all 12 comments

[–]ThisReality 18 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Unfortunately, I don't think the commenter's wrong about the possibility of a terrorist attack against trans people. But if it happens, it won't be a woman who does it. Name the problem.

[–]jet199 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I actually think it's unlikely.

Most normal people don't have trans on their radar no matter how loudly they shout, and that includes the alt right.

Meanwhile in the UK we just had an actual terrorist attack against gay men, 3 killed, and no one's really bothered. Many news stories didn't even say they were gay men. Even the pink press preferred to call them LGBT or queer, so they can pretend all groups under the banner are at similar risk.

[–]MezozoicGay 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

As someone said on this subreddit "queer people is so vague description" and "some queer people - who is that?". When trans is attacket it is transphobia, when gay or lesbian - it is not homophobia but "queer people attacked". Yeah, and in Iran "queer people are executed or forced to become transwomen/transmen", it is not specifically gay and lesbian people targeted, it is some unknow "queer people", it is not homophobia suuuuure, just some vague "queer"-phobia, I suppose.

[–]MezozoicGay 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So far all I see is trans allies are making physical attacks on lesbians. So if it will be a terrorist attack, it will be by trans against "terfs".

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 9 fun9 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

Such silly boys! Don't they know women can't aim? /s

[–]Spikygrasspod 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Welp, if more sexist men keep calling themselves feminists, and more of us cease to become feminists because we don't 'understand what feminism is about' (according to TRAs), maybe the statistical risk of violence posed by feminists will in fact go up. But as things stand, I don't think the war will start any time soon. Unless you count murder by words, in which case I think JK's reign of terror has just started.

[–]MezozoicGay 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When transwomen included in women statistics, women crime rate is raising up significantly, I wonder why.

[–]Spikygrasspod 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is most assuredly because radfems flip out and fuck shit up.

[–]womenopausal 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Radfem_the_Hun 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's always projection with them.

Considering the amount of incels that have become "trancels," and how we already know about the robust link between incels and violence...

They have physically attacked numerous women (and men) at this point, while GC feminists have not physically attacked a single tran.

[–]Badmammajamma 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

More likely a TRA will shoot up a woman’s space.

[–]yishengqingwa666 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's funny, because men are the ones who do mass shootings, along with every other violent crime there is--and the victims are mostly women.