as the derisive and mocking lampoons about “the bastard” which circulated in the Jewish ghettoes. *Rabbi Stephen Wise, the leading Zionist organizer in the United States during the 1910-1950 period, used this phrase for the obvious political motive, of confusing non-Jewish hearers. Speaking to such an “inter-faith” meeting at the Carnegie Hall at Christmastide 1925, he stated “Jesus was a Jew, not a Christian” (Christianity was born with the death of Jesus). For this he was excommunicated by the Orthodox Rabbis Society of the United States, but a Christian Ministers Association “hailed me as a brother”. Rabbi Wise adds the characteristic comment: “I know not which was more hurtful, the acceptance of me as a brother and welcoming me into the Christian fold, or the violent diatribe of the rabbis”. The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, First Printing 1956, p. 59 ff.

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:56:06+00:00

Jesus was not a Pharisee (modern Judaism) or Talmudic Jew; He damned them… repeatedly! He rejected the racial creed which the Orthodoxy of Judaism, the worst religion ever devised which has no redeeming qualities whatsoever, has taught secular culture Jews through victimhood complexes, the Holocaust industry and Zionism.

Recall especially that today’s “Jews” boast that they follow the Pharisees…

"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.” -- Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474 "Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.” -- Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, The Jewish Publication Society of America (1946) p. xxi "The Talmud is the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the ‘Tradition of the Elders,’ and to which He makes frequent allusions.” --Michael L. Rodkinson, The History of the Talmud: From The Time Of Its Formation About 200 B. C. Up To The Present Time, Kessinger Publishing, LLC (June 8, 2006), ISBN-13: 978-1428631366, p.70

"Allusions”? Yes, Jesus damned those man-made traditions for voiding the commandment of God. Mark 7:8-9

“This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible.” -- Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p.59, 159 …and that Jesus singled out the followers of the Pharisees as twofold children of Hell more than the Pharisees themselves. Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves. Matthew 23:15 The word “Jew” is a modern word with many ambiguous meanings, but neither by race, residence, nor religion was Jesus Christ a “Jew” and He certainly isn’t a bastard of a whore boiling in feces as Jews insist. In his book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed drills that point home most eloquently: What manner of man was this? Another paradox in the story of Zion is that in our generation Christian divines and theologians often insist that “Jesus was a Jew”, whereas the Judaist elders refuse to allow this (those Zionist rabbis who occasionally tell political or “interfaith'” audiences that Jesus was a Jew are not true exceptions to this rule; they would not make the statement among Jews and seek to produce an effect among their non-Jewish listeners, for political reasons). This public assertion, “Jesus was a Jew”, is always used in our century for political purposes. It is often employed to quell objections to the Zionist influence in international politics or to the Zionist invasion of Palestine, the suggestion being that, as Jesus was a Jew, none ought to object to anything purporting to be done in the name of Jews. The irrelevance is obvious, but mobs are moved by such phrases, and the paradoxical result, once again, is that a statement, most offensive to literal Jews, is most frequently made by non-Jewish politicians and ecclesiastics who seek Jewish favour. The English abbreviation, “Jew” is recent and does not correspond to anything denoted by the Aramaic, Greek or Roman terms for “Judahite” or “Judean”, which were in use during the lifetime of Jesus. In fact, the English noun “Jew” cannot be defined (so that dictionaries, which are scrupulously careful about all other words, are reduced to such obvious absurdities as “A person of Hebrew race”); and the Zionist state has no legal definition of the term (which is natural, because the Torah, which is the Law, exacts pure Judahite descent, and a person of this lineage is hardly to be found in the entire world). If the statement, “Jesus was a Jew”, has meaning therefore, it must apply to the conditions prevailing in his time. In that case it would mean one of three things, or all of them: that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah (therefore Judahite); that he was of Judean domicile (and therefore Judean); that he was religiously “a Jew” if any religion denoted by that term existed in his time. Race, residence, religion, then. This book is not the place to argue the question of Jesus's racial descent, and the surprising thing is that Christian divines allow themselves some of the statements which they make. The reader should form his own opinion, if he desires to have one in this question. The genealogy of Mary is not given in the New Testament, but three passages might imply that she was of Davidic descent; St. Matthew and St. Luke trace the descent of Joseph from David and Judah, but Joseph was not the blood father of Jesus. The Judaist authorities discredit all these references to descent, holding that they were inserted to bring the narrative into line with prophecy. As to residence, St. John states that Jesus was born at Bethlehem in Judea through the chance that his mother had to go there from Galilee to register; the Judaist authorities, again, hold that this was inserted to make the account agree with Micah's prophecy that “a ruler” would come out of Bethlehem”. The Jewish Encylopaedia insists that Nazareth as Jesus's native town, and indeed, general agreement exists that he was a Galilean, whatever the chance of his actual birthplace. Galilee, where nearly all his life was spent, was politically entirely separate from Judea, under its own Roman tetrarch, and stood to Judea in the relationship of “a foreign country” (Graetz). Marriage between a Judean and a Galilean was forbidden and even before Jesus’s birth all Judeans living in Galilee had been forced by Simon Tharsi, one of the Maccabean princes, to migrate to Judah. Thus, the Galileans were racially and politically distinct from the Judeans. Was this Galilean, religiously, what might today be called “a Jew”? The Judaist authorities, of course, deny that most strenuously of all; the statement, often heard from the platform and pulpit, might cause a riot in the synagogue. It is difficult to see what responsible public men can mean when they use the phrase. There was in the time of Jesus no “Jewish” (or even Judahite or Judaist or Judean) religion. There was Jehovahism, and there were the various sects, Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes, which disputed violently between themselves and contended, around the temple, for power over the people. They were not only sects, but also political parties, and the most powerful of them were the Pharisees with their “oral traditions” of what God had said to Moses. If today the Zionists are “the Jews” (and this is the claim accepted by all great Western nations), then the party which in Judea in the time of Jesus corresponded to the Zionists was that of the Pharisees. Jesus brought the whole weight of his attack to bear on these Pharisees. He also rebuked the Sadducees and the scribes. but the Gospels show that he held the Pharisees to be the foes of God and man and that he used an especial, scarifying scorn towards them. The things which he singled out for attack, in them and in their creed, are the very things which today's Zionists claim to be the identifying features of Jews, Jewishness and Judaism. Religiously, Jesus seems beyond doubt to have been the opposite and adversary of all that which would make a literal Jew today or would have made a literal Pharisee then. None can say with certainty who or what he was, and these suggestive statements by non-Jewish politicians ring as false as the derisive and mocking lampoons about “the bastard” which circulated in the Jewish ghettoes. *Rabbi Stephen Wise, the leading Zionist organizer in the United States during the 1910-1950 period, used this phrase for the obvious political motive, of confusing non-Jewish hearers. Speaking to such an “inter-faith” meeting at the Carnegie Hall at Christmastide 1925, he stated “Jesus was a Jew, not a Christian” (Christianity was born with the death of Jesus). For this he was excommunicated by the Orthodox Rabbis Society of the United States, but a Christian Ministers Association “hailed me as a brother”. Rabbi Wise adds the characteristic comment: “I know not which was more hurtful, the acceptance of me as a brother and welcoming me into the Christian fold, or the violent diatribe of the rabbis”. The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, First Printing 1956, p. 59 ff.

