all 11 comments

[–]lefterfield 51 insightful - 5 fun51 insightful - 4 fun52 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Man punches woman in the face. Woman walks away. Man: You coward! How could you let me punch you like that!

Yes, truly they are the logic-based sex.

[–]AboveBatman 31 insightful - 3 fun31 insightful - 2 fun32 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

This was so dumb, they took her comment about not reacting to the porn and decided it meant she did nothing about it when it meant she's not going to respond to those assholes sending porn to kids!

[–]owmygenderfeels[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

TRAs: "Omg, she said she ignores it!!!!!111111"

She ignores as in doesn't respond with attention, you absolute imbeciles. Ignore and report.

[–]Bloommagical 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, twitter is dumb. JK was replying to the bottom comment.

[–]mindsqueeze 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This was wild to me- instead of being angry that anyone would do this and leveling that rage at said tweeters, it was her they took umbrage with because they seem unable to understand her tweet. The context of her tweet demonstrated all these horrible things that a certain crowd were doing to her, but that she as the recipient was taking the high road and not using her platform to respond. I find it so callous to ignore the impact of spamming children, their families, and the author with inappropriate content and instead choose to thunderously denounce the recipients who are innocent in this debacle.

[–]PainfulTruthsMatter 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

JK probably gets thousands of tweets in her timeline, but how dare she not spend every waking of her hour policing and dealing with every single troll reply she receives?!

Yet more delusional nonsense from her haters. It's really unsurprising at this point.

[–]materialrealityplz 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So they know what they are doing is bad (well, "bad" is an extreme understatement), and somehow... make JK Rowling out to be bad for not pointing it out? Huh?

[–]venecia 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She ignores it in the drastic hope that you cut it the fuck out/less children have to see it if she throws fuel on the fire by acknowledging it. You loons.

[–]SameOldBS 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That TRA who who said she was unsafe around children was taking this tack too. Bring it on. They're making themselves look like the lunatics they are.

[–]Stranger 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wonder if they really lack this much critical thinking