***REDDIT MELTDOWN WATCH*** RITTENHOUSE NOT GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES

submitted by Tarrock from self.MeanwhileOnReddit

Get ready, the salt is about to be flowing.

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/qxm3nu/kyle_rittenhouse_found_not_guilty/ https://old.reddit.com/r/AgainstHateSubreddits/comments/qxmapx/pcm_now_celebrating_the_rittenhouse_not_guilty/ https://old.reddit.com/r/PoliticalHumor/comments/qurwp4/for_immediate_release_rpoliticalhumor_moderators/?sort=new https://old.reddit.com/r/BlackLivesMatter/comments/qxnd4f/kyle_rittenhouse_found_not_guilty_on_all_charges/ https://old.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/qxmdf7/rittenhouse_not_guilty_on_all_charges/ https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/qxoc5t/kyle_rittenhouse_acquitted_on_all_charges/?sort=new https://old.reddit.com/r/MurderedByWords/comments/qxniwu/savage_burn_on_the_prosecution/?sort=controversial

REMINDER, THESE ARE THE INCELS TELLING YOU "WHITE PEOPLE BAD!"

all 79 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]scormac1752 16 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

I think it's important we really drive the point home: Kyle Rittenhouse is not only innocent, he is an actual hero. He stepped up when the police gave up on the citizenry without a fight.

I saw a couple comments saying, "Oh He's nOT GuilTY, bUt iT WAs stiLL sTUPid of hiM to bE thERE!" No. You are retarded if you believe that.

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

this should be considered kyle rittenhouse day and celebrated each november 19th

[–]The_Mad_Pirate 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

International Man's Day and Kyle Rittenhouse Hero Day all in one. Count me in !

[–]Zapped 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Not stupid to be there, but stupid for the older folks to leave him hanging out there by himself.

[–]IkeConn 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (13 children)

Now the butt hurt lefty people have the excuse they wanted to destroy Kenosha.

[–]jet199 11 insightful - 8 fun11 insightful - 7 fun12 insightful - 8 fun -  (9 children)

They don't dare without black people to cover them.

Do black people care?

Edit: some aren't taking it well.

https://twitter.com/KyleHooten2/status/1461781383328718855?t=Ouzv7c23e50pVv0AQHx2-g&s=19

[–]Tiwaking 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty
Black people outraged! https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/11/19/kyle-rittenhouse-found-not-guilty-on-all-charges

Rittenhouse’s lawyers argued he had a right to carry the semi-automatic rifle he brought to the demonstration and had acted in self-defence after being attacked.

But civil rights and anti-racism groups in the US denounced Friday’s verdict as a “travesty”.

“Rittenhouse’s trial highlights an urgent need for reform for both police and the criminal legal system. The system is broken, and it desperately needs to be fixed,” Shaadie Ali, interim executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Wisconsin, said in a statement.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Fuck, when did the ACLU become the enemy?

[–]Zapped 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

A long time ago. A better organization now is Institute For Justice. https://www.ij.org/

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

How did you just notice this?

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I dunno, I just remember them as fighting for freedom of speech once upon a time. Took notice when they sued the government on behalf of immigrants and now this. It doesn't seem to be a very American group anymore.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

they might care that it's an excuse to loot

[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

They don't dare without black people to cover them.

Are you saying that because Rosenbaum was Jewish?

Edit:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200828172841/https://www.jewishchronicle.org/2020/08/27/rosenbaum-killed-amid-kenosha-unrest-doesnt-come-from-practicing-jewish-family/

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Any excuse, eh?

[–]Noam_Chomsky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I went to verify this info after I commented.

I couldn't find it, because it was censored.

Censorship is abhorrent, so I posted a link to the archived page.

[–]Canbot 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

The riots are organized by the DNC. It is not an election year, they have nothing to gain.

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Good point

https://imgur.com/a/UO9RTn4

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Down ballot Democrats are livid with Biden and the DNC. They are going to get beat bad in 2022 and 2024 and they don't like it.

[–]Red23 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (32 children)

Tbh the people on imgur.com were worse, totally against Kyle and ridiculing him every chance they could.

[–]jet199 10 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 8 fun -  (7 children)

What percentage of imgur users are furries though.

[–]BravoVictor 7 insightful - 9 fun7 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

Probably easier to ask what percentage aren't.