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:52:51+00:00

Jesus was not a Pharisee (modern Judaism) or Talmudic Jew; He damned them… repeatedly! He rejected the racial creed which the Orthodoxy of Judaism, the worst religion ever devised which has no redeeming qualities whatsoever, has taught secular culture Jews through victimhood complexes, the Holocaust industry and Zionism.

Recall especially that today’s “Jews” boast that they follow the Pharisees…

"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.” -- Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474 "Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.” -- Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, The Jewish Publication Society of America (1946) p. xxi "The Talmud is the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the ‘Tradition of the Elders,’ and to which He makes frequent allusions.” --Michael L. Rodkinson, The History of the Talmud: From The Time Of Its Formation About 200 B. C. Up To The Present Time, Kessinger Publishing, LLC (June 8, 2006), ISBN-13: 978-1428631366, p.70

"Allusions”? Yes, Jesus damned those man-made traditions for voiding the commandment of God. Mark 7:8-9

“This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible.” -- Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p.59, 159 …and that Jesus singled out the followers of the Pharisees as twofold children of Hell more than the Pharisees themselves. Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves. Matthew 23:15 The word “Jew” is a modern word with many ambiguous meanings, but neither by race, residence, nor religion was Jesus Christ a “Jew” and He certainly isn’t a bastard of a whore boiling in feces as Jews insist. In his book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed drills that point home most eloquently: What manner of man was this? Another paradox in the story of Zion is that in our generation Christian divines and theologians often insist that “Jesus was a Jew”, whereas the Judaist elders refuse to allow this (those Zionist rabbis who occasionally tell political or “interfaith'” audiences that Jesus was a Jew are not true exceptions to this rule; they would not make the statement among Jews and seek to produce an effect among their non-Jewish listeners, for political reasons). This public assertion, “Jesus was a Jew”, is always used in our century for political purposes. It is often employed to quell objections to the Zionist influence in international politics or to the Zionist invasion of Palestine, the suggestion being that, as Jesus was a Jew, none ought to object to anything purporting to be done in the name of Jews. The irrelevance is obvious, but mobs are moved by such phrases, and the paradoxical result, once again, is that a statement, most offensive to literal Jews, is most frequently made by non-Jewish politicians and ecclesiastics who seek Jewish favour. The English abbreviation, “Jew” is recent and does not correspond to anything denoted by the Aramaic, Greek or Roman terms for “Judahite” or “Judean”, which were in use during the lifetime of Jesus. In fact, the English noun “Jew” cannot be defined (so that dictionaries, which are scrupulously careful about all other words, are reduced to such obvious absurdities as “A person of Hebrew race”); and the Zionist state has no legal definition of the term (which is natural, because the Torah, which is the Law, exacts pure Judahite descent, and a person of this lineage is hardly to be found in the entire world). If the statement, “Jesus was a Jew”, has meaning therefore, it must apply to the conditions prevailing in his time. In that case it would mean one of three things, or all of them: that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah (therefore Judahite); that he was of Judean domicile (and therefore Judean); that he was religiously “a Jew” if any religion denoted by that term existed in his time. Race, residence, religion, then. This book is not the place to argue the question of Jesus's racial descent, and the surprising thing is that Christian divines allow themselves some of the statements which they make. The reader should form his own opinion, if he desires to have one in this question. The genealogy of Mary is not given in the New Testament, but three passages might imply that she was of Davidic descent; St. Matthew and St. Luke trace the descent of Joseph from David and Judah, but Joseph was not the blood father of Jesus. The Judaist authorities discredit all these references to descent, holding that they were inserted to bring the narrative into line with prophecy. As to residence, St. John states that Jesus was born at Bethlehem in Judea through the chance that his mother had to go there from Galilee to register; the Judaist authorities, again, hold that this was inserted to make the account agree with Micah's prophecy that “a ruler” would come out of Bethlehem”. The Jewish Encylopaedia insists that Nazareth as Jesus's native town, and indeed, general agreement exists that he was a Galilean, whatever the chance of his actual birthplace. Galilee, where nearly all his life was spent, was politically entirely separate from Judea, under its own Roman tetrarch, and stood to Judea in the relationship of “a foreign country” (Graetz). Marriage between a Judean and a Galilean was forbidden and even before Jesus’s birth all Judeans living in Galilee had been forced by Simon Tharsi, one of the Maccabean princes, to migrate to Judah. Thus, the Galileans were racially and politically distinct from the Judeans. Was this Galilean, religiously, what might today be called “a Jew”? The Judaist authorities, of course, deny that most strenuously of all; the statement, often heard from the platform and pulpit, might cause a riot in the synagogue. It is difficult to see what responsible public men can mean when they use the phrase. There was in the time of Jesus no “Jewish” (or even Judahite or Judaist or Judean) religion. There was Jehovahism, and there were the various sects, Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes, which disputed violently between themselves and contended, around the temple, for power over the people. They were not only sects, but also political parties, and the most powerful of them were the Pharisees with their “oral traditions” of what God had said to Moses. If today the Zionists are “the Jews” (and this is the claim accepted by all great Western nations), then the party which in Judea in the time of Jesus corresponded to the Zionists was that of the Pharisees. Jesus brought the whole weight of his attack to bear on these Pharisees. He also rebuked the Sadducees and the scribes. but the Gospels show that he held the Pharisees to be the foes of God and man and that he used an especial, scarifying scorn towards them. The things which he singled out for attack, in them and in their creed, are the very things which today's Zionists claim to be the identifying features of Jews, Jewishness and Judaism. Religiously, Jesus seems beyond doubt to have been the opposite and adversary of all that which would make a literal Jew today or would have made a literal Pharisee then. None can say with certainty who or what he was, and these suggestive statements by non-Jewish politicians ring as false as the derisive and mocking lampoons about “the bastard” which circulated in the Jewish ghettoes. *Rabbi Stephen Wise, the leading Zionist organizer in the United States during the 1910-1950 period, used this phrase for the obvious political motive, of confusing non-Jewish hearers. Speaking to such an “inter-faith” meeting at the Carnegie Hall at Christmastide 1925, he stated “Jesus was a Jew, not a Christian” (Christianity was born with the death of Jesus). For this he was excommunicated by the Orthodox Rabbis Society of the United States, but a Christian Ministers Association “hailed me as a brother”. Rabbi Wise adds the characteristic comment: “I know not which was more hurtful, the acceptance of me as a brother and welcoming me into the Christian fold, or the violent diatribe of the rabbis”. The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, First Printing 1956, p. 59 ff.

