all 22 comments

[–][deleted] 35 insightful - 1 fun35 insightful - 0 fun36 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah, and I feel like they tried to replace bi with pan but didn't stick so they're trying to change bisexuality definition: "Bi means two, attracted to same gender and others." Nah my friend, bi means two as in female and male. I ain't attracted to gender roles and stereotypes.

[–]limeindecoconut 22 insightful - 6 fun22 insightful - 5 fun23 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

All the "woke" ones are pan and polyamorous and they never shut up about it.

[–]lxit09 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So true. I have no issue if people wanna be poly but how it became associated with LGB is a mystery to me. Having multiple partners and being same sex attracted have nothing in common (I guess same as TQ+ but I can understand how that wormed its way in to an extent)

[–]StupidHappyPancakes 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yet they often call themselves asexual at the same time!

[–]Tom_Bombadil 13 insightful - 14 fun13 insightful - 13 fun14 insightful - 14 fun -  (1 child)

Pansexuality is a cookware fetish.

[–]blargus 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I thought it was something to do with bread!?

[–]RedditHatesLesbians 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Words in the bio that are an instant red flad: Pan, queer, demiromantic, she/her he/his they/their or any other pronouns whatsoever, simply calling themselves "LGBTQ+" and for a bonus, the classic gender bender Snapchat filter hair in the profile pic.

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

In the old sub I remember someone describing pansexuals as bisexuals and smug about it. Seems pretty accurate.

[–]jkfinn 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Who needs a red flag, when all you gotta do is look at them. Although many bios don't include a picture, I'll bet the vast majority of trans bios do. And what's most convincing to them is most unconvincing to everyone else.

[–]aldoushuxleyghost 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Sadly, I've met all too many young teen girls who say they are pan. It's the new #notlikeothergirls sex-posi virtue-signaling.

[–]LeaveAmsgAfterBeep 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

“My friends said I’m not allowed to like one sex or the other or both as its oppressive so I’m pan“ it was the same when I was a teenager and pan was coined in the “progressive” teenager circles

[–]jkfinn 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sadly, I've met all too many young teen girls who say they are pan. It's the new #notlikeothergirls sex-posi virtue-signaling.

I guess they think of goddesses and flower children when they think of pan, while I think of the Marquis deSade.

[–]jelliknight 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

it's also a loophole in the ideology. If you say you're a lesbian but you like a TIF and you don't like a TIM you're a bigot. So you say you're pan and then you can just happen to be attracted to certain people for no particular reason

[–]joeytundra 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

i think all the ones bashing lesbians are paedos...they hate women because women have stood in their way in the past of latching onto gay rights. Start calling them paedos.

[–]herecomesthesass 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I remember seeing a crazy post on tumblr that was like "EVERYONE should be pan. If you're not, you openly admit to being transphobic" it was literally what you said but played totally straight

[–]Astrid2448 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it's true, but this problem extends beyond pansexuality. do you guys not remember how before pansexual became popular, all these bisexuals would go online being like "hearts not parts <3" and all? people in general need to realize that being willing to spread your legs doesn't make you some superior being

[–]Eurowoman24 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i've known that to be true, funny how the ones I know at least haven't dated anyone but het/bi men ;)

[–]joeytundra 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think NAMBLA is using the T part and want that P in there under the guise of "Pansexual". NAMBLA hates lesbians because it was lesbians that wanted NAMBLA kicked out in the first place. The abuse lesbians are facing under the "T" part of the umbrella just doesn't make much sense...unless they are pedophiles punishing lesbians.


The first documented opposition to NAMBLA from LGBT organizations occurred at the conference that organized the first gay march on Washington in 1979.[26][better source needed] In 1980, a group, called the Lesbian Caucus, distributed a flyer urging women to split from the annual New York City Gay Pride March, because according to the group, the organizing committee had been dominated by NAMBLA and its supporters.[26][better source needed] The next year, after some lesbians threatened to picket, the Cornell University group Gay People at Cornell (Gay PAC) rescinded its invitation to NAMBLA founder David Thorstad to be the keynote speaker at the annual May Gay Festival.[26][better source needed] In the following years, gay rights groups tried to block NAMBLA’s participation in gay pride parades, prompting leading gay rights figure Harry Hay to wear a sign proclaiming "NAMBLA walks with me" as he participated in a 1986 gay pride march in Los Angeles.[27]

By the mid-1980s, NAMBLA was virtually alone in its positions and found itself politically isolated.[28][better source needed] Support for "groups perceived as being on the fringe of the gay community," such as NAMBLA, vanished in the process.[28][better source needed] In 1994, a New York LGBT rights group called Stonewall 25 voted to ban NAMBLA from its international march on the United Nations in June of that year, accusing the religious right in the US for conflating child abuse and pedophilia for "twisted interests".[29]

In 1994, NAMBLA was again banned from the march commemorating Stonewall. Instead, members of NAMBLA and the Gay Liberation Front formed their own competing march called "The Spirit of Stonewall".[30] The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) adopted a document called "Position Statement Regarding NAMBLA", which said GLAAD "deplores the North American Man Boy Love Association's (NAMBLA) goals, which include advocacy for sex between adult men and boys and the removal of legal protections for children. These goals constitute a form of child abuse and are repugnant to GLAAD."[31] Also in 1994 the Board of Directors of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) adopted a resolution on NAMBLA that said, "NGLTF condemns all abuse of minors, both sexual and any other kind, perpetrated by adults. Accordingly, NGLTF condemns the organizational goals of NAMBLA and any other such organization."[31]

In April 2013, the hacktivist group Anonymous prevented NAMBLA's website from being accessed as part of an operation dubbed "Operation Alice Day".[32][33] The timing of the attack coincided with Alice Day, a Pedophilia Pride Day celebrated by a small group of pedophiles and their supporters on April 25.[34][35][36]

[–]Anoki 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a bi person , I’m sorry but I’m not and will never be attracted to any one of them , so I’m happy that this separation called pansexuality exist

[–]Rock3stone 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

i have a fb friend who has described her struggle with being pan, shes obviously virtue signaling because its real easy to say you're pan when you're in a monogamous heterosexual relationship...... shes one of the biggest sjw's i've ever known, a constant propaganda machine.

[–]Chunkeeguy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't even think most of them are bi. Just virtue signallers.

[–]Marsupial 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The pan label is helpful because it tells me they're bisexual but also that they're a woke dumbass I don't need to waste time on.