[–]Red23 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

imgur is a cesspool imho.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Tophat123 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    I remember the entire team was morbidly obese as well as their dog and it was called out by FPH and it was enough to get them banned.

    [–]Red23 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    That would explain imgurian's obsession with the overweight. The funny thing is they applaud people that lose weight, but find the morbidly obese hilarious at the same time. They lap up videos by Tasty Hoon, even though he's a glutton, but the irony is totally lost on them.

    [–]Red23 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I wouldn't be surprised.

    [–]MarkJefferson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Imgur sucked so bad Reddit had to make their in house image hosting. There's not even a way to upload on the imgur mobile site now because they try so hard to force the adoption of the app.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (23 children)

    https://i.imgur.com/bZILHXX.jpeg

    [–]Tophat123 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (14 children)

    Actually, that image is accurate. That firearm saved the only life that mattered and ended the lives of commies which arent people.

    [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    😂

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

    reported for promoting murder

    [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

    It doesn't seem like promoting so much as commentary about the incident, and of course that wasn't ruled murder. It's hard to want those guys Rittenhouse shot to have lived, they were bad hombres.

    I saw a relevant comment on twitter: If you are in shock over the verdict, get better news sources.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    The bigger question is: if you don't want a law against reckless endangerment that leads to homicide, do you really want armed teenagers walking around shooting anyone who gets close to them? Perhaps this law?: reckless endangerment that leads to homicide is legal IF you kill people who aren't likable.

    [–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    do you really want armed teenagers walking around shooting anyone who gets close to them?

    What's this got to do with the Rittenhouse case?

    The dead guy literally told the kid he'd kill him if he saw him on his own.

    It wasn't anything like just getting closer to him. There was a legitimate threat.

    Again with the fantasy scenarios.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So - an unarmed, obviously crazy person tells you that he'd kill you if he saw you on your own - and this justifies putting 4 bullets in him immediately? If you want people to shoot at you because you've said something threatening, then - by all means - appeal to lawyers to change the law, clarifying that anyone who annoys a person with a gun should be shot.

    [–]Noam_Chomsky 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    reckless endangerment that leads to homicide is legal IF you kill people who aren't likable the key witness admits during cross examination that the defendant was acting in self defense.

    FTFY

    It's natural law.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    You know that this is cherry picking

    [–]Noam_Chomsky 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    You know that this is cherry picking

    It is apparent to anyone who reads your comments that you are willfully misinformed.

    The prosecuting attorney literally facepalmed himself after his witness told the court it was self defense.

    He admitted it was self defense. It's in the public record.

    Subjectively omitting the relevant factual info is cherry picking.

    Hypocrites are embarrassed to be associated with you.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So you have to resort to personal attacks? What a weakling.

    Cherry picking: you selected one example that does not itself fit an argument regarding the other two victims.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    The jurors were not allowed to know the attacker's criminal records, it wasn't a factor in the trial, just a comforting note for all us viewers at home.

    if you don't want a law against reckless endangerment that leads to homicide

    You must be talking about something else, because this was ruled self-defense.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    It's an acquittal (the jury didn't say it's self-defense; they ruled that the prosecutors did not provide sufficient proof for a guilty verdict).

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    He was found innocent of homicide and reckless endangerment. It wasn't accidental. That leaves self-defense.

    I understand people not liking the laws, but I think it was really obvious Rittenhouse shouldn't have been charged in the first place, and after he was, that there was only one correct conclusion, which the jury reached.

    More importantly than Rittenhouse though, one side of the media acted poorly. The liberal outrage was manufactured. They led people like you down a bad path for their own agenda and gain. That's abhorrent.

    [–]Red23 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    Sums up the average imgur user, close to brain dead.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    It's just an image hosting site.

    [–]Red23 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    It's way more than that.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It's too big and diverse to be more than that. I remember when it started, and the basic principles for it haven't changed.

    [–]wristaction 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    https://i.postimg.cc/HLWt6JjR/Fixed-meme-rittenhouse-murder-weapons.png

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/195325/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-weapon-used/

    [–]send_nasty_stuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    This is the perfect response to that lazy logic meme that socks posted.

    [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    That is pathetic beyond belief.

    [–]send_nasty_stuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    https://abc7.com/starbucks-fight-santa-ana-man-dies-skateboard/1098183/

    [–]RedEyedWarrior 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    Of course that degenerate AgainstHateSubreddits sub was full of salt and butthurt. They are mad that a child defended himself against a paedophile.