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:45:44+00:00

What good did persecuting the lowly Jew do to Christian societies? Eventually it ended in the elite Jewish class finding its way back into the fold, or they had never left, and lived among the Christians as conversos.

To an elitist Jew, mammon worshipping politician, usurer or vulture capitalist, prosecution is persecution and retribution is antisemitism.

Expulsion and persecution must never be held as methods to combat the Jewish question or any question for that matter. Justice, prosecution, retribution are the three rules to atop this madness and we can only do it by looking within ourselves, knowing who we are, refraining from looking down the rabbit hole, and working on obtaining judicature power.

Until then, whatever conspiracy you wish to expose, will be of no use. They got away with 9/11 because THEY 5 Zionist Jews controlled all aspects of the lawsuit/payout process.

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:37:18+00:00

Kellogg had no say in the wide adoption of genital mutilation of which Jews had the largest influence. Kellogg was even kicked out of the Christian denomination he attended because he was a liar, fraud and weirdo.

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:34:46+00:00

I actually wrote an essay about American circumcision years ago, around 70pgs. It was taken up largely because of Jewish influence in medicine and their revenge against 'goyim,' as well as for profit motives, and the very sadistic mutilation damages a child's brain.

In fact, the Jewish supremacist Maimonides had said that the act of circumcision makes men docile and subservient.

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:30:34+00:00

And yet that's not true in the slightest. Most people in Jewish porn are circumcised. Circumcision is a Jewish occult ritual against 'goyim.'

Jesus · 2023-03-17T06:28:01+00:00

Ahhh, yeah, it's CRISPR cas9.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:55:48+00:00

"Bred space."

Only a Jew.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:39:49+00:00

Jews were heavily involved in Bolshevism, many used pseudonyms. Poland, thankfully, was not tricked like Russia or Hungary was. Solzhenitsyn's 200 Years Together is the best account of Jewish Bolshevism, and it is true that many Jews also fell under the steamroller, but if it were not for Jews, the Bolshevisk coup would not have been successful, as Trotsky and Lenin admit. They were also notorious for exploiting the peasants.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:38:39+00:00

Stalin raped a 13 year old.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:37:04+00:00

Mossad did 9/11.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:35:51+00:00

One can become soverign. Find unincorporated town, stop using Fed or US notes, build home, trade, barter, if you have to make a profit, make very little and only enough for your needs to survive. You will get leniency even if in an incorporated town.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:31:42+00:00

So where has Commun(ism) been tried?

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:30:28+00:00

Commun(ism) is an incorporation, from its inception to its practice.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:28:32+00:00

Capital(ism) is an incorporation.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:26:30+00:00

Imagine beliving that a name online is a moniker for the person in real life. That says more about you than anything else. But then again, you spew all the ADL talking points, so I'm not surprised.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:25:20+00:00

Idk. They fake shootings constantly through DHS. Half of the high profile shootings since SHES, including the Synagogue shooting in PA, have been fake drills passed off as real.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:23:57+00:00

Proud Latin mass Church goer, indeed.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:11:25+00:00

There's nothing broken about it. The US is self funding corporation, we just have to give 6000 in interest to mostly Jewish bankers every year because we are goyim. In reality, we can end the FED and instate English Law or distributist economy that bars Talmudic Lien and Zionist looting.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:09:05+00:00

Doesn't even understand that the US is a self-fundig corporation and cannot be indebted to itself. Really, it is indebted to Jewish bankers, and that can all but be erased by instating the treasury issue US currency without interest AFTER usurious Jews are barred from holding office, which would include every Jew, because every Jew holding public office is a Zionist and Zionism is treason under the title of nobility clause in the Constitution.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:04:23+00:00

And this is why they infiltrated and subverted it with crypto-Jews, Cabalists and Freemasons, they created a faux carciture, in order to delegitimise it and radicalise antichrists into destroying it.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:01:29+00:00

Is this site related in anyway to Judaism.is?

Jesus · 2023-01-24T03:00:56+00:00

Rosenberg, the philosopher behind Nazism was of Jewish ancestry. Marx was a Jew. They're crypto-Jews pretending to be Christians.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:59:34+00:00

Marx was a Jew, he is even related to the Rothschilds.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:59:01+00:00

They all work for the Talmudic Jews.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:58:03+00:00

Jesus was not a Jew.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:57:33+00:00

Nazism is the naturalist opposed racialism of Jewish racialism.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:56:38+00:00

He asked a question.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:56:07+00:00

Hibiki, we already know you shill for Jews and Freemasons. Jesuits were Catholics until Jews took the society over.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:52:27+00:00

Beautiful book! I have the original hardcover.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:51:50+00:00

I'm a Catholic mod, I won't let that happen.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:47:16+00:00

Francis is a freemasonic Jew. His genealogy and actions prove it.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:44:39+00:00

Jewish rabbis have a much higher sexual abuse record than the Church.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:43:56+00:00

May God bless you!

