“I wish women would fight as hard as trans women for our right to harvest their organs”

submitted by Marigold-plate from self.GenderCritical

The GC spirit is still alive on Reddit: Archived (Reddit discussion): https://archive.vn/OEjuj Screenshot they were discussing:

https://imgur.com/LBPl1uS

Reddit link. https://www.reddit.com/r/TumblrInAction/comments/jhw9wk/i_wish_women_would_fight_as_hard_as_trans_women/

transcommunity #transmisogyny #thingsTRAssay #gendercritical #misogyny

all 23 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]GConly 44 insightful - 3 fun44 insightful - 2 fun45 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Best comment:

It’s never going to work. You can’t just stick a uterus in a male body and expect it not to atrophy and go sceptic. Which is exactly what happened when this was attempted.

Even if it somehow manages not to rot and kill the person being experimented on there’s no goddamn way it’d be able to carry a fetus to term. Women have other organs, structures and an endocrine system involved in the reproductive process.

So why the fuck is anyone enabling this? Cause it’s mean to tell a man “no”?

[–]yousaythosethings 28 insightful - 8 fun28 insightful - 7 fun29 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

As if we needed more proof that the genderists have no idea how babies are made.

[–]MarkTwainiac 23 insightful - 13 fun23 insightful - 12 fun24 insightful - 13 fun -  (3 children)

Best comment:

It’s never going to work. You can’t just stick a uterus in a male body and expect it not to atrophy and go sceptic.

Yes, and the misspelling of "septic" is the best typo too! Now I have an image of a uterus with a face wearing a very doubtful, scoffing expression and wondering, "WTF? How on earth did I end up here? This is clearly no place for the likes of me."

[–]diapason 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, and the misspelling of "septic" is the best typo too! Now I have an image of a uterus with a face wearing a very doubtful, scoffing expression and wondering, "WTF? How on earth did I end up here? This is clearly no place for the likes of me."

Thank you for that mental image, that was wonderful hahahaha

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We gotta laugh when we can.

[–]hmimperialtortie 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sceptical Uterus is the name of my next band.

[–]windrunner 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Cause it’s mean to tell a man “no”?

This is exactly what everything comes down to.

[–]arcticbasket 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Men can't handle "No."

[–]Cicerosolo 24 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 0 fun25 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Even if yo ucoukd sort out transplanting the whole reproductive system to a male successfully and have it work (essentially impossible anyway) how on earth can someone with srs actually give birth to the child? Their 'vagina opening' does not have the ability to dilate to the extent to have a baby, right?

[–]Marigold-plate[S] 27 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 0 fun28 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That’s irrelevant. We already know their logic isn’t grounded in reality. What matters is exposing how entitled they feel, and showing how they think women are second class citizens.

[–]MarkTwainiac 27 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 0 fun28 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The issue wouldn't just be with their fauxgina opening (at either end) - it would be that the entire thing isn't hugely elastic and muscular the way a vagina is. An infant has to travel the entire length of the vagina/birth canal from one end to the other to be born. And vaginal birth typically requires the mother to use her vaginal muscles to do a lot of intentional, intense pushing in order to bring a baby into the world.

If you have a fauxgina made of flaccid skin from the penis or other body parts, none of this would be possible. Also, there'd be other issues such as fauxginas not having any kind of lubrication, and the fact that research has shown the typical fauxgina usually is full of nasty bacterial flora that would pose a huge health risk to a newborn... and therefore even attempting a "natural birth" would be a no-no. A CS would be the only option.

But all such issues would be beside the point, coz if a uterus were somehow successfully transplanted into a male with a fauxgina, the only way he could possibly get pregnant would be through IVF using a donor egg. In females who have IVF, the fertilized embryo is put into the uterus through the cervix, the neck of the uterus to which the vagina is naturally and seamlessly connected. But since a fauxgina is by definition closed up/sealed off at the end, getting a fertilized embryo into the uterus would require some kind of surgery - either cutting through the end of the fauxgina, or going in through the abdomen. Seems needlessly risky. But then the whole thing would be needlessly risky, especially for the embryo/fetus and child - whose wellbeing usually doesn't count at all in the calculations of these narcissistic men.

Also, I'd think the issue of IVF for males who ID as women would raise new issues of consent for women who might provide the eggs. Women who provide and sell eggs are usually coercively convinced to do so by being fed a lot of fluffy hearts and flowers propaganda about how they're helping an infertile woman fulfill her dream of carrying a child/becoming a biological mother and making it possible for a childless couple to create a family. The idea of donating eggs to help a TIM live out his fetishistic sexual fantasies and feel "validated" is bound to have considerably less appeal to many women thinking about providing eggs.

[–]MezozoicGay 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But then the whole thing would be needlessly risky, especially for the embryo/fetus and child - whose wellbeing usually doesn't count at all in the calculations of these narcissistic men.

I am perfectly sure it will not work at all, because male body is just not able and is lacking organs and instructions of body that will control hormonal levels, feed embryo/fetus and create cells and surroundings for it to be safe and developing.

[–]Cicerosolo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks, that's basically the explanation I wanted. As a dude I only have a basic understanding of the area

[–]MarkTwainiac 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL, it was obvious from your comment about a/the 'vagina opening' as if there is only one that you have only "a basic understanding of the area."

The human vagina has openings at both ends and is a muscular tube of some length. In birth, the vagina (like the cervix, aka he neck of the uterus) expands enormously in width/diameter. The human vagina also expands in length during both sexual activity and labor/childbirth. But funny thing is, whilst there's been lots of research on the length, girth and expansiveness of human penises, there's been hardly any about these same characteristics of human vaginas.

[–]LushCanopy 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's anatomically impossible for someone with a male pelvis to give birth. A c-section probably makes a trans woman feel invalidated lol.

[–]Eurowoman24 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they would rage even if they were able to get a c-section.

[–]Madsea 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I’m sure they’d plan a c section. But I mean it’s pure fantasy anyways.

[–]Finnegan7921 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

they'd just get c-sections.

[–]Cicerosolo 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's true but then the very next complaint that they would have is the fact they need c sections and it's everyone else's fault

[–]mharmless 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

If only we could just give them c sections without bothering with a fetus. or stitching it back up. or anesthetic.

[–]grixit 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i hope these are being saved somewhere else in addition to archive.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was refreshing.

[–]Panchino 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But even that—-what if pre term labor occurred and a c section wasn’t available? The host could be killed as could the child. Painfully and horrifically. A planned c section sounds well and good but birth takes many turns. How many of us have had babies in the car, or at home, by accident? Happens all the time and the risk is vastly different. You’d have to have an operating team capable of operating on a man, too. Not just any old doctor would do.