    [–]The_Mad_Pirate 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

    Yeah, Tardfinn himself is seething and dilating over the veredict. What can I say ? Today was a great day for patriots all over the world.

    [–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    u/bardfinn is hiding in saidit

    [–]The_Mad_Pirate 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    I bet he wants to subvert said.it too with his threats and tranny tantrums. He tried it with Odysee .....and failed miserably.

    [–]NeedMoreCoffee 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    Lol all the comments on PCM are hilarious, these AHS pricks have no chill or sense of humour.

    [–]jet199 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Which is standard for self-important teenagers.

    [–]BravoVictor 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    They're just sad at this point. I take no pleasure watching their mental illness in action.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    I didn't see it on reddit but it was if switching to "new", and in that everyone supported this verdict, but I bet that changes as bots astroturf it. No one is really a reddit type of democrat. There are true liberals out there of course but they get banned off reddit for supporting bernie.

    [–]BusterGrundle 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Hold up. the comments in /r/news are... levelheaded? what the fuck am I looking at?

    [–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty of all charges
    Black people and their allies outraged!
    Trans-Race commentator Talcum X doubly outraged

    [–]Trajan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Funny how do many of them are throwing the prosecutor under the bus. While the prosecution was incompetent and malicious, it’s not like this was an easy case. Maybe these people should think more about why the prosecution had such a difficult case to argue?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It was a difficult case to argue. If the prosecution could not prove for the Rosenbaum homicide case that there was indeed 'reckless endangerment that led to homicide', then they would have failed with the other charges.

    When watching the trial, one noticed that the prosecutors made various mistakes, and that the judge was potentiall biased, and that much of the trial really unprofessional. It was not a proper trial, and the prosecutor's team were a very big part of the reason for the shitshow. That said, the defense team wasn't much better. The jury was distracted by a lot of unprofessional behaviour. The reason it took them so long to decide on the case is because there was substeantial evidence against Rittenhouse.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

    Thanks for the links. I am reading good arguments on those Reddit pages. Seems you're the one having a meltdown. None of the posts I see are about or by incels or white people. Your ALL CAPS are rather dramatic in this case. One general trend in those Reddit comments is that: many are now under the impression that they and other kids can now take ARs into crowds of people and murder anyone who throws a sandwich. Thank about that for a minute. The prosecution and judge obviously fucked up.

    [–]jet199 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

    many are now under the impression that they and other kids can now take ARs into crowds of people and murder anyone who throws a sandwich

    That just proves they are as stupid and proudly ignorant as you are.

    Nothing more.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Why the personal attack, Jet? You don't have a reasonable argument?

    [–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    It's literally just a fair description.

    No need to take it personally.

    You need to have an argument why Rittenhouse broke the law.

    Not just "my weebo mates are crying, circle jerking and coming up with mad fantasy scenarios which are completely unfalsifyable rather than addressing the actual facts of the case because admitting they might be wrong or have been lied to hurts their feelz too much."

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    You need to have an argument why Rittenhouse broke the law.

    And you need to have an argument regarding his supposedly legal actions. I replied to your 2nd Amendment comment a moment ago. Here below is a law he broke, which I copy from one of my other responses:

    You cannot accuse someone of breaking a law if there is no evidence that the person broke the law. And you cannot hold a trial without sufficient evidence that a law was broken. Let's pick "reckless endangerment" and the multiple shots that killed Rosenbaum (one of which in the back). One can shoot in if one's life is in danger, but - after - Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum in the hand, did he have to keep shooting Rosenbaum? There are of course laws against reckless endangerment that result in homicide. Rittenhouse broke at least one of them. If the prosecution could not effectively clarify the way in which that law was broken, and if the jury was not convinced of the arguments (as they weren't), then Rittenhouse had to walk, even if he technically broke that law.

    [–]jet199 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    In think your mistake is that you are assuming Rittenhouse was there for a fight.

    He wasn't.

    He was there to put out fires and give first aid and the gun was just for self defence.

    Before he was attacked he put out a dumpster on fire which was being rolled towards a petrol station.

    That's why he was there.

    I think it was completely fair for him to assume that if he was in a situation with people who try to blow up petrol stations his life would be threatened at some point and being openly armed would stop that.

    Unfortunately he didn't count on a paedo with a death wish being there.