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:41:17+00:00

EndJewSupremacy

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:40:51+00:00

The old would be made obsolete for the New, which is Christ and the Mystical Body.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:39:17+00:00

Francis is a Talmudic Freemasonic Jew. Vatican II is a Jewish 'Church.'

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:37:54+00:00

Wait, a Satanic Jew is saying this?

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:34:03+00:00

I found something interesting in regards to Sandy Hook. Basically the 'principal' Dawn Hochsprung (Dawning of where the Hoax was Sprung) at Sandy Hook Elementary school (SHES) was an alias.

Saint Rose Lima's principal, Mary Maloney (who left shortly after the SHES event for another job), her childhood surname was one Scampoli. St. Rose Lima is a few miles from SHES. This Scampoli (now Maloney) did not take the name Maloney until much later in life.

There was footage of police running towards St. Rose Lima in the early hours of the alleged shooting at SHES which was claimed to be the response due to a "bomb threat" happening simultaneously. NASA footage that one must pay for shows that St. Rose and SHES had cars parked nearly all in uniform. The former looked as if they were parked in such a way as the drivers were to be quickly escorted in mass unto several busses, which is what often happened with field trips with parents during my days in school, and the latter featuring cars parked nearly all the same way, yet past footage shows nothing of this kind for 10+ years in google imagery, as if they were all quickly parked in the location for one reason or another at both schools. There were, in fact, several bus loads that traveled from, lets assume St. Rose to SHES in the early hours, and were bussed backed later. Whether it was because the roads were blocked or something else, is unknown to me.

Anyway, many, many years ago out of curiosity I looked up the backstory on the SHES principal Dawn who supposedly died heroically and in the wee hours of the morning she was said to be alive and fine and was interviewed by the Newtown Bee (later retracting this story) and a journalist who wrote that she had called herself the principal, but that he 'wrongly' (rightly) assumed that this was Dawn because "this principal had very similar features to Dawn." His response was that he got confused due to the "commotion of the day." Although he doesn't say who he talked to, it is clear that this person is Mary Maloney (Scampoli), the principal at St. Rose Lima. It should be noted that both the Jewish founded Satanic society of America has a large presence in Newtown and the Church right next to where the Hoax was sprung features not one, but two Jewish Novus ordo preists pretending to be Catholics and being witting particpants in the psyop, (one such 'priest' was named Weiss).

I found the upper state NY High school where Mary Maloney (Scampoli) of St. Rose Lima had graduated from and discovered that http://classmates.com/ pointed to a women named Mary Maloney, and it looked sort of similar to St. Rose Lima's Maloney but was definitely not her. How could it be if she was a Scampoli and did not adopt the surname Maloney until much later in life?

Mary Maloney (Scampoli) was a senior at that school anyway and not a sophomore like the other unrelated Mary Maloney, that looks similar to Mary Maloney (Scampoli) but is definitely a different person. So, I scanned the same yearbook and found, yup, a young Mary Scampoli at the same school with the correct graduation date who looks exactly like Dawn Hochsprung, I mean there's no difference, just put on 8-10 years and invert the image to not entirely give it away. If the conspiracy theorists are right, it would mean the photo they used for Dawn photoshopped and was a very old photograph of Mary Scampoli, older than 2000, which was used as an alias for Hochsprung. But everything I'm saying could be a misunderstanding, but Inhighly doubt it. I believe there are aliases going on here, and SHES was not a working school at the time ans the kids were already housed at the Monroe Middle School where SHES food was already being sent to.

It's just bizarre that you have a Mary Maloney who isn't the same Mary Maloney today, in which classmates pretends it is her, and where Scampoli is in the same school and looks nearly identical to the photo used for Hochsprung.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:15:43+00:00

That was disinfo. The superbowl featured some of the kids. I know how they did it.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:13:58+00:00

Remember, the photos they used are years younger. So, the kids wouod be 4-6 years older.

Jesus · 2023-01-24T02:12:28+00:00

Remember, Jew Zients is the one who terminated your job because you wouldn't get the CRISPR cas9 injection.

Jesus · 2023-01-03T05:32:07+00:00

Capitalism is an incorporation. The market economy is determined by persons under limited agency who are incorporated.

Anything outside of federally or statutory issued money used for commercial purposes, such as bartering...

Is NOT incorporated.

Jesus · 2023-01-03T05:28:35+00:00

He was an obese Talmudic Jew related to the Rothschilds.

Jesus · 2023-01-03T05:26:50+00:00

You're the title, but it ain't the reality.

https://saidit.net/s/debatealtright/comments/89hv/the_problem_with_capitalism_is_that_theres_so/

Jesus · 2023-01-03T05:25:50+00:00

You're retarded, Jew.

Capitalism" is owning the MONETARY/CREDIT & STATUTORY POLICY production from which all corporations exist. Gerard Malynes, 1622.

That's why capitalism didn't exist in the U.S. corp territories until Rockefeller and JP Morgan. Come to find out, rich people creating cheap workers is now suddenly "prosperity gospel" for Team America Inc.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CYVM2wvUMAAKjUG?format=png&name=small

And then we have commie inc. proposing 70% marginal tax rate on multimillionaire incomes.... ahhhhhh , hello, why not propose CAPITAL GAINS TAX...otherwise they just dodge the damned tax like JP Morgan or Rockefeller! Geeze.

But then we have Team US corp whining about how capitalism is 'freedom' or stupidly suggesting that "capitalism" is somehow older than JP Morgan?

This is American Capitalism:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CYVMieCU0AEWZIu?format=png&name=small

...and no amount of sock puppets, shills and bots can negate this.

