all 15 comments

[–][deleted]  (4 children)


    [–]calmbluejay[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I don't understand this entire "coming out" mularky.

    Here's my reasoning why I think coming out is hogwash,

    I'm married and I don't discuss my sex life with anyone. Plus, when people come over to our home no one even sees our bedroom. In fact, because my husband is almost 30 years older than I am the majority of people don't even think we're married.

    Same thing with homosexuals,

    No one would know that they're gay if they just stopped flaunting it in everyone's face. When a gay couple goes for a walk together there will be people that are going to think the worst and be disgusted but 97% of the people won't care at all. Sure enough that I believe homosexuality is a sin and talks to me about it then I'll state my beliefs. However, I'm not going to break down someone's bedroom door to stop them from doing whatever it is that they're doing. All I'm saying is keep what's private PRIVATE.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)


      [–]calmbluejay[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      You might not but that's exactly the type of thing that would happen throughout history.

      It seems to me that homosexuals like to meddle in politics and if what's going on today is any proof then they're politics are extremely messed up. So my question is: Were the homosexuals being persecuted because of the kind of sex they were engaging in or because everyone feared their far-left beliefs?

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)


        [–]calmbluejay[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        I'm sure they're going to force it on everyone as often as they can.

        [–]Its-Silver 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        This is going to make explaining my faith harder isn't it

        [–]calmbluejay[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Give it a shot.

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        I can’t wait to see how they explain transworld to kids.

        [–]Inspector_Monkfish 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        Why would a persons gender be relevant to their historical exploits? And why would you want to delete them from history in the first place?

        [–]calmbluejay[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        I don't believe in deleting anyone from history. However, I also don't believe in discussing any historical figures sex life.

        [–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        like how hoover was a crossdresser fetishist?

        [–]calmbluejay[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Such information is in the same category of historical information as recording the size of a man's penis or a woman's breasts. IE: There's not a good reason to mention such information unless it played a serious role in how historical events unfolded.

        Now if Hoover was indeed a fetishist and the decisions he made were because of his fetishes then we should record that. However, if there's no evidence to that effect then we should ignore it.

        [–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        i mean he was a racist cross dresser