    Often attackers don't stop once shot. A shot to the hand doesn't mean a man who told you he would kill you it's going to stop trying to kill you. You are making these assumptions that simply don't play out in real life.

    And you still haven't given your argument why he was guilty of anything.

    You just try to muddy the waters.

    [–]Tophat123 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Like anyone gives what a fucking faggot like yourself says. All you ever do is post leftist diatribes that no one takes seriously. Of course you would be outraged as it parallels the programming prescribed by your overlords.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    What are you so defensive and angry? Lacking confidence? You have no reasonable response? Can't think of anything? Back off, especially if you can't handle a normal discussion.

    [–]The_Mad_Pirate 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

    If those AR can be used to stop commie terrorists from spreading their marxist subversion, then that's a good thing.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    So you're in favor of hunting people you don't like?

    [–]The_Mad_Pirate 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    I am in favor of defending myself and my principles from people initiating the use of force ( like indoctrination, coercion, threats and violence ) to subvert my culture and my nation.

    It is called defending the Western Civilization and Culture.

    That's why the principle of "peace through strength" exists.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Yes - everyone has the right to defend themselves

    No - protecting your principles is not the same as protecting yourself

    No - there is no law that allows people to determine what they consider to be their own culture and then to defend that culture

    Yes - there is a US constitutional 2nd Amendment for a WELL REGULATED MILITIA to help protect one's nation

    No - there is no law that allows people to determine what they consider to be "western civilization and culture" and then to defend that "western civilization and culture" ("civilizations" and cultures are always in transition)

    Peace through strength can apply to one's right to defend one's self and others, or it can apply to the US military industrial complex and over 100 significant military interventions in the US's brief 200 year history

    My main point here is that there is a significant, legal difference between a 'well regulated militia' and vigilantism, whereby the latter is illegal, and can result in anarchy and your own death. It's mob rule.

    [–]The_Mad_Pirate 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Should I remind you that the progressives classify ANY self-assembled citizen militia ( like the one that repelled the domestic terrorist in Kenosha ) as a "White Supremacist Far Right Terrorists" ? The 2A was meant to provide citizens a way to fight against those who were went on destroying and undermining the US constitution and the principles over it was founded, be it an EXTERNAL OR INTERNAL threat. I would say that the 2A did a pretty damn good job on Kenosha that night.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Mad Pirate - Rittenhouse was not part of a "well regulated militia," as we know, and thus the 2A doesn't support what he did. He was acting as a vigilante, which is what Madison wanted to protect Americans against: against mob violence from vigilantes, as well as monb violence from the 'Federal' government. He and many like him were balancing the approaches of the constitusion by regulating against extremes, favoring instead a regulated populace, militia, and federal government, as well as 3 major branches of government, and a democratic party system. No one wants a Rittenhouse in their neighborhood, walking up to people with ARs and creating dangerious situations were it's likely to lead to murder.

    [–]The_Mad_Pirate 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    So the guys that disrespect the founding fathers so much that they call them "slave traders" and who think that the US Constitution is so worthless that is has to be reinterpreted by "modern culture" as a "living constitution" suddenly know better than the Founding Fathers themselves what is the spirit of the 2nd Amendment ? ( which is by itself ironic, since the Founding Fathers already established what the spirit of "militia part" of the 2nd amendment in the federalist papers, more specifically Federalist 29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._29 ). It is obvious that the National Guard did not acted as it should have in Kenosha or nothing of this sort would have had happened, therefore it was up to the citizens to defend themselves from the domestic terrorists burning down their city. That's what Kyle and other did and they were on their right to do so. In that sense, groups like "The 3 percencenters" or "Patriot Prayer" who is well known train regularly fill the void left by the inaction of the National Guard ( when for example, Democrat governors fail to activate them in fear of upsetting the Progressive Status Quo ). Again, they are perfectly in their right to do so. Besides, when country kill commies, it becomes a better country.

    #KillAllMarxists

    And hell, even congressmen are saying nothing would have happened if the National Guard had acted ... https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/11/20/gop-rep-steil-rittenhouse-incident-wouldnt-have-happened-if-there-was-adequate-law-enforcement-presence/ As I said, in those cases, citizen militias become essential to defend the traditions and the soul of a country as it was founded.

    [–]GST893 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Retardit is seething! I couldn't be happier!

    [–]Ethnocrat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Glorious!