Capitalism is when a small group of people who control a private corporation, claim it's a "government" & use violence/propaganda to coerce all others to do what their told. Just like communism and socialism. All three models are the complete opposite of a meritocracy.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D28syWfWwAEyuxe?format=jpg&name=medium

America LLC was only ever private corporations as "muh government", was never "muh free market" & "muh capitalism" meme was a banking scam to legitimize outlawed loan-sharking. Meme-jobs like wall-street or the government don't feed a nation. And we are top-heavy with meme-jobs. UBI FOR FARMERS! Or not... because it's 'better' near nobody can afford it and we instead subsidise wall-street whilst they plan on going back to the golden or silver calf of reserve backed currency based on the worship of "intrinsic value" like all the Libertardiams morons speak of. Yes, that's it, it is better we live in an unsustainable meme make-work economy where the billionaires fatten themselves up and the lazy don't know how to plant a tomato plant yet produce poop piss and garbage, stinking up the cities and doing a great service to technocratic impact/vale market corporations.

As for Every-ism: Allowed fake vote to buy from Limited Inc., then shot when you complain on sub-standard services. Same with fascism & capitalism.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKMGeBEWkAEQCrW?format=jpg&name=small

Capitalism & the "american dream"...no god, no real churches, no soul...just money. Always the money, only the money on nu-age masonic naturalism.

Or a better future... Public banks (county-based banks; non-private ie. moving private credit) should issue experimental Universal Basic Income, though, so few in operation, and illegal for a state sub-franchise such as Massachusetts Inc., to do so; so as to increase basic cred flow to suppressed areas, which will increase spending and automatically create small corps for retail products...

Farming might come back in style if normal people could afford to do it + local distribution; though big companies are not fond of small distribution from small companies.

It would also alleviate Soc.Sec. admin/book problems & take pressure off the courts/prisons. MAYBE.

Reminder:

It is impossible for an imaginary corporation to owe itself imaginary money via other imaginary sub-franchise corporations, when it can really print all the imaginary credit & currency it ever will require ab initio at will, Descarte.

But the Libertardians and politicians for some reason don't want you to know that, or, maybe they don't know that. Maybe they are as ignorant as they look, probably not.

Jesus · 2023-01-02T21:33:03+00:00

Maybe. There are thousands of studies on this coronavirus and it targeting ace2 receptors. Yes, the CRISPR cas9 injections are a bioweapon.

Jesus · 2023-01-02T21:29:42+00:00

Capitalist communist nexus. Both are incorporations. Autonomy is the way to go.

Jesus · 2023-01-02T21:29:08+00:00

Capitalism is an incorporation in which all statutory laws are founded.

Jesus · 2023-01-02T21:28:17+00:00

Yeah, but Jews are doing that.

Jesus · 2023-01-02T21:27:12+00:00

Hahah, yeah, Thatcher had a Rothschild appointed. Bolshevism is Jewish nationalism against goyim countries, German National Socialism is naturalist racialism against Jews, though Jews can also be national socialists ie. Zionism.

Jesus · 2022-12-29T03:55:10+00:00

...the role of the Vrill and Thule societies in his rise to power.

Many books on these secret soceities. I'll link some later. Hitler was tasked by the German army to infiltrate the Thule Society, which had several Jewish members.

shared symbolism between the Nazis, Freemasons, and Theosophic Society (such as a shared reverence for the swastika)

Yes and no; relationship of symbology doesn't always mean one and the same. He very well could have been hijacking these movements for his own political gain. He liquidated Freemasonry except for the Prussian lodges which remained antisemitic, but they too were eventually disbanded.

funding of the Nazis by the American establishment

True. Businesses is business. Warburg or Bush did not fund Hitler.

the assimilation of the Nazis into the American intelligence community and NASA

Their country was destroyed thousands were executed at a nearly all Jewish kangaroo court, and those who had the intelligence or a gift for genius were given a choice, death at Nurmeberg or give us all your technological and political secrets. It definably wasn't a 2 sided deal.

Hitler's disappearance which leaves open the possibility that he escaped, and possibly wasn't personally in danger

Killed himself, his family attests to this.

the fact that the Allied forces deliberately left weapon plants intact, indicating that a hidden power meant for the war to go on for a while.

Based on these facts, I cannot exclude the possibility that Hitler was controlled opposition.

BUT IF YOU WANT TO GO DOWN THIS LINE OF THINKING, cannot do better than this:

18 pages https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/hitler-the-kabbalistic-talmudic-creation-of-ww2/

Jesus · 2022-12-29T03:41:48+00:00

He'a a Jew whose grandfather was a Transhumanist. Search geni. Worked with Mossadnik Nicole Junkermann.

Jesus · 2022-12-29T03:41:11+00:00

Jesus was conceived on Christmas and born on 9/11.

Jesus · 2022-12-29T03:35:35+00:00

Jews do, hence the inbreeding, and yet their blood is still intermixed.

Jesus · 2022-12-29T03:34:30+00:00

Funny enough I told a racialist Jew I had Ashkenazi genetics but wanted to erradicate Judaism from the face of the planet and believed in Christ because there can be no Jew without Judaism (obviously erradication would be impossible) but he said, doesn't matter, you're a Jew, self-hating, but a Jew who will eventually convert to our side.

Cult, period.

Jesus · 2022-12-29T03:31:54+00:00

And yet Judaism holds them all together or Holocaustianity.

Jesus · 2022-12-29T03:30:53+00:00

Khazars were considered door proselytes by Levite Pharisees as well. In the end, they're not a race, they're a cult. There's Yemenite Jews, Kaifeng Jews, Korean and Japense Jews, Mongolian Jews, Ethiopian Jews, etc., etc.

There's no such thing as a full blooded Jew. While racialist Jews might claim they're a high IQ race, they are only doing so as a survival tactic because the religion of Judaism is retarded and has no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

Jesus · 2022-12-29T03:25:42+00:00

It's a stealth bioweapon targeting Indo-European's ACE2 receptors but unsurprisingly does not effect Ashkenazi Jews who created the CRISPR cas9 injections that also act to supress ACE2 receptors causing AIDS like illness in 5-10 years with probable death.

