all 4 comments

[–]DomitiusOfMassilia[M] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry about that OP. I've been a bit busy. Here's the quote by TentElephant:

Oh you want to talk about pedophillia? Lets see what the prophets of post modernism have to say...

Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.

-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex

It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not ­it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.

-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender

But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.

-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality

tl;dr Not fucking children is child abuse.

Note: I am not supporting pedos. You are still a bad fortune teller.

[–]ZackRoyerOption 4 Alum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I won't remember the quotes exactly, but if it's the one I remember it had a Foucault quote I think.

It was basically 3 stooges post modernists defending pedo shit, and the user pointed out how it related to the leftism we see today and their urge to corrupt children.

[–]ClockworkFoolKiA Old Guard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Current theory is that the issue was the quotes being included and the admins not caring at all about the context or what the post in it's entirety was about. Simply including the things actually said by the three post-modernists was enough to set them off.

At least, that's the theory. It's not like the admins are talking.

[–]filbs111 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why not ask the posters to post the info on this site?