all 11 comments

[–]PumpkinSpiceVagina 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

The day of the banwave, I enjoyed many arguments with TIMs, my favorite being this guy who kept saying completely insane things like how there used to be more than two sexes but when agricultural societies began to pop up they all simultaneously engaged in a thousands-years-long campaign to murder all the other ones until eventually there were no more of them. Before I could even ask he was like, "I'm not going to give you any sources because you wouldn't believe them anyway!" So I asked where were all the bones of these mystery-sexed individuals he said, "well of course there aren't going to be any bones if you burn them all!" So I asked what happened to all the animals and plants and he was like, "agriculture!" I stopped playing along at that point because it was getting tiresome. But the point is, he sounded a lot like the dude above and I wonder if it was the same guy.

[–]luckystar 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I keep seeing "the gender binary is a Western colonial invention" and it's the most insufferable thing ever. Like as if the rest of the world didn't know where babies came form until the white man enlightened them. These people are so woke they wrapped back around to being full on racist and sexist.

[–]WhyDoesHeDoThat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How can he know other sexes existed if there's no proof of it?

[–]courage2courage 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds like he got lost on the way to the paleo sub. Those folk demonise agriculture like nobody else.

[–]luckystar 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The same WHO that let coronavirus spread because they didn't accept data from Taiwan because of political pressure from China. Yeah, they seem like a good objective arbiter of health standards, no vulnerability to manipulation at all.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

China that also controls majority of the real estate on the west coast and invests heavily in tech. No bias whatsoever/s.

[–]LoganBlade[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The same WHO that refuses to even talk about that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlCYFh8U2xM

The same WHO who threatened New Zealand's economy when they said Taiwan did a good job. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pt-2STEwrI

[–]LasagnaRossa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The same WHO that let the virus spread in Italy because "masks are not essential".

Science is a method, and it's done by people. People can get mistaken.

Peer reviewing is there exactly for this reason: anybody who knows the subject can critique an experiment and its thesis.

Did they know that the same guy who won the nobel prize for have discovered HIV is now a nutjob who talks against vaccines and 5g?

[–]CleverNickName 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Uh, that experiment only proves that dresses are gendered, not the men wearing them.

Better experiment would be to have the man walk in buck naked and then tally the number of patrons who will identify that person as a woman...

[–]Ihun 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

piss off chad

finish your GED

ah yes, such big brain arguments that can't possibly be refuted

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wauw. Yeah, I got nothin. 🤦🏻‍♀️