all 8 comments

[–]Chunkeeguy 20 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

No sane person could read that and come to any conclusion other than that the pair of them are deeply mentally disturbed.

[–]wendyokoopa1 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Totally. Pray they don't procreate

[–]FlippyKing 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Odd that "his" "girlfriend" reminded "him" that as a man "he" has no say in the matter, only the "girlfriend" does. "Pregnant people" or potentially pregnant people have no say in the matter. The more things change, the more they stay the same. or Meet the new boss, same-- literally-- as the old boss, just in a dress.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not a radical feminist, but

The narrative-assumption is that only radfems oppose the religion of Genderism, sure. While I'm not strictly a radfem, I agree with many (if not all) of their viewpoints and arguments in that of the pejoratively-called "grievance studies", I believe that (2nd/4th-wave) feminists are the only such discipline that have objective, un-refutable concerns.

That being said, although radfems are the boogyman (*boogywoman) of choice for TRAs, its a farce to believe that criticism (or outright detraction) of gender ideology need necessarily come from a radfem perspective, and I think we've seen that perspective become more widely-acknowledged in radfem-GC circles as they've continued to accrue allies from across the political spectrum in the effort to expel gender nonsense from policy discussions.

[–]Cass 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That's hilarious tbh

"sexually activated"

[–]Finnegan7921 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Normally I would say that this has to be satire, but on the insane clown world of T logic, this line of thought is not only plausible, but probable.

[–]saiditting 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Satire?

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One can only hope.