I've noticed that the people claiming its 100% fake happen to be Likudnik Jews.

Jesus · 2022-12-28T03:42:17+00:00

In a comedy special way back as well as one old interview in Aspen and a newer interview I'll have to find.

Jesus · 2022-12-28T01:58:02+00:00

Carlin had Jewish ancestry and was a cynic anti-Christ.

The Nordic blue eyed man from the north is going to have to pay the price. [smiles] — Carlin, concerning white genocide.

We have to crucify middle-class republican bankers." — Carlin, doesn't mention billionaire Jews nor mammon worshipping gentile bankers. It's rural white middleclass 'bankers.' Sure!

Your children will feel the blade, muslims will win, white people will go extinct, there's too many white people, even if their population is declining... too many white people."— Carlin, a slithering Jew.

Jesus · 2022-12-28T01:51:22+00:00

Merry late Christmas to you too.

Jesus · 2022-12-28T01:50:53+00:00

It's part of Jew theatre. They use the black shabbos goy to create an atmosphere of guilt.

Jesus · 2022-12-28T01:49:31+00:00

She's not, I'm Indo-European and could Convert to Judaism and become a Jew. Jews are NOT a race, if they were I wouldn't have 13% ashkenazi genetics due to Polish ancestry. They are racialists practicing a cult religion.

Jesus · 2022-12-28T01:47:30+00:00

Hey Jew, the day of expulsion is coming.

Jesus · 2022-12-28T01:46:58+00:00

The point is she uses a pseudonym Jew surname as a black goy in Jew dominated Hollywood and claimed that Judaism and Jews are not a race (they're not) and was reprimanded because of it.

Jesus · 2022-12-27T11:58:10+00:00

A Jew.

Jesus · 2022-11-18T21:32:52+00:00

that's antisemantic

Jesus · 2022-10-29T19:22:40+00:00

The Jews.

Jesus · 2022-10-29T18:55:11+00:00

Lol. I know. Problem is all I see is psyop articles.

Jesus · 2022-10-26T02:44:11+00:00

Vacation

Jesus · 2022-10-26T02:43:17+00:00

Goyim I'm totally sry for locking you down, terminating employment if you didn't get vaccine and stealing tens of millions to stop deflationary crisis but since we were sucessful with this anti-deflationary scheme, we are totally sry.

Jesus · 2022-10-23T22:48:25+00:00

German dislike of Jews arose from a planned, centralized, Nazi plan, without any provocation.

If you believe that, I got a bridge to sell you.

Zionism will support any boycott that institutionalizes racism in their own ehnonstate because Zionism is a colonizing, commercialization incorporation to erect a Jewish ethnostate by the sword and bomb. Boycotts are a constitutional response to foreign agent organizations.

Jesus · 2022-10-23T22:46:47+00:00

I think when they had the pogroms to the east it pushed a lot of poor Jewish immigrants into Germany and many places were overwhelmed.

Pogroms were exaggeratted to high heaven, as noted by Solzhenitsyn. Jews were already situated in Poland, Prussia/Germany for hundreds and hundreds of years.

In France the Nazis actually were only allowed to take immigrant Jews to the camps, not French Jews.

That's not true. Judenrat SS Jews arrested common Jews and sent them to transfer camps to be taught agriculture for the erection of the Zionist state. Hitler and his entourage wanted most Jews, especially those in finance, to leave Germany; and Zionist Jews wanted Palestine, so they essentially made a deal: the Haavara Agreement. Those Jews who had fought for the Reich in WW1 were able to live a life in Germany with very little discrimination until the war years.

The immigrants from pogroms are where you get characters like Fagin from. They aren't rich bankers. They are poor people trying to survive in a system which is collapsing under the pressure of overpopulation and unrooted people who don't have any loyalties to their community.

The Yiddish speaking Jews in russia, many extolled the 'revolution' others fell under its steamroller, were exclusive, seperate and odd to the Gentile. They were extrememly disimilative. They did not practice nor would follow the same laws as a Gentile, as was the case in Russia, until the Judaeo-Bolshevik coup. In fact, these Jews often spoke negatively of the Jews who exploited the peasant theough usury and promoting drunkenness. Where communist Jewish groups desired to rid of these separatist laws and assimilate them into the Messianic state, Jewish telegraphs in California complained of their mistreatment, an agenda which was never successful. During that same time in one town 50 Bishops and 6,500 preists were executed without even a mention from the Western press.

Jesus · 2022-10-23T22:37:36+00:00

Peter Theil is a Netanyahu loving homosexual cryptoJew, and transhumaniam is the negation of Christ. Where God made man and women a union, and a man more masculine but feminine in the qualities of care, which the female dominates in, transhumaniam looks to uproot this system.

See Mormonism (faux Christianity) and the Tranhumaniat brain initiative.

Jesus · 2022-10-23T22:34:36+00:00

Alas, 2 million Jews were under Hitler's dominion, 4 million survived and 6 million perished.

Jesus · 2022-10-21T22:17:03+00:00

I have a few books about Kaifeng Jews; they are older books and hard to aquire. Plus, Jews (Chinese practicing Judaism and the oral laws of the elders) were situated in China thousands of years ago as merchants and conducted banking; the Catholic Jesuit order wrote extensively about them in a book I have but cannot seem to find at the moment.

...do have a problem with the use of "meeting up with Jews" for the narrative that they're 1) part of the agenda or 2) controlled by them or 3) a Jew themselves.

I look at Jews with a traditional latin Catholic perspective. Because of the notorious infiltration of Jews who desired to subvert and destroy the Church, first through the Jesuit order, in which was imposed a blood purity law by anti-Converso Catholic Jesuits to prevent crypto (Marrano) infiltration, and later the Church itself, anti-Pope Bergoglio (see Maurice Pinay's The Plot Againat the Church)...

https://www.omnia-veritas.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/products-36b77c_6f74c3c43fd242929e9ca8e2f7190740-768x1152.jpg

...being of liberal Character and parting ways with the gospel, himself being of Jewish crypto ancestry; it is necessary to take a theological approach against Jusaism, a sect which has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. There have been Jews, that means a human born and indoctrinated into the cult of Judaism, who sincerely renounced Judaism and exposed the Talmud and became Gospel preaching Catholics who repudiated all forms of so-called Jewishness, a so-called preist by the name of Friedman comes to mind, Dennis Fahey details him in his book The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World.

