I am very hateful of pedos any name or standard zero sympathy from me I support them killing selves before doin anything to a kid and being killed before too and death or life sentence for first offense and anti pedo everything no csam no lgbt like acceptance I’m Pro kink shaming def of pedos and I am anti ship. I don’t think pedosadism is free speech. I agree w radical feminists on that. Dworkin on Ginsberg and their other anti written porn stuff and anti porn stuff

She says don’t call her queer I guess she thinks mental illness means ppl have to coddle you excuse ur abusive behavior and be nice to you I never thought of it that way I don’t think much ab it but I guess there’s truth to that she’s big on her own “mental illness”

And I support safeguarding which includes monitoring police and institutions who should be catching pedos / predators and keeping them away from kids immediately. Some institutions are required in fact seems everyone’s required to avert and react and report predators and child rapists which duh.. but plenty of ppl and orgs go the extra mile like anonymous creep catchers various researchers.. social workers if the govt is well funded..

Ppl say the cause of what reisman is talking ab in the church is this (major tw)

Can’t add it… have a really good link on that tho I think it is called beyond the detroux affair and it says the reason for the decriminalization of child rape in the church is Opus Dei she’s saying we should return to the common law … there’s stuff ab how the US is involved towards the end so it contains most of whatever else I have read ab.

I would never oppose any of this chris Hansen ppl and researchers

Lenin is a safeguarder he says he wants to know ab all predators and remove them from access to kids immediately and he said they shoot theives on sight so why not pedos.

I didn’t know anyone is pro Pedo and sympathizes w them esp not sexology but anyone now I am on the lookout more but I think most ppl don’t. Most ppl have never heard of anything sexology says on this matter and might not recognize it as pro pedosadism Pedo sympathy etc bc they lie and say they’re science

But it took me a while to learn these things so I am putting them all here for ppl who dk them and dk it’s going on

This is another important fact, for the anti ship stance. Nambla agenda for decriminalization and anti safeguarding is to not be censured

Why can’t I copy paste anymore in these comments but this is important so maybe I’ll type it out

I am writing to you at present at the request of an organization that is not interested in advancing the cause of kiddie porn for the sake of the exploitation of children, but rather for the social recognition of children’s sexuality, for the acceptance of the sexual expression of adults that desire sexual relations of a loving and tender nature w children and ultimately for raising human beings without the typical sexual impediments that are so prevalent in our judeo Christian society. In other words, “if it’s good for us, it’s good for the nation”.

That Is about nambla

Anyway those are the responses to the scourge of pedosadism I agree w and I never had a different opinion some of this stuff I had to learn bc I didn’t know it’s going on but I always hate pedos want them to die be kept away from kids for life and not to be accepted like lgbt and agree w only hate to them all and deepest sympathy for survivors and support all existing criminalization would never question it and think it should be more … there’s no science which would ever change that and I don’t think they’re at all compatible to lgbt. Even t but some ppl will say lgb. I am pure criminalization and negativity… zero tolerance on this matter and consider anyone who knows all this.. really knows all of it … bc I know it takes a while to process it and comprehend like probably at least a year maybe three of learning about it … and still entertains the “we need science” when clearly no science would ever justify any other response … to be a wilfull sympathizer w pedos and their most evil cause and I wish bad things to them I def don’t want anything to do w them and think they should be kept away from kids and any position of influence.

Also Fredrich Engels is the science on the matter. He surpassed this kind of outdated “science” before sex science even existed.

And Lenin. He said sexual and material relations change after the proletarian revolution.. radical feminists allied w the Reagan conservative counter revolution and look where it got them.. read economies of violence by Jennifer suchland tho I think she goes too far w liberal apologism for the sex industry and Lenin doesn’t agree w her read Lenin on the womens question what he says ab “sex work isn’t work” and sex workers aren’t workers. I have even read that meese and Reagan admin are connected to the cause of these sex scientists like cantor who say violence is caused by abnormalities in the brain obv pedosadism is violence.

