Saidit.net — April 25, 2019 — New Saidit logo, infinitely resizable expandos, new self-post images, now more than 7500 saidit users by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The banner image itself is the same, just the div frame is a little taller which reveals more of it.

All Eyez On Me by The_In-Betweener in Memetics

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Haha yeah I watched that. They made it in college, I think it was the first real project they did together.

/r/CringeAnarchy has been banned by Fire in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The deplatforming is a concern, but that's why we have all those cryptocurrency donation options available.

We don't want this place to be as far right as voat, we kind of hope to hit more of a centrist middle-ground between reddit and voat. That's the group that doesn't really have a place to speak their mind, so that's why we created saidit.

Thanks for the advice, I appreciate it.

All Eyez On Me by The_In-Betweener in Memetics

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVkTmnJkAN8

The way he pronounces words when he sings is hilarious

Leftist doublespeak translator by 07user01 in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This post: complains about strawman attacks, while making a strawman attack

All Eyez On Me by The_In-Betweener in Memetics

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's hilarious. I should re-watch that movie now that I know it's the south park guys. Team America World Police is one of my all-time favorites. Thanks for the song haha

What a beautiful agenda by 07user01 in CringeAnarchy

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So really you hate activists, not gay people

Ancap vs Ancom by 07user01 in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Without regulations, corporations are free to literally destroy their competition, so the most ruthless and largest corporations with armies literally can destroy the rest

Block/hide users by Flesh in IdeasForSaidIt

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ha yeah.

I removed the floating logo and instead put the logo on the header background. It's the only way to get the speech bubble to go outside the <a href=""> boundary that it's in, otherwise it gets clipped off at the height of the top of the tabs for some reason I could not figure out for the life of me. So I just put it on the background and turned off the floating logo image (but the div is still there so the link is clickable). Just wanted to let you know

Block/hide users by Flesh in IdeasForSaidIt

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, and it takes up a lot of time to code all the different variations. I'd just keep it simple I guess, and if people say "but just the home page?" then we can care. Unless it's a feature you personally want, then by all means go for it.

Also I'm working on the logo right now, so if it's acting weird it's just me

LP vs Hoppeanism by 07user01 in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Absolutist monarchies can only exist because of feudal aristocratic kings, who then get entrenched and become the status quo. That's how it's worked for centuries

H O P P E A N P H Y S I C A L R E M O V A L by HoppeanAncap in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah you just said it was related to that though.

lol by HoppeanAncap in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If your idea of "better" is to advocate violence, then we don't need your form of "better"

LP vs Hoppeanism by 07user01 in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is "natural" about letting billionaires run everything? That's exactly why the era of monarchies came to an end, because that system doesn't work.

The end of an era by Adolf in CringeAnarchy

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh nice, I didn't know that

LP vs Hoppeanism by 07user01 in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What don't you understand of what I said? By letting big money run everything, we wind up with a system very similar to the one we already have

H O P P E A N P H Y S I C A L R E M O V A L by HoppeanAncap in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you can't handle not advocating violence, then you're not going to fit in here, sorry

H O P P E A N P H Y S I C A L R E M O V A L by HoppeanAncap in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because a troll used a hack to create a bunch of subs and we removed most of them but I didn't realize it was related to advocating violence against groups of people. I guess I'll remove it then too, thanks for the heads up.

lol by HoppeanAncap in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That doesn't exempt it from the rules, it's still a meme about killing a group of people

Ancap vs Ancom by 07user01 in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So your solution is to have giant corporations be completely unregulated?

I think we saw how that went wrong in the 1800s, we already tried that...

I agree less regulation would probably be good, especially due to regulatory capture being so common. But zero regulation is just as foolish as tons of regulation. Zero regulation just means companies do whatever they want, set up their own governments, etc. Eventually the normal government would become obsolete and a corporate government that's more powerful would take over, would it not? Then we'd be right back where we started.

Navy SEALs Tried for Months to Report Superior for War Crimes and Were Told to “Let It Go” by salvia_d in WorldPolitics

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Hey, can you stop with this 'applying the law' nonsense? We have a war to do here."

What a beautiful agenda by 07user01 in CringeAnarchy

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So what? There are many more ways to contribute to the world than having children... if that's what you believe, then you must think Central Africa and Afghanistan are super great places: https://www.targetmap.com/ThumbnailsReports/7704_THUMB_IPAD.jpg

Ancap vs Ancom by 07user01 in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If the government exists, big money will buy it. Why wouldn't they? What's to stop them? This is the thing Ancaps never can fully address.

The end of an era by Adolf in CringeAnarchy

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Saidit doesn't have that feature yet, but we're developing it soon.

What a beautiful agenda by 07user01 in CringeAnarchy

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

...said the person calling others parasites simply for who they choose to love. Sounds pretty self-centered to me, tbh