The very idea of Jewishness, as naturalist Hitler criticized and defined as a racial construct, is simply a waste product of the racialism of rabbinic Judaism. For there would be no such thing as a irreligious, secualr Jewish Zionist ethnonationalist nor nihilistic Bolshevik Jews without Judaism! Judaism conquers through door proselytizing and indoctrination. The ruling power also uses Judaism to their advantage because of its immoral character against outsiders.

Considering that there are so many Jews that are in positions of power, it's inevitable that other leaders to hold meetings with them.

Very true. And the fact that Talmudic Judaism advocates for preemptive killing. Gentile ruling class who do not have thr armor of Christ will submit to their wishes.

In terms of someone like Deng, he was at odds with Mao and only rose to power when Mao died. Deng introduced capitalism to China under the guise of "socialism with Chinese characteristics". The deep state then tried to overthrow Deng during the Tiananmen event. In your link, the proof given for Deng being a Jew is hearsay testimony. I would say he likely wasn't a part of the Jewish cult. Also, I surmise that Xi doesn't exactly see eye to eye with Western Jews or that he doesn't necessarily follow the underlying ideology.

Yes, but Jews are not a monolith. There are eurasianist Jews opposed to unipolarist ruling class Jews. What they both have in common, however, is their hatred for Christianity.

Pedophilia is the main control mechanism for deep state puppets. Money is another control mechanism, but a weaker one. Neither of those can be used to control the top Chinese leaders, meaning the Jews aren't in complete control.

While I agree, many Jews front the Chinese ambition. They will quickly shift towards multipolarism at a moments notice, especially when they feel threatened by Gentiles in the West.

It seems like to me that Jews are one group in power, Hibiki's work on the Jesuits makes it seem like they're another group in power.

No, hibiki spews disinfo constantly. I have had a hundred run ins with him over the years (see my posts) and have debunked his work extensively. The Jesuits are a Catholic sect. They were infiltrated by Cabalistic Jews (Trump is a Cabalistic Jew) in the 15th century. True Jesuits, fought tooth and nail against this subversive order but lost in the 20th century. Today, the Jesuit order is largely controlled by Talmudic and Cabalist Jews. Again, SEE MAURICE PINAY, The Plot Against the Church. For the Jesuits, read the chapter about infiltration of the order by Jews and Freemasons.

...under the third supreme general, Francisco de Borja (of the family of Pope Alexander VI and Cesare Borgia) the Jesuit Order become to be seen as a Jewish Synagogue. Conversos [crypto-Jews] had made a complete take-over of the Society.

After Borje died, there was the counterstrike. Italian and Portuguese anti-converso lobby, most prominent being Benedetto Palmio, managed to elect Everard Mercurian as the fourth supreme general and after him Claudio Acquaviva. Under these generals the Jesuit Order pushed conversos from leading roles and stopped admission of new conversos. The purity of blood rule was mitigated in 1608, but conversos never gained back the power that they had obtained in the early years.

The study describes the actions of Acquaviva. He asked his trusted men, many of whom were anti-converso, to give opinions what should be improved in the Society. These opinions presented converted Jews as troublemakers, who should not be accepted to the Society. In 1590 Acquaviva gave secret orders to Spanish provincials to exclude New Christians from jobs that were very visible to the outside world, as their presence irritated Spanish nobles. Acquaviva did not at this point ban all of Jewish origins from joining the Society. Three years later, in 1593, Acquaviva imposed the Limpieza de sangre, which made it impossible for New Christians to join Jesuits. The study suggests the reason was that memorialistas had tried a revolt against the way Acquaviva ruled the Society. The memorialistas were a group of Spanish Jesuits, largely conversos, who were sending secret memorandums to the Spanish crown, the Inquisition and the Pope in order to get the supreme general of Jesuits (Mercurian and Acquaviva) change his orders. It was a rebel in a military order like that of Jesuits.

Whether the problem of conversos was only that they gained power in the Society, or were the conversos also leading the Society in a non-Christian spirit, is not well answered by [8]. It is explained that Palmio thought that New Christians were still Jews and “overly ambitious, insolent, Janus-faced, pretentious, despotic, astute, terrible, greedy for power, and infamous”, and that “the neophytes want to dominate everywhere and this is why the Society is agitated by the tempest of discords and acrimonies”, and that “all their and our evils proceeded from neophytes and especially from those who governed in Rome”.

"Being children of this world, pompous, cunning, fake, self-seeking, etc.,it is certain that they fit religious life very badly and that it is impossible to maintain union with them. If those of this blood are made superiors, they employ almost all their government in external things: they promote genuine mortification and solid virtues very little and seem to be merchants, seeking first seats and being called rabbis; they are hardly eager to seek perfection that is described in the parts 5 and 6 of the Constitutions; and readily admit others of the same blood who are very unworthy.”

Hibiki refuses to believe Loyola, the founder of the Jesuits, of Jewish ancestry, and a preacher of the Gospel, can somehow be a Christian if he had Jewish ancestry. At leasts 30% of the founding members had Jewish ancestry who renounced their Jewishness in good faith and exposed Judaism. Therefore, they ceased to be Jews. Had the subversive character of Judaism penetrated the early Jesuits, the Catholics would have kicked out them out. Read: The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews.

https://www.amazon.com/Synagogue-Studies-Medieval-Reformation-Traditions/dp/900417981X

Based on mainstream conspiracy culture, anti-Semitics seems like an op that's being unnaturally promoted, especially with Kayne West's recent rant.

Antisemitism is a non-sequitur misnomer. A pedantic term cooked up by German and Jewish intellectuals in the 16 century. The root etymological meaning confines semite to a linguistic category. Hence, antisemite in its true meaning is defined as anti, in compoete opposition to Hebrew and Arabic language.