Radical feminists complain how much they have been marginalized since their collaboration w the Reagan admins counterrevolution well.. now they will usher in common law rape or girls and nambla bc that’s what we get actually after their conservative counter revolution. Again read economies of violence https://youtu.be/rW1ym7VuqxQ finally can add a link https://michael-hudson.com/2015/02/ukraine-denouement/ and this one too I can add that some links I can’t add

That’s the stuff I think is the “politics” of the matter that and cyber libertarianism Michael salter talks ab … what ppl here call politics is like activism. It’s like competing agendas zero tolerance vs tolerance and acceptance and sex positivity being called science for some reason… the sexual revolution I guess.. w no real Commentary on political causes. The political and economic base.

apparently the pedo pro child rape cause has sympathizers much more than I ever thought could be possible that’s crazy to me but I am very against that and would only ever be every moment of my life

Incl when I was sex pos for consenting adults bc I didn’t know you could be against that too but I have always been against pedos and pro gay acceptance mostly prob lgbt acceptance but have been more critical of t but not as much now but the fact many radfems will talk to trans ppl like here shows they don’t think they’re like pedos

Like I am maximally against Pedos anything that means or requires that’s what I’d say every moment of my life nothing else could ever be possible but I didn’t know anything else could ever be possible

Anyway this is another thing I didn’t know. Their agenda and their playbook and I would rather die than ever repeat any of it not like I ever got into convos ab those monsters besides wishing them death and life sentence every once in a while.

Again I can’t copy paste but this is important bc I didn’t know this and to look out for it … I guess I have to type it out again

bc what he’s really saying is an exact duplicate of the pedophile “Strategy for normalization”. From “the use of value neutral terminology” [not 100% negativity - my comment and my stated and intended principle] to “redefining the term child sexual abuse” [ig they call it adult child sex] all the way to “questioning the assumption of harm” [most subhuman death worthy views anyone could ever entertain I had heard of that as a liberal never been more disturbed by anything but thought only nambla thinks that] and every other technique in the middle - his language comes right out of the pedophile playbook. He is an activist for pedophiles.

I didn’t know ab that but that would never be me. I never got into convos ab pedos beyond kill them all stuff so that would never be me but I didn’t know of other convos and I wouldn’t have known how to reject them all tbh. I had to learn ab it and make sure I know the anti pedo side and I didn’t always get it right just like those who assaulted me w the dsm calling to an orientation didn’t always get it right. But I went in only open to the maximal anti Pedo side and I would only agree w the maximal anti pedo maximal criminalization option any moment of my life nothing else could ever be possible and I consider it severe gas lighting and abuse to suggest anything else is possible or to try to push my boundaries on it like cantor says is scientists job to do. Fuck off.

Another strategy for normalization is sex positivity defending csam or the desire at all or tolerance of it. Defending it instead of criticizing and condemning it and I support criminalizing it all. Really would never care to defend it I don’t think it’s free speech. Pro shipping is the same as their playbook too. I would rather die and be tortured than align w any pedo playbook in my life.

also very important bc of Bihet lesbian abusers who act in bad faith and want to make an ex out of you they wouldn’t of anyone else doing the same thing… and think that means they won their point that they assert homosexuality is bad and wrong… while they say don’t call them queer call them gay..you can’t say it’s alienation like I did in two tags as an after thought after saying pedos are individually responsible for their inherently wrong attraction and there’s no excuse and they need to avoid children follow rules of sor and die

Don’t say that.. what Engels said is ok blaming porn is ok but alienation isn’t I guess it’s excusing abusers … and I agree the only fact is It’s an individual moral failing and an industry and govt cover up and elite cover up affecting society… and individual moral failing and a crime of the pedos and failing of other adults to safeguard and oppose Pedo sympathizers and failure of institutions to safeguard and remove abusers from access to vulnerable which children inherently are and failure or police etc and failure of the public again to hold those institutions accountable