This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

Copy from memegender women are living fossils

submitted by Riceand420 from self.Incels

If you want to experience what human nature was like 300,000 years ago, look at women.

Women are essentially animals, or barely sentient biomechanisms, that can't fathom existence outside of 30 second timeframes (I think even that might be too long, you could even consider it 10 seconds), and a space of 1 foot around them. The only thing that triggers any sort of neuron activity resembling sentience, is the presence of Chad.

They have one track minds because they haven't evolved past their primitive state.

They never needed to, because their primary function has remained identical for half a million years.

Most women are able to reproduce regardless of what goes on in their "brains" so they simply just failed to evolve while men reproduced according to different qualities such as intellect, money, status or strength or with religious indoctrination.

Women just reproduced by spreading their legs. Essentially it's why female birds remain nearly identical for an entire genetic history of a species while males became more and more elaborate over time.

Most women have:

no interest in anything more profound than what to eat for dinner or what to wear (look at Instagram food posts). When they select clothes the clothes pretty much are designed to increase her desirability to alpha homosapien males, her * * existence is built around her sexuality towards dominant men

extremely narrow and intense interest towards dominant, strong, alpha males extremely reductive fantasies about rape, dominant men, physically violent men, and even animals

sexuality and sexual desire linked to ideas of conquest, being turned on by men who can hurt or subdue other men

the moral equivalency to a barely domesticated animal, meaning they will be loyal to the person who feeds them but that's about it (literally)

their primary function is to sexually select men and either base their existence off of showing off her high status man, or showing off her personal belongings and appearance, like female spiders

no concept of higher existence, no ability to build or survive, merely to exist in continuous mental limbo, never really even bothering to question why she exists no capacity for self-reflection or understanding basic cause and effect Essentially they're femosaurs, just living fossils from another time.

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Moses_Sithole 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

If you look at literally any aspect that separates man from beast, it's painfully clear that women are lacking in it. Be it self-control, self-sacrifice, contemplation or moralizing. It is clear women do not practice any of these virtues.

Woman operate on one level and one level only: produce healthy children with optimistic futures (in other words: alpha fucks, beta bucks).

This in itself is not actually amoral or wrong in any way. On the contrary, it is perhaps entirely necessary to keep the species going. But beyond this aspect there is nothing more to be said about women. Everything they ever think and do is based around this animal desire.

Men also largely operate on a bodily desire: to spread our seed. And in fact most men never ascend beyond this. They live as an animal and die as an animal. But what separates men from animal is the potential to ascend beyond this.

Women do not have the capacity to practice higher level aspects than that of following animal desires. At least , we have never seem them do so.

Women dont philosophize: there are basically no female philosophers. Women dont contemplate morality, their morals are whatever is necessary to fit in with the herd (a woman needs to fit in with the herd to secure safety for her and her children. In fact I daresay women are better at sticking to whatever customs and morals exist in society than men are, because she does not question them). A woman who is faithful is not practising self-control; she has merely decided that right now the life that her spouse is giving to her is too beneficial to risk losing.

In the end, the only creature that stands out in this world, that is seperate from nature, is man. Women are in the same category as a snake or a fish or a tree or a hurricane. They are just another part of nature that man needs to contend with. They just happen to be the thing that man has to mate with. If man did not exist, Earth would appear to have no intelligent life.

With this in mind it is also important to recognise who the real villains in this feminine society are. It is not women, but the weak men who allowed this to happen. Women are always going to be like this, it is no more useful to get annoyed at women than it is at a dog for shitting on your lawn. You don't blame the dog, you blame the owner. Feminism is like dogs claiming they are being oppressed by not being allowed to shit on lawns. And it can really only succeed if the owner agrees.

[–]Riceand420[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

hmm strange by philosphizing we came to the conclusion that the blames lies not on the femoid but on weak men

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ultimately the removal of the proverbial Chesterton's fence was due to greedy i.e. weak men. Letting women be hypergamous did work for a while. Apparently it was impossible to be incel in the late 1970s and early 1980s. I'm sure a divorce lawyer played a huge role in making it so easy for divorce to occur in the 1970s. Let's not forget all the money made by pharmaceutical companies from birth control, which need I remind you is one of the only drugs the government provides to its citizens for free.

On paper it sounded great! Trickle down sex. I can't pretend I wouldn't have fallen for it myself.

[–]Moses_Sithole 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Women are wild animals. Weak men let the animals off their leash. This is the reason why women should be subjugated to a life of oppression and slavery, just like the days of the old testament.

[–]letsgobish29 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

imagine if we let dogs off the leash and let them do whatever they want. they'd bring mud into the house, they'd piss on the furniture, they'd poo in the laundry, they'd bark endlessly, they'd eat your food leave scraps everywhere then whine for more. they would go from being a good companion to ruining your life. and that's exactly what's happened with women. we have gone from order to chaos. they MUST be controlled before we devolve back into primates.

[–]hybristophilia 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

High IQ posts in here. Feels good to know so many made it out to saidit

[–]Riceand420[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

imho this place is still to small its just of fraction of r/celouts let alone braincels we need more frens

[–]dragonzord 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Give it time, fren. Rome wasn’t built in a day.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It doesn't matter what your genes or memes are. All men are brothers. Some of our brothers mog us, sometimes they piss us off, some were even exposed to so much soy they went crazy and chopped off their dicks. But at the end of the day they're still our brothers.

Our brothers only turn to the bluepill in the first place for two reasons: fear and ignorance. They're afraid they'll die alone, realize there's no way to stop it, and cope with bluepilled rhetoric. Even the chads and chadlites can learn to use their time on Earth more effectively because it certainly never benefited anyone to have a delusional view of how the world works. So strive to spread the Blackpill to our brethren, not hate. They'll get it eventually because we're all wired that way.

Okay, maybe not every single one of us. At the very least you have to admit we have the same internal organs. You can't even say that about the female humanoid.

[–]Moses_Sithole 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the moral equivalency to a barely domesticated animal, meaning they will be loyal to the person who feeds them but that's about it (literally)

They won't even be loyal to the person who feeds them. They are like stubborn goats.

[–]Moses_Sithole 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Women are essentially animals, or barely sentient biomechanisms, that can't fathom existence outside of 30 second timeframes (I think even that might be too long, you could even consider it 10 seconds), and a space of 1 foot around them. The only thing that triggers any sort of neuron activity resembling sentience, is the presence of Chad.

This is literal gospel. Preach!!