We can look at the Partition of Catholic Poland and their liberal nature on the Jews, and we can see, as Stefan Laudyn made clear, that a large percentage of Jews aided in her destruction, sided with Prussia and Russia, and then dominated the Communist 'Polish' puppet state. Criticism of Judaism is not an op, but I agree that Kanye West and his countless interviews seem to be a perception management op. After all, he is pro-Trump ans posted for revolutiom in Iran. His attack on Soros is like Yair Netanyahu's attack on Soros. So-called 'Antisemitism' increases money for the ADL hate racket as well. Think about the Jewish founded progressive ACLU siding with the leader of the American Nazi Party Frank Cohen, a pedophile Zionist Jew, who wanted to march in Jewish neighborhoods to scare them into funding the Jewish establishment cause.

Jesus · 2022-10-21T04:45:51+00:00

https://i0.wp.com/fitzinfo.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/image20-312w127h.png

And this is why racialism of Judaism almost always inhibits the truth. It masks the true origins of Jewish supremacism which is ideology, which is Judaism.

Jesus · 2022-10-21T04:40:14+00:00

dexx731 on twitter and elsewhere has lots of sources and see here:

https://fitzinfo.net/2021/07/19/how-jews-took-over-china-an-created-chinese-communism/

And here:

https://archive.org/details/152415639-chinese-jews

There are other scholarly books showing that many Chinese rulers were Kaifeng Jews.

Jesus · 2022-10-21T04:33:07+00:00

Exactly, Indo-Europeans. Stop calling yourself White and start calling yourself Indo-European.

A lot of peoppe don't know theor ancestry and history because of the white abstraction.

Jesus · 2022-10-21T04:31:21+00:00

I'll say it again. A Jew is to Judaism what a Christian is to Christianity. Yemenite Jews, Kaifeng Jews, and various other non-Semitic Jews. Jews are not blood related to ancient Israelites, they might have semitic qualities, but are a European and asiatic mixture who intermixed with surrounding tribes. They were edomites, canaanites and Khazar door proselytes. Door proselytization being their modus operandi to conquer nations.

Calling Judaism one race negates the most damning aspect of Judaism, whih is infiltration of races and ethnicities.

Jesus · 2022-10-20T00:22:33+00:00

Jews, Pfizer; Jews, Moderna; Jews, CDC.

Jesus · 2022-10-20T00:21:30+00:00

Wrong, I can convert to Judaism. Jews can be of all types of races/ethnicities.

Israel just wants to figure out who is a 'worthy' Sephardi or Ashkenazi Jew, converts who descend from pagan Khazars, even Cossacks have Khazar blood. It doesn't actually make them a Jew. Only Judaism does, and believing your a Jew and upholding its backwards teachings.

Jesus · 2022-10-20T00:18:09+00:00

Exactly. Zio Jews created this abstraction. A baseless category of skin color, always attacked and always privileged.

Jesus · 2022-10-20T00:17:15+00:00

Zionist Jews (racialist Jews) racialized blacks as blacks (Swartzers ie. "Niggers" a Yiddish term) and whites as white, an abstraction that means absolutely nothing. Jews are Jews because they have their diabolical religion which has no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

Jewishness is a culture, cult and religious sect. Hence the proselytizing of non-Jew pagan Khazars and reform Judaism. Hence, Yemenite Jews, Ethiopian Jews, Kaifeng Jews, etc.

By generalizing whites under one category we forget that we are Indo-Europeans with a long history.

Jesus · 2022-10-19T05:39:47+00:00

Yup, it's not even about it being required, it won't be. It's all about legal immunity.

Jesus · 2022-10-18T02:58:47+00:00

Nope, they were not.

Jesus · 2022-10-18T02:57:41+00:00

Not credible, the 'Pope' is a Jew and the Catholic social rights are a feigning lip service to the Talmudic Jews. Read any encyclical prior to 1910 and you will see what the Catholics wished to ahieve economically and morally but were unable due to Judaeo-masonry. Now Judaeo-Masonry has taken over the Church, so look for te Noachide laws to be enacted.

Jesus · 2022-10-18T02:39:43+00:00

Gun control is more of a cultural issue, not an indication that she's a deep state shill.

True, seeing that 7% of the pop. commits over 50% of the murders and nearly 40% of gun crime. If ghettos and African-American men seized to exist in America, gun crime would be near Swiss levels. If we subtracted Indo-Europeans out of the equation, blacks in America would have a violent crime rate near Congo levels. This isn't a racial issue as much as it is an economic and cultural issue but Tulsi doesn't say. Gun crime afflicted by one party or group impacts the other party of group. This is the problem with 'Democracy' which is a feigning abstraction for charter corporations and the ruling class.

Furthermore, the country with the most lax gun control laws among 1st world nations (America) is also the most corrupt, evil nation in the history of mankind.

Wrong, America is a landmass, the the US and Israel are the most evil corporations of all, and it takes treasonous and corrupt people in power to perpetuate their abuses. The rhetoric you spew can easily be a tactic of the KGB or MOSSAD.

Or at least, they're the main weapon of choice used by the globalist cabal.

**Zionist Jews.

For the past 100 years or longer, they've been behind nearly every major catastrophic event around the world and operate mainly through US factions like the OSS/CIA, DARPA, military/air force, etc.

**Yeah, Zionist Jews, Israel and the unconventional sect of the CIA which is connected to the Likudniks.

Tulsi's a part of the same military psyops unit (351st Civil Affairs Command) once led by Major General Paul E Vallely, who's associated with QAnon and Trump:

Now that's interesting.

Jesus · 2022-10-15T06:31:14+00:00

Kanye even slipped and said the US was a corporation. Guy has a 150 IQ.

Jesus · 2022-10-15T06:28:42+00:00

Thanks!

Jesus · 2022-10-15T06:27:26+00:00

She's a shill. See my post.

Jesus

MODERATOR OF

EndJewSupremacy

BUT IF YOU WANT TO GO DOWN THIS LINE OF THINKING, cannot do better than this:

The point is she uses a pseudonym Jew surname as a black goy in Jew dominated Hollywood and claimed that Judaism and Jews are not a race (they're not) and was reprimanded because of it.