all 5 comments

[–]VioletRemi[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It happened few months ago, but need a reminder.

men

There "man", singular.

[–]our_team_is_winning 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We need only one political party, the Reality Party. Of course they wouldn't stand a chance as apparently the masses prefer the Gaslighting Party.

I'm not young. I've seen plenty of things I never thought would happen. But men literally replacing women is something I never saw coming. Do NOT enable this.

[–]Finnegan7921 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah that dude in the dress with his package bulging out is a total embarrassment. How they allowed this to happen is beyond me, tbh, even though I know the answer. His twitter feed is sheer ultra woke progressive fantasy drivel...and this guy has a bit of political power.

[–]FemaleIsntAFeeling 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you scroll down the article, there's a photo of the dude in a dress with his penis bulge in full display.

But nooooo, it's not a sexual fetish, they just want to pee!

[–]sisterinsomnia 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From the article it seems that Decaudin is campaigning to erase any reference to biological sex. He must be an MRA plant, because the group benefiting from that is men as all erasure of the biological sex that has so far taken place has affected only the female biological sex. There are no health articles about ejaculators, in the name of inclusiveness, but many about menstruators, for the same reason. So getting rid of biological sex means